Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology.

The Impella device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pump that is currently used for (1) cardiogenic shock, (2) left ventricular unloading (combination of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella concept), (3) high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions, (4) ablation of ventricular tachycardia, and (5) treatment of right ventricular failure. Impella-assisted forward blood flow increased mean arterial pressure and cardiac output, peripheral tissue perfusion, and coronary blood flow in observational studies and some randomized trials. However, because of the need for large-bore femoral access (14 F for the commonly used Impella CP device) and anticoagulation, the incidences of bleeding and ischemic complications are as much as 44% and 18%, respectively. Hemolysis is reported in as many as 32% of patients and stroke in as many as 13%. Despite the rapidly growing use of the Impella device, there are still insufficient data on its effect on outcome and complications on the basis of large, adequately powered randomized controlled trials. The only 2 small and also underpowered randomized controlled trials in cardiogenic shock comparing Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump did not show improved mortality. Several larger randomized controlled trials are currently recruiting patients or are in preparation in cardiogenic shock (DanGer Shock [Danish-German Cardiogenic Shock Trial; NCT01633502]), left ventricular unloading (DTU-STEMI [Door-To-Unload in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction; NCT03947619], UNLOAD ECMO [Left Ventricular Unloading to Improve Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on VA-ECMO], and REVERSE [A Prospective Randomised Trial of Early LV Venting Using Impella CP for Recovery in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Managed With VA ECMO; NCT03431467]) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PROTECT IV [Impella-Supported PCI in High-Risk Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease and Reduced Left Ventricular Function; NCT04763200]).

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 in primary care health care workers assessed by antibody testing.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused a pandemic threat of public health during the last month causing more than 10 million infections and 500 000 deceased patients worldwide. Nevertheless, data about risk of infection for health care workers are sparse. METHODS: In a large primary care facility, 151 workers underwent SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) testing. In addition, participants had to complete a survey regarding symptoms and their individual risk of infection. RESULTS: Symptoms suspicious for COVID-19 occurred in 72%, fever in 25% of all subjects. Four workers (2.6%, 95% confidence interval 0.8-7.1%) had a positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. None of these was free from COVID-19 suspicious symptoms. Source of infection was presumably professional in three of four individuals. CONCLUSION: Our systematic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of health care workers in a large outpatient centre revealed an apparently low rate of 2.6% past SARS-CoV-2 infections. Relative risk for infection following health care profession cannot be derived as data about infection rates in the corresponding general population are lacking.

Early repolarization pattern is the strongest predictor of arrhythmia recurrence in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: results from a single centre long-term follow-up over 20 years.

AIMS: Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (iVF) accounts for up to 14% of VF incidence. Data regarding long-term outcome and clinical risk markers of arrhythmia recurrence are scarce. The objective of our study was to describe a long-term follow-up (FU) of a cohort of iVF survivors in our centre during the past 20 years, and to investigate the influence of clinical parameters, e.g. presence of an early repolarization pattern (ERP), on recurrence rate of arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five iVF survivors were identified and retrospectively analysed regarding recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) interventions and covariates potentially influencing arrhythmia recurrence. Appropriate ICD interventions occurred in 15 patients (43%) after a median of 6.6 years during a median FU period of 8.8 years. Two patients (13%) received the first appropriate therapy after an assumed average ICD battery longevity of 7 years, while in all other patients, the first therapy occurred within the first ICD period. Appropriate interventions were observed more often and earlier in patients with ERP (HR 3.9; 1.4-11.0; P = 0.01), whereas all other covariates failed to predict subsequent events. A high incidence of inappropriate ICD therapies (67 interventions in 14 patients) could be attributed to the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (66% of all inappropriate therapies). CONCLUSION: The recurrence rate of ventricular arrhythmias in iVF survivors is high and recurrence might occur delayed (>7 years after the initial event). ERP seems to be highly predictive with respect to early arrhythmia recurrence. Our results highlight that better pathophysiologic understanding of ERP might facilitate a better risk stratification before and an optimal treatment after an iVF event. The high rate of AF and ERP in iVF survivors might indicate an underlying heart disease or myocardial electrical disorder not apparent at the index event.

