Prognostic significance of adjuvant therapy and specific radiation dosages in Taiwanese patients with oral cavity cancer and extra-nodal extension: a nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The evidence for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with extra-nodal extension (ENE) in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines is derived from patients with head and neck cancer. The guidelines further suggest a radiation dose ranging from 6000 to 6600 cGy. In this nationwide study, we sought to evaluate the prognostic significance of adjuvant therapy and the specific radiation dosage in Taiwanese patients with pure OCSCC and ENE. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1577 OCSCC patients with ENE who underwent resection and received adjuvant CRT or radiotherapy (RT) between January 2011 and December 2020 was conducted. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed that adjuvant RT, more than four pathologically positive nodes, and radiation dosage below 6000 cGy were independent risk factors for unfavorable 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Comparing patients who received CRT (n = 1453) to those treated with RT (n = 124) before and after propensity score (PS) matching, the 5-year outcomes were as follows: before PS matching, DSS (54% versus 30%, p < 0.0001), OS (42% versus 18%, p < 0.0001); after PS matching (n = 111 in each group), DSS (52% versus 30%, p = 0.0016), OS (38% versus 21%, p = 0.0019). For patients who underwent CRT, the 5-year outcomes for different radiation dose groups (6600 - 7000 cGy, n = 1155 versus 6000 - 6500 cGy, n = 199) were as follows: before PS matching, DSS (52% versus 54%, p = 0.1904), OS (43% versus 46%, p = 0.1610); after PS matching (n = 199 in each group), DSS (55% versus 54%, p = 0.8374), OS (46.5% versus 46.3%, p = 0.7578). CONCLUSIONS: For OCSCC patients with ENE, our study shows CRT improved survivals than RT alone, underscoring the clinical significance of chemotherapy. Patients undergoing CRT with irradiation doses ranging from 6000 to 6500 cGy exhibited comparable survival outcomes to those receiving doses of 6600-7000 cGy. This observation suggests that irradiation doses exceeding the 6600 cGy may not confer the survival advantage in these patients. Further research is needed to confirm our results and explore the optimal irradiation dose for managing these patients.

Early relapse is an adverse prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: results from a nationwide registry study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of the relapse interval in patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is a matter of ongoing debate. In this large-scale, registry-based, nationwide study, we examined whether the time interval between surgery and the first disease relapse may affect survival outcomes in Taiwanese patients with OCSCC. METHODS: Data made available by the Taiwan Health Promotion Administration as of 2004 were obtained. The study cohort consisted of patients who were included in the registry between 2011 and 2017. Disease staging was performed according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual, Eight Edition. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 13,789 patients with OCSCC who received surgical treatment. A total of 2327 (16.9%) patients experienced a first disease relapse. The optimal cutoff value for the relapse interval was 330 days when both 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) (≤ 330/>330 days, n = 1630/697) were taken into account. In addition, we undertook a propensity score (PS)-matched analysis of patients (n = 654 each) with early (≤ 330 days) versus late (> 330 days) relapse. RESULTS: The median follow-up time in the entire study cohort was 702 days (433 and 2001 days in the early and late relapse groups, respectively). Compared with patients who experienced late relapse, those with early relapse showed a higher prevalence of the following adverse prognostic factors: pT4, pN3, pStage IV, poor differentiation, depth of invasion ≥ 10 mm, and extra-nodal extension. Multivariable analysis revealed that early relapse was an independent adverse prognostic factor for both 5-year DSS and OS (average hazard ratios [AHRs]: 3.24 and 3.91, respectively). In the PS-matched cohort, patients who experienced early relapse showed less favorable 5-year DSS: 58% versus 30%, p < 0.0001 (AHR: 3.10 [2.69 - 3.57]) and OS: 49% versus 22%, p < 0.0001 (AHR: 3.32 [2.89 - 3.81]). CONCLUSION: After adjustment for potential confounders and PS matching, early relapse was an adverse prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with OCSCC. Our findings may have significant implications for risk stratification.

