A phase I dose-escalation study of TAK-733, an investigational oral MEK inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Purpose TAK-733, an investigational, selective, allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor effects against multiple cancer cell lines and xenograft models. This first-in-human study investigated TAK-733 in patients with solid tumors. Methods Patients received oral TAK-733 once daily on days 1-21 in 28-day treatment cycles. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 3.0. Response was assessed using RECIST v1.1. Blood samples for TAK-733 pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (inhibition of ERK phosphorylation) were collected during cycle 1. Results Fifty-one patients received TAK-733 0.2-22 mg. Primary diagnoses included uveal melanoma (24 %), colon cancer (22 %), and cutaneous melanoma (10 %). Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities of dermatitis acneiform, plus fatigue and pustular rash in one patient, and stomatitis in one patient. The maximum tolerated dose was 16 mg. Common drug-related AEs included dermatitis acneiform (51 %), diarrhea (29 %), and increased blood creatine phosphokinase (20 %); grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 27 (53 %) patients. Median Tmax was 3 h; systemic exposure increased less than dose-proportionally over the dose range 0.2-22 mg. On day 21 maximum inhibition of ERK phosphorylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 46-97 % was seen in patients receiving TAK-733 ≥ 8.4 mg. Among 41 response-evaluable patients, 2 (5 %) patients with cutaneous melanoma (one with BRAF L597R mutant melanoma) had partial responses. Conclusions TAK-733 had a generally manageable toxicity profile up to the maximum tolerated dose, and showed the anticipated pharmacodynamic effect of sustained inhibition of ERK phosphorylation. Limited antitumor activity was demonstrated. Further investigation is not currently planned.

Gemcitabine pharmacokinetics and interaction with paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m(2) per min has been reported to achieve plasma steady-state concentrations ranging from 10 to 20 microM in patients with acute leukemia. These concentrations have been shown to saturate the intracellular accumulation of the active triphosphate metabolite. We designed this pharmacokinetic study to assess the ability of a fixed dose rate of gemcitabine to achieve the desired steady-state concentration in the absence and presence of paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of 14 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer received paclitaxel 110 mg/m(2) over 3 h on days 1 and 8 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) over 80 min on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Patients received gemcitabine alone on cycle (C) 1, day (D) 1. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 80 min during infusion and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after infusion on C1D1, C1D8, C2D1, C4D1 and C6D1. RESULTS: Of 13 patients included in the pharmacokinetic analysis, 61% achieved the desired steady-state concentration (C(ss)) with gemcitabine alone (C1D1), whereas only 0 to 45% of patients achieved the desired C(ss) with paclitaxel and gemcitabine, depending on the treatment cycle. Paclitaxel significantly decreased systemic clearance (Cl(T); P=0.012) and volume of distribution (V(d); P=0.050) and significantly increased C(ss) ( P=0.009). Gemcitabine plasma pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrated great interpatient variability in the absence of paclitaxel (C(ss) 30%, Cl(T) 30%, V(d) 55%). Interpatient and intrapatient variability in gemcitabine pharmacokinetics were not observed when gemcitabine was administered in combination with paclitaxel (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine plasma pharmacokinetic parameters are significantly altered in the presence of paclitaxel.

Relative activation of human pregnane X receptor versus constitutive androstane receptor defines distinct classes of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 inducers.

Both the human pregnane X receptor (hPXR) and constitutive androstane receptor (hCAR) are capable of regulating CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 gene expression. However, the majority of currently identified CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 inducers are confirmed activators of hPXR but not hCAR. To compare these receptors with respect to their chemical selectivities, 16 drugs known to induce CYP3A4 and/or CYP2B expression were evaluated for relative activation of hPXR versus hCAR. Because of the high basal but low chemical-induced activation of hCAR in immortalized cells, alternative methods were used to evaluate hCAR activation potential. Thirteen of the 16 compounds were classified as moderate to strong hPXR activators. In contrast, carbamazepine (CMZ), efavirenz (EFV), and nevirapine (NVP) were classified as negligible or weak hPXR activators at concentrations associated with efficacious CYP2B6 reporter or endogenous gene induction in primary human hepatocytes, suggesting potential activation of hCAR. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that these three drugs efficiently induced nuclear accumulation of in vivo-transfected enhanced yellow fluorescent protein-hCAR and significantly increased expression of a CYP2B6 reporter gene when hCAR was expressed in CAR-/- mice. In addition, using a recently identified, chemically responsive splice variant of hCAR (hCAR3), the hCAR activation profiles of the 16 compounds were evaluated. By combining results from the hPXR- and hCAR3-based reporter gene assays, these inducers were classified as hPXR, hCAR, or hPXR/hCAR dual activators. Our results demonstrate that CMZ, EFV, and NVP induce CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 preferentially through hCAR and that hCAR3 represents a sensitive tool for in vitro prediction of chemical-mediated human CAR activation.

Differential regulation of hepatic CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 genes by constitutive androstane receptor but not pregnane X receptor.

Accumulated evidence suggests that cross-talk between the pregnane X receptor (PXR) and the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) results in shared transcriptional activation of CYP2B and CYP3A genes. Although most data imply symmetrical cross-regulation of these genes by rodent PXR and CAR, the actual selectivities of the corresponding human receptors are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the symmetry of human (h) PXR and hCAR cross-talk by comparing the selectivities of these receptors for CYP2B6 and CYP3A4. Human hepatocyte studies revealed nonselective induction of both CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 by hPXR activation but marked preferential induction of CYP2B6 by selective hCAR activation. Gel shift assays demonstrated that hPXR exhibited strong and relatively equal binding to all functional response elements in both CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 genes, whereas hCAR displayed significantly weak binding to the CYP3A4 proximal ER6 motif. In cell-based transfection assays, hCAR displayed greater activation of CYP2B6 reporter gene expression compared with CYP3A4 with constructs containing both proximal and distal regulatory elements. Furthermore, in agreement with binding observations, transfection assays using promoter constructs containing repeats of CYP2B6 DR4 and CYP3A4 ER6 motifs revealed an even greater difference in reporter activation by hCAR. In contrast, hPXR activation resulted in less discernible differences between CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 reporter gene expression. These results suggest asymmetrical cross-regulation of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 by hCAR but not hPXR in that hCAR exhibits preferential induction of CYP2B6 relative to CYP3A4 because of its weak binding and functional activation of the CYP3A4 ER6.

Modulation of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 in primary human hepatocytes by prototypical inducers.

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the modulation of UGT1A1 expression in human hepatocytes using prototypical CYP450 inducers. A bank of 16 human livers was utilized to obtain an estimate of the range of UGT1A1 protein expression and catalytic activity. Concentration-dependent changes in UGT1A1 response were evaluated in hepatocyte cultures after treatment with 3-methylchloranthrene, beta-napthoflavone, rifampicin, or phenobarbital. Pharmacodynamic analyses of UGT1A1 expression were conducted and compared to those of CYP450 after treatment with inducers in 2-3 different hepatocyte preparations. Additionally, expression of UGT1A1 mRNA and protein was evaluated in human hepatocytes treated with 14 different compounds known to activate differentially the human pregnane-X-receptor or constitutive androstane receptor. Pharmacodynamic modeling revealed EC50 values statistically significant between UGT1A1 and CYP2B6 after treatment with PB, but not statistically distinguishable between UGT1A1 and CYP's 1A2 or 3A4 after treatment with 3-methylchloranthrene or rifampicin, respectively. UGT1A1 was most responsive to the pregnane-X-receptor-agonists rifampicin, ritonavir, and clotrimazole at the mRNA level and, to a lesser extent, the constitutive androstane receptor-activators, phenobarbital and phenytoin. Pharmacodynamic analyses support a mechanism of coordinate regulation between UGT1A1 and a number of CYP450 enzymes by multiple nuclear receptors.

A phase I trial defining the maximum tolerated systemic exposure of topotecan in combination with Carboplatin and Etoposide in extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Topotecan is active in relapsed small cell lung cancer; thus, its addition to the standard carboplatin-etoposide regimen may improve outcomes in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients. Significant interpatient variability in the topotecan systemic exposure results when it is dosed based on body surface area (mg/m2). The purpose of this Phase I trial was to determine the maximally tolerated systemic exposure (MTSE) of topotecan in combination with carboplatin and etoposide. METHODS: Thirty-four chemotherapy-naïve ES-SCLC patients received topotecan in combination with carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL*min and oral etoposide 100 mg/m2/day. Topotecan was administered as a 30-minute infusion either on Days 1-5 or Days 1-3 and the dosage was individualized to attain a topotecan lactone AUC range (ng/mL*hr) in successive patient cohorts from 7 to 23; 24 to 36; 37 to 53; 54 to 66. RESULTS: The majority (67 percent) of the measured topotecan AUCs were within target range. Overall, 8 of 34 patients experienced Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), either neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Carboplatin administration prior to topotecan resulted in 2 of 6 patients having Cycle 1 DLT. When the administration sequence was changed (topotecan, carboplatin, etoposide), Cycle 1 hematologic toxicity decreased; however, the maximum topotecan lactone AUC of 24-36 ng/mL*hr (median dose 0.82 mg/m2) had significant cumulative hematologic toxicity. The number of topotecan doses were reduced from 5 to 3, which resulted in a maximum topotecan lactone AUC of 37 to 53 ng/mL*hr with only 1 of 6 patients having Cycle 1 DLT. Overall response rate was 71 percent with median survival of 10.8 months. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to target topotecan lactone AUC in adult ES-SCLC patients. However, this triplet regimen resulted in considerable hematologic toxicity and has a median survival comparable to carboplatin-etoposide. Alternative, less toxic regimens should be investigated for improving survival in ES-SCLC.

Human constitutive androstane receptor mediates induction of CYP2B6 gene expression by phenytoin.

Compared with its rodent orthologs, little is known about the chemical specificity of human constitutive androstane receptor (hCAR) and its regulation of hepatic enzyme expression. Phenytoin (PHY), a widely used antiepileptic drug, is a potent inducer of CYP2B6 in primary human hepatocytes, but does not activate human pregnane X receptor (PXR) significantly in cell-based transfection assays at the same concentrations associated with potent induction of CYP2B6. Based on this observation, we hypothesized that PHY may be a selective activator of hCAR. In primary human hepatocytes, expression of CYP2B6 reporter genes containing phenobarbital-responsive enhancer module (PBREM) or PBREM/xenobiotic-responsive enhancer module (XREM) response elements were activated up to 14- and 28-fold, respectively, by 50 microm PHY. By contrast, parallel experiments in HepG2 cell lines co-transfected with an hPXR expression vector did not show increased reporter activity. These results indicated that a PXR-independent pathway, which is retained in primary hepatocytes, is responsible for PHY induction of CYP2B6. Further experiments revealed that PHY effectively translocates hCAR from the cytoplasm into the nucleus in both primary human hepatocytes and CAR(-/-) mice. Compared with vehicle controls, PHY administration significantly increased CYP2B6 reporter gene expression, when this reporter construct was delivered together with hCAR expression vector into CAR(-/-) mice. However, PHY did not increase reporter gene expression in CAR(-/-) mice in the absence of hCAR vector, implying that CAR is essential for mediating PHY induction of CYP2B6 gene expression. Taken together, these observations demonstrate that, in contrast to most of the known CYP2B6 inducers, PHY is a selective activator of CAR in humans.

A novel distal enhancer module regulated by pregnane X receptor/constitutive androstane receptor is essential for the maximal induction of CYP2B6 gene expression.

CYP2B6 plays an important role in the metabolism of a variety of structurally unrelated xenobiotics, including the anticancer drugs cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide. Previous studies have shown that the nuclear receptors constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR) are involved in the transcriptional regulation of CYP2B genes through the phenobarbital-responsive enhancer module (PBREM). However, for human CYP2B6 the relatively weak response of the PBREM to PXR and CAR activation in transfection assays fails to describe the potent induction observed in primary human hepatocyte cultures. In this report, a novel nuclear receptor response module located -8.5 kilobases upstream from the CYP2B6 encoding region is described. Several potential PXR/CAR binding motifs were identified within the distal regulatory cluster. In electrophoretic mobility shift assays, one DR4 motif showed the strongest binding to both PXR and CAR. Transient transfection assays in HepG2 cells demonstrated that the novel distal response cluster could be activated by PXR and CAR. In primary human hepatocytes, both PBREM and the distal responsive element were activated individually by endogenous nuclear receptors upon exposure to prototypical inducers. However, in both HepG2 cells and primary human hepatocytes maximal reporter activation was observed in a construct containing both PBREM and the distal responsive element. In mouse tail-vein injection experiments, a construct containing both the distal responsive element and the proximal PBREM exhibited a strong synergistic expression in phenobarbital-treated mice. These results show that a novel xenobiotic-responsive enhancer module in the distal region of the CYP2B6 promoter (CYP2B6-XREM) together with the PBREM mediates optimal drug-induced expression of CYP2B6.

Glucocorticoid receptor enhancement of pregnane X receptor-mediated CYP2B6 regulation in primary human hepatocytes.

