Mixed Gonadal Dysgenesis: A Narrative Literature Review and Clinical Primer for the Urologist.

PURPOSE: Mixed gonadal dysgenesis is a difference of sex development that is often confused with other conditions. Individuals have a 45,X/46,XY karyotype. Gonads are characterized by a streak gonad and a dysgenetic testis at varying levels of descent. Persistent Müllerian structures are typical (eg, hemi-uterus). There is significant phenotypic heterogeneity of the internal and external genitalia that, together with different interpretations of the definition, have contributed to a poor understanding of the condition among pediatric urologists. Mixed gonadal dysgenesis is one manifestation of the 45,X/46,XY karyotype. 45,X/46,XY mosaicism can also be associated with typical female or male external genitalia. This review aims to clarify the mixed gonadal dysgenesis definition and to provide urologists with diagnostic and management considerations for affected individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched 3 medical databases for articles related to mixed gonadal dysgenesis. 287 full-text abstracts and manuscripts were reviewed for content pertinent to: (1) Clarifying the definition of mixed gonadal dysgenesis, and (2) Describing the following related to the care of affected individuals: prenatal and neonatal evaluation and management, genital surgery, gonadal malignancy risk and management, fertility, gender dysphoria/incongruence, puberty and long-term outcomes, systemic comorbidities, and transitional care. RESULTS: 50 articles were included. Key points and implications for each of the above topics were summarized. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed gonadal dysgenesis exists on a wide phenotypic spectrum and management considerations reflect this heterogeneity. Care for individuals with mixed gonadal dysgenesis is complex, and decisions should be made in a multidisciplinary setting with psychological support.

Clinical utility of early rapid genome sequencing in the evaluation of patients with differences of sex development.

Establishing an early and accurate genetic diagnosis among patients with differences of sex development (DSD) is crucial in guiding the complex medical and psychosocial care they require. Genetic testing routinely utilized in clinical practice for this population is predicated upon physical exam findings and biochemical and endocrine profiling. This approach, however, is inefficient and unstandardized. Many patients with DSD, particularly those with 46,XY DSD, never receive a molecular genetic diagnosis. Rapid genome sequencing (rGS) is gaining momentum as a first-tier diagnostic instrument in the evaluation of patients with DSD given its ability to provide greater diagnostic yield and timely results. We present the case of a patient with nonbinary genitalia and systemic findings for whom rGS identified a novel variant of the WT1 gene and resulted in a molecular diagnosis within two weeks of life. This timeframe of diagnosis for syndromic DSD is largely unprecedented at our institution. Rapid GS expedited mobilization of a multidisciplinary medical team; enabled early understanding of clinical trajectory; informed planning of medical and surgical interventions; and guided individualized psychosocial support provided to the family. This case highlights the potential of early rGS in transforming the evaluation and care of patients with DSD.

Co-design and usability of an interactive web-based fertility decision aid for transgender youth and young adults.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a patient- and family-centered Aid For Fertility-Related Medical Decisions (AFFRMED) interactive website targeted for transgender and nonbinary (TNB) youth/young adults and their parents to facilitate shared decision-making about fertility preservation interventions through user-centered participatory design. METHOD: TNB youth/young adults interested in or currently receiving pubertal suppression or gender-affirming hormone treatment and parents of eligible TNB youth/young adults were recruited to participate in a series of iterative human-centered co-design sessions to develop an initial AFFRMED prototype. Subsequently, TNB youth/young adults and parents of TNB youth/young adults were recruited for usability testing interviews, involving measures of usability (i.e., After Scenario Questionnaire, Net Promotor Score, System Usability Scale). RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants completed 18 iterative co-design sessions and provided feedback on 10 versions of AFFRMED (16 TNB youth/young adults and 11 parents). Nine TNB youth/young adults and six parents completed individual usability testing interviews. Overall, participants rated AFFRMED highly on measures of acceptability, appropriateness, usability, and satisfaction. However, scores varied by treatment cohort, with TNB youth interested in or currently receiving pubertal suppression treatment reporting the lowest usability scores. CONCLUSIONS: We co-created a youth- and family-centered fertility decision aid prototype that provides education and decision support in an online, interactive format. Future directions include testing the efficacy of the decision aid in improving fertility and fertility preservation knowledge, decisional self-efficacy, and decision satisfaction.

Prenatal detection and evaluation of differences of sex development: A qualitative interview study of parental perspectives and unmet needs.

