Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(5): 1038-1044, 2024 05 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38482607

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are commonly treated in the emergency department (ED), and unfortunately, resistance to first-line agents is increasing. OBJECTIVES: To characterize treatment of pyelonephritis in a nationally representative sample of ED patients and to identify patient- and treatment-specific factors associated with receiving initial inactive antibiotics. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, observational cohort study utilizing the Emergency Medicine PHARMacotherapy Research NETwork (EMPHARM-NET), comprising 15 geographically diverse US EDs. All patients ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of pyelonephritis between 2018 and 2020 were included. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received initial inactive empirical antibiotic therapy and to identify predictive factors of inactive antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Of the 3714 patients evaluated, 223 had culture-positive pyelonephritis. Median patient age was 50.1 years and patients were mostly female (78.3%). Overall, 40.4% of patients received an IV antibiotic, most commonly ceftriaxone (86.7%). The most frequently prescribed antibiotics were cefalexin (31.8%), ciprofloxacin (14.3%), cefdinir (13.5%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (12.6%). Overall, 10.3% of patients received initial inactive therapy. After adjustment in a multivariable analysis, long-acting IV antibiotic was predictive of inactive therapy (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: In our prospective, multicentre observational study, we found that only 40.4% of patients with pyelonephritis received empirical IV antibiotics in the ED, contributing to inactive therapy. Receipt of long-acting IV antibiotics was independently associated with a decreased rate of initial inactive therapy. This reinforces guideline recommendations to administer long-acting IV antibiotics empirically in the ED upon suspicion of pyelonephritis.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Pielonefrite , Humanos , Pielonefrite/tratamento farmacológico , Pielonefrite/microbiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Idoso , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Alta do Paciente , Estudos de Coortes , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 82: 166-173, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38909552

RESUMO

The purpose of this article is to summarize pharmacotherapy related emergency medicine (EM) literature indexed in 2023. Articles were selected utilizing a modified Delphi approach. The table of contents from pre-determined journals were reviewed and independently evaluated via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system by paired authors. Pharmacotherapy-related publications deemed to be GRADE 1A and 1B were reviewed by the collective group for inclusion in the review. In all, this article summarizes and provides commentary on the potential clinical impact of 13 articles, 6 guidelines, and 5 meta-analyses covering topics including guideline releases and updates on rapid sequence intubation in the critically ill, managing cardiac arrest or life-threatening toxicity due to poisoning, and management of major bleeding following trauma. Also discussed are ongoing controversies surrounding fluid resuscitation, time and treatment modalities for ischemic stroke, steroid use in community-acquired pneumonia, targeted blood product administration, and much more.


Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , Humanos , Tratamento Farmacológico/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 69: 136-142, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37116295

RESUMO

The purpose of this article is to summarize pharmacotherapy related emergency medicine (EM) literature indexed in 2022. Articles were selected utilizing a modified Delphi approach. The table of contents from pre-determined journals were reviewed and independently evaluated via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system by paired authors, with disagreements adjudicated by a third author. Pharmacotherapy-related publications deemed to be GRADE 1A and 1B were reviewed by the group for inclusion in the review. In all, this article summarizes and provides commentary on the potential clinical impact of 13 articles, 4 guidelines, and 3 meta-analyses covering topics including anticoagulant reversal, tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke, guideline updates for heart failure and aortic aneurysm, magnesium in atrial fibrillation, sedation in mechanically ventilated patients and pain management strategies in the Emergency Department (ED), and tranexamic acid use in epistaxis and GI bleed.


Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , AVC Isquêmico , Humanos
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 71: 169-174, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37421813

