Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 83
Filtrar
1.
Alzheimers Dement ; 15(5): 615-624, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30872114

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is an unmet need for effective methods for conducting dementia prevention trials. METHODS: Home-based assessment study compared feasibility and efficiency, ability to capture change over time using in-home instruments, and ability to predict cognitive conversion using predefined triggers in a randomized clinical trial in (1) mail-in questionnaire/live telephone interviews, (2) automated telephone/interactive voice recognition, and (3) internet-based computer Kiosk technologies. Primary endpoint was defined as cognitive conversion. RESULTS: Analysis followed a modified intent-to-treat principle. Dropout rates were low and similar across technologies but participants in Kiosk were more likely to dropout earlier. Staff resources needed were higher in Kiosk. In-home instruments distinguished conversion and stable groups. Cognitively stable group showed improvement in cognitive measures. Triggering was associated with higher likelihood of conversion but statistically significant only in mail-in questionnaire/live telephone interviews. DISCUSSION: Relatively low efficiency of internet-based assessment compared with testing by live-assessors has implications for internet-based recruitment and assessment efforts currently proposed for diverse populations.


Assuntos
Demência/prevenção & controle , Avaliação Geriátrica , Voluntários Saudáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Humanos , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Telefone
2.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 32(1): 10-17, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29240561

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The neuropsychological battery of the Uniform Data Set (UDSNB) was implemented in 2005 by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) Alzheimer Disease Centers program to measure cognitive performance in dementia and mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer Disease. This paper describes a revision, the UDSNB 3.0. METHODS: The Neuropsychology Work Group of the NIA Clinical Task Force recommended revisions through a process of due diligence to address shortcomings of the original battery. The UDSNB 3.0 covers episodic memory, processing speed, executive function, language, and constructional ability. Data from 3602 cognitively normal participants in the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center database were analyzed. RESULTS: Descriptive statistics are presented. Multivariable linear regression analyses demonstrated score differences by age, sex, and education and were also used to create a normative calculator available online. DISCUSSION: The UDSNB 3.0 neuropsychological battery provides a valuable non proprietary resource for conducting research on cognitive aging and dementia.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Testes Neuropsicológicos/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Alzheimers Dement ; 14(11): 1397-1405, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30297140

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about factors affecting motivation and satisfaction of participants in dementia prevention trials. METHODS: A Research Satisfaction Survey was administered to 422 nondemented older adults who participated in the Home-Based Assessment trial. RESULTS: Overall satisfaction was high, with means of all individual items near to above a value of 3 on a scale from 1 (worst) to 4 (best). Greater satisfaction was associated with staff-administered interviews versus automated technologies. The most liked aspects of research participation were volunteerism, opportunity to challenge and improve mental function, and positive interactions with staff. The least liked aspect was repetitiveness of the assessments. Participants requested more contact with staff and other older adults and more feedback on performance. DISCUSSION: Older adults' participation in research was primarily motivated by altruism. Methodologies that facilitate human contact, encourage feedback and novelty of tasks should be incorporated into future trial design.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Demência/prevenção & controle , Demência/psicologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Altruísmo , Estudos de Coortes , Participação da Comunidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Motivação , Testes Neuropsicológicos
4.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 19(4): 1810-1817, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29616490

RESUMO

One of the current methods for cycle optimization in primary drying to is develop a graphical design space based on quality by design (QbD). In order to construct the design space, the vial heat transfer coefficient (Kv) is needed. This paper investigated experimental factors that can affect the Kv result, examined the relationship between the batch average Kv and Kv values for individual vials, and recommended best practices for measuring Kv. Factors investigated included the technique for measuring ice temperature, shelf temperature, the use of a radiation shield on the door of the freeze-dry chamber, and shelf spacing. All experiments reported here used a chamber pressure of 100 mTorr. The most important factor was the technique for ice temperature measurement, where it is important to assure that any restrictions to vapor flow at the top of the vial are the same between monitored and non-monitored vials. Another factor that was found to play a role was the shelf temperature whereby the lower the shelf temperature, the larger the "edge effect," and the larger the average Kv. Factors that were found to not have a significant effect were the use of a radiation shield inside the chamber door and the shelf spacing. Being aware of these factors and knowing best practices when determining the vial heat coefficient will lead to more accurate design spaces and better cycle optimization.