OBJECTIVES: Prenatal diagnoses of differences of sex development (DSD) are increasing due to availability of cell-free DNA screening (cell-free DNA screening (cfDNA)). This study explores first-hand experiences of parents whose children had prenatal findings of DSD. METHODS: Eligible parents were identified through chart review at a pediatric center and interviewed about their prenatal evaluation, decision making, informational sources, and support systems. Interviews were coded using a combined inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Parents also completed quantitative measures of decisional regret. RESULTS: Seventeen parents (13 mothers; 4 fathers) of 13 children (with 7 DSD diagnoses) were recruited. Four children had discordance between sex predicted by cfDNA versus prenatal ultrasound, and 2 had non-binary appearing (atypical) genitalia on prenatal ultrasound. Of these 6, 3 were not offered additional prenatal testing or counseling. Most parents described tension between obtaining support through disclosure of their child's diagnosis and preserving their child's autonomy/privacy, highlighting the need for mental health support. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to gather qualitative data from parents whose children had prenatal findings of DSD. We identified multiple targets for intervention to improve care for patients with DSD across the lifespan, including improvements in clinician education, pre- and post-test counseling, and patient education materials.

Proximal Hypospadias-Isolated Genital Condition or Marker of More?

PURPOSE: The prevalence of endocrine/genetic anomalies in boys with proximal hypospadias is unknown. We describe an endocrine/genetic evaluation for boys with proximal hypospadias to determine who may have a difference/disorder of sex development and/or benefit from additional testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed boys with hypospadias seen at our hospital between January 2013 and October 2018. Those with proximal (penoscrotal, scrotal, perineal) hypospadias who presented before age 6 months and underwent endocrine/genetic testing were included. Demographics, test results, testicular examination at presentation, comorbidities and diagnoses were abstracted. RESULTS: A total of 1,789 boys with hypospadias were identified. Of 131 boys with proximal hypospadias all 60 who underwent endocrine/genetic evaluation were included. Most of these patients had bilateral palpable testes (52, 86%) that were fully descended (41, 68%). Associated anatomical anomalies were found in 53% of patients. All boys underwent endocrine testing, which was completely typical for a male infant in most (41, 68%). Common genetic tests included karyotyping (100%), microarray (38%) and multigene panel (13%). Genetic anomalies were found in 17 boys (28%), including 7 of 41 (17%) with bilateral descended testes and 10 of 19 (53%) with 1 or more undescended testes (p=0.01). Six of 8 boys with at least 1 nonpalpable testis had a genetic anomaly vs 11 of 52 with bilateral palpable testes (p=0.005). Differences/disorders of sex development were found in 9 patients (15%). CONCLUSIONS: Of 60 boys with proximal hypospadias 53% had nongenital anomalies, 28% had genetic anomalies and 15% had a difference/disorder of sex development. Although endocrine testing was clinically useful, genetic testing was most diagnostically revealing. Endocrine/genetic evaluation should be considered for boys with proximal hypospadias.

Establishing an Institutional Gonadal Tissue Cryopreservation Protocol for Patients with Differences of Sex Development.

PURPOSE: Many individuals with differences of sex development experience subfertility. We describe a novel gonadal tissue cryopreservation protocol for those individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Before 2018 patients with differences of sex development electing gonadal tissue cryopreservation were enrolled in a cancer focused protocol. Thereafter, our hospital developed a protocol specifically for these patients undergoing gonadectomy due to neoplasia risk. Protocol development steps and procedures are reported. A retrospective chart review was conducted for patient characteristics and cryopreservation choices. RESULTS: During the institutional review board approval process there were multidisciplinary meetings with stakeholders. The main concerns discussed included preoperative counseling, pathological evaluation and final tissue disposition. Detailed multidisciplinary preoperative counseling is provided regarding potential gonadal tissue cryopreservation for patients undergoing gonadectomy. For enrolled patients the gonad is bisected after removal, with half being sent to pathology and half being processed for cryopreservation. If neoplasia is noted, cryopreserved tissue is recalled for further pathological analysis. Postoperative counseling is performed after pathology results are available, and the final gonadal tissue cryopreservation decision is made. During the study period 7 patients with 5 diagnoses and a median age of 10.99 years (IQR 1.29 to 14.84) elected to attempt gonadal tissue cryopreservation. Of the patients 4 (57%) had germ cells and elected to store tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Gonadal tissue cryopreservation at the time of gonadectomy is feasible for patients with differences of sex development at risk for gonadal neoplasia. The protocol described represents a template for institutions wishing to offer gonadal tissue cryopreservation to patients electing gonadectomy. More than half of patients thus far have cryopreserved gonadal tissue.

Patient and Caregiver Attitudes toward Disorders of Sex Development Nomenclature.

PURPOSE: The medical terminology applied to differences/disorders of sex development has been viewed negatively by some affected individuals. A clinical population of patients with differences/disorders of sex development and their caregivers were surveyed regarding current nomenclature, hypothesizing that those unaffiliated with support groups would have more favorable attitudes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited English and Spanish speaking patients 13 years old or older with differences/disorders of sex development and their caregivers at 5 national tertiary care clinics from July 2016 to December 2018. No diagnoses were excluded. Participants completed a survey rating terminology commonly applied to differences/disorders of sex development. Responses were compared between subgroups, including members vs nonmembers of a support group. RESULTS: Of 185 potential participants approached 133 completed the survey (72% response rate). Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (33%) was the most common diagnosis. "Variation of sex development" was the most liked term (37%) but was not liked more significantly than "disorders of sex development" (27%, p=0.16). No term was liked by a majority of respondents. "Disorders of sex development" (37%) and "intersex" (53%) were the only terms most frequently viewed unfavorably. Support group members were significantly more likely to dislike the term "intersex" (p=0.02) and to like "variation of sex development" (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A clinical population of patients and their caregivers had generally neutral attitudes toward nomenclature applied to differences/disorders of sex development. Members of a support group had clearer terminology preferences. "Variation of sex development" was the most liked term, and "disorders of sex development" and "intersex" were the most disliked. No term was liked by most respondents, and no clear alternative to the present nomenclature was identified.

Impact of cell-free DNA screening on parental knowledge of fetal sex and disorders of sex development.

OBJECTIVE: Discrepancies between cfDNA and ultrasound predicted fetal sex occur, possibly indicating disorders/differences of sex development (DSDs). Among expectant/recent parents, this study assessed cfDNA knowledge/use, fetal sex determination attitudes/behaviors, general knowledge of DSD, and possible psychological impact of discrepancy between fetal sex on cfDNA and ultrasound. METHOD: Parents were surveyed about fetal sex determination methods, knowledge of cfDNA and DSD, distress related to possible cfDNA inaccuracy. RESULTS: Of 916 respondents, 44% were aware of possible discrepancy between cfDNA and ultrasound, 22% were aware of DSD. 78% and 75% would be upset and worried, respectively, with results showing fetal sex discrepancy. Most (67%) revealed predicted fetal sex before delivery. 38% were offered cfDNA. Of those revealing fetal sex, 24% used cfDNA results, 71% ultrasound, and 7% both. cfDNA users were more frequently aware of possible discrepancy between cfDNA and ultrasound (76% vs 41%, P < .0001), but not of DSD (29% vs 23%, P = .29). CONCLUSION: Fetal sex determination is favored, and cfDNA is frequently used for predicting fetal chromosomal sex. Many parents are unaware of possible discrepancies between cfDNA and ultrasound, and potential for DSD. Most would be distressed by discordant results. Accurate counseling regarding limitations cfDNA for fetal sex determination is needed.

Formative development of a fertility decision aid for transgender adolescents and young adults: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study.

PURPOSE: No educational and decision support tools exist to aid transgender and non-binary (TNB) adolescents and young adults (AYA) in making decisions about fertility preservation in the context of initiating gender-affirming medical care that can impair fertility. This study identified critical content areas and learning objectives to include in a decision aid about fertility preservation targeted for TNB AYA. METHODS: Delphi methodology was leveraged to engage 80 multidisciplinary experts in reproductive medicine and pediatric transgender health care in a two round consensus building procedure. Proposed content areas rated as "probably keep" or "definitely keep" by 75% of experts were retained. Proposed learning objectives reaching 75% agreement on ratings of importance and priority were also identified. RESULTS: The Delphi procedure identified five priority content areas (Basic Reproduction; Gender-Affirming Medical Interventions: Impacts on Fertility; Established Fertility Preservation Options; Benefits and Risks of Established Fertility Preservation Procedures; Alternative Pathways to Parenting) and 25 learning objectives to prioritize in a fertility-related decision aid for TNB AYA. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary panel of experts achieved agreement around content areas and learning objectives to incorporate into a decision aid about fertility preservation for TNB AYA.

Fertility Preservation for a Teenager with Differences (Disorders) of Sex Development: An Ethics Case Study.

