RESUMO
Neurolytic celiac plexus block (CPB) under radiological guidance is often performed to manage pain associated with pancreatic cancer. Serious complications related to the block are rare. Computed Tomography (CT)-guided neurolytic CPB is advocated to improve the efficacy of the block and to reduce the incidence of associated complications. We describe a case of superior mesenteric vein thrombosis associated with neurolytic CPB performed under CT guidance.
Assuntos
Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo/efeitos adversos , Plexo Celíaco/irrigação sanguínea , Manejo da Dor , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Depressores do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Etanol/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Veias Mesentéricas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaçõesRESUMO
Opioids remain at the center of most postoperative pain control therapies. The choice between full agonist opioids should be determined by the time for a given dose to produce its maximum effect (i.e., latency to peak effect), and the duration of action. There is little to choose between different opioids administered by patient-controlled analgesia. Parenterally-administered NSAIDs (e.g., ketorolac) contribute significantly to analgesia and reduce opioid requirements. Morphine may be the opioid of choice for epidural administration. The combination of epidural opioids and local anesthetics provides synergistic analgesia and appears to provide superior analgesia with activity. Several nonopioid receptor agonists are under investigation as neuraxial analgesics.
Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Regional anesthesia of the upper extremity may be achieved by the infraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus. METHODS: Advantages of this approach include profound anesthesia of the upper extremity with minimal risk of complications. RESULTS: Isolated block of the musculocutaneous nerve may result by this approach if biceps muscle contractions are accepted as evidence of brachial plexus location by peripheral nerve stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulation of the musculocutaneous nerve in the infraclavicular region results in biceps muscle contraction. Inadequate anesthesia of the upper extremity may result due to exiting of the musculocutaneous nerve outside the axillary sheath in this region. Evidence of more distal stimulation (finger/wrist flexion) improves the likelihood of successful block of the brachial plexus by the infraclavicular route.
Assuntos
Plexo Braquial , Nervo Musculocutâneo , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Adulto , Clavícula , Epinefrina , Feminino , Humanos , LidocaínaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to test a treatment algorithm for management of bladder function after outpatient general or local anesthesia. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-four outpatients, stratified into risk categories for urinary retention, were studied. Patients in category 1 were low-risk patients (n = 227) having non-pelvic surgery and randomly assigned to receive 10 ml/kg or 2 ml/kg of intravenous fluid intraoperatively. They were discharged when otherwise ready, without being required to void. Patients in category 2 (n = 40), also presumed to be low risk, had gynecologic surgery. High-risk patients included 31 patients having hernia or anal surgery (category 3), and 31 patients with a history of retention (category 4). Bladder volumes were monitored by ultrasound in those in categories 2-4, and patients were required to void (or be catheterized) before discharge. The incidence of retention and urinary tract symptoms after surgery were determined for all categories. RESULT: Urinary retention affected 0.5% of category 1 patients and none of category 2 patients. Median time to void after discharge was 75 min (interquartile range 120) in category 1 patients (n = 27) discharged without voiding. Fluids administered did not alter incidence of retention or time to void. Retention occurred in 5% of high-risk patients before discharge and recurred in 25% after discharge. CONCLUSION: In reliable patients at low risk for retention, voiding before discharge appears unnecessary. In high-risk patients, continued observation until the bladder is emptied is indicated to avoid prolonged overdistention of the bladder.