Assuntos
Embalagem de Medicamentos/métodos , Vidro/química , Temperatura Alta , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/métodos , Dessecação/métodos , Embalagem de Medicamentos/normas , Liofilização/métodos
5.
N Engl J Med ; 370(4): 322-33, 2014 Jan 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24450891

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bapineuzumab, a humanized anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibody, is in clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: We conducted two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials involving patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease--one involving 1121 carriers of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele and the other involving 1331 noncarriers. Bapineuzumab or placebo, with doses varying by study, was administered by intravenous infusion every 13 weeks for 78 weeks. The primary outcome measures were scores on the 11-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog11, with scores ranging from 0 to 70 and higher scores indicating greater impairment) and the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating less impairment). A total of 1090 carriers and 1114 noncarriers were included in the efficacy analysis. Secondary outcome measures included findings on positron-emission tomographic amyloid imaging with the use of Pittsburgh compound B (PIB-PET) and cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau (phospho-tau) concentrations. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in the primary outcomes. At week 78, the between-group differences in the change from baseline in the ADAS-cog11 and DAD scores (bapineuzumab group minus placebo group) were -0.2 (P=0.80) and -1.2 (P=0.34), respectively, in the carrier study; the corresponding differences in the noncarrier study were -0.3 (P=0.64) and 2.8 (P=0.07) with the 0.5-mg-per-kilogram dose of bapineuzumab and 0.4 (P=0.62) and 0.9 (P=0.55) with the 1.0-mg-per-kilogram dose. The major safety finding was amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema among patients receiving bapineuzumab, which increased with bapineuzumab dose and APOE ε4 allele number and which led to discontinuation of the 2.0-mg-per-kilogram dose. Between-group differences were observed with respect to PIB-PET and cerebrospinal fluid phospho-tau concentrations in APOE ε4 allele carriers but not in noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: Bapineuzumab did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with Alzheimer's disease, despite treatment differences in biomarkers observed in APOE ε4 carriers. (Funded by Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy and Pfizer; Bapineuzumab 301 and 302 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00575055 and NCT00574132, and EudraCT number, 2009-012748-17.).


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Peptídeos beta-Amiloides/antagonistas & inibidores , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Doença de Alzheimer/genética , Peptídeos beta-Amiloides/análise , Peptídeos beta-Amiloides/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Apolipoproteínas E/genética , Biomarcadores/análise , Biomarcadores/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Encéfalo/patologia , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Método Duplo-Cego , Edema/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Fosforilação , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Falha de Tratamento , Proteínas tau/líquido cefalorraquidiano
6.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 18(7): 2379-2393, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28205144

RESUMO

Recommended best practices in monitoring of product status during pharmaceutical freeze drying are presented, focusing on methods that apply to both laboratory and production scale. With respect to product temperature measurement, sources of uncertainty associated with any type of measurement probe are discussed, as well as important differences between the two most common types of temperature-measuring instruments-thermocouples and resistance temperature detectors (RTD). Two types of pressure transducers are discussed-thermal conductivity-type gauges and capacitance manometers, with the Pirani gauge being the thermal conductivity-type gauge of choice. It is recommended that both types of pressure gauge be used on both the product chamber and the condenser for freeze dryers with an external condenser, and the reasoning for this recommendation is discussed. Developing technology for process monitoring worthy of further investigation is also briefly reviewed, including wireless product temperature monitoring, tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy at manufacturing scale, heat flux measurement, and mass spectrometry as process monitoring tools.