One-year clinical outcome after ablation with a novel multipolar irrigated ablation catheter for treatment of atrial fibrillation: potential implications for clinical use.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, PVI remains a time-consuming procedure. A novel multipolar irrigated radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter (nMARQ™) is aiming to improve PVI. We investigated the influence on procedural parameters and assessed clinical outcomes after PVI using this novel catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF were equally allocated (n = 29/group) to PVI treatment with (i) the novel multipolar ablation catheter (nMARQ™) and (ii) a standard single-tip ablation catheter (SAC). Study endpoints included procedure time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, RF time, number of energy applications, and clinical outcome defined as freedom from AF after a single procedure. Successful PVI was confirmed by a separate circular, multipolar mapping catheter in all patients treated with the nMARQ™. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 100% in the SAC group. In the nMARQ™ group, PVI was suggested in all patients. However, confirmatory mapping revealed persistent pulmonary vein (PV) conduction in 19 out of 29 nMARQ™ patients. These patients underwent further ablation, which still failed to achieve PVI in 5 of the 29 nMARQ™ patients, mainly due to significant temperature rise in the oesophagus and device-related limitations reaching the right inferior PV. Mean fluoroscopy time (31 ± 12 vs. 23 ± 10 min, P < 0.05) and (132 ± 37 vs. 109 ± 30 min, P < 0.05) were longer in nMARQ™ vs. SAC patients. Radiofrequency time was shorter in nMARQ™ vs. SAC group (21 ± 9 vs. 35 ± 12 min, P < 0.001). Radiation dose and the number of energy applications did not differ between both groups. Clinical outcome analysis revealed no significant differences (nMARQ™: 72 vs. SAC: 72%) after a mean follow-up of 373 ± 278 days. CONCLUSION: The use of the nMARQ™ catheter is associated with important device-related limitations to achieve successful PVI. However, clinical outcomes were equivalent in nMARQ™- and SAC-treated patients.

Recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation: is repeat pulmonary vein isolation enough? A prospective, randomized trial.

AIMS: In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF), pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become an accepted treatment option with single procedure success rates of 60-80%. A repeat ablation is performed in ∼30% of patients because of arrhythmia recurrence. The strategy for this repeat procedure is not defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with pAF recurrence after PVI were prospectively randomized and underwent a second ablation procedure with either PVI of all reconnected veins or PVI with an additional left atrial anterior line. Follow-up in our arrhythmia clinic was every 3 months up to 12 months including 7 day Holter monitoring. A total of 77 patients (mean age 63 ± 9 years, 69% males) were included in the analysis. A repeat PVI was performed in 41 patients, PVI + anterior line in 36 patients. After a follow-up of 12 months, 26 of 41 (63%) patients after repeat PVI and 18 of 36 (50%) patients with PVI + anterior line were in stable sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic medication (P = 0.26). In most patients (12 of 15 patients with PVI and 14 of 18 patients with PVI + anterior line) with an arrhythmia recurrence after the second procedure, the recurring arrhythmia was paroxysmal AF. In 2 of 15 patients of the PVI group and in 4 of 18 patients of the PVI + anterior line group atypical flutter was the reoccurring arrhythmia (P = NS). CONCLUSION: In this prospective randomized trial, patients with a recurrence of paroxysmal AF had no better outcome after repeat PVI + one left atrial line compared with patients with repeat PVI only.

Pulmonary vein isolation using new technologies to improve ablation lesion formation: Initial results comparing enhanced catheter tip irrigation (Surround Flow(®)) with contact force measurement (Smarttouch(®)).

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a significant problem in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We report about patients who underwent contact force (CF) guided PVI using CF catheter and compared them to patients with PVI using an ablation catheter with enhanced tip irrigation. METHODS: A total of 59 patients were included in the analysis. In 30 patients circumferential PVI was performed using the Thermocool Smarttouch(®) ablation catheter (ST) whereas in 29 patients circumferential PVI using the Thermocool Surround Flow SF(®) ablation catheter (SF) was performed. Patients were compared in regard to procedure time, fluoroscopy time/dose as well as RF-application duration and completeness of PVI. Adverse events (pericardial effusion, PV stenosis, stroke, death) were evaluated. The presence of sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic medication was assessed during 6 months follow-up using multiple 7 day Holter-ECGs. RESULTS: In both groups, all PVs were isolated without serious adverse events. Procedure time was 2.15 ± 0.5 h (ST) vs. 2.37 ± 1.13 h (SF) (p = 0.19). Duration of RF-applications was 46.6 ± 18 min (ST) and 49.8 ± 19 min (SF) (p = 0.52). Fluoroscopy time was 25.2 ± 13 min (ST) vs. 29 ± 18 min (SF), fluoroscopy dose 2675.6 ± 1658 versus 3038.3 ± 1997 cGym(2) (p = 0.36 and 0.46 respectively). Sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic medication validated with 7 day Holter ECGs was present in both groups in 72% of patients after 6 months of follow up. CONCLUSION: PVI using the new contact force catheter is safe and effective in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Importance of sinus rhythm as endpoint of persistent atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: The endpoint of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if sinus rhythm (SR) as endpoint of persistent AF ablation has a better long-term outcome compared to atrial tachycardia (AT) or AF at the end of the procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2011, 191 consecutive patients undergoing de novo catheter ablation for symptomatic persistent and long-standing persistent AF using a sequential ablation approach (including pulmonary vein isolation, ablation of complex fractionated electrograms and linear lesions) were included in the study. According to the result at the end of ablation procedure, patients were classified into 3 groups: patients with termination of AF into SR (Group 1, n = 62), patients with AT undergoing cardioversion (CV) (Group 2, n = 47), or patients with AF undergoing CV (Group 3, n = 82). The primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months. At 12 months, estimated proportions of patients free from any arrhythmia recurrence were 42% for Group 1, 13% for Group 2, and 25% for Group 3 (P = 0.002). In a Cox regression analysis only termination into SR was associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence (HR: 0.62; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: If SR is achieved as endpoint of persistent and long-standing persistent AF ablation using a sequential ablation approach it is associated with the highest long-term single procedure success rate compared to AT or AF at the end of the procedure.

Acute and long-term outcome after catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in patients after the Mustard or Senning operation for D-transposition of the great arteries.

AIMS: Data about the acute and long-term outcome of catheter ablation in patients with D-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA) post-Mustard/Senning operation are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-centre retrospective analysis includes 26 patients (mean age 28.7 ± 6.7 years, 8 females) after Mustard (n = 15) or Senning (n = 11) operation who underwent catheter ablation for intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia (IART) or atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from January 2004 to May 2011. The electrophysiological studies were performed using a three-dimensional mapping system (CARTO). Remote magnetic navigation (RMN) was available since 2008. Follow-up on an outpatient basis was conducted 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation and yearly thereafter. In the 26 patients, 34 procedures were performed (one procedure n = 19, two n = 6, and three n = 1). Overall, 34 tachycardia forms (IART n = 30; AVNRT n = 4) were ablated manually (n = 25) or by RMN (n = 9). Acute success reached in 29/34 forms (85.3%). Mean fluoroscopy time (FT) was 28.2 ± 20.7 min and mean procedure duration (PD) was 290.9 ± 107.6 min. After a mean follow-up of 34.1 ± 24.5 months, 25/26 (96.2%) patients were free from IART or AVNRT. In the nine RMN ablations (mean follow-up 14.2 ± 5.8 months) acute and long-term success was 100%. Fluoroscopy time and PD were significantly reduced using RMN compared with manual ablation (11.9 ± 6.2 vs. 34.6 ± 20.6 min, 225.7 ± 24.1 vs. 312 ± 118.2 min, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation of IART or AVNRT in patients post-Mustard/Senning operation for d-TGA has a high acute success rate. The recurrence rate for IART is about 30%; however, after a second ablation, long-term results are excellent. Remote magnetic navigation seems to improve single-procedure acute and long-term success and significantly reduces FT and PD.

Association of ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation presentation on ECG with transmurality and size of myocardial infarction as assessed by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: It is the general perception, that ST-elevation myocardial infarction is associated with transmural ischemia while Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction is found in non-transmural subendocardial ischemia. This association, however, derives primarily from post mortem studies. METHODS: A total of 220 patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) who had PCI on admission and contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) within one week were included into the study. Size and transmural extent of MI was quantified by CMR and correlated with the ECG on admission. RESULTS: Based on the ECG findings, 57% were classified as STEMI and 43% as NSTEMI. CMR infarct size was significantly larger in STEMI than NSTEMI (23.2 vs. 14.2 LV%, p<0.001). As assessed by CMR, STEMI patients were transmural in 63% as compared to 27% of patients with NSTEMI (p<0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression model, total infarct size was significantly associated with presence of STEMI (OR: 1.045, 95% CI [1.014-1.077], p=0.004) whereas the number of transmural segments did not significantly add further information for a STEMI/NSTEMI classification (p=0.054, change of c-index from 0.69 to 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: The electrocardiographic STEMI/NSTEMI classification does rather characterize the total size of MI than the transmural extent as assessed by CMR.

Evaluation of a Standardized Training and Adherence Surveillance Programme to Overcome Quality-of-Life Impairments and Enhance Compliance in Patients Treated with Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator.

Background: Treatment with wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCD) is a non-invasive, transient therapy option for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with temporary contraindications for implantation of a permanent cardioverter defibrillator. Due to the constant risk of fatal arrhythmias, compliance is the fundamental requirement for effectiveness of a WCD, but this might be hindered by the poor quality-of-life (QoL) during WCD therapy. In this retrospective single-center study, we examined if a standardized WCD training and adherence surveillance programme could enhance compliance and QoL. Methods: All patients with a prescription for WCD treatment from January 2017 to August 2019 were included and received a standardized WCD training programme. QoL was validated using the modified EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. The findings were compared to a historical, previously published, retrospective cohort from our center (WCD prescription period 03/2012-02/2016), not receiving the additional training programme. Endpoints comprised therapy adherence, arrhythmic episodes, and dimensions of QoL. Results: Ninety-two patients underwent WCD treatment in the study cohort for a median of 49 days. Median daily wear time was enhanced in the study cohort (historical cohort vs study cohort 21.9 vs 23.3 hours/per day, p<0.01) and artefact alarms occurred less frequently (67.9% vs 48.9%, p 0.01). Major restrictions in QoL in the study cohort were found in mobility (48%), daily routine (44%), and sleep (49%), but the dimensions pain (36% vs 4%, p<0.01), mental health (43% vs 29%, p 0.03), and restrictions in daily routine (48% vs 30%, p 0.04) improved. Conclusion: A standardized training and adherence surveillance programme might have beneficial effects on compliance and QoL. As these findings are essential for therapy success, they might potentially lead to a reduction in arrhythmic deaths in upcoming WCD trials.

Effects of contemporary hard- and software mapping and ablation features on acute and long-term success in premature ventricular complex ablation.

BACKGROUND: Current standards of ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVC) combine modern hard- and software mapping and ablation features like multielectrode mapping catheters (MEC), contact force (CF) guided ablation catheters and pattern matching filters (PMF). Benefits of these individual tools were described for selected patients with PVC, but data on combination of these features in the real world setting is sparse. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2021 we retrospectively enrolled 172 consecutive patients undergoing PVC ablation in our center. The utilization of MEC, CF guided ablation catheters and PMF software was analyzed in terms of procedural data, acute and long-term success after 12 months. RESULTS: Acute ablation success was reached in 71% of patients (n = 118) with an overall recurrence rate of 34% after 12 months. PMF software was used in 130 patients (78%), MEC in 131 patients (79%) and ablation was guided using CF in 99 patients (60%). PMF significantly reduced procedural duration and time of radiofrequency application (RF, 150 vs. 185 min, p 0.04 and 325 vs. 556 min, p 0.01). CF enabled significantly shorter radiation time (7.9 vs. 12.3 min, p 0.01), whereas MEC did not influence procedural data. Acute and long-term outcomes were not affected by these modern mapping and ablation features, yet, multivariable regression analysis revealed an underlying cardiomyopathy and the respective focus as independent predictors for recurrence. CONCLUSION: Contemporary hard- and software mapping and ablation features could reduce procedural, radiation and RF time in PVC ablation. Furthermore, patient characteristics rather than technical factors alter outcome of this all-comer collective.

Prevalence, management, and prediction of venous access site occlusion in patients undergoing lead revision surgery.

BACKGROUND: Implantable electronic cardiac devices (CIED) have emerged as an essential component in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure. Due to increased life expectancy, expanding indications and limited technical survival, an increasing number of revision procedures can be anticipated. Venous access site occlusion (VASO) is the main obstacle during revision surgery. In this retrospective study we evaluated the prevalence, predictive parameters and operative management of venous access site occlusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 01/2016 and 12/2020 304 patients underwent lead revision surgery of transvenous CIED in our department. Prevalence of VASO was 25.7% (n = 78), one patient was symptomatic. Independent predicting clinical parameters were male sex (2.86 (1.39-5.87), p < 0.01) and lead age (1.11 (1.05-1.18), p < 0.01)). Revision surgery despite VASO was successful in 97.4% (n = 76) without prolongation of the total surgery time or higher complication rates. Yet, lead extraction was possible in 92% of patients with VASO vs. 98.2% of patients without VASO (p 0.01). CONCLUSION: VASO is a frequent condition in patients undergoing lead revision surgery, but successful revision is feasible in most cases without preceding lead extraction. However, the lower success rates of lead extractions may be prognostically relevant, especially for younger patients.