Although the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) facilitates the xenobiotic-induced expression of CYP2B in rodents, its role in the regulation of human CYP2B6 is unclear. In this report, the role of human GR in the regulation of CYP2B6 was evaluated using primary human hepatocytes and transfection assays with Huh7 cells. CYP2B6 expression was not induced in primary hepatocytes treated with dexamethasone (DEX) concentrations (0.01-1 microM) known to activate GR. In contrast, treatment with 0.1 microM DEX enhanced CYP2B6 induction by different pregnane X receptor (PXR) activators, including rifampin, phenytoin, clotrimazole, and phenobarbital. In Huh7 cells, cotransfection of human (h)GR and hPXR with CYP2B6-phenobarbital-responsive enhancer module (PBREM) reporter constructs revealed that all hPXR ligands induce CYP2B6 reporter gene activity, and this ligand-dependent activation is greatly enhanced by activated hGR. CYP2B6 reporter gene expression was not induced in the presence of hPXR ligands when hGR alone was cotransfected with CYP2B6 reporter construct. In hGR and human constitutive androstane receptor (hCAR) cotransfection assays, activated hGR increased the constitutive activation of PBREM reporter constructs by hCAR in the absence of inducers. In the presence of activated hGR and known inducers of CYP2B6, only PB treatment caused a further 2-fold activation of hCAR compared with control. These studies show that hGR is involved synergistically in the xenobiotic-responsive regulation of human CYP2B6 by hPXR and hCAR. Moreover, the results suggest that the GR-enhanced expression of CYP2B6 is mediated through an indirect mechanism that does not require increased expression of nuclear receptor.

Regulation of CYP2B6 in primary human hepatocytes by prototypical inducers.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of 14 compounds, which differentially activate human pregnane X receptor (hPXR), to induce CYP2B6 expression and to compare CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 concentration- and time-dependent induction by select inducers. Three primary human hepatocyte preparations were treated daily for 3 days with three concentrations of all compounds. Additional concentration- and/or time-response studies were conducted with clotrimazole, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and rifampin in six preparations. CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 protein and activities were assessed by Western blotting, bupropion hydroxylation, and testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation, respectively. To evaluate hPXR activation by the 14 compounds, reporter gene assays were conducted using Huh7 cells cotransfected with hPXR and a CYP2B6 (NR1)5-LUC reporter plasmid. Clotrimazole, phenobarbital, rifampin, and ritonavir strongly induced CYP2B6 and activated hPXR; dexamethasone t-butylacetate and sulfinpyrazone induced CYP2B6 weakly and activated hPXR moderately; paclitaxel strongly activated hPXR but did not increase CYP2B6 expression; carbamazepine and phenytoin moderately or strongly increased CYP2B6 expression but weakly activated hPXR; and dexamethasone, methotrexate, probenecid, sulfadimidine, and troleandomycin demonstrated weak or negligible effects on CYP2B6 and hPXR. EC50 values for CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 induction by clotrimazole, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and rifampin were strongly correlated (r2 = 0.99) and were statistically indistinguishable for clotrimazole, phenytoin, and rifampin. Kinetic constants governing time-dependent induction by phenobarbital and rifampin were also similar between CYP2B6 and CYP3A4. These results indicate that CYP2B6 is highly inducible by known CYP3A4 inducers and suggest that hPXR is a major determinant of CYP2B6-inducible expression for many, but not all, compounds evaluated in this study.

The effect of cyclophosphamide with and without dexamethasone on cytochrome P450 3A4 and 2B6 in human hepatocytes.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the concentration-response effects of cyclophosphamide (CPA) with and without dexamethasone (DEX; 10 microM) on the expression of CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 in cultured human hepatocytes at concentrations representative of standard- and high-dose CPA therapy (25 to 750 microM). CPA produced concentration-dependent increases in CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 activity and immunoreactive protein that peaked at 250 and 125 microM, respectively, and declined thereafter. The inductive effect of CPA alone and in combination with DEX was greater in magnitude for CYP2B6 compared with CYP3A4. To further examine the inductive effect of CPA on CYP3A4, CPA (250 microM) and DEX (10 microM) alone and in combination were examined in 10 hepatocyte preparations. The combination of CPA and DEX yielded higher rates of 6beta-hydroxytestosterone formation than either agent alone. However, the effect was less than additive in human hepatocyte cultures with relatively high baseline CYP3A4 activity and additive or synergistic in human hepatocyte cultures with relatively low baseline CYP3A4 activity. Induction index was highly correlated with CYP3A4 baseline activity for both CPA (r(2) = 0.75) and CPA plus DEX (r(2) = 0.85). To investigate the potential mechanism for CPA-induced increases in CYP3A4 activity, the ability of CPA alone and in combination with DEX to activate pregnane X receptor (PXR) was explored using transient transfection assays. CPA produced a dose-dependent increase in PXR activation that was maximal at the highest CPA concentration studied (500 microM). The addition of DEX to CPA resulted in a minor increase in PXR activation compared with CPA alone. These results indicate that CPA alone and in combination with DEX differentially induces the expression of CYP3A4 and 2B in a concentration-dependent manner, which may be mediated partially through activation of PXR. The impact of these effects on the efficacy and toxicity of CPA therapy warrants further investigation.