Assuntos
Liofilização/instrumentação , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/instrumentação , Liofilização/métodos , Pressão , Análise Espectral , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/métodos , Temperatura
7.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol ; 27(4): 266-75, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24759088

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neuropsychological and depression measures have been found to predict cognitive functioning. We compared these associations among whites and Spanish-speaking Hispanics. METHODS: Fifty-two pairs of whites and Hispanics were matched demographically and clinically in a cross-sectional study. Hierarchical regression analyses predicted Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) rating by baseline neuropsychological tests and depression symptoms. RESULTS: Neuropsychological tests predicted GDS better in whites; depression symptoms--specifically retardation--predicted well in Hispanics but not whites. Immediate recall of the New York University (NYU)-Paragraph Test and the Retardation item of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale were associated with GDS in Hispanics and delayed recall of the NYU-Paragraph Test and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Digit Symbol in whites. Neuropsychological tests and depression symptoms predicted GDS differently in Hispanics and whites. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that other measures should be considered to increase the predictive accuracy of neuropsychological tests when assessing cognitive status in Spanish-speaking Hispanics. Additional studies of specific ethnic/racial and sociodemographic subgroups are warranted.


Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/etnologia , Demência/etnologia , Depressão/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Testes Neuropsicológicos/normas , População Branca/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cognição , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/psicologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/psicologia , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Idioma , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , New York , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Análise de Regressão
8.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 27(4): 356-62, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23151596

RESUMO

This report describes the baseline experience of the multicenter, Home-Based Assessment study, designed to develop methods for dementia prevention trials using novel technologies for test administration and data collection. Nondemented individuals of 75 years of age or more were recruited and evaluated in-person using established clinical trial outcomes of cognition and function, and randomized to one of 3 assessment methodologies: (1) mail-in questionnaire/live telephone interviews [mail-in/phone (MIP)]; (2) automated telephone with interactive voice recognition; and (3) internet-based computer Kiosk. Brief versions of cognitive and noncognitive outcomes were adapted to each methodology and administered at baseline and repeatedly over a 4-year period. "Efficiency" measures assessed the time from screening to baseline, and staff time required for each methodology. A total of 713 individuals signed consent and were screened; 640 met eligibility and were randomized to one of 3 assessment arms; and 581 completed baseline. Dropout, time from screening to baseline, and total staff time were highest among those assigned to internet-based computer Kiosk. However, efficiency measures were driven by nonrecurring start-up activities suggesting that differences may be mitigated over a long trial. Performance among Home-Based Assessment instruments collected through different technologies will be compared with established outcomes over this 4-year study.


Assuntos
Demência/prevenção & controle , Demência/psicologia , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Visita Domiciliar , Relatório de Pesquisa , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Demência/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Internet/normas , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Relatório de Pesquisa/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Telefone/normas
9.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 28(2): 164-72, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22492589

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Relevant Outcome Scale for Alzheimer's disease (ROSA) is a novel, valid, and reliable instrument for multidimensional assessment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) symptoms across all severity stages. The ROSA and four standard instruments -- the Alzheimer's disease Assessment Scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog), Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD), and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) -- were used in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical study to assess treatment-induced changes in cognitive, functional, and behavioral symptoms in patients with AD at different severity stages. METHODS: A total of 451 patients were treated with memantine (initiated at 5 mg/day and up-titrated with 5 mg weekly to a final dose of 20 mg/day) for 12 weeks. The study endpoints comprised changes from baseline in the scores of the ROSA, ADAS-cog, SIB, DAD, and NPI as well as global changes on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C). Analyses were performed for the overall population and by AD severity stage (early, middle, late). RESULTS: The ROSA scores increased significantly after a 12-week treatment in all study groups except for early stage. Mean changes in the ADAS-cog score indicated a trend towards worsening in early and middle stages. Non-significant changes were shown by the SIB, NPI, and DAD assessments at week 12. The CGI-C demonstrated 'minimal improvement' or 'no change' for most of the patients. Overall, memantine treatment was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated the ROSA feasibility in daily practice for assessment of memantine effects over time in patients with moderate and late AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Memantina/uso terapêutico , Nootrópicos/uso terapêutico , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Áustria , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Memantina/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nootrópicos/efeitos adversos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Qualidade de Vida
10.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 27(1): 15-21, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21384431

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: When complex cognitive functions are measured with multi-item scales like the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), it seems valuable information can be lost due to combination of the ADAS-cog items results into a total score. We hypothesized, that an analysis of the results of different ADAS-cog item combinations may reveal drug treatment effects in distinct cognitive domains and/or enhance the sensitivity to detect such treatment effects. Here, we present a novel approach called 'subsetting analysis' for assessment of drug treatment effects with multi-item scales, like the ADAS-cog. METHODS: The subsetting approach is a mathematical algorithm designed to select and group scale items in a subset detecting drug treatment effects in a particular study population. The approach was applied in a post-hoc analysis of ADAS-cog results from two randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind clinical trials with memantine in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). The subsetting analysis of the ADAS-cog combined database aimed at selecting the scale items showing no worsening at study end compared to baseline due to memantine treatment in mild AD (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE >19)) patients. RESULTS: Two ADAS-cog subsets were finally revealed by the analysis: a subset of five ADAS-cog items, identified as most sensitive to memantine effects in mild AD patients, and a subset of six ADAS-cog items shown to detect significant memantine effects in moderate AD patients. CONCLUSION: The subsetting approach of analyzing ADAS-cog data is a powerful alternative for gaining information about drug effects on cognitive performance in mild and moderate AD patients.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/tratamento farmacológico , Dopaminérgicos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Memantina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos
11.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord ; 29(5): 406-12, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20502014

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) scale is widely used in Alzheimer trials. It assesses cognition, activities of daily living (ADLs), behavior and global functioning. To advance the understanding of relationships between the ADCS-CGIC and scores from other commonly used tools, this analysis investigated the ability of each domain to measure change. This was a hypothesis-forming study, designed to provide a basis for possible future research. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial [study ENA713D2320 (IDEAL)] that evaluated rivastigmine patches and capsules in AD patients. RESULTS: At week 24, significant treatment effects versus placebo were seen on the ADCS-CGIC cognitive domain with rivastigmine 17.4 mg/24 h patch (p < 0.01), 9.5 mg/24 h patch (p = 0.02) and capsules (p < 0.01); similarly on the ADCS-CGIC ADL domain. The cognition portion of the CGIC correlated with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale and the ADL section with the ADCS-ADL trial measures. Variance ascribable to these tools was small, indicating that CGIC detects changes not measured by the domain-specific tools. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this post hoc analysis suggest that the ADCS-CGIC accurately reflects changes in cognitive and functional domains measured by other tools; it captures changes not assessed by domain-specific instruments. Cognitive alterations show greatest correlation with total CGIC. These results may assist in analyzing and interpreting CGIC results in other trials.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/uso terapêutico , Fenilcarbamatos/administração & dosagem , Fenilcarbamatos/uso terapêutico , Administração Cutânea , Administração Oral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comportamento , Cápsulas , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Processos Mentais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rivastigmina , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 24(3): 256-63, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20592583

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: This report describes a pilot study to evaluate feasibility of new home-based assessment technologies applicable to clinical trials for prevention of cognitive loss and Alzheimer disease. METHODS: Community-dwelling nondemented individuals >or=75 years old were recruited and randomized to 1 of 3 assessment methodologies: (1) mail-in questionnaire/ live telephone interviews (MIP); (2) automated telephone with interactive voice recognition (IVR); and (3) internet-based computer Kiosk (KIO). Brief versions of cognitive and noncognitive outcomes were adapted to the different methodologies and administered at baseline and 1-month. An Efficiency measure, consisting of direct staff-to-participant time required to complete assessments, was also compared across arms. RESULTS: Forty-eight out of 60 screened participants were randomized. The dropout rate across arms from randomization through 1-month was different: 33% for KIO, 25% for IVR, and 0% for MIP (Fisher Exact Test P=0.04). Nearly all participants who completed baseline also completed 1-month assessment (38 out of 39). The 1-way ANOVA across arms for total staff-to-participant direct contact time (ie, training, baseline, and 1-month) was significant: F (2,33)=4.588; P=0.017, with lowest overall direct time in minutes for IVR (Mn=44.4; SD=21.5), followed by MIP (Mn=74.9; SD=29.9), followed by KIO (Mn=129.4; SD=117.0). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of older individuals, a higher dropout rate occurred in those assigned to the high-technology assessment techniques; however, once participants had completed baseline in all 3 arms, they continued participation through 1 month. High-technology home-based assessment methods, which do not require live testers, began to emerge as more time-efficient over the brief time of this pilot, despite initial time-intensive participant training.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/métodos , Idoso , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Projetos Piloto , Consulta Remota/instrumentação , Consulta Remota/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Telefone , Interface Usuário-Computador
13.
Alzheimers Dement ; 6(2): 89-97, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20298968

