Comparison of Staged Versus Same-day Bilateral Hip Surgery in Nonambulatory Children With Cerebral Palsy.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral hip reconstructions with osteotomies are commonly required in patients with severe cerebral palsy (CP) and dysplasia. These procedures can be performed by staging each hip surgery, separated by weeks to months, or by addressing both hips in a single-event surgery. The optimal timing of such surgery is yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare major complications between the staged and single-event approaches. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent bilateral hip osteotomies, with at least one side including a pelvic osteotomy, were retrospectively reviewed. Subjects were identified who had a diagnosis of nonambulatory CP (defined by Gross Motor and Functional Classification System level IV or V), and at least 1 year of clinical follow-up. All hips were treated by 1 of 7 surgeons: 2 surgeons who always performing single-event surgery and 5 who always perform staged surgeries. Complications were stratified by the Modified Clavien-Dindo Classification (grades 1 to 5). The primary outcome was major complications (grade ≥3), while minor complications, readmissions, reoperations, and resource utilization outcomes were investigated secondarily. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients met our inclusion criteria: 35 received single-event surgery and 30 received staged surgery. The staged group had a higher rate of major complications per patient (0.30 vs. 0; P=0.013). Unplanned readmissions and reoperations were likewise increased in the staged group. Minor complication rates were high in both groups, with no differences observed between staged and single-event approaches (3.27 per patient vs. 2.91; P=0.952). There were no complications causing permanent disability or death. The total length of stay (6.2 vs. 4.0 d; P<0.001) and mean nonsurgical operating room time (65.7 vs. 45.6 min; P<0.001) were increased in the staged group versus the single-event group. CONCLUSIONS: The staged approach to bilateral hip reconstructions in the nonambulatory CP population was associated with a higher rate of major complications compared with a single-event approach. Minor complications were similar for both approaches. Both approaches can have an acceptable safety profile with no observed grade 4 or 5 complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Risk of cardiac disease and observations on lack of potential predictors by clinical history among children presenting for cardiac evaluation of mid-exertional syncope.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of cardiac disorders among children with mid-exertional syncope evaluated by a paediatric cardiologist, determine how often a diagnosis was not established, and define potential predictors to differentiate cardiac from non-cardiac causes. Study design We carried out a single-centre, retrospective review of children who presented for cardiac evaluation due to a history of exertional syncope between 1999 and 2012. Inclusion criteria included the following: (1) age ⩽18 years; (2) mid-exertional syncope; (3) electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and an exercise stress test, electrophysiology study, or tilt test, with exception of long QT, which did not require additional testing; and (4) evaluation by a paediatric cardiologist. Mid-exertional syncope was defined as loss of consciousness in the midst of active physical activity. Patients with peri-exertional syncope immediately surrounding but not during active physical exertion were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients met the criteria for mid-exertional syncope; 32 (53%) were diagnosed with cardiac syncope and 28 with non-cardiac syncope. A majority of cardiac patients were diagnosed with an electrical myopathy, the most common being Long QT syndrome. In nearly half of the patients, a diagnosis could not be established or syncope was felt to be vasovagal in nature. Neither the type of exertional activity nor the symptoms or lack of symptoms occurring before, immediately preceding, and after the syncopal event differentiated those with or without a cardiac diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Children with mid-exertional syncope are at risk for cardiac disease and warrant evaluation. Reported symptoms may not differentiate benign causes from life-threatening disease.

Predicting epiphyseal stability of slipped capital femoral epiphysis with preoperative CT imaging.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed preoperative CT scans of hips with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) for characteristics that could be predictive of intraoperative epiphyseal stability and developed a set of imaging criteria for stable and unstable SCFE. We then compared this grading system with the Loder classification. METHODS: We reviewed preoperative CT imaging to develop a SCFE stability classification system. Three orthopaedic surgeons used the classification system to grade stability on a series of SCFE hips. Kappa was used to evaluate intra- and interobserver reliability among the observers. A series of SCFE hips treated with open procedures in which intraoperative stability was determined under direct visualization was evaluated. Intraoperative stability was compared with stability ratings as determined by the CT classification system and the Loder classification system. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability among our three observers was κ = 0.823 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.414 to 1.0; p < 0.001). Intraobserver reliability was κ = 0.901 (95% CI 0.492 to 1.31; p < 0.001). In all, 27 hips were used in the comparison of intraoperative stability with the Loder and CT classification systems. CT-predicted stability exhibited 78% concordance with intraoperative stability. The sensitivity and specificity of CT-predicted stability was 75% and 82%, respectively, versus Loder sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 91%. CONCLUSION: The CT evaluation method provided is easy to use and can help to improve the accuracy in determining preoperative epiphyseal stability, which may lead to improved treatment outcomes for this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.