Preoperative prognostic nutritional index predicts prognosis of patients with oral cavity cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether prognostic nutritional index (PNI) predicts patient survival outcomes in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of a total of 360 patients subjected to primary surgery for OSCC were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorised into high-PNI (≥51.75) and low-PNI (<51.75) groups based on the PNI cut-off value attained from receiver operating characteristic analyses (p < .001), and the intergroup differences in clinicopathological features were determined. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were employed to determine the survival prediction ability of the PNI, and a nomogram based on the PNI was established for individualised survival prediction. RESULTS: A low PNI was noted to exhibit a significant association with shorter overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (both p < .001). Multivariate Cox analyses showed that a lower PNI independently indicated shorter OS and DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.187; p = .001 and HR = 1.459; p = .023, respectively). The concordance index and calibration plots of the PNI-based nomogram revealed the high discriminative ability for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PNI is a valuable biomarker for predicting OSCC prognosis, and the proposed PNI-based nomogram can provide individualised prognostic prediction.

Retrospective study on the potential of albumin/globulin ratio as a prognostic biomarker for oral cavity cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Although the serum albumin/globulin ratio (AGR) is recognized as a valuable prognostic biomarker in various cancers, its clinical value in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is still unclear. We aimed to probe the prognostic value of AGR in patients with OSCC undergoing curative surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 306 patients who were newly diagnosed as having OSCC and receiving curative surgery between 2008 and 2017. The correlation of AGR with survival outcomes was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis. A nomogram based on AGR was established, and its accuracy was assessed according to the concordance index. RESULTS: The log rank test and Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients who had low AGR had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) as well as 5-year overall survival (OS) than those with high AGR. The multivariate Cox analysis revealed that low AGR was an independent predictor of poor OS and DFS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.812; 95% CI 1.729-4.573; p < 0.001, and aHR = 1.743; 95% CI 1.201-2.530; p = 0.003, respectively). The concordance index of the nomogram model based on TNM staging alone was 0.656 and could increase to 0.783 with the inclusion of AGR and other prognostic variables in the calculation. CONCLUSION: Preoperative AGR may represent an accessible, valuable prognostic biomarker in patients with OSCC. The nomogram model incorporating AGR and clinicopathological prognostic variables may improve the accuracy of prognostic predictions in these patients.

A combined analysis of maximum standardized uptake value on FDG-PET, genetic markers, and clinicopathological risk factors in the prognostic stratification of patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical outcomes of patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) chiefly depend on the presence of specific clinicopathological risk factors (RFs). Here, we performed a combined analysis of FDG-PET, genetic markers, and clinicopathological RFs in an effort to improve prognostic stratification. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 2036 consecutive patients with first primary OCSCC who underwent surgery between 1996 and 2016. Of them, 345 underwent ultra-deep targeted sequencing (UDTS, between 1996 and 2011) and 168 whole exome sequencing (WES, between 2007 and 2016). Preoperative FDG-PET imaging was performed in 1135 patients from 2001 to 2016. Complete data on FDG-PET, genetic markers, and clinicopathological RFs were available for 327 patients. RESULTS: Using log-ranked tests based on 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), the optimal cutoff points for maximum standardized uptake values (SUV-max) of the primary tumor and neck metastatic nodes were 22.8 and 9.7, respectively. The 5-year DFS rates were as follows: SUVtumor-max ≥ 22.8 or SUVnodal-max ≥ 9.7 (n = 77) versus SUVtumor-max < 22.8 and SUVnodal-max < 9.7 (n = 250), 32%/62%, P < 0.001; positive UDTS or WES gene panel (n = 64) versus negative (n = 263), 25%/62%, P < 0.001; pN3b (n = 165) versus pN1-2 (n = 162), 42%/68%, P < 0.001. On multivariate analyses, SUVtumor-max ≥ 22.8 or SUVnodal-max ≥ 9.7, a positive UDTS/WES gene panel, and pN3b disease were identified as independent prognosticators for 5-year outcomes. Based on these variables, we devised a scoring system that identified four distinct prognostic groups. The 5-year rates for patients with a score from 0 to 3 were as follows: loco-regional control, 80%/67%/47%/24% (P < 0.001); distant metastases, 13%/23%/55%/92% (P < 0.001); DFS, 74%/58%/28%/7% (P < 0.001); and disease-specific survival, 80%/64%/35%/7% (P < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combined assessment of tumor and nodal SUV-max, genetic markers, and pathological node status may refine the prognostic stratification of OCSCC patients.

Tumor Depth of Invasion (Tumor > 4 cm/Depth > 10 mm and Depth > 20 mm) and Through Cortex/Skin Invasion are Both Valid Criteria for Classifying Tumors as pT4a in AJCC 2018 Oral Cavity Cancer Staging System.

BACKGROUND: According to the AJCC third to seventh edition staging manuals (1988-2010), the presence of through cortex and/or skin invasion in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) identifies T4a tumors. The AJCC eighth edition (2018) introduced a depth of invasion (DOI) > 20 mm as a criterion for pT4a. Subsequently, a revision maintained that tumors > 4 cm with a DOI > 10 mm should be classified as pT4a. We sought to analyze the prognostic impact of the three distinct criteria identifying pT4a disease. METHODS: We examined 667 consecutive patients with pT3-4 buccal/gum/hard palate/retromolar SCC who underwent surgery between 1996 and 2016. pT1/pT2 (n = 108/359) disease were included for comparison purposes. RESULTS: The 5-year outcomes of patients with pT1/pT2/without (n = 406)/with tumor > 4 cm/DOI > 10 mm (n = 261), pT1/pT2/DOI ≤ 20 mm (n = 510)/> 20 mm (n = 157), and pT1/pT2/without (n = 305)/with through cortex/skin invasion (n = 362) were as follows: disease-specific survival (DSS), 98%/89%/79%/65%, p < 0.001, 98%/89%/78%/59%, p < 0.001, and 98%/89%79%/69%, p < 0.001; overall survival (OS), 90%/79%/63%/51%, p < 0.001, 90%/79%/63%/42%, p < 0.001, and 90%/79%/65%/52%, p < 0.001. In pT3-4 disease, a tumor > 4 cm/DOI > 10 mm was an independent adverse prognosticator for 5-year DSS rate, DOI > 20 mm was an independent adverse prognosticator for 5-year DSS and OS rates, whereas through cortex/skin invasion independently predicted 5-year OS rates. CONCLUSIONS: All of the three criteria (tumor > 4 cm/DOI > 10 mm, DOI > 20 mm, and through cortex/skin invasion) identify high-risk patients, which should be reflected in further revisions of pT4a classification in OCSCC.

Identification of predisposing factors for osteonecrosis of the jaw after marginal mandibulectomy in the surgical management of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) with the extent of marginal mandibulectomy. METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2012, 3087 patients undergoing ablative resection were consecutively enrolled. Among them, 345 cases undergoing marginal mandibulectomy were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The occurrence of ONJ was 5.51% and associated with body mass index, overall stage, diabetes, concomitant mandibulotomy, and radiotherapy (P = 0.023, 0.033, 0.009, 0.016, and 0.006, respectively). As for bone parameters based on radiological measurements after marginal mandibulectomy, resected bone height, remaining bone height to original bone height ratio, and resected bone height to original bone height ratio were associated with ONJ. In multivariate logistic analyses, concomitant mandibulotomy, radiotherapy, diabetes, resected bone height of >14.5 mm, resected bone height to original bone height ratio of >49.5%, and remaining bone height to original bone height ratio of <53.5% indicated higher risks for ONJ (adjusted HR: 4.345, 4.152, 4.079, 3.402, 3.541, and 3.211; P = 0.018, 0.013, 0.009, 0.021, 0.018, and 0.043, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the predisposing factors and parameters associated with ONJ with marginal mandibulectomy; more caution is necessitated in performing marginal mandibulectomy in patients with multiple risks to prevent ONJ.

The second-time flap from the previously used anterior thigh donor site for head and neck microsurgical reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Multiple free tissue transfer from the same donor site is not well described for microsurgical head and neck reconstruction. METHODS: Between (8/2011 and 11/2012), 103 patients received 103 free ALT flaps for head and neck reconstruction; flaps were called first-time ALT flaps. Intra-operative findings were used to assess the presence of a favorable anatomy for a future second flap from the same donor site. And, between 9/2009 and 12/2013, second-time flaps from previously used anterior thighs were attempted either freely or guided by the intra-operative data from the previous surgery. RESULTS: A favorable anatomy for a future second-time flap was noted in (n: 96/103). Future second-time flaps were ALT, AMT, and TFL flaps (n: 32, n: 91, n: 96, respectively). The second-time flap was attempted (n: 11) and was successful (n: 8, 72.7%). Harvested second-time flaps were (5 ALT, 2 AMT, 1TFL). All flaps survived. The donor site was closed primarily (n: 6) and skin grafted (n: 2). CONCLUSION: Thorough exploration of the anatomy of the anterior thigh during the first-time ALT flap surgery with detailed documentation in addition to meticulous surgery are essential for success. The proposed concept limits morbidity to one site, and serves as an alternative donor site or a life-boat.

Outcomes and prognostic factors for surgery followed by modern radiation therapy in parotid gland carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with parotid gland cancers treated with adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with parotid gland cancers were identified between October 2001 and September 2011. The median radiation dose was 66 Gy (range, 9-76 Gy). The outcomes assessment included overall survival, locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival. RESULTS: The stage distribution was 20 patients  (23.5%) in stage I, 28 (32.9%) stage II, 14 (16.5%) stage III and 23 (27.1%) stage IV. Fifty-five patients (64.7%) had positive margins and 23 patients (27.1%) had close margins (<0.5 cm). Lymph node extracapsular spreading occurred in nine patients. The adjuvant therapy included radiotherapy alone in 47 patients (55.3%) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in 38 patients (44.7%). With a median follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 0.4-11 years), the 5-year overall survival, locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival were 82.0, 88.4, 82.4 and 77.5%, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, N1/N2 was a significant negative prognostic factor for distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival. Perineural invasion was a significant negative prognostic factor for locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival. Patients 50 years or older had significantly worse distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery and radiotherapy treatment could achieve excellent outcomes in a modern cohort. However, N1/N2, perineural invasion and age ≥50 years, but not positive margins, are significant factors associated with a worse prognosis.

Current Concepts of Ablative Surgery in Oral Cavity Cancer.

Introduction: Ablative surgery has evolved over the years with the attempt to extirpate the tumor in its entirety with the understanding of the molecular tumor biology, pattern of tumor invasion of the tumors, as well as availability of better instrumentations. Materials and Methods: Subset-based evaluation and management of oral cancer. conclusion: For oral cancer, surgery is still the primary therapeutic option. To establish surgical adequacy, a wide excision with sufficient margins in all three dimensions must be carried out.

Survival-weighted quality of life profiles in patients treated for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers.

Objectives: This study assessed functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in the long term in individuals treated for laryngohypopharyngeal cancer (LHC) by estimating their life expectancy (LE), survival-weighted psychometric scores (SWPSs), and quality-adjusted LE (QALE). Materials and methods: To estimate survival outcomes, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 1576 patients treated for primary LHC between January 2010 and December 2018 and followed them until death or December 2020. We also prospectively collected QoL and functional data between October 2013 and November 2022 from 232 patients by administering the Taiwanese Chinese versions of the QoL Questionnaire Core 30, Head and Neck 35, and EQ-5D-3L. To estimate LE, we employed linear extrapolation of a logit-transformed curve. We calculated QALE and SWPSs by combining the QoL data with the LE results. Results: We estimated the LE of the patients with LHC to be 7.8 years and their loss of LE to be 15.7 years. The estimated QALE was 7.0 QALYs, with a loss of QALE of 16.5 QALYs. Lifetime impairment durations were estimated for cognitive (4.9 years), physical (4.2 years), emotional (3.4 years), social (3.4 years), and role functions (2.7 years). We estimated the durations of problems related to swallowing, speech, and teeth to be 6.2, 5.6, and 4.8 years, respectively. The patients were expected to be dependent on feeding tubes for 1.2 years. Conclusions: Patients with LHC experience significant reductions in both LE and QALE. SWPSs may constitute a valuable tool for obtaining subjective information regarding how LHC affects multifaceted QoL outcomes.

Prognostic importance of modified geriatric nutritional risk index in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

We probed the associations of preoperative modified geriatric nutritional risk index (mGNRI) values with prognosis in patients receiving surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 333 patients with OCSCC and undergoing surgery between 2008 and 2017. The preoperative mGNRI was calculated using the following formula: (14.89/C-reactive protein level) + 41.7 × (actual body weight/ideal body weight). We executed receiver operating characteristic curve analyses to derive the optimal mGNRI cutoff and employed Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard model to probe the associations of the mGNRI with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The optimal mGNRI cutoff was derived to be 73.3. We noted the 5-year OS and DFS rates to be significantly higher in the high-mGNRI group than in the low-mGNRI group (both p < 0.001). A preoperative mGNRI below 73.3 was independently associated with unfavorable DFS and OS. A mGNRI-based nomogram was constructed to provide accurate OS predictions (concordance index, 0.781). Hence, preoperative mGNRI is a valuable and cost-effective prognostic biomarker in patients with OCSCC. Our nomogram facilitates the practical use of mGNRI and offers individualized predictions of OS.

Prognostic utility of preoperative platelet-to-albumin ratio in surgically treated oral cavity cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the prognostic utility of the preoperative platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR) among patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed of 355 patients with surgically-treated OSCC between 2008 and 2017. The optimal PAR cutoff for patient stratification was determined through X-tile analysis. Prognostic variables for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. We developed a PAR-based nomogram to predict personalized OS. RESULTS: We determined the optimal PAR cutoff to be 7.45. A PAR of ≥7.45 was an independent negative prognostic factor for DFS and OS (hazard ratio = 1.748 and 2.386; p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). The developed nomogram demonstrates the practical utility of PAR and accurately predicts personalized OS. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative PAR is a promising and cost-effective prognostic biomarker for patients with surgically-treated OSCC; the PAR-based nanogram accurately predicts OS for such patients.

Prognostic utility of the geriatric nutritional risk index for head and neck cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

We conducted a systematic review of the literature to assess the potential prognostic utility of geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for head and neck cancer (HNC). We selected studies and extracted data after searching the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. The associations between GNRI and survival outcomes were explored by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) through a random-effects meta-analysis. We included 11 studies that involved 2887 patients with HNC. The combined HR demonstrated significant associations of low GNRI with unfavorable progression-free survival (HR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.32-2.65, p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR = 3.04, 95% CI = 2.30-4.03, p < 0.001). The association between the GNRI and overall survival persisted across various subgroups. The GNRI could serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker for patients with HNC. Low GNRI scores are significantly associated with unfavorable survival outcomes.

Should sub-millimeter margins be deemed positive in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: While several studies have indicated that a margin status of < 1 mm should be classified as a positive margin in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), there is a lack of extensive cohort studies comparing the clinical outcomes between patients with positive margins and margins < 1 mm. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2020, we identified 18,416 Taiwanese OCSCC patients who underwent tumor resection and neck dissection. Of these, 311 had margins < 1 mm and 1013 had positive margins. To compare patients with margins < 1 mm and those with positive margins, a propensity score (PS)-matched analysis (n = 253 in each group) was conducted. RESULTS: The group with margins < 1 mm displayed a notably higher prevalence of several variables: 1) tongue subsite, 2) younger age, 3) smaller depth of invasion), 4) early tumor stage, and 5) treatment with surgery alone. Patients with margins < 1 mm demonstrated significantly better disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates compared to those with positive margins (74 % versus 53 %, 65 % versus 43 %, both p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis further confirmed that positive margins were an independent predictor of worse 5-year DSS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.38, p = 0.0103) and OS (HR = 1.28, p = 0.0222). In the PS-matched cohort, the 5-year outcomes for patients with margins < 1 mm compared to positive margins were as follows: DSS, 71 % versus 59 %, respectively (p = 0.0127) and OS, 60 % versus 48 %, respectively (p = 0.0398). CONCLUSIONS: OCSCC patients with a margin status < 1 mm exhibited distinct clinicopathological characteristics and a more favorable prognosis compared to those with positive resection margins.

