RESUMO
Humans accurately identify observed actions despite large dynamic changes in their retinal images and a variety of visual presentation formats. A large network of brain regions in primates participates in the processing of others' actions, with the anterior intraparietal area (AIP) playing a major role in routing information about observed manipulative actions (OMAs) to the other nodes of the network. This study investigated whether the AIP also contributes to invariant coding of OMAs across different visual formats. We recorded AIP neuronal activity from two macaques while they observed videos portraying seven manipulative actions (drag, drop, grasp, push, roll, rotate, squeeze) in four visual formats. Each format resulted from the combination of two actor's body postures (standing, sitting) and two viewpoints (lateral, frontal). Out of 297 recorded units, 38% were OMA-selective in at least one format. Robust population code for viewpoint and actor's body posture emerged shortly after stimulus presentation, followed by OMA selectivity. Although we found no fully invariant OMA-selective neuron, we discovered a population code that allowed us to classify action exemplars irrespective of the visual format. This code depends on a multiplicative mixing of signals about OMA identity and visual format, particularly evidenced by a set of units maintaining a relatively stable OMA selectivity across formats despite considerable rescaling of their firing rate depending on the visual specificities of each format. These findings suggest that the AIP integrates format-dependent information and the visual features of others' actions, leading to a stable readout of observed manipulative action identity.
Assuntos
Macaca/fisiologia , Neurônios/fisiologia , Lobo Parietal/fisiologia , Percepção Visual , Animais , Comportamento Animal , Feminino , Masculino , Lobo Parietal/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Based on neural tracer injections we found evidence for 3 connectionally distinct sectors of the dorsal part of the macaque prefrontal area 46 (46d), located at different rostro-caudal levels. Specifically, a rostral sector displayed an almost exclusive and extensive intraprefrontal connectivity and extraprefrontal connections limited to superior temporal areas and the caudal cingulate area 31. Conversely, both a middle and a caudal sector were characterized by robust, topographically organized connections with parietal and frontal sensorimotor areas. Both these sectors shared connections with caudal and medial superior parietal areas (V6A and PGm) where visuospatial information is combined with gaze- and arm-related signals for visuomotor control of arm reaching and/or eye movements. However, the caudal sector was preferentially connected to parietal and frontal oculomotor areas, whereas the middle one was preferentially connected to skeletomotor, mostly arm-related, parietal and premotor areas. The present study provides evidence for a rostro-caudal organization of area 46d similar to that described for the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, in which more caudal areas are relatively more directly involved in controlling different aspects of motor behavior and more rostral areas are most likely involved in higher order, possibly more abstract, cognitive functions.
Assuntos
Rede Nervosa/fisiologia , Lobo Parietal/fisiologia , Córtex Pré-Frontal/fisiologia , Animais , Função Executiva/fisiologia , Feminino , Macaca fascicularis , Masculino , Rede Nervosa/química , Lobo Parietal/química , Córtex Pré-Frontal/químicaRESUMO
Current knowledge regarding the processing of observed manipulative actions (OMAs) (e.g., grasping, dragging, or dropping) is limited to grasping and underlying neural circuitry remains controversial. Here, we addressed these issues by combining chronic neuronal recordings along the anteroposterior extent of monkeys' anterior intraparietal (AIP) area with tracer injections into the recorded sites. We found robust neural selectivity for 7 distinct OMAs, particularly in the posterior part of AIP (pAIP), where it was associated with motor coding of grip type and own-hand visual feedback. This cluster of functional properties appears to be specifically grounded in stronger direct connections of pAIP with the temporal regions of the ventral visual stream and the prefrontal cortex, as connections with skeletomotor related areas and regions of the dorsal visual stream exhibited opposite or no rostrocaudal gradients. Temporal and prefrontal areas may provide visual and contextual information relevant for manipulative action processing. These results revise existing models of the action observation network, suggesting that pAIP constitutes a parietal hub for routing information about OMA identity to the other nodes of the network.
Assuntos
Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Neurônios/fisiologia , Lobo Parietal/fisiologia , Percepção Visual/fisiologia , Potenciais de Ação , Animais , Feminino , Mãos , Macaca mulatta , Masculino , Vias Neurais/fisiologia , Neurônios/citologia , Lobo Parietal/anatomia & histologia , Córtex Pré-Frontal/anatomia & histologia , Córtex Pré-Frontal/fisiologia , Lobo Temporal/anatomia & histologia , Lobo Temporal/fisiologiaRESUMO
The pre-supplementary motor area F6 is involved in a variety of functions in multiple domains, from planning/withholding goal-directed actions in space to rule-based cognitive processes and social interactions. Yet, the neural machinery underlying this functional heterogeneity remains unclear. Here, we measured local population dynamics in different rostro-caudal sites of cytoarchitectonically verified area F6 in two monkeys during spatial, contextual and motor processes, both in individual and social conditions. Then, we correlated multimodal population tuning with local anatomical connectivity revealed by neural tracer injections into the functionally characterized sites. We found stronger tuning for object position relative to the monkey in the rostral portion of area F6 than in its caudal part, which in turn exhibits stronger tuning to self and other's (observed) action. Functional specificities were associated with a rostro-caudal transition in connectivity strength from lateral prefrontal cortex, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and associative striatum (rostrally), to dorso-ventral premotor areas and the motor putamen (caudally). These findings suggest that the functional heterogeneity of the pre-supplementary area F6 is accounted for by gradual transitions in functional properties grounded on local cortico-cortical and cortico-striatal connectional specificities.