Fertility preservation has become more common for various populations, including oncology patients, transgender individuals, and women who are concerned about age-related infertility. Little attention has been paid to fertility preservation for patients with differences/disorders of sex development (DSD). Our goal in this article is to address specific ethical considerations that are unique to this patient population. To this end, we present a hypothetical DSD case. We then explore ethical considerations related to patient's age, risk of cancer, concern about genetic transmission of a DSD condition to children, co-occurring gender dysphoria, and access to experimental fertility preservation procedures. Given the limitations of current technologies, we recommend offering fertility preservation to individuals living with DSD using an informed decision-making approach that instills realistic expectations and minimizes the potential for false hope. Finally, we conclude with practical recommendations for this case based on the ethical considerations.

The National Physicians Cooperative: transforming fertility management in the cancer setting and beyond.

Once unimaginable, fertility management is now a nationally established part of cancer care in institutions, from academic centers to community hospitals to private practices. Over the last two decades, advances in medicine and reproductive science have made it possible for men, women and children to be connected with an oncofertility specialist or offered fertility preservation soon after a cancer diagnosis. The Oncofertility Consortium's National Physicians Cooperative is a large-scale effort to engage physicians across disciplines - oncology, urology, obstetrics and gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, and behavioral health - in clinical and research activities to enable significant progress in providing fertility preservation options to children and adults. Here, we review the structure and function of the National Physicians Cooperative and identify next steps.

Presence of Germ Cells in Disorders of Sex Development: Implications for Fertility Potential and Preservation.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the presence of germ cells in the gonads of patients with disorders of sex development to establish whether preservation of germ cells for future fertility potential is possible. We hypothesized that germ cells are present but vary by age and diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed histology from patients with disorders of sex development who underwent gonadectomy/biopsy from 2002 to 2014 at a single institution for pathological classification of the gonad, composition of gonadal stroma and germ cell presence. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were identified and germ cells were present in 68%. The presence and average number of germ cells per mm2 were analyzed by gonad type and diagnosis. By gonad type all ovotestes, most testes, ovaries and dysgenetic testes, and 15% of streak gonads had germ cells present. By diagnosis germ cells were present in all patients with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, Denys-Drash syndrome, SRY mutation, mixed gonadal dysgenesis, ovotesticular conditions and StAR (steroid acute regulatory protein) deficiency, in some patients with persistent müllerian duct syndrome, XO/XY Turner syndrome and disorders of sex development not otherwise specified, and in none with complete or partial gonadal dysgenesis. Germ cells were present in the gonads of 88% of patients 0 to 3 years old, 50% of those 4 to 11 years old and 43% of those older than 12 years. CONCLUSIONS: Germ cells were present in the majority of our cohort and the presence decreased with age. This novel, fertility driven evaluation of germ cell quantity in a variety of disorders of sex development suggests that fertility potential may be greater than previously thought. Further studies must be done to evaluate a larger population and examine germ cell quality to determine the viability of these germ cells.

Fertility Preservation for Pediatric Patients: Current State and Future Possibilities.

PURPOSE: This review provides an overview of pediatric fertility preservation. Topics covered include the patient populations who could benefit, the current state of fertility preservation options and research, and considerations related to ethics and program development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A broad Embase® and PubMed® search was performed to identify publications discussing investigational, clinical, ethical and health care delivery issues related to pediatric fertility preservation. Relevant publications were reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: Populations who could benefit from fertility preservation in childhood/adolescence include oncology patients, patients with nononcologic conditions requiring gonadotoxic chemotherapy, patients with differences/disorders of sex development and transgender individuals. Peripubertal and postpubertal fertility preservation options are well established and include cryopreservation of oocytes, embryos or sperm. Prepubertal fertility preservation is experimental. Multiple lines of active research aim to develop technologies that will enable immature eggs and sperm to be matured and used to produce a biological child in the future. Ethical challenges include the need for parental proxy decision making and the fact that fertility preservation procedures can be considered not medically necessary. Successful multidisciplinary fertility preservation care teams emphasize partnerships with adult colleagues, prioritize timely consultations and use standardized referral processes. Some aspects of fertility preservation are not covered by insurance and out-of-pocket costs can be prohibitive. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric fertility preservation is an emerging, evolving field. Fertility preservation options for prepubertal patients with fertility altering conditions such as cancer and differences/disorders of sex development are currently limited. However, multiple lines of active research hold promise for the future. Key considerations include establishing a multidisciplinary team to provide pediatric fertility preservation services, an appreciation for relevant ethical issues and cost.

Turner Syndrome With Y Chromosome and Germ Cells: A Case Report Highlighting the Need to Prioritize Individualized Care.

Turner syndrome (TS) is a genetic condition in phenotypic females in which the individual has 1 intact X chromosome and the second sex chromosome is absent or structurally altered Components of Y chromosome (eg, 45,X/46,XY) have been found in 5%-15% of patients with TS; these patients are often referred to as having "Turner syndrome with Y" (TS+Y). The presence of Y chromosome material increases risk for development of gonadal tumors. Historically, prophylactic gonadectomy has been recommended in this population to prevent malignancy, and patients were presumed infertile due to the presence of streak gonads with no germ cells (GCs). More recently, studies have reported on spontaneous puberty and menarche in TS+Y patients suggesting the presence of viable GC and ovarian function. Our institution offers patients with TS+Y the option of experimental gonadal tissue cryopreservation (GTC) at the time of gonadectomy. We present a unique case of a young girl with TS+Y who had GCs present in her gonads and underwent experimental GTC at the time of gonadectomy.

Workflow for Management of Gonadal Neoplasm in 2 Patients with Differences of Sex Development Enrolled in an Experimental Gonadal Tissue Cryopreservation Protocol.

OBJECTIVE: To outline our experimental gonadal tissue cryopreservation (GTC) protocol that does not disrupt the standard of care in medically-indicated gonadectomy for patients with differences of sex development, including highlighting the multidisciplinary collaborative protocol for when neoplasm is discovered in these cases. METHODS: Two patients with complete gonadal dysgenesis who were undergoing medically-indicated prophylactic bilateral gonadectomy elected to pursue GTC. Both were found to have germ cell neoplasia in situ on initial pathologic analysis, requiring recall of the gonadal tissue, which had been cryopreserved. RESULTS: Cryopreserved gonadal tissue was successfully thawed and transferred to pathology for complete analysis. No germ cells were identified in either patient nor were found to have malignancy, so further treatment beyond gonadectomy was not indicated. Pathologic information was communicated to each family, including that long-term GTC was no longer possible. CONCLUSION: Organizational planning and coordination between the clinical care teams, GTC laboratory, and pathology were key to handling these cases with neoplasia. Processes that anticipated the possibility of discovering neoplasia within tissue sent to pathology and the potential need to recall GTC tissue to complete staging included (1) documenting the orientation and anatomical position of tissue processed for GTC, (2) defining parameters in which tissue will be recalled, (3) efficiently thawing and transferring GTC tissue to pathology, and (4) coordinating release of pathology results with verbal communication from the clinician to provide context. GTC is desired by many families and at the time of gonadectomy and is (1) feasible for patients with DSD, and (2) did not inhibit patient care in 2 patients with GCNIS.

ENU mutagenesis in mice identifies candidate genes for hypogonadism.

Genome-wide mutagenesis was performed in mice to identify candidate genes for male infertility, for which the predominant causes remain idiopathic. Mice were mutagenized using N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), bred, and screened for phenotypes associated with the male urogenital system. Fifteen heritable lines were isolated and chromosomal loci were assigned using low-density genome-wide SNP arrays. Ten of the 15 lines were pursued further using higher-resolution SNP analysis to narrow the candidate gene regions. Exon sequencing of candidate genes identified mutations in mice with cystic kidneys (Bicc1), cryptorchidism (Rxfp2), restricted germ cell deficiency (Plk4), and severe germ cell deficiency (Prdm9). In two other lines with severe hypogonadism, candidate sequencing failed to identify mutations, suggesting defects in genes with previously undocumented roles in gonadal function. These genomic intervals were sequenced in their entirety and a candidate mutation was identified in SnrpE in one of the two lines. The line harboring the SnrpE variant retains substantial spermatogenesis despite small testis size, an unusual phenotype. In addition to the reproductive defects, heritable phenotypes were observed in mice with ataxia (Myo5a), tremors (Pmp22), growth retardation (unknown gene), and hydrocephalus (unknown gene). These results demonstrate that the ENU screen is an effective tool for identifying potential causes of male infertility.

Primary Amenorrhea and Differences of Sex Development.

Primary amenorrhea may be a feature or a presenting sign of a difference of sex development, most often due to a congenital anatomic difference or hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. History and physical exam are very important, including whether any variation in external genitalia was present at birth as well as a careful review of pubertal development. Further evaluation includes hormone measurement, imaging, and genetic evaluation. Those with a disorder of sexual development diagnosis should receive care through a multidisciplinary team with psychosocial support.