RESUMO

Among the major impediments to the design of clinical trials for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most critical is the lack of validated biomarkers, assessment tools, and algorithms that would facilitate identification of asymptomatic individuals with elevated risk who might be recruited as study volunteers. Thus, the Leon Thal Symposium 2009 (LTS'09), on October 27-28, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada, was convened to explore strategies to surmount the barriers in designing a multisite, comparative study to evaluate and validate various approaches for detecting and selecting asymptomatic people at risk for cognitive disorders/dementia. The deliberations of LTS'09 included presentations and reviews of different approaches (algorithms, biomarkers, or measures) for identifying asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for AD who would be candidates for longitudinal or prevention studies. The key nested recommendations of LTS'09 included: (1) establishment of a National Database for Longitudinal Studies as a shared research core resource; (2) launch of a large collaborative study that will compare multiple screening approaches and biomarkers to determine the best method for identifying asymptomatic people at risk for AD; (3) initiation of a Global Database that extends the concept of the National Database for Longitudinal Studies for longitudinal studies beyond the United States; and (4) development of an educational campaign that will address public misconceptions about AD and promote healthy brain aging.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/prevenção & controle , Bases de Dados como Assunto/normas , Cooperação Internacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Sistema de Registros/normas , Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Biomarcadores/análise , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Desenho de Fármacos , Educação em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Medição de Risco
14.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 23(3): 260-7, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19812469

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) was modified for use in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) trials and tested in the ADCS MCI randomized clinical trial of donepezil, vitamin E, and placebo. We assessed feasibility for its use by determining whether or not: (1) it distinguished a medication effect at 6 months and 12 months, (2) baseline demographic or clinical characteristics predicted change, (3) there was an association between MCI-CGIC and change in other clinical measures in order to evaluate external or concurrent validity. METHODS: We used a generalized estimating equations approach for ordinal outcome data to test the effects of treatment, baseline characteristics, and change in clinical measures on the MCI-CGIC over 12 months, and ordinal logistic regression to assess the association between MCI-CGIC and change in clinical measures at 6 months and 12 months. RESULTS: On the MCI-CGIC overall, 12.9% and 10.6% were rated as having improved, and 31.6% and 39.8% as having worsened over 6 months and 12 months, respectively. The MCI-CGIC did not distinguish the donepezil or vitamin E groups from placebo at 6 and 12 months treatment. Variables at screening or baseline that were associated with worse CGIC scores over 6 and 12 months included white race, greater years of education, worse depression, dementia severity rating, cognitive, and daily activities scores, and lower memory domain scores on a neuropsychological battery. Rate of worsening on the MCI-CGIC over 12 months was associated with change on the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive and on executive function. Worsening at 6 months and 12 months, separately, were associated with the corresponding change in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive, Activities of Daily Living, Beck Depression Inventory, Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes, memory, and executive function. CONCLUSIONS: Change detected by the MCI-CGIC was associated with baseline clinical severity and with change in clinical ratings over 6 and 12 months, supporting the validity of a CGIC approach in MCI. The effect size of the donepezil-placebo difference was similar to that of other outcomes at 12 months. About 40% of MCI patients were judged worse and about 11% improved, consistent with clinical experience and other ratings.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Colinesterase/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Cognitivos/tratamento farmacológico , Indanos/uso terapêutico , Memória/efeitos dos fármacos , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Atividades Cotidianas , Doença de Alzheimer/prevenção & controle , Antioxidantes/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Donepezila , Humanos , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Vitamina E/uso terapêutico
15.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 23(2): 91-101, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19474567

