Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Oncol ; 59(5): 541-548, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32090645

RESUMO

Objective: To compare radiation-induced toxicity and dosimetry parameters in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LANPC) treated with a mixed-beam (MB) approach (IMRT followed by proton therapy boost) with an historic cohort of patients treated with a full course of IMRT-only.Material and methods: Twenty-seven patients with LANPC treated with the MB approach were compared to a similar cohort of 17 patients treated with IMRT-only. The MB approach consisted in a first phase of IMRT up to 54-60 Gy followed by a second phase delivered with a proton therapy boost up to 70-74 Gy (RBE). The total dose for patients treated with IMRT-only was 69.96 Gy. Induction chemotherapy was administrated to 59 and 88% and concurrent chemoradiotherapy to 88 and 100% of the MB and IMRT-only patients, respectively. The worst toxicity occurring during the entire course of treatment (acute toxicity) and early-late toxicity were registered according to the Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events V4.03.Results: The two cohorts were comparable. Patients treated with MB received a significantly higher median total dose to target volumes (p = .02). Acute grade 3 mucositis was found in 11 and 76% (p = .0002) of patients treated with MB and IMRT-only approach, respectively, while grade 2 xerostomia was found in 7 and 35% (p = .02) of patients treated with MB and IMRT-only, respectively. There was no statistical difference in late toxicity. Local progression-free survival (PFS) and progression-free survival curves were similar between the two cohorts of patients (p = .17 and p = .40, respectively). Local control rate was 96% and 81% for patients treated with MB approach and IMRT-only, respectively.Conclusions: Sequential MB approach for LANPC patients provides a significantly lower acute toxicity profile compared to full course of IMRT. There were no differences in early-late morbidities and disease-related outcomes (censored at two-years) but a longer follow-up is required to achieve conclusive results.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/terapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Terapia com Prótons/efeitos adversos , Lesões por Radiação/epidemiologia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Progressão da Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosite/diagnóstico , Mucosite/epidemiologia , Mucosite/etiologia , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/mortalidade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Terapia com Prótons/métodos , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Xerostomia/diagnóstico , Xerostomia/epidemiologia , Xerostomia/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa