Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.

PURPOSE: To compare the interpretive performance of synthetic mammography (SM), reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in a diagnostic setting, covering different conditions of breast density and mammographic signs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 231 patients, who underwent FFDM and DBT (from which SM images were reconstructed) between September 2014-September 2015. The study included 250 suspicious breast lesions, all biopsy proven: 148 (59.2%) malignant and 13 (5.2%) high-risk lesions were confirmed by surgery, 89 (35.6%) benign lesions had radiological follow-up. Two breast radiologists, blinded to histology, independently reviewed all cases. Readings were performed with SM alone, then with FFDM, collecting data on: probability of malignancy for each finding, lesion conspicuity, mammographic features and dimensions of detected lesions. RESULTS: Agreement between readers was good for BI-RADS classification (Cohen's k-coefficient = 0.93 ± 0.02) and for lesion dimension (Wilcoxon's p = 0.76). Visibility scores assigned to SM and FFDM for each lesion were similar for non-dense and dense breasts, however, there were significant differences (p = 0.0009) in distribution of mammographic features subgroups. SM and FFDM had similar sensitivities in non-dense (respectively 94 vs. 91%) and dense breasts (88 vs. 80%) and for all mammographic signs (93 vs. 87% for asymmetric densities, 96 vs. 75% for distortion, 92 vs. 85% for microcalcifications, and both 94% for masses). Based on all data, there was a significant difference in sensitivity for SM (92%) vs. FFDM (87%), p = 0.02, whereas the two modalities yielded similar results for specificity (SM: 60%, FFDM: 62%, p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: SM alone showed similar interpretive performance to FFDM, confirming its potential role as an alternative to FFDM in women having tomosynthesis, with the added advantage of halving the patient's dose exposure.

Pancreas bifidum: an extremely rare cause of acute pancreatitis.

A wide spectrum of anomalies of the pancreas, the pancreatic ductal system and the biliary tree are commonly encountered at radiologic evaluation. Pancreas bifidum, also known as bifid pancreas or fish-tail pancreas, is an extremely rare congenital branching anomaly of the main pancreatic duct characterized by its duplication. These 2 separate ducts are laid from the pancreatic tail to neck and they generally join at the pancreas body-tail draining via the major papilla; the pancreatic parenchyma is also bifurcated with separated dorsal and caudal buds. The clinical impact of this condition is not well established: although some authors sustained that probably does not cause or contribute to abdominal pain or overt pancreatic diseases, others argued that could be considered as a possible cause of acute pancreatitis. We herewith describe the case of a 51-year-old woman presenting to our hospital with epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. Biochemical tests were suspicious for acute pancreatitis. Ultrasound examination was negative. MRI, including MR cholangiopancreatography revealed bifid pancreas characterized by duplication of the main pancreatic duct with 2 separate ducts that join at the pancreas head and draining via the minor papilla. On T2-weighted images the ventral bud of the pancreas was enlarged and characterized by slightly hyperintensity without peripancreatic fluid collections. The MRI findings were consistent with acute pancreatitis limited to the ventral bud of a bifid pancreas. Patient was treated with intravenous fluid resuscitation, pain control and institution of early enteral nutrition and discharged on the seventh day after admission.

Focal nodular hyperplasia after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: A diagnostic challenge.

Chemotherapy could induce benign liver alterations presenting as diffuse or focal lesions mimicking metastases. Oxaliplatin-induced vascular liver injury is described in literature, but the association with FNH-like lesions has been reported in a limited number of cases. We herewith describe the case of a 67-year-old male, who had laparoscopic right-sided hemicolectomy, 8 years ago, because of colonic adenocarcinoma (pT3N0M0) and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine + oxaliplatin), who referred to the ultrasound service of our Radiology Unit because of abdominal pain. Five-years follow-up was negative for metastases. Ultrasound examination showed 2 small hypoechoic hepatic nodules, in segment VIII and VII, confirmed at CT, suspected for metastases. FDG-PET was negative, and blood tumor markers were within normal ranges. For further evaluation we performed gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI that showed hyperintensity of the nodules in the hepatobiliary phase with central small hypointensity due to a central scar. Considering the previous oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy the findings were compatible with FNHlike lesions and the diagnostic suspicion was confirmed at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Knowledge of the possible occurrence of FNH-like lesions in oncologic setting, along with the detection of typical MRI appearance, is important for appropriate management and may avoid unnecessary biopsy or surgery and reduce patients' anxiety.

A rare case of adrenal ganglioneuroblastoma-intermixed in an adult and a review of literature.

Peripheral neuroblastic tumors are extremely rare in the adult with less just over 20 cases involving adrenal gland described in the literature. We reported herewith the case of a 22-year-old young male who presented with epigastric pain and diarrhea. Imaging studies documented a 3.5cm x 3cm x 4cm solid well-circumscribed right adrenal mass, of heterogeneous structure and with fine calcifications. The lesion turned negative at MIBG scintigraphy. A right robotic-assisted adrenalectomy was performed leading to complete excision of the lesion without complications. Histology was consistent with intermixed stroma-rich ganglioneuroblastoma. A wait-and-see strategy was considered adequate. Two years after diagnosis patient is alive disease-free. Although the definitive diagnosis of a peripheral neuroblastic tumor is obtained after histopathological analysis, CT, and MRI are helpful to further characterize masses and useful in pretreatment risk stratification. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of GNB development in adult population and its malignant potential.

Bilateral breast metastases as the first manifestation of an occult pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Breast metastases are uncommon findings compared to primary breast cancer and in particular bilateral secondary breast lesions from neuroendocrine tumor (NET)s are extremely rare with just less over 13 cases described in literature. We reported herewith the case of a 54-year-old woman who presented to our Breast Unit after noticing multiple, mobile, bilateral breast lumps. Imaging studies confirmed the presence of multiple, circumscribed, bilateral breast masses with slightly spiculated margins, classified as suspicious for malignancy (BI-RADS 4). A tru-cut biopsy was carried out on the largest lesion of each side and histopathologic and immunohistochemistry examination was consistent with metastases from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET). Total-body CT revealed the presence of a mass located in the pancreatic body - tail with associated abdominal lymphadenopathies and multiple secondary nodules in bilateral breast and in the liver. Stage IV disease was diagnosed, patient did not undergo surgery and started LAR - octreotide therapy. Although rare, breast metastases from NETs represent an important diagnostic challenge for practitioners because of the difficulty to differentiate from a primary breast carcinoma or even from benign breast lesions. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of bilateral breast metastases in differential diagnosis of breast lesions in order to ensure the correct diagnosis and the most appropriate management of these patients.