Aged Garlic Extract Reduces Low Attenuation Plaque in Coronary Arteries of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome in a Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUND: Although several previous studies have demonstrated that aged garlic extract (AGE) inhibits the progression of coronary artery calcification, its effect on noncalcified plaque (NCP) has been unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether AGE reduces coronary plaque volume measured by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: Fifty-five patients with MetS (mean ± SD age: 58.7 ± 6.7 y; 71% men) were prospectively assigned to consume 2400 mg AGE/d (27 patients) or placebo (28 patients) orally. Both groups underwent CCTA at baseline and follow-up 354 ± 41 d apart. Coronary plaque volume, including total plaque volume (TPV), dense calcium (DC), NCP, and low-attenuation plaque (LAP), were measured based upon predefined intensity cutoff values. Multivariable linear regression analysis, adjusted for age, gender, number of risk factors, hyperlipidemia medications, history of coronary artery disease, scan interval time, and baseline %TPV, was performed to examine whether AGE affected each plaque change. RESULTS: The %LAP change was significantly reduced in the AGE group compared with the placebo group (-1.5% ± 2.3% compared with 0.2% ± 2.0%, P = 0.0049). In contrast, no difference was observed in %TPV change (0.3% ± 3.3% compared with 1.6% ± 3.0%, P = 0.13), %NCP change (0.2% ± 3.3% compared with 1.4% ± 2.9%, P = 0.14), and %DC change (0.2% ± 1.4%, compared with 0.2% ± 1.7%, P = 0.99). Multivariable linear regression analysis found a beneficial effect of AGE on %LAP regression (ß: -1.61; 95% CI: -2.79, -0.43; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the %LAP change was significantly greater in the AGE group than in the placebo group. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether AGE has the ability to stabilize vulnerable plaque and decrease adverse cardiovascular events. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01534910.

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Digital Therapeutic (CT-152) as an Adjunct to Antidepressant Treatment in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: Protocol for the MIRAI Remote Study.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is common worldwide and can be highly disabling. People with MDD face many barriers to treatment and may not experience full symptom relief even when treated. Therefore, new treatment modalities are needed for MDD. Digital therapeutics (DTx) may provide people with MDD an additional treatment option. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe a phase 3 remote, multicenter, randomized, masked, sham-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a smartphone app-based DTx (CT-152) in adult participants diagnosed with MDD, used as an adjunct to antidepressant therapy (ADT). METHODS: Participants aged 22-64 years with a current primary diagnosis of MDD and an inadequate response to ADT were included. Participants were randomized 1:1 to CT-152 or a sham DTx. CT-152 is a smartphone app-based DTx that delivers a cognitive-emotional and behavioral therapeutic intervention. The core components of CT-152 are the Emotional Faces Memory Task exercises, brief lessons to learn and apply key therapeutic skills, and SMS text messaging to reinforce lessons and encourage engagement with the app. The sham DTx is a digital working memory exercise with emotionally neutral stimuli designed to match CT-152 for time and attention. Participants took part in the trial for up to 13 weeks. The trial included a screening period of up to 3 weeks, a treatment period of 6 weeks, and an extension period of 4 weeks to assess the durability of the effect. Sites and participants had the option of an in-person or remote screening visit; the remaining trial visits were remote. Efficacy was evaluated using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. The durability of the effect was evaluated with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale. Adverse events were also assessed. Satisfaction, measured by the Participant and Healthcare Professional Satisfaction Scales, and health status, measured by the EQ-5D-5L, were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: This study was initiated in February 2021 and had a primary completion date in October 2022. CONCLUSIONS: This represents the methodological design for the first evaluation of CT-152 as an adjunct to ADT. This study protocol is methodologically robust and incorporates many aspects of conventional pivotal pharmaceutical phase 3 trial design, such as randomization and safety end points. Novel considerations included the use of a sham comparator, masking considerations for visible app content, and outcome measures relevant to DTx. The rigor of this methodology will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of CT-152. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04770285; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04770285. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/56960.