Comparing the clinical outcomes of initial surgery and primary definitive radiotherapy with a dosage of 6600 cGy or higher in cT1-2N0M0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcomes of two treatment modalities, initial surgery and primary definitive radiotherapy (RT), in Taiwanese patients diagnosed with cT1-2N0M0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2019, we analyzed data for 13,542 cT1-2N0M0 patients who underwent initial surgery (n = 13,542) or definitive RT with a dosage of at least 6600 cGy (n = 145) for the treatment of OCSCC. To account for baseline differences, we employed propensity score (PS) matching, resulting in two well-balanced study groups (initial surgery, n = 580; definitive RT, n = 145). RESULTS: Before PS matching, the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 88% for the surgery group and 58% for the RT group. After PS matching, the 5-year DSS rates of the two groups were 86% and 58%, respectively. Similarly, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates before PS matching were 80% for the surgery group and 36% for the RT group, whereas after PS matching, they were 73% and 36%, respectively. All these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). A multivariable analysis identified treatment with RT, older age, stage II tumors, and a higher burden of comorbidities as independent risk factors for both DSS and OS. We also examined the 5-year outcomes for various subgroups (margin ≥5 mm, margin <5 mm, positive margins, RT combined with chemotherapy, and RT alone) as follows: DSS, 89%/88%/79%/63%/51%, respectively, p < 0.0001; OS, 82%/79%/68%/39%/32%, respectively, p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: In Taiwanese patients with cT1-2N0M0 OCSCC, a remarkably low proportion (1.1%) completed definitive RT. A significant survival disparity of 30% was observed between patients who underwent initial surgery and those who received definitive RT. Interestingly, even patients from the surgical group with positive surgical margins exhibited a significantly superior survival compared to those in the definitive RT group.

Prognostic impact of elective tracheotomy in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Elective tracheotomy is commonly performed in resected oral squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) to maintain airway patency. However, the indications for this procedure vary among surgeons. This nationwide study evaluated the impact of tracheotomy on both the duration of in-hospital stay and long-term survival outcomes in patients with OCSCC. METHODS: A total of 18,416 patients with OCSCC were included in the analysis, comprising 7981 patients who underwent elective tracheotomy and 10,435 who did not. The primary outcomes assessed were 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). To minimize potential confounding factors, a propensity score (PS)-matched analysis was performed on 4301 patients from each group. The duration of hospital stay was not included as a variable in the PS-matched analysis. RESULTS: Prior to PS matching, patients with tracheotomy had significantly lower 5-year DSS and OS rates compared to those without (71% vs. 82%, p < 0.0001; 62% vs. 75%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariable analysis identified tracheotomy as an independent adverse prognostic factor for 5-year DSS (hazard ratio = 1.10 [1.03-1.18], p = 0.0063) and OS (hazard ratio = 1.10 [1.04-1.17], p = 0.0015). In the PS-matched cohort, the 5-year DSS was 75% for patients with tracheotomy and 76% for those without (p = 0.1488). Five-year OS rates were 66% and 67%, respectively (p = 0.0808). Prior to PS matching, patients with tracheotomy had a significantly longer mean hospital stay compared to those without (23.37 ± 10.56 days vs. 14.19 ± 8.34 days; p < 0.0001). Following PS matching, the difference in hospital stay duration between the two groups remained significant (22.34 ± 10.25 days vs. 17.59 ± 9.54 days; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: While elective tracheotomy in resected OCSCC patients may not significantly affect survival, it could be associated with prolonged hospital stays.

Is elective neck dissection justified in cT2N0M0 oral cavity cancer defined according to the AJCC eighth edition staging system?

BACKGROUND: The current NCCN guidelines recommend considering elective neck dissection (END) for early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with a depth of invasion (DOI) exceeding 3 mm. However, this DOI threshold, determined by evaluating the occult lymph node metastatic rate, lacks robust supporting evidence regarding its impact on patient outcomes. In this nationwide study, we sought to explore the specific indications for END in patients diagnosed with OCSCC at stage cT2N0M0, as defined by the AJCC Eighth Edition staging criteria. METHODS: We examined 4723 patients with cT2N0M0 OCSCC, of which 3744 underwent END and 979 were monitored through neck observation (NO). RESULTS: Patients who underwent END had better 5-year outcomes compared to those in the NO group. The END group had higher rates of neck control (95% vs. 84%, p < 0.0001), disease-specific survival (DSS; 87% vs. 84%, p = 0.0259), and overall survival (OS; 79% vs. 73%, p = 0.0002). Multivariable analysis identified NO, DOI ≥5.0 mm, and moderate-to-poor tumor differentiation as independent risk factors for 5-year neck control, DSS, and OS. Based on these prognostic variables, three distinct outcome subgroups were identified within the NO group. These included a low-risk subgroup (DOI <5 mm plus well-differentiated tumor), an intermediate-risk subgroup (DOI ≥5.0 mm or moderately differentiated tumor), and a high-risk subgroup (poorly differentiated tumor or DOI ≥5.0 mm plus moderately differentiated tumor). Notably, the 5-year survival outcomes (neck control/DSS/OS) for the low-risk subgroup within the NO group (97%/95%/85%, n = 251) were not inferior to those of the END group (95%/87%/79%). CONCLUSIONS: By implementing risk stratification within the NO group, we found that 26% (251/979) of low-risk patients achieved outcomes similar to those in the END group. Therefore, when making decisions regarding the implementation of END in patients with cT2N0M0 OCSCC, factors such as DOI and tumor differentiation should be taken into account.

