Retention Rates of Genetic Therapies Based on AAV Serotypes 2 and 8 Using Different Drug-Delivery Materials.

The purpose of this study was to compare the retention rate of Adeno-associated viral vector (AAV) gene therapy agents within different subretinal injection systems. The retention of AAV serotype 2-based voretigene neparvovec (VN) and a clinical-grade AAV serotype 8 vector within four different subretinal cannulas from two different manufacturers was quantified. A standardized qPCR using the universal inverted terminal repeats as a target sequence was developed. The instruments compared were the PolyTip® cannula 25 g/38 g by MedOne Surgical, Inc., Sarasota, FL, USA, and three different subretinal injection needles by DORC, Zuidland, The Netherlands (1270.EXT Extendible 41G subretinal injection needle (23G), DORC 1270.06 23G Dual bore injection cannula, DORC 27G Subretinal injection cannula). The retention rate of VN and within the DORC products (10-28%) was comparable to the retention rate (32%) found for the PolyTip® cannula that is mentioned in the FDA-approved prescribing information for VN. For the AAV8 vector, the PolyTip® cannula showed a retention rate of 14%, and a similar retention rate of 3-16% was found for the DORC products (test-retest variability: mean 4.5%, range 2.5-20.2%). As all the instruments tested showed comparable retention rates, they seem to be equally compatible with AAV2- and AAV8-based gene therapy agents.

Choroideremia: The Endpoint Endgame.

Choroideremia is an X-linked retinal degeneration resulting from the progressive, centripetal loss of photoreceptors and choriocapillaris, secondary to the degeneration of the retinal pigment epithelium. Affected individuals present in late childhood or early teenage years with nyctalopia and progressive peripheral visual loss. Typically, by the fourth decade, the macula and fovea also degenerate, resulting in advanced sight loss. Currently, there are no approved treatments for this condition. Gene therapy offers the most promising therapeutic modality for halting or regressing functional loss. The aims of the current review are to highlight the lessons learnt from clinical trials in choroideremia, review endpoints, and propose a future strategy for clinical trials.

Gene therapy for inherited retinal disease: long-term durability of effect.

The recent approval of voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna®) for patients with biallelic RPE65 mutation-associated inherited retinal dystrophy with viable retinal cells represents an important step in the development of ocular gene therapies. Herein, we review studies investigating the episomal persistence of different recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vector genomes and the pre-clinical and clinical evidence of long-term effects of different RPE65 gene replacement therapies. A targeted review of articles published between 1974 and January 2021 in Medline®, Embase®, and other databases, was conducted, followed by a descriptive longitudinal analysis of the clinical trial outcomes of voretigene neparvovec. Following an initial screening, 14 publications examining the episomal persistence of different rAAV genomes and 71 publications evaluating gene therapies in animal models were included. Viral genomes were found to persist for at least 22 months (longest study follow-up) as transcriptionally active episomes. Treatment effects lasting almost a decade were reported in canine disease models, with more pronounced effects the earlier the intervention. The clinical trial outcomes of voretigene neparvovec are consistent with pre-clinical findings and reveal sustained results for up to 7.5 years for the full-field light sensitivity threshold test and 5 years for the multi-luminance mobility test in the Phase I and Phase III trials, respectively. In conclusion, the therapeutic effect of voretigene neparvovec lasts for at least a decade in animal models and 7.5 years in human subjects. Since retinal cells can retain functionality over their lifetime after transduction, these effects may be expected to last even longer in patients with a sufficient number of outer retinal cells at the time of intervention.

Benefits and Shortcomings of Laboratory Model Systems in the Development of Genetic Therapies.

Gene therapeutic approaches promise treatment or even a cure of diseases that were previously untreatable. Retinal gene therapies tested in clinical trials comprise a wide range of different strategies, including gene supplementation therapies, in vivo gene editing, modulation of splicing mechanisms, or the suppression of gene expression. To guarantee efficient transfer of genetic material into the respective target cells while avoiding major adverse effects, the development of genetic therapies requires appropriate in vitro model systems that allow tests of efficacy and safety of the gene therapeutic approach. In this review, we introduce various in vitro models of different levels of complexity used in the development of genetic therapies and discuss their respective benefits and shortcomings using the example of adeno-associated virus-based retinal gene therapy.

Challenges to Gene Editing Approaches in the Retina.

Retinal gene therapy has recently been at the cutting edge of clinical development in the diverse field of genetic therapies. The retina is an attractive target for genetic therapies such as gene editing due to the distinctive anatomical and immunological features of the eye, known as immune privilege, so that inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) have been studied in several clinical studies. Thus, rapid strides are being made toward developing targeted treatments for IRDs. Gene editing in the retina faces a group of heterogenous challenges, including editing efficiencies, off-target effects, the anatomy of the target organ, immune responses, inactivation, and identifying optimal application methods. As clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated nuclease (Cas) based technologies are at the forefront of current gene editing advances, their specific editing efficiency challenges and potential off-target effects were assessed. The immune privilege of the eye reduces the likelihood of systemic immune responses following retinal gene therapy, but possible immune responses must not be discounted. Immune responses to gene editing in the retina may be humoral or cell mediated, with immunologically active cells, including microglia, implicated in facilitating possible immune responses to gene editing. Immunogenicity of gene therapeutics may also lead to the inactivation of edited cells, reducing potential therapeutic benefits. This review outlines the broad spectrum of potential challenges currently facing retinal gene editing, with the goal of facilitating further advances in the safety and efficacy of gene editing therapies.

Importance of Nonhuman Primates as a Model System for Gene Therapy Development in Ophthalmology.

Gene therapy is a treatment concept that uses, in most cases, viral vectors to deliver a therapeutic transgene to target cells. Although the idea of gene therapy dates back over 50 years ago, due to the complexity of the treatment concept, it took until the last decade for the responsible agencies like FDA and EMA to recommend the first gene therapy products for clinical use. The development of these therapies relies on molecular engineering of specifically designed vectors and models to test the effectiveness and safety of the treatment. Despite an increasing effort to find effective surrogates, animal models are still irreplaceable in gene therapy development. Rodents are important for exploring pathways and disease mechanisms and identifying potential treatment targets. However, only the primate eye resembles the human eye to a degree where most structures are nearly identical. Some research questions can therefore only be answered using a nonhuman primate (NHP) model. In this review, we want to summarize these key features and highlight the importance of the NHP model for gene therapy development in ophthalmology.

Surgical Aspects in Gene Therapy for Inherited Retinal Diseases. / Chirurgische Aspekte der Gentherapie von Netzhautdystrophien.

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) have been studied since their recognition by Franz Donders and Albrecht von Graefe. It nevertheless took 100 years for a causal therapy to take shape in the form of gene therapy: The approval of Voretigen Neparvovec (VN) for the treatment of hereditary retinal dystrophies due to RPE65 mutations was thus a significant milestone - for the era of personalised medicine in general and ophthalmology in particular. The clinical management around gene therapy applications is complex and requires the cooperation of various experts as a multidisciplinary team. This article describes the requirements, challenges, approaches, and open questions regarding the surgical aspects of gene therapy for retinal dystrophies. The first part outlines the standard surgical treatment. Based on this standard, alternative approaches are indicated for each individual step and their value discussed. Knowledge gaps are defined and in the outlook we speculate on future developments.

CHANGES IN RETINAL SENSITIVITY AFTER GENE THERAPY IN CHOROIDEREMIA.

PURPOSE: Choroideremia (CHM) is a rare inherited retinal degeneration resulting from mutation of the CHM gene, which results in absence of functional Rab escort protein 1 (REP1). We evaluated retinal gene therapy with an adeno-associated virus vector that used to deliver a functional version of the CHM gene (AAV2-REP1). METHODS: THOR (NCT02671539) is a Phase 2, open-label, single-center, randomized study. Six male patients (51-60 years) with CHM received AAV2-REP1, by a single 0.1-mL subretinal injection of 10 genome particles during vitrectomy. Twelve-month data are reported. RESULTS: In study eyes, 4 patients experienced minor changes in best-corrected visual acuity (-4 to +1 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters); one gained 17 letters and another lost 14 letters. Control eyes had changes of -2 to +4 letters. In 5/6 patients, improvements in mean (95% confidence intervals) retinal sensitivity (2.3 [4.0] dB), peak retinal sensitivity (2.8 [3.5] dB), and gaze fixation area (-36.1 [66.9] deg) were recorded. Changes in anatomical endpoints were similar between study and control eyes. Adverse events were consistent with the surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: Gene therapy with AAV2-REP1 can maintain, and in some cases, improve, visual acuity in CHM. Longer term follow-up is required to establish whether these benefits are maintained.

[The Natural History of Choroideraemia]. / Der natürliche Verlauf der Choroideremie.

Since its first description in 1872, there has been a lively academic debate about the natural history of choroideremia. Due to the low prevalence of choroideremia, interest in this discussion has been limited to subspecialists. However, the current development of novel, potentially disease-modifying therapies has sparked the attention of a larger professional audience. This review summarises the literature around the natural history of the disease and illustrates its key aspects using a simple two-stage model. Apart from a comprehensive discussion of ubiquitous clinical modalities, the manuscript reviews scientifically relevant questions, such as intra-individual symmetry and the utility of novel endpoints for use in clinical studies. Furthermore, it examines the limitations of past and current studies and develops recommendations for further observational trials.

Codon-Optimized RPGR Improves Stability and Efficacy of AAV8 Gene Therapy in Two Mouse Models of X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa.

X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) is generally a severe form of retinitis pigmentosa, a neurodegenerative, blinding disorder of the retina. 70% of XLRP cases are due to mutations in the retina-specific isoform of the gene encoding retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGRORF15). Despite successful RPGRORF15 gene replacement with adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors being established in a number of animal models of XLRP, progression to human trials has not yet been possible. The inherent sequence instability in the purine-rich region of RPGRORF15 (which contains highly repetitive nucleotide sequences) leads to unpredictable recombination errors during viral vector cloning. While deleted RPGR may show some efficacy in animal models, which have milder disease, the therapeutic effect of a mutated RPGR variant in patients with XLRP cannot be predicted. Here, we describe an optimized gene replacement therapy for human XLRP disease using an AAV8 vector that reliably and consistently produces the full-length correct RPGR protein. The glutamylation pattern in the RPGR protein derived from the codon-optimized sequence is indistinguishable from the wild-type variant, implying that codon optimization does not significantly alter post-translational modification. The codon-optimized sequence has superior stability and expression levels in vitro. Significantly, when delivered by AAV8 vector and driven by the rhodopsin kinase promoter, the codon-optimized RPGR rescues the disease phenotype in two relevant animal models (Rpgr-/y and C57BL/6JRd9/Boc) and shows good safety in C57BL6/J wild-type mice. This work provides the basis for clinical trial development to treat patients with XLRP caused by RPGR mutations.

AAV8 Can Induce Innate and Adaptive Immune Response in the Primate Eye.

Ocular gene therapy has evolved rapidly into the clinical realm due to promising pre-clinical proof-of-concept studies, recognition of the high unmet medical need of blinding disorders, and the excellent safety profile of the most commonly used vector system, the adeno-associated virus (AAV). With several trials exposing subjects to AAV, investigators independently report about cases with clinically evident inflammation in treated eyes despite the concept of ocular immune privilege. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of innate and adaptive immune response to clinical-grade AAV8 in non-human primates and compare this to preliminary clinical data from a retinal gene therapy trial for CNGA3-based achromatopsia (ClinicalTrials.gov: 02610582).

Sobre la terapia génica para enfermedades de la retina.

Las mutaciones en un gran número de genes provocan degeneración de la retina y ceguera sin que exista actualmente cura alguna. En las últimas décadas, la terapia génica para enfermedades de la retina ha evolucionado y se ha convertido en un nuevo y prometedor paradigma terapéutico para estas enfermedades poco comunes. Este artículo refleja las ideas y los conceptos que parten de la ciencia básica hacia la aplicabilidad de la terapia génica en el ámbito clínico. Se describen los avances y las reflexiones actuales sobre la eficacia de los ensayos clínicos en la actualidad y se discuten los posibles obstáculos y soluciones de cara al futuro de la terapia génica para enfermedades de la retina.

On Retinal Gene Therapy.

Mutations in a large number of genes cause retinal degeneration and blindness with no cure currently available. Retinal gene therapy has evolved over the last decades to become a promising new treatment paradigm for these rare disorders. This article reflects on the ideas and concepts arising from basic science towards the translation of retinal gene therapy into the clinical realm. It describes the advances and present thinking on the efficacy of current clinical trials and discusses potential roadblocks and solutions for the future of retinal gene therapy.

Multimodal assessment of choroideremia patients defines pre-treatment characteristics.

PURPOSE: Choroideremia (CHM) is a X-chromosomal disorder leading to blindness by progressive degeneration of choroid, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and retinal neurons. A current clinical gene therapy trial (NCT01461213) showed promising safety and efficacy data in a carefully selected patient population. The present study was performed to shed light on pre-treatment characteristics of a larger cohort of CHM patients using a high resolution multi-modal approach. METHODS: In a retrospective cross-sectional study, data from 58 eyes of 29 patients with clinically confirmed CHM were analysed including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), perimetry, and tonometry. Residual retinal volume, area of residual RPE, and foveal thickness were quantified to further define natural disease progression and assess symmetry. RESULTS: We evaluated 98 data points of BCVA [0.34 ± 0.06 (logMAR); mean ± 95 % confidence interval], 80 of IOP (14.6 ± 0.6 mmHg), and 98 of refraction (-2.16 ± 1.08 spherical equivalent). Visual fields (n  = 76) demonstrated variable degrees of concentric constriction (54 % <10°, 25 % 10-30°, 21 % >30°). Mean residual RPE area on FAF (n  = 64) measured 8.47 ± 1.91 mm(2) (range 0.30-38.5 mm(2)), while mean neuroretinal volume (n  = 42) was found to be 1.76 ± 0.12 mm(3). Age at examination was exponentially associated with BCVA, while logarithmic functions best described progressive loss of retinal area and volume. A high degree of left to right symmetry was found in all modalities with structural markers showing the best correlation (r (2) area = 0.83; r (2) volume = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Analysis of these widely available clinical data defines the natural disease characteristics of a relevant patient population eligible for gene therapeutic intervention. In the wake of preliminary reports on safety and efficacy of CHM gene therapy (NCT01461213), this multi-modal assessment of a cohort of CHM patients provides important evidence of the natural rate of disease progression and degree of symmetry between eyes.

Dose-Dependent Progression of Chorioretinal Atrophy at the Injection Site After Subretinal Injection of rAAV2/8 in Nonhuman Primates.

Objective: Progressive retinal atrophy has been described after subretinal gene therapy utilizing the adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector platform. To elucidate whether this atrophy is a consequence of inherent properties of AAV, or if it is related to the surgical trauma of subretinal delivery, we analyzed data from an Investigational New Drug-enabling study for PDE6A gene therapy in nonhuman primates. Design: Animal study (nonhuman primates), retrospective data analysis. Subjects: Forty eyes of 30 healthy nonhuman primates (macaca fascicularis) were included in the analysis. Two AAV dose levels (low: 1x10E11, high: 1x10E12) were compared with sham injection (balanced saline solution; BSS). Twenty untreated eyes were not analyzed. Methods: Animals were treated with a sutureless 23G vitrectomy and single subretinal injections of AAV.PDE6A and/or BSS. The follow-up period was 12 weeks. Atrophy development was followed using fundus autofluorescence (AF), OCT, fluorescence angiography, and indocyanine green angiography. Main Outcome Measures: Area [mm2] of retinal pigment epithelium atrophy on AF. Presence of outer retinal atrophy on optical coherence tomography. Area [mm2] of hyperfluorescence in fluorescence angiography and hypofluorescence in indocyanine green angiography. Results: Progressive atrophy at the injection site developed in 54% of high-dose-treated, 27% of low-dose-treated, and 0% of sham-treated eyes. At the end of observation, the mean ± SD area of atrophy in AF was 1.19 ± 1.75 mm2, 0.25 ± 0.50 mm2, and 0.0 ± 0.0 mm2, respectively (sham × high dose: P = 0.01). Atrophic lesions in AF (P = 0.01) and fluorescence angiography (P = 0.02) were significantly larger in high-dose-treated eyes, compared with sham-treated eyes. Rate of progression in high-dose-treated eyes was 4.1× higher compared with low-dose-treated eyes. Conclusion: Subretinal injection of AAV.PDE6A induced dose-dependent, progressive retinal atrophy at the site of injection. Findings from multimodal imaging were in line with focal, transient inflammation within the retina and choroid and secondary atrophy. Atrophic changes after gene therapy with AAV-based vector systems are not primarily due to surgical trauma and increase with the dose given. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Voretigene Neparvovec: Results up to 2 Years from the Prospective, Registry-Based PERCEIVE Study.

Voretigene neparvovec (VN) is the first available gene therapy for patients with biallelic RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy who have sufficient viable retinal cells. PERCEIVE is an ongoing, post-authorization, prospective, multicenter, registry-based observational study and is the largest study assessing the real-world, long-term safety and effectiveness of VN. Here, we present the outcomes of 103 patients treated with VN according to local prescribing information. The mean (SD) age was 19.5 (10.85) years, 52 (50.5%) were female, and the mean (SD) duration of the follow up was 0.8 (0.64) years (maximum: 2.3 years). Thirty-five patients (34%) experienced ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most frequently related to chorioretinal atrophy (n = 13 [12.6%]). Eighteen patients (17.5%; 24 eyes [13.1%]) experienced ocular TEAEs of special interest, including intraocular inflammation and/or infection related to the procedure (n = 7). The mean (SD) changes from baseline in full-field light-sensitivity threshold testing (white light) at month 1, month 6, year 1, and year 2 were -16.59 (13.48) dB (51 eyes), -18.24 (14.62) dB (42 eyes), -15.84 (14.10) dB (10 eyes), and -13.67 (22.62) dB (13 eyes), respectively. The change in visual acuity from baseline was not clinically significant. Overall, the outcomes of the PERCEIVE study are consistent with the findings of VN pivotal clinical trials.