RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Evidence supports that better parental involvement and communication are related to reduced obesity in children. Parent-child collaborative decision-making is associated with lower BMI among children; while child-unilateral and parent-unilateral decision-making are associated with overweight children. However, little is known about associations between joint decision-making and obesity among Hispanic youth. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the relationship between parent-child decision making and obesity in a sample of predominantly Hispanic adolescents. METHODS: Data from two studies focused on risk for type II diabetes were analyzed. A total of 298 adolescents 10-14 years of age and their parent/legal guardian were included. Parents completed questionnaires related to psychosocial, family functioning, and environmental factors. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the association between obesity (≥ 95th percentile for age and gender), the dependent variable, and how often the parent felt they made decisions together with their child (rarely/never, sometimes, usually, always), the primary independent variable. Covariates included gender, age, ethnicity, total family income, and days participated in a physical activity for at least 20 min. ORs and 95% CIs were calculated. RESULTS: Adolescent participants were predominantly Hispanic n = 233 (78.2%), and approximately half n = 150 (50.3%) were female. In multivariate analyses, adolescents who rarely/never made decisions together with their family had significantly higher odds (OR = 3.50; 95% CI [1.25-9.83]) of being obese than those who always did. No association was observed between either those who sometimes make decisions together or those who usually did and those that always did. CONCLUSIONS: Parents and children not making decisions together, an essential aspect of parent-child communication, is associated with increased childhood obesity. The results of our study contribute to evidence of parental involvement in decision-making as an important determinant of adolescent health. Further studies should explore temporal relationships between parenting or communication style and obesity.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Relações Pais-Filho , Pais/psicologia , Obesidade Infantil/etnologia , Obesidade Infantil/psicologia , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade Infantil/epidemiologia , Texas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The role of lipid profile in predicting the risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in children is not clearly established. Our aim is to screen non-diabetic children aged 10-14 years for risk of developing T2DM and evaluate the association of abnormal lipids and socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: Data on race/ethnicity, family history, body mass index percentile, blood pressure and presence of neck pigmentation (acanthosis nigricans) were collected from 149 non-diabetic children. Using these factors, children were classified into low risk (<3 risk factors) and high risk (>3 risk factors) groups. Logistic regression model and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the association of blood lipid profile and demographic variables. Independent t-test was used to compare the ratio of Total Cholesterol (TC) and High Density Lipids (HDL) with T2DM risk. RESULTS: 60% of children were at high risk for developing T2DM. HDL (p<0.001), triglycerides (p=0.02) and TC/HDL ratio (p<.001) were significantly abnormal in high risk group. Low SES showed a marginal association with high risk group. There were no gender or age differences between high and low risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: The significant determinants associated with high risk group were modifiable factors providing an opportunity for early intervention and prevention.
Assuntos
Glicemia/metabolismo , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Triglicerídeos/sangue , Acantose Nigricans/diagnóstico , Acantose Nigricans/etnologia , Acantose Nigricans/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , População Negra , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnologia , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Classe Social , Texas , População BrancaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Refugees are less likely than US born populations to receive cancer screenings. Building Bridges is a community health worker prevention program designed to increase refugee's cancer screening uptake. The purpose of this cross sectional analysis was to assess differences in uptake of cervical, breast, liver, and colorectal screens across six cultural groups. METHODS: Data was abstracted in 2018 for this analysis. Participants were categorized into six cultural groups (Myanmar, Central Africa, Bhutan, Somalia, Arabic Speaking Countries, and Other) to assess differences in sociodemographic measures and screening uptake. Uptake proportions were calculated for each cancer type (cervical, breast, liver, and colon) among eligible participants, by gender and cultural group. Differences in uptake across groups were assessed using stratified analysis and logistic regression. Prevalence odds ratios (POR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each group to assess the association between screening completion and cultural group. FINDINGS: 874 refugees were asked about cancer screening history. The majority of participants were either 'never had been screened' or 'not up-to-date' for every cancer screening. Among age eligible, 82% had no prior pap exam within the past 3 years, 81% had no prior mammogram within the past year, 69% didn't know their Hepatitis B status and 87% never had a colon cancer screening. Overall, higher uptake of all types of cancer screenings was observed in Myanmar and Bhutanese groups, except colon cancer screening which was higher among Central African Region and Arabic Speaking participants. CONCLUSION: Screening uptake varied by ethnic group and screening type. The program reached an under and never screened population, however, the proportion of refugees who received a cancer screening remained low compared to the US population. Diversity within refugee communities requires adaptation to specific cultural and linguistic needs to include new Americans in cancer elimination efforts.