Prognostic impact of bridge or neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy in patients with resected oral cavity cancer: A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: While surgery remains the primary treatment for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), induction chemotherapy (IC) can be used as a bridging or neoadjuvant therapy. This nationwide study in Taiwan examines the survival outcomes of OCSCC patients who received IC before surgery. METHODS: We analyzed data from 29,891 patients with OCSCC. Of these, 29,058 initially underwent surgery (OP group), whereas 833 received IC before surgery (IC + OP group). A propensity score (PS)-matched analysis (4, 1 ratio, 3260 vs. 815 patients) was performed considering tumor subsite, sex, age, Charlson comorbidity index, clinical T1-T4b tumors, clinical N0-3 disease, and clinical stage I-IV. RESULTS: In the PS-matched cohort, the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 65% and 57%, respectively. When comparing the OP and IC + OP groups, the 5-year DSS rates were 66% and 62%, respectively (p = 0.1162). Additionally, the 5-year OS rates were 57% and 56%, respectively (p = 0.9917). No significant intergroup differences in survival were observed for specific subgroups with cT4a tumors, cT4b tumors, cN3 disease, pT4b tumors, and pN3 disease. However, for patients with pT4a tumors, the OP group demonstrated superior 5-year outcomes compared to the IC + OP group, with a DSS of 62% versus 52% (p = 0.0006) and an OS of 53% versus 44% (p = 0.0060). Notably, patients with cT2-3, cN1, and c-Stage II disease in the IC + OP group were significantly more likely to achieve pT0-1 status (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Following PS matching, the IC + OP group generally exhibited similar prognosis to the OP group. However, for pT4a tumors, the OP group showed superior 5-year outcomes. While IC may not universally improve survival, it could be advantageous for patients who respond positively to the treatment.

Post-irradiation sarcoma after definitive radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Postirradiation sarcoma (PIS) is a rare radiation-induced malignancy after nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively screened 9,185 NPC patients between 2000 and 2020 and identified 41 patients with PIS according to the modified Cahan's criteria: (1) the PIS must have arisen within a previous radiation field; (2) a latent period must have existed; (3) histologically proved sarcoma; (4) the tissue in which the PIS arose must have been healthy prior to the radiation. The initial radiation therapy techniques used were 2D (25; 61.0%), 3D (7; 17.1%), and IMRT (9; 22%). RESULTS: The time (year) from radiotherapy (RT) to PIS was longer when using 2D or 3D irradiation techniques (median, 14.2; range, 3.4-28.1; Q1-Q3, 8.6-19.7) than when using IMRT (median, 6.6; range, 3.8-15.7; Q1-Q3, 4.5-11.7; P =.026). The time (year) from RT to PIS diagnosis was significantly longer when using lower radiation energy from cobalt-60 (median, 15.8; range, 10.4-28.4; Q1-Q3, 12.5-23.8) than when using a higher radiation energy of 6 or 10 MV (median, 10.2; range, 3.4-23.3; Q1-Q3, 6.5-16.1; P =.006). The 2-year overall survival rates for patients who underwent surgery, radical radiotherapy, systemic therapy alone and no treatment were 60.7 %, 42.9 %, 0 % and 0 %, respectively (P =.000). Of the 3 retrievable initial RT dosimetry plans for NPC, the D95 values (dose that covers 95 % of the PIS volume) for PIS were 6267, 6344 and 5820 cGy, respectively. CONCLUSION: High radiation energy and modern techniques may shorten NPC PIS latency. Surgery may be associated with improved survival if feasible.