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis identification and treatment is a priority for emergency department (ED) providers and payors alike. However, aggressive metrics aimed at improving sepsis care could have unintended consequences for patients who do not have sepsis. METHODS: All ED patient visits for a one month period before and after a quality initiative to increase early antibiotic use in septic patients were included. Overall broad spectrum (BS) antibiotic use, admission rates, and mortality were compared in the 2 time periods. A more detailed chart review was performed on those who received BS antibiotics in the before and after cohorts. Patient were excluded for pregnancy, age < 18, COVID-19 infection, hospice patients, left ED against medical advice, and if antibiotics were given for prophylaxis. In BS antibiotic treated patients, we sought to determine mortality, rates of subsequent multidrug resistant (MDR) or Clostridium Difficile (CDiff) infections and rates of non-infected patients receiving BS antibiotics. RESULTS: There were 7967 and 7407 ED visits in the pre- and post-implementation periods, respectively. Of those, BS antibiotics were administered in a total of 3.9% pre-implementation and 6.2% post-implementation (p ≤ 0.00001). Admission was more common in the post-implementation period, but overall mortality was unchanged (0.9% pre-implementation and 0.8% post-implementation, p = 0.41). After exclusions, 654 patients treated with BS antibiotics were included in the secondary analyses. Baseline characteristics were similar between the pre-implementation and post-implementation cohorts. There was no difference in the rate of CDiff infection or the proportion of patients receiving BS antibiotics who were not infected, but there was an increase in the post-implementation period in MDR infections after ED BS antibiotics, 0.72% vs. 0.35% of the entire ED cohorts, p = 0.0009. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a QI sepsis initiative was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients who received BS antibiotics in the ED, and a small absolute increase in associated subsequent MDR infections, with no apparent effect on mortality in all ED patients or the subset treated with BS antibiotics. Further research is needed to assess the impact on all patients affected by aggressive sepsis protocols and initiatives, rather than only those with sepsis.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções por Clostridium , Sepse , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Am J Emerg Med ; 60: 88-95, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35930996

RESUMO

This article highlights the most relevant emergency medicine (EM) pharmacotherapy publications indexed in 2021. A modified Delphi approach was utilized for selected journals to identify the most impactful EM pharmacotherapy studies via the GRADE system. After review of journal table of contents GRADE 1A and 1B articles were reviewed by authors. Twenty articles, 2 guidelines, 2 position papers, and 2 meta-analysis were selected for full summary. Articles included in this review highlight acute agitation management, acute appendicitis treatment, sexually transmitted infection updates, optimizing sepsis management and treatment, updates for the ideal thrombolytic agent in acute ischemic stroke and endovascular therapy candidates, indications for tranexamic acid, calicium for out of hospital cardiac arrest, optimial inotrope for cardiogenic shock, awareness during rapid sequence intubation paralysis, comparison of propofol or dexmedetomidine for sedation, treatment of cannabis hyperemsis syndrome, and prophylactic use of diphenhydramine to reduce neuroleptic side effects. Selected articles are summarized to include design, results, limitations, conclusions and impact.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Dexmedetomidina , Medicina de Emergência , AVC Isquêmico , Propofol , Ácido Tranexâmico , Difenidramina , Fibrinolíticos , Humanos
6.
Am J Emerg Med ; 49: 200-205, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34139435

RESUMO

The year 2020 was not easy for Emergency Medicine (EM) clinicians with the burden of tackling a pandemic. A large focus, rightfully so, was placed on the evolving diagnosis and management of patients with COVID-19 and, as such, the ability of clinicians to remain up to date on key EM pharmacotherapy literature may have been compromised. This article reviews the most important EM pharmacotherapy publications indexed in 2020. A modified Delphi approach was utilized for selected journals to identify the most impactful EM pharmacotherapy studies. A total of fifteen articles, eleven trials and four meta-analyses, were identified. This review provides a summary of each study, along with a commentary on the impact to the EM literature and EM clinician.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Tratamento Farmacológico , Medicina de Emergência , Bibliometria , Humanos , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(9): 1879-1883, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32745920

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous push (IVP) diltiazem and metoprolol are commonly used for management of atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular rate (RVR) in the emergency department (ED). This study's objective was to determine if there was a significant difference in blood pressure reduction between agents. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult patients initially treated with IVP diltiazem or metoprolol in the ED from 2008 to 2018. Primary endpoint was mean reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to nadir during the study period. Study period was defined as time from first dose of IVP intervention to 30 min after last dose of IVP intervention or first dose of maintenance therapy, whichever came first. RESULTS: A total of 63 diltiazem patients and 45 metoprolol patients met eligibility criteria. Baseline characteristics were similar except for initial ventricular rate (VR) and home beta-blocker use. Median dose of initial intervention was 10 [10-20] mg and 5 [5-5] mg for diltiazem and metoprolol respectively. Mean SBP reduction was 18 ± 22 mmHg for diltiazem compared to 14 ± 15 mmHg for metoprolol (p = .33). Clinically relevant hypotension was similar between groups 14% vs. 16% (p = .86). Rate control was achieved in 35 (56%) of the diltiazem group and 16 (36%) of the metoprolol group (p = .04). CONCLUSION: IVP diltiazem and metoprolol caused similar SBP reduction and hypotension when used for initial management of AF with RVR in the ED. However, rate control was achieved more often with diltiazem.


Assuntos
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Diltiazem/uso terapêutico , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Metoprolol/uso terapêutico , Administração Intravenosa , Idoso , Antiarrítmicos/administração & dosagem , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Diltiazem/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metoprolol/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 21(3): 130-134, 2022 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35994721

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently admitted from the emergency department (ED), and when discharged, are not reliably prescribed indicated anticoagulation. We report the impact of a novel computerized ED AF pathway orderset on discharge rate and risk-appropriate anticoagulation in patients with primary AF. METHODS: The orderset included options for rate and rhythm control of primary AF, structured risk assessment for thrombotic complications, recommendations for anticoagulation as appropriate, and follow up with an electrophysiologist. All patients discharged from the ED in whom the AF orderset was utilized over an 18-month period comprised the primary study population. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate anticoagulation or not according to confirmed CHADS-VASC and HASBLED scores. Additionally, the percentage of primary AF patients discharged directly from the ED was compared in the 18-month periods before and after introduction of the orderset. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients, average age 57.8 years and average initial heart rate 126 beats/minute, were included in the primary analysis. All 56 (100%; 95% confidence interval, 94-100) received guideline-concordant anticoagulation. The discharge rates in the pre- and postorderset implementation periods were 29% and 41%, respectively (95% confidence interval for 12% difference, 5-18). CONCLUSIONS: Our novel AF pathway orderset was associated with 100% guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients discharged from the ED. Availability of the orderset was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of ED AF patients discharged.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Algoritmos , Anticoagulantes , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia
10.
Acad Emerg Med ; 29(9): 1096-1105, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35652493

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Uropathogen resistance, fluoroquinolone-resistance (FQR), and extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), has been observed to be emerging worldwide with prevalences above recommended thresholds for routine empirical treatment. The primary aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of FQR from a geographically diverse sample of United States emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We conducted a multi-center, observational cohort study using a network of 15 geographically diverse US EDs. All patients ≥18 years of age with the primary or secondary diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in the ED identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) diagnosis code of cystitis, pyelonephritis, or UTI from 2018 to 2020 were included. We calculated descriptive statistics for uropathogens and susceptibilities. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify antimicrobial resistance risk factors associated with FQR Escherichia coli. RESULTS: Among 3779 patients who met inclusion criteria, median age was 62.9 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 41-77.6) and 76.3% were female. The most common diagnoses were complicated (41.2%) and uncomplicated cystitis (40.3%). E. coli was the most common pathogen (63.2%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.2%) and Enterococcus species (5.8%). Across all sites, overall E. coli FQ-resistance prevalence was 22.1%, ranging from 10.5 to 29.7% by site. The prevalence of ESBL-producing uropathogen was 7.4%, ranging from 3.6% to 11.6% by site. Previous IV or oral antimicrobial use in the past 90-days and history of a multi-drug resistant pathogen were associated with FQ-resistant E. coli (odds ratio [OR] 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.04-3.51, and OR 6.93, 95% CI: 4.95-9.70, respectively). Of the patients who had FQ-resistant E. coli or an ESBL-producing uropathogen isolated, 116 (37.1%) and 61 (36.7%) did not have any documented risk factors for resistance. CONCLUSION: FQ-resistant E. coli is widely prevalent across US sites highlighting the need for ongoing monitoring of antimicrobial resistance and, at some locations, modification of empirical treatments.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Cistite , Infecções Urinárias , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Cistite/diagnóstico , Cistite/tratamento farmacológico , Cistite/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Escherichia coli , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , beta-Lactamases/uso terapêutico
11.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 77(13): 1051-1053, 2020 06 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32470139

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Piperacillin/tazobactam is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that is widely used and commonly administered via the intravenous (i.v.) piggyback route over 0.5 to 4.0 hours. Recommendations for i.v. push (IVP) administration of piperacillin/tazobactam are lacking due to the high osmolality of the solution. The primary objective of this study was to retrospectively assess the safety and tolerability of piperacillin/tazobactam administered peripherally by IVP. Methods. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate adverse drug reactions after administration of a single dose of IVP piperacillin/tazobactