RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The indications of daptomycin have been extended to off-label indications including prosthesis-related infection, and bone and joint infection (BJI). However, efficacy and safety have not been thoroughly demonstrated compared with the standard of care. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the treatment effect of daptomycin and glycopeptides for complicated infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing daptomycin and standard of care for Gram-positive infections, published until 30 June 2021. The primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical and microbiological success. The main safety outcome was any severe adverse event (SAE) (grade â≥3). RESULTS: Overall, eight RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, totalling 1095 patients. Six (75%) were in complicated skin and soft-structure infections, one (12.5%) in bacteraemia and one (12.5%) in a BJI setting. Six RCTs used vancomycin as a comparator and two used either vancomycin or teicoplanin. All-cause mortality and clinical cure were not different between groups. The microbiological cure rate was superior in patients who received daptomycin [risk ratio (RR)â=â1.17 (95% CI: 1.01-1.35)]. The risk of SAEs [RRâ=â0.57 (95% CI: 0.36-0.90)] was lower in the daptomycin arm. CONCLUSIONS: While daptomycin is associated with a significantly lower risk of SAEs and a better microbiological eradication, substantial uncertainty remains about the best treatment strategy in the absence of good-quality evidence, especially in bacteraemia and endocarditis where further RCTs should be conducted.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Daptomicina , Glicopeptídeos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Daptomicina/uso terapêutico , Daptomicina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/mortalidade , Glicopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Glicopeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Vancomicina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
There is a strong rationale for using phages in patients with bone and joint infections (BJIs). Indeed, specific phages can infect and replicate in bacterial pathogens and have also demonstrated their activity in vitro against biofilm produced by different bacteria. However, there is a high variability of the different clinical forms of BJI, and their management is complex and frequently includes surgery followed by the administration of antibiotics. Regardless of the availability of active phages, optimal ways of phage administration in patients with BJIs are unknown. Otherwise, all BJIs are not relevant for phage therapy. Except for diabetic foot infection, a BJI with bone exposure is potentially not a relevant indication for phage therapy. On the counterpart, prosthetic joint infections in patients for whom a multidisciplinary expert team judges a conservative approach as the best option to keep the patient's function seem to be a relevant indication with the hypothesis that phage therapy could increase the rate of infection control. The ESCMID Study Group for Non-traditional Antibacterial Therapy (ESGNTA) was created in 2022. One century after the first use of phages as a therapy, the phage therapy 2.0 era, with the possibility to evaluate personalized phage therapy in modern medicine and orthopedic surgery, is just open.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas , Bacteriófagos , Terapia por Fagos , Humanos , Bactérias , Controle de Infecções , Biofilmes , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/terapia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologiaRESUMO
The treatment of musculoskeletal infections (MSIs), including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and fracture-related infection (FRI), is often complicated by biofilm-related challenges necessitating multiple revision surgeries and incurring substantial costs. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) adds to the complexity of the problem, leading to increased morbidity and healthcare expenses. There is an urgent need for novel antibacterial strategies, with the World Health Organization endorsing non-traditional approaches like bacteriophage (phage) therapy. Phage therapy, involving the targeted application of lytic potent phages, shows promise in the treatment of MSIs. Although historical clinical trials and recent case studies present significant milestones in the evolution of phage therapy over the past century, challenges persist, including variability in study designs, administration protocols and phage selection. Efforts to enhance treatment efficacy consist of personalized phage therapy and combination with antibiotics. Future perspectives entail addressing regulatory barriers, standardizing treatment protocols, and conducting high-quality clinical trials to establish phage therapy's efficacy for the treatment of MSIs. Initiatives like the PHAGEFORCE study and the PHAGEinLYON Clinic programme aim to streamline phage therapy, facilitating personalized treatment approaches and systematic data collection to advance its clinical utility in these challenging infections.
RESUMO
Background: Ceftaroline fosamil is approved for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP); however, data on its real-world use and effectiveness in Europe and Latin America are currently limited. This retrospective observational study assessed ceftaroline fosamil use and treatment outcomes in adults hospitalized with cSSTI or CAP treated with ceftaroline fosamil in a usual care setting in Europe and Latin America. Results for patients with cSSTI are reported. Methods: Data from patients with cSSTI who received ≥4 consecutive intravenous ceftaroline fosamil doses up to May 31, 2019, were collected from sites in Brazil, Colombia, France, Greece, Italy, and Spain. Patient characteristics, clinical management, hospitalization information, microbiological diagnosis, and clinical responses were summarized descriptively. Healthcare resource use variables were evaluated by clinical response to ceftaroline fosamil. Results: Data for 132 patients were included (58.3% male; mean age 58.5 years). Most common lesions were cellulitis/fasciitis (62.1%), abscess (34.1%), and post-surgical wounds (19.7%). Pathogens most frequently identified were methicillin-resistant (18.2%) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (17.4%). Median (range) ceftaroline fosamil treatment duration was 8 (2-60) days (daily doses of 1200 [400-2400] mg); 78 patients (59.1%) received monotherapy. In total, 75 (56.8%) patients had additional antibiotics after ceftaroline fosamil. Clinical response occurred in 118 (89.4%) patients. All-cause 30-day readmission occurred in 13 (9.8%) patients, and all-cause 30-day mortality in 7 (5.3%). Clinical response to ceftaroline was associated with >25% shorter length of hospital and intensive care stay, and with ~40% lower hospital costs, versus non-responders. Conclusion: Ceftaroline fosamil was effective in treating adults with cSSTI and clinical response to ceftaroline fosamil was associated with reductions in healthcare resource use compared with non-responders, in Europe and Latin America. Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT04198571.
RESUMO
Background: This multicentre, observational, retrospective chart review study assessed ceftaroline fosamil treatment patterns and outcomes in adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in usual care settings. Methods: Anonymized patient data were extracted from hospital records of adults with CAP who received ≥4 consecutive IV ceftaroline fosamil doses at sites in Brazil, Colombia, France, Greece, Italy, Russia and Spain. Results: The dataset included 185 patients (58.9% male; mean age 62.2â years), of whom 128 (69.2%) had severe CAP defined by CURB-65, PSI/PORT score or physician judgement. Streptococcus pneumoniae (nâ=â44; 23.8%) and Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA (nâ=â15) and MRSA (nâ=â14)] were the most frequently identified pathogens. Clinical response occurred in 151 (81.6%) patients overall, and in 104 (81.3%) severe CAP patients. Response within ≤4 and >4â days occurred in 79 (42.7%) and 62 (33.5%) patients (unknown, nâ=â10), respectively. Twenty (10.8%) patients required readmission within 30â days. Thirty-day all-cause mortality rates were 9.7% (nâ=â18) overall and 10.2% (nâ=â13) in severe CAP. In sensitivity analysis using ICU admission as a more objective marker of severe CAP (nâ=â75), clinical response and 30â day mortality occurred in 57 (76.0%) and 10 (13.3%) patients, respectively. Overall, clinical response to ceftaroline fosamil was associated with >60% shorter length of ICU stay (3.6 versus 9.2â days), and >30% lower hospital costs ($8449 versus $12â559) versus non-responders. Conclusions: Ceftaroline fosamil was effective in treating adults with CAP, including severe CAP, in Europe and Latin America. Clinical response to ceftaroline fosamil was associated with reductions in healthcare resource use compared with non-responders.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The dosage of daptomycin is usually based on body weight. However, it has been shown that this approach yields too high an exposure in obese patients. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic indexes (PK/PD) have been proposed for daptomycin's antibacterial effect (AUC/CMI >666) and toxicity (C0 > 24.3 mg/L). We previously developed machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict starting doses based on Monte Carlo simulations. We propose a new way to perform probability of target attainment based on an ML algorithm to predict the daptomycin starting dose. METHODS: The Dvorchik model of daptomycin was implemented in the mrgsolve R package and 4950 pharmacokinetic profiles were simulated with doses ranging from 4 to 12 mg/kg. We trained and benchmarked four machine learning algorithms and selected the best to iteratively search for the optimal dose of daptomycin maximizing the event (AUC/CMI > 666 and C0 < 24.3 mg/L). The ML algorithm was evaluated in simulations and an external database of real patients in comparison with population pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: The performance of the Xgboost algorithms developed to predict the event (ROC AUC) in the training and test set were 0.762 and 0.761, respectively. The most important prediction variables were dose, creatinine clearance, body weight and sex. In the external database of real patients, the starting dose administered based on the ML algorithm significantly improved the target attainment by 7.9% (p-value = 0.02929) in comparison with the dose administered based on body weight. CONCLUSION: The developed algorithm improved the target attainment for daptomycin in comparison with weight-based dosing. We built a Shiny app to calculate the optimal starting dose.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Antibacterianos , Daptomicina , Aprendizado de Máquina , Daptomicina/farmacocinética , Daptomicina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Modelos Biológicos , Peso Corporal , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Método de Monte Carlo , Simulação por Computador , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , IdosoRESUMO
Serological studies of COVID-19 convalescent patients have identified polyclonal lineage-specific and cross-reactive antibodies (Abs), with varying effector functions against virus variants. Individual specificities of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Abs and their impact on infectivity by other variants have been little investigated to date. Here, we dissected at a monoclonal level neutralizing and enhancing Abs elicited by early variants and how they affect infectivity of emerging variants. B cells from 13 convalescent patients originally infected by D614G or Alpha variants were immortalized to isolate 445 naturally-produced anti-SARS-CoV-2 Abs. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were tested for their abilities to impact the cytopathic effect of D614G, Delta, and Omicron (BA.1) variants. Ninety-eight exhibited robust neutralization against at least one of the three variant types, while 309 showed minimal or no impact on infectivity. Thirty-eight mAbs enhanced infectivity of SARS-CoV-2. Infection with D614G/Alpha variants generated variant-specific (65 neutralizing Abs, 35 enhancing Abs) and cross-reactive (18 neutralizing Abs, 3 enhancing Abs) mAbs. Interestingly, among the neutralizing mAbs with cross-reactivity restricted to two of the three variants tested, none demonstrated specific neutralization of the Delta and Omicron variants. In contrast, cross-reactive mAbs enhancing infectivity (n = 3) were found exclusively specific to Delta and Omicron variants. Notably, two mAbs that amplified in vitro the cytopathic effect of the Delta variant also exhibited neutralization against Omicron. These findings shed light on functional diversity of cross-reactive Abs generated during SARS-CoV-2 infection and illustrate how the balance between neutralizing and enhancing Abs facilitate variant emergence.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Anticorpos Bloqueadores , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Anticorpos Antivirais , Glicoproteína da Espícula de CoronavírusRESUMO
No consensus exists about the techniques to use for microbiological diagnosis of bone and joint infections (BJIs). The objective herein was to define an algorithm to optimize BJI diagnosis in adults using various bacteriological methods on synovial fluid samples. This prospective multi-center study included 423 synovial fluids collected from adult patients with suspected BJIs. Culture (using five solid media, an enrichment broth, and blood culture bottles), universal 16S rRNA PCR followed by Sanger sequencing, and seven specific bacterial PCRs were systematically performed. Combinations of methods were compared to arrive at the optimized algorithm. Among 423 synovial fluids, 242 infections were diagnosed (57.2â¯%): 213 mono- and 29 poly-microbial for a total of 284 bacteria (staphylococci at 54.6â¯%, streptococci-enterococci at 16.5â¯%, Gram-negative bacilli at 15.5â¯%, anaerobic species at 8.8â¯%). Comparing culture techniques, blood culture bottles had the highest sensitivity (67.6â¯% for pediatric and 63.9â¯% for anaerobic bottles) but are not sufficient alone and require being combined with solid media. The 16S rDNA PCR detected only 52.3â¯% of the bacteria, whereas specific PCRs had a higher sensitivity (Staphylococcus spp. at 66.2â¯%, S. aureus at 85.2â¯%, Streptococcus spp. at 91.2â¯%). Based on these results, an algorithm was proposed associating three solid media; inoculation into blood culture bottles; and 16S, Staphylococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp. PCRs, which would have detected 90.5â¯% of bacteria in the present cohort versus 79.2â¯% using all culture techniques on synovial fluid. This prospective study shows that a combination of culture and molecular methods on synovial fluids allows the optimization of bacterial detection.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: While tuberculosis remains a significant global health concern, prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) caused by members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex are exceptionally rare. Our objective is to perform a retrospective search of new cases of this disease and analyze all cases available in the literature of tuberculous PJIs, aiming to detect factors that may influence patient outcomes. METHODS: The ESGIAI and ESGMYC study groups were used to collect information on non-published cases of tuberculous prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Additionally, a literature review of all published cases of tuberculous PJIs was conducted. All identified cases in the retrospective study and in the literature review were merged and included in the statistical analysis, involving both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Fifteen previously unreported cases of tuberculous prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) from four countries were detailed. Among them, ten patients were female, with a median age of 76 years. The hip was affected in 13 cases. Seven patients experienced co-infection with another microorganism. Treatment approaches varied, with 13 patients undergoing implant removal, one treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), and one case was treated with an unknown treatment method. All patients received antibiotic therapy and achieved a cure. The literature review that was conducted detected 155 published cases. Univariate analysis revealed a statistical significance for previous tuberculosis, joint, and no importance of surgery for cure. CONCLUSIONS: Tuberculous prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare condition, typically presenting as a localized chronic infection. Antibiotic treatment is essential for the management of these patients, but neither surgical treatment nor duration of treatment seems to have importance in the outcome.
RESUMO
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the main causes of healthcare-associated infection in Europe that increases patient morbidity and mortality. Multi-resistant pathogens are a major public health issue in burn centers. Mortality increases when the initial antibiotic treatment is inappropriate, especially if the patient is infected with P. aeruginosa strains that are resistant to many antibiotics. Phage therapy is an emerging option to treat severe P. aeruginosa infections. It involves using natural viruses called bacteriophages, which have the ability to infect, replicate, and, theoretically, destroy the P. aeruginosa population in an infected patient. We report here the case of a severely burned patient who experienced relapsing ventilator-associated pneumonia associated with skin graft infection and bacteremia due to extensively drug-resistant P. aeruginosa. The patient was successfully treated with personalized nebulized and intravenous phage therapy in combination with immunostimulation (interferon-γ) and last-resort antimicrobial therapy (imipenem-relebactam).