The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on access to medical services and its consequences on emergency surgery.

Background: On March 9, 2020, the Italian Prime Minister announced the lockdown, which was officially closed on May 4. This extraordinary measure was necessary to contain the COVID-19 pandemic spread in Italy. During this phase, a significant decrease in patients' access to Emergency Department (ED) was observed. Delayed access to treatment determined a delay in the diagnosis of acute surgical conditions, as already documented in other clinical areas, with consequences on surgical outcome and survival. Aim of this study is to provide a detailed description of abdominal urgent-emergent conditions surgically treated and surgical outcomes during the lockdown in a tertiary referral Italian hospital, compared with historical data. Methods: A retrospective review of urgent-emergent patients surgically treated in our department was conducted in order to compare patients' characteristics and surgical outcomes during the period March 9th-May 4th, 2020 with the same period of the previous year. Results: 152 patients were included in our study, 79 patients in 2020 group and 77 patients in 2019. We found no significant differences between the groups regarding ASA score, age, gender, and disease prevalence. Significant differences were found in symptom duration before ER access and abdominal pain as the main symptom in non-traumatic conditions. We also performed a sub-analysis on peritonitis which showed significant differences in: hospital length of stay, presence of colostomy vs. ileostomy, and fatal events in 2020. No differences were found in the use of laparoscopy. Conclusions: While the overall number of ER accesses has decreased in 2020 group, the number of patients surgically treated in emergency-urgency conditions has not decreased. However, those patients waited significantly more before the hospital access. This diagnostic delay was associated with a more severe clinical condition and a consequent significantly worse prognosis.

Utilizing the Most Accurate Preoperative Risk Calculator.

The most commonly used preoperative assessment tools include the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Revised Cardiac Risk Index. These tools seek to predict the risk of an individual experiencing postoperative complications, including but not limited to mortality, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, stroke, venous thromboembolism, and pneumonia. Many published studies have sought to objectively quantify the utility of the preoperative risk calculations by retrospectively compiling data for patients who underwent the same or comparable surgeries to compare actual complications to predicted complications. Therefore, we searched these studies to review the literature to draw more general conclusions and recommend which risk calculator is best for different types of surgeries.

HIV Encephalopathy Mimicking Acute Demyelinating Processes.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) encephalopathy lies in the severe spectrum of HIV-associated neurological disorder (HAND) and ranges from asymptomatic condition to minor neurological features to severe dementia. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis helps to rule out the presence of other opportunistic infections. Neuroimaging helps establish the diagnosis. We report a case of a 39-year-old African American female who presented with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute multiple sclerosis (MS) flares in the setting of advanced acute immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) encephalopathy. She presented with bilateral lower extremity muscle weakness and pain with apparent cognitive decline. Notable laboratory findings included leukopenia with normal neutrophils and positive serology for HIV-1. The MRI showed mild post-contrast enhancement suggestive of demyelinating disease, favoring MS over progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Cerebrospinal fluid analysis was significant for positive oligoclonal bands and negative serology. She was started on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for AIDS while holding steroids due to the possibility of worsening AIDS. After treatment for HIV, she showed immunologic and functional status improvement. HIV encephalopathy must be diagnosed by ruling out other similar presenting neurological illnesses for tactful patient management.

Acromegaly and coronary disease: an integrated evaluation of conventional coronary risk factors and coronary calcifications detected by computed tomography.

CONTEXT: Coronary atherosclerosis in acromegaly was not extensively investigated in the literature until now. At autopsy, it was demonstrated in about 20% of patients with long-lasting disease, and myocardial infarction was reported as cause of death in a quarter of acromegalics. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate coronary atherosclerosis in a cohort of acromegalics with controlled or uncontrolled disease. DESIGN: Coronary risk was evaluated by the Framingham algorithm, according to the Framingham score (FS). Patients were stratified into low (<6%), intermediate (6-20%), and high (>20%) midterm risk. Coronary calcium deposits were detected by multidetector computed tomography and measured by the Agatston algorithm. Coronary artery calcium [Agatston score (AS)] was quantified at the level of left main artery, left anterior descendent artery, left circumflex artery, right coronary artery, and posterior descendent artery. Total AS values in healthy persons are less than 50 (aged < 60 yr) and less than 300 (age > or = 60 yr). PATIENTS: Thirty-nine patients (12 males and 27 females, aged 53.0 +/- 2.1 yr) were evaluated. In each patient, the mean of at least four determinations of serum IGF-I, assayed during the last 2 yr before study, was normalized for the age-matched normal range, and the result was presented as sd value (IGF-I sd). On the basis of serum IGF-I sd, acromegaly was considered controlled (< or =1.9 sd; n = 24) or uncontrolled (> or = 2.0 sd; n = 15). RESULTS: The FS was intermediate in 12 and high in two acromegalics. Overall, the FS was not correlated with serum GH values and IGF-I sd. Mean FS was not significantly different between patients with controlled and uncontrolled acromegaly. Total AS was increased in nine patients, most frequently in left anterior descendent, left circumflex, and left main arteries. In these nine patients, mean AS was similar in individuals with controlled and those with uncontrolled acromegaly, and the rate of 17% patients with controlled disease having increased AS was not statistically different from the rate of 33% uncontrolled acromegalics. Total AS was increased in six of 12 males and in three of 27 females (chi(2) 7.1, P < 0.01). Overall, total AS correlated with FS (r(2) = 0.4, P < 0.0002) but not age, body mass index, disease duration, indexed left ventricular mass, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, GH, or IGF-I levels. Increased AS was more frequently observed in acromegalics with diabetes mellitus (chi(2) = 5.2, P < 0.05) or hypertension (chi(2) = 9.8, P < 0.002) but not in smokers (chi(2) = 1.34, P = NS). Seven of nine patients with coronary calcium deposits had a FS greater than 6%. In six of 13 patients with FS greater than 6%, multidetector computed tomography did not demonstrate coronary calcifications. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the integrated evaluation of FS and AS showed that 41% of acromegalics are at risk for coronary atherosclerosis and that coronary calcifications were evident in about half of them despite the fact that myocardial infarction was not more frequent in acromegalic patients than the general population. Moreover, the control of acromegaly did not influence significantly the extent of coronary atherosclerosis.