Safety Evaluation in Iterative Development of Wearable Patches for Aripiprazole Tablets With Sensor: Pooled Analysis of Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Wearable sensors in digital health may pose a risk for skin irritation through the use of wearable patches. Little is known about how patient- and product-related factors impact the risk of skin irritation. Aripiprazole tablets with sensor (AS, Abilify MyCite; Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc) is a digital medicine system indicated for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, and major depressive disorder. AS includes aripiprazole tablets with an embedded ingestible event marker, a wearable sensor attached to the skin through a wearable patch, a smartphone app, and a web-based portal. To continuously improve the final product, successive iterations of wearable patches were developed, including raisin patch version 4 (RP4), followed by disposable wearable sensor version 5 (DW5), and then reusable wearable sensor version 2 (RW2). OBJECTIVE: This analysis pooled safety data from clinical studies in adult participants using the RP4, DW5, and RW2 wearable patches of AS and evaluated adverse events related to the use of wearable patches. METHODS: Safety data from 12 studies in adults aged 18-65 years from May 2010 to August 2020 were analyzed. All studies evaluated safety, with studies less than 2 weeks also specifically examining human factors associated with the use of the components of AS. Healthy volunteers or patients with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, or major depressive disorder were enrolled; those who were exposed to at least 1 wearable patch were included in the safety analysis. Adverse events related to the use of a wearable patch were evaluated. Abrasions, blisters, dermatitis, discoloration, erythema, irritation, pain, pruritus, rash, and skin reactions were grouped as skin irritation events (SIEs). All statistical analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: The analysis included 763 participants (mean [SD] age 42.6 [12.9] years; White: n=359, 47.1%; and male: n=420, 55%). Participants were healthy volunteers (n=269, 35.3%) or patients with schizophrenia (n=402, 52.7%), bipolar I disorder (n=57, 7.5%), or major depressive disorder (n=35, 4.6%). Overall, 13.6% (104/763) of the participants reported at least 1 SIE, all of which were localized to the wearable patch site. Incidence of ≥1 patch-related SIEs was seen in 18.1% (28/155), 14.2% (55/387), and 9.2% (28/306) of participants who used RP4, DW5, and RW2, respectively. Incidence of SIE-related treatment discontinuation was low, which is reported by 1.9% (3/155), 3.1% (12/387), and 1.3% (4/306) of participants who used RP4, DW5, and RW2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rates of SIEs reported as the wearable patch versions evolved from RP4 through RW2 suggest that information derived from reported adverse events may have informed product design and development, which could have improved both tolerability and wearability of successive products. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02091882, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02091882; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02404532, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02404532; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02722967, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02722967; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02219009, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02219009; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03568500, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03568500; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03892889, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03892889.

Changes in Coronary Plaque Volume: Comparison of Serial Measurements on Intravascular Ultrasound and Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography.

Serial measurements of coronary plaque volume have been used to evaluate drug efficacy in atherosclerotic progression. However, the usefulness of computed tomography for this purpose is unknown. We investigated whether the change in total plaque volume on coronary computed tomographic angiography is associated with the change in segment plaque volume on intravascular ultrasound. We prospectively enrolled 11 consecutive patients (mean age, 56.3 ± 5 yr; 6 men) who were to undergo serial invasive coronary angiographic examinations with use of grayscale intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography, performed <180 days apart at baseline and from 1 to 2 years later. Subjects underwent 186 serial measurements of total plaque volume on coronary computed tomography and 22 of segmental plaque volume on intravascular ultrasound. We used semiautomated software to examine percentage relationships and changes between total plaque and segmental plaque volumes. No significant correlations were found between percentages of total coronary and segment coronary plaque volume, nor between normalized coronary plaque volume. However, in the per-patient analysis, there were strong correlations between the imaging methods for changes in total coronary and segment coronary plaque volume (r=0.62; P=0.04), as well as normalized plaque volume (r=0.82; P=0.002). Per-patient change in plaque volume on coronary computed tomography is significantly associated with that on intravascular ultrasound. Computed tomographic angiography may be safer and more widely available than intravascular ultrasound for evaluating atherosclerotic progression in coronary arteries. Larger studies are warranted.