Assuntos
Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Refugiados/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Butão , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mianmar , Neoplasias/etnologia , Razão de Chances , Texas , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnósticoRESUMO
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) has demonstrated accuracy in the axillary staging of breast cancer patients. Despite variability in selection criteria and technique, an SLN is consistently identified in approximately 96% of cases and in most series predicts the status of remaining axillary LNs in >95% of cases. The false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was originally reported as 5%-10% (sensitivity 90%-95%), but improved rates are attainable by experienced surgeons. Radiolocalization with lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) increases SLN identification rates. LSG is a useful tool to establish the abnormal lymphatic drainage patterns and to detect the extra-axillary nodes, particularly internal mammary nodes. Despite controversy regarding the optimal injection method, studies have generally suggested high concordance between the various radiotracer application sites and axillary SLN identification. Discordant SLN identification would have implications for nodal staging as the true SLN might not be identified with individual injection techniques. In the current study, imaging from consecutive patients presenting for breast LSG over a-19 month period was retrospectively reviewed. Radiotracer application was performed with simultaneous injection of peritumoral, subcutaneous, and subareolar regions. This application method provided a mechanism to assess the LSG drainage patterns with a view to assessing injection site concordance and SLN identification rates. Data from 123 breast LSG patients were reviewed. Using our radiotracer technique, the axillary SLN identification rate was 98%. A single axillary node was detected in 110, two axillary nodes were detected in 10, and no axillary node was detected in three patients. Among those 10 patients in whom two axillary nodes were seen, at least two cases of discordant drainage occurred from different injection sites. This study demonstrates that different LSG injection sites can result in the identification of different axillary sentinel nodes although this appears to be a rare event. This finding may be of clinical importance if the true SLN is sought. In addition, the multisite injection technique appears to be an optimal method of axillary SLN identification, with high SLN detection rates.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Bilateral balloon occlusion has been employed as a prophylactic measure in cases of placenta accretism prior to caesarean section with the aim of reducing blood loss and its associated morbidity/mortality. There is however no clear consensus on its efficacy in the current literature. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of bilateral balloon occlusion of the common iliac arteries (CIA) in reducing intra-operative morbidity in cases of placenta accretism. METHODS: The databases of the pathology department and radiology interventional suite were reviewed over a nine year period. Fifty-two cases of confirmed placental accretism who underwent caesarean section with or without hysterectomy were identified and divided into two groups. Twenty-five cases had temporary occlusion of the common iliac arteries (CIA) during delivery and these were considered the study group. The reminder 27 cases did not have temporary occlusion of the CIA and were considered the control group. The two groups were compared based on gravidity, age group, post-operative haemoglobin, drop in haemoglobin, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion requirement and the histopathological sub-types of placenta accretism. RESULTS: There was no statistically difference between the study and the control groups regarding EBL, post-operative haemoglobin drop, transfusion requirement or in the placenta accretism histopathological subtype. Two cases in the study group had acute thromboembolic complications. Both groups had a single patient requiring a massive intra-operative transfusion. CONCLUSION: Our study was not able to detect a significant difference in blood loss or blood product requirement between patients who underwent CIA balloon in the setting of caesarean section for placenta accreta. This remains a challenging scenario requiring a multidisciplinary approach.
Assuntos
Oclusão com Balão/métodos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Cesárea , Artéria Ilíaca , Placenta Acreta/cirurgia , Adulto , Angiografia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , New South Wales , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) are markers for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); alkaline phosphatase is a marker of liver disease. Mexican-American adolescents are disproportionately affected by T2DM, while in Mexico its prevalence is emerging. We assessed liver biomarkers and lipid profiles among Mexican and Mexican-American adolescents 10-14 years old with high/low risk of T2DM through a cross-sectional, descriptive study (Texas n = 144; Mexico n = 149). We included family medical histories, anthropometry, and blood pressure. Obesity was present in one-third of subjects in both sites. ALT (UL) was higher (p < 0.001) in high-risk adolescents (23.5 ± 19.5 versus 17.2 ± 13.4 for males, 19.7 ± 11.6 versus 15.1 ± 5.5 for females), in Toluca and in Texas (26.0 ± 14.7 versus 20.0 ± 13.2 for males, 18.2 ± 13.4 versus 14.6 ± 10.1 for females), as well as GGT (UL) (p < 0.001) (18.7 ± 11.1 versus 12.4 ± 2.3 for males, 13.6 ± 5.8 versus 11.5 ± 3.9 for Mexican females; 21.0 ± 6.8 versus 15.4 ± 5.5 for males, 14.3 ± 5.0 versus 13.8 ± 5.3 for females in Texas). We found no differences by sex or BMI. Total cholesterol and HDL were higher among Mexican-Americans (p < 0.001). In conclusion, multiple risk factors were present in the sample. We found differences by gender and between high and low risk for T2DM adolescents in all liver enzymes in both sites.