Prospective assessment of short- and long-term quality of life after ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: This study prospectively assesses different aspects of short- and long-term quality of life (QoL) after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). An analysis of 7 validated generic and tailored questionnaires was performed with regard to the relation of QoL to ablation success. METHODS: The study included 133 patients (74% men, age 57±10) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation ± linear or electrogram-guided substrate modification for AF. QoL was quantitatively assessed at baseline, 3 months after ablation and at a median of 4.3 ± 0.5 years after ablation by the AF severity scale (AFSS), AF symptom checklist (AFSC), WHO-5-Well-Being-Index (WHO), Major Depression Inventory (MDI), Sleep and Vegetative disorder (SV), Vital Exhaustion (VE), and Illness intrusiveness (Ii). RESULTS: QoL was improved significantly 3 months after ablation in all patients (regardless of ablation success or AF type) and stayed significantly improved after a median of 4.3±0.5 years (AFSS, AFSC, WHO, MDI, VE, PE (all P < 0.001), and SV (P = 0.007)). Patients who had a successful ablation improved significantly more than patients with an unsuccessful ablation in the AFSS, AFSC, and MDI questionnaire (delta change from baseline to long-term follow-up P = <0.001, P = <0.001, and P = 0.039, respectively). CONCLUSION: Overall, all patients significantly improved their QoL irrespective of the AF type in all questionnaires 3 months and 4 years after ablation. The increase in QoL was significantly greater in patients who underwent a successful ablation than patients with unsuccessful ablation in the AFSS, AFSC, and MDI questionnaire.

Long-term follow-up after cryoablation for adolescent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: recurrence is not predictable.

AIMS: Data about the long-term outcome after cryoablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in the paediatric population indicate that recurrence rates are higher with cryo than with radiofrequency energy (RF). The purpose of this study was to review our institutional long-term outcome after cryoablation for AVNRT and to seek for predictors of recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (28 female, age 14 ± 2.7 years) undergoing slow-pathway modulation or ablation for AVNRT at our institution from 2004 to 2008 were included in the study.  Acute success was obtained in all patients (100%) with a mean procedure time of 164 ± 50 min and a mean fluoroscopy time of 13 ± 8 min. During a follow-up time of 30 ± 1.9 months, AVNRT recurrence occurred in 11/49 patients (22.4%). Age, sex, number of cryomappings or ablations, catheter tip (4 mm vs. 6 mm), or ablation endpoint (slow-pathway ablation vs. modulation) were not predictive for recurrence. In eight patients, reablation using cryo was performed. All these patients remained free of arrhythmia symptoms during a follow-up of 30 ± 8 months following the second procedure. CONCLUSION: Although cryoablation for the treatment for AVNRT in paediatric and adolescent patients is safe and associated with a high acute success rate, AVNRT recurrence occurs in 22% of patients during long-term follow-up without identifiable predictors for recurrence. A second cryoablation procedure leads to a success rate of 100% during long-term follow-up.

Safety of screening procedures with hand-held metal detectors among patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices: a cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Case reports suggest that the hand-held metal detectors used for security screening generate electromagnetic fields that may interfere with pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) function. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in function of pacemakers and ICDs after exposure to hand-held metal detectors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Two medical centers in Europe. PATIENTS: 388 patients (209 with pacemakers and 179 with ICDs) presenting for routine follow-up of device function between September 2009 and December 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Abnormalities on electrocardiography suggestive of rhythm device malfunction (pacing inhibition, loss of capture, inappropriate mode switch, ventricular oversensing, and spontaneous reprogramming) after 30 seconds of exposure to 2 widely used hand-held metal detectors with a maximal electromagnetic flux density of 6.3 µT. RESULTS: No change in device function, including pacing or sensing abnormalities or device reprogramming, was observed in any patient. LIMITATIONS: The study included a convenience sample of patients, and the number of different device models tested was small. Testing was conducted in 2 clinic settings. CONCLUSION: Hand-held metal detectors did not affect the function of pacemakers or ICDs in this sample. The use of hand-held metal detectors for security screening is probably safe for patients with pacemakers and ICDs, but these findings require confirmation. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Single-center experience of ultra-high-density mapping guided catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation is the treatment of choice for recurrent focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) as medical therapy is limited. Routinely, a three-dimensional mapping system is used. Whether or not optimized signal detection does improve ablation success rates has not yet been investigated. This retrospective cohort study compared ablation procedures using an ultra-high-density mapping system (UHDM, Rhythmia, Boston Scientific) with improved signal detection and automatic annotation with procedures using a conventional electroanatomic mapping system (CEAM, Biosense Webster, CARTO). METHODS: All patients undergoing ablation for FAT using UHDM or CEAM from April 2015 to August 2018 were included. Endpoints comprised procedural parameters, acute success as well as freedom from arrhythmia 12 months after ablation. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients underwent ablation (48 with UHDM, 22 with CEAM). No significant differences were noted for parameters like procedural and radiation duration, area dose, and RF applications. Acute success was significantly higher in the UHDM cohort (89.6% vs. 68.2%, p = .03). Nevertheless, arrhythmia freedom 12 months after ablation was almost identical (56.8% vs. 60%, p = .87), as more patients with acute success of ablation presented with a relapse during follow-up (35.0 vs. 7.7%, p = .05). CONCLUSION: Acute success rate of FAT ablation might be improved by UHDM, without an adverse effect on procedural parameters. Nevertheless, further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanism for increased recurrence rates after acute successful ablation.

Prevalence of pathological arrhythmia in patients triaged to "cardiac arrhythmia" in the emergency department: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms caused by cardiac arrhythmia are common problems that lead to presentation to the emergency department. However, the prevalence of pathological heart rhythm in patients triaged for cardiac arrhythmia in the emergency department remains up to now unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study, patients triaged for cardiac arrhythmia admitted to the interdisciplinary emergency department of the Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital in Munich within 1 year were included. Subsequently, cardiac rhythm in the 12-lead electrocardiogram, clinical presentation, admission rate, and diagnosis at discharge was analyzed. A total of 558 out of 39,798 patients were triaged for cardiac arrhythmia. Of these 42.3% of patients showed a pathological heart rhythm on the initial electrocardiogram (66.9% atrial fibrillation, 16.5% atrial flutter, 16.5% others). About 80% presented in emergency severity index III (many resources are needed without critical vitals) conditions. Sixty-two percent of the pathological electrocardiogram group and 60% of the sinus rhythm group of patients were admitted to the hospital, and 34.7% with pathological electrocardiogram underwent invasive investigations (16.8% in the sinus rhythm group). In 43.4% of patients, the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmia was already known from previous medical contacts. CONCLUSION: A total of 1.8% of patients who presented to our interdisciplinary emergency department were triaged for cardiac arrhythmia. With 49.5%, the hospital admission rate was quite high but the patients presented to the emergency department in our cohort were rarely in critical condition. As a high percentage of our cohort had a history of cardiac arrhythmia, better outpatient management is needed for these patients to reduce emergency department visits and save resources.

Impairment of Quality of Life in Patients with Implanted Subcutaneous Cardioverter Defibrillator (S-ICD) Compared to Implanted Transvenous Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy.

Background: The subcutaneous cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) has been shown to be a viable alternative to transvenous ICDs (TV-ICD) in all patients at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) but without pacing indication. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of therapy with current S-ICD devices on quality of life (QoL) in comparison to patients with TV-ICD devices. Methods: In our single-centre study, 52 consecutive patients with S-ICD and 52 matched patients with TV-ICD were analysed. QoL has been assessed by a standardized questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L, modified). Additionally, clinical baseline and follow-up data were evaluated. Results: Two-thirds of the total study population reported restrictions in daily routine compared to their life before ICD implantation. A total of 27.7% of S-ICD patients stated to expect an improvement of QoL by deactivation or explantation of their defibrillator compared to only 6.4% of patients with TV-ICD (p=0.006), which was mainly caused by discomfort and pain from the S-ICD pocket (relevant discomfort and pain in 32.6% vs 11.5%; p<0.01). Limitations: Main limitation of the study is that quality of life was assessed for one single time point only and time since implantation differed significantly between S-ICD and TV-ICD. Furthermore our collective is younger, and, due to the high proportion of patients without cardiomyopathy, the mean EF is better than usual ICD collective. The absence of heart failure in about the half of our patients might have relevant impact on our QoL analysis. Conclusion: A relevant proportion of S-ICD patients expects an improvement of QoL by explantation of the device. Of note, this impression was not driven by the fear of receiving shocks but mainly by discomfort and pain caused by the pulse generator.