RESUMO

The neuropsychologic test battery from the Uniform Data Set (UDS) of the Alzheimer's Disease Centers (ADC) program of the National Institute on Aging consists of brief measures of attention, processing speed, executive function, episodic memory, and language. This paper describes development of the battery and preliminary data from the initial UDS evaluation of 3268 clinically cognitively normal men and women collected over the first 24 months of utilization. The subjects represent a sample of community-dwelling, individuals who volunteer for studies of cognitive aging. Subjects were considered "clinically cognitively normal" based on clinical assessment, including the Clinical Dementia Rating scale and the Functional Assessment Questionnaire. The results demonstrate performance on tests sensitive to cognitive aging and to the early stages of Alzheimer disease in a relatively well-educated sample. Regression models investigating the impact of age, education, and sex on test scores indicate that these variables will need to be incorporated in subsequent normative studies. Future plans include: (1) determining the psychometric properties of the battery; (2) establishing normative data, including norms for different ethnic minority groups; and (3) conducting longitudinal studies on cognitively normal subjects, individuals with mild cognitive impairment, and individuals with Alzheimer disease and other forms of dementia.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento/psicologia , Doença de Alzheimer , Cognição/classificação , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Neuropsicológicos/normas , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Coleta de Dados/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , National Institute on Aging (U.S.)/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Neuropsicológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos
16.
Alzheimers Dement ; 5(5): 369-74, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19751915

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Language impairment is one of the most troublesome manifestations of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The objective of this post hoc analysis was to assess the treatment effects of Memantine on language in patients with moderate to severe AD, using the recently developed Severe Impairment Battery-Language (SIB-L) scale. METHODS: From a combined database including four Memantine clinical trials in moderate-to-severe AD, we analyzed 801 patients with SIB-L scores of <38 and Mini-Mental State Examination scores of <15. Patients were treated with either 20 mg Memantine per day or placebo. Mean changes in SIB-L scores from baseline were calculated. For responder analyses, a change in SIB-L score greater than or equal to the SIB-L measurement error of 3.7 points was considered a clinically relevant response. RESULTS: The mean change from baseline in SIB-L score at week 12 and weeks 24/28 (study end) significantly favored Memantine over placebo treatment (P < .0001 and P = .0182, respectively). Overall, more Memantine-treated patients than placebo-treated patients benefited from treatment. The effect was especially pronounced in patients with substantial language impairment on the SIB-L (baseline score,

Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Transtornos da Linguagem/tratamento farmacológico , Memantina/uso terapêutico , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Transtornos da Linguagem/psicologia , Masculino , Entrevista Psiquiátrica Padronizada , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Alzheimers Dement ; 5(5): 375-9, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19751916

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Communication problems are common in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, but instruments to assess these symptoms are limited. Our objective was to create a new scale, based on the language subscale of the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), as a sensitive and reliable measurement of treatment effects on language performance. METHODS: All 24 items of the SIB language subscale were chosen for analysis. Baseline scores of 1320 moderate-to-severe patients (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score, <15), from a combined AD database of four Memantine clinical trials (Study Codes: IE-2101, MEM-MD-01, MEM-MD-02, and MRZ-9605), were used for item reduction according to a standard principal components factor analysis. All items with loadings >0.5 on the identified factors were selected for inclusion in the new language scale. Correlations with existing AD scales were examined. RESULTS: The analysis indicated six factors, with 21 of 24 items showing loadings >0.5. The resulting 21-item SIB Language (SIB-L) scale exhibited high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.809). The maximal SIB-L score was 41 points, with a measurement error of 3.7 points. The stratification of baseline SIB-L scores (mean, 31.7; SD, 8.4) by MMSE scores (mean, 9.7; SD, 3.3) showed a high variance in SIB-L scores. This confirms that patients with a low MMSE score can possess preserved language abilities. The SIB-L scale did not exhibit substantial floor-and-ceiling effects. CONCLUSIONS: The new SIB-L is a fast (<15 minutes) and easily administered scale with favorable psychometric characteristics for assessing language impairment and treatment effects on the language performance of patients with moderate to severe AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Avaliação da Deficiência , Transtornos da Linguagem/diagnóstico , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/classificação , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/classificação , Transtornos Cognitivos/psicologia , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Transtornos da Linguagem/classificação , Transtornos da Linguagem/psicologia , Masculino , Entrevista Psiquiátrica Padronizada/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicometria , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
18.
Alzheimers Dement ; 5(2): 182-96, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19328456

RESUMO

The purpose of the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable meeting was to discuss the potential of finding diagnostic tools to determine the earliest risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, drugs approved for AD address symptoms which are generally manifest after the disease is already well-established, but there is a growing pipeline of drugs that may alter the underlying pathology and therefore slow or halt progression of the disease. As these drugs become available, it will become increasingly imperative that those at risk for AD be detected and possibly treated early, especially given recent indications that the disease process may start decades before the first clinical symptoms are recognized. Early detection must go hand-in-hand with qualified tools to determine the efficacy of drugs in people who may be asymptomatic or who have only very mild symptoms of the disease. Devising strategies and screening tools to identify and monitor those at risk in order to perform "prevention" trials is seen by many as a top public-health priority, made all the more urgent by an impending growth in the elderly population worldwide.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Idoso , Envelhecimento/patologia , Doença de Alzheimer/prevenção & controle , Biomarcadores/análise , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Progressão da Doença , Diagnóstico Precoce , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/tendências , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas
19.
Alzheimers Dement ; 5(2): 85-92, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19328434

RESUMO

This document proposes an array of recommendations for a National Plan of Action to accelerate the discovery and development of therapies to delay or prevent the onset of disabling symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. A number of key scientific and public-policy needs identified in this document will be incorporated by the Alzheimer Study Group into a broader National Alzheimer's Strategic Plan, which will be presented to the 111th Congress and the Obama administration in March 2009. The Alzheimer's Strategic Plan is expected to include additional recommendations for governance, family support, healthcare, and delivery of social services.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/fisiopatologia , Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Academias e Institutos , Idoso , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/economia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Desenho de Fármacos , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria Farmacêutica/normas , Governo Federal , Política de Saúde/economia , Política de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Sistema de Registros/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estados Unidos
20.
N Engl J Med ; 352(23): 2379-88, 2005 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15829527

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment is a transitional state between the cognitive changes of normal aging and early Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: In a double-blind study, we evaluated subjects with the amnestic subtype of mild cognitive impairment. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 2000 IU of vitamin E daily, 10 mg of donepezil daily, or placebo for three years. The primary outcome was clinically possible or probable Alzheimer's disease; secondary outcomes were cognition and function. RESULTS: A total of 769 subjects were enrolled, and possible or probable Alzheimer's disease developed in 212. The overall rate of progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease was 16 percent per year. As compared with the placebo group, there were no significant differences in the probability of progression to Alzheimer's disease in the vitamin E group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.41; P=0.91) or the donepezil group (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.57 to 1.13; P=0.42) during the three years of treatment. Prespecified analyses of the treatment effects at 6-month intervals showed that as compared with the placebo group, the donepezil group had a reduced likelihood of progression to Alzheimer's disease during the first 12 months of the study (P=0.04), a finding supported by the secondary outcome measures. Among carriers of one or more apolipoprotein E epsilon4 alleles, the benefit of donepezil was evident throughout the three-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in the rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease between the vitamin E and placebo groups at any point, either among all patients or among apolipoprotein E epsilon4 carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin E had no benefit in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Although donepezil therapy was associated with a lower rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease during the first 12 months of treatment, the rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease after three years was not lower among patients treated with donepezil than among those given placebo.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/prevenção & controle , Inibidores da Colinesterase/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Cognitivos/tratamento farmacológico , Indanos/uso terapêutico , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Vitamina E/uso terapêutico , Doença de Alzheimer/genética , Apolipoproteína E4 , Apolipoproteínas E/genética , Inibidores da Colinesterase/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença , Donepezila , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Indanos/efeitos adversos , Nootrópicos/efeitos adversos , Nootrópicos/uso terapêutico , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Falha de Tratamento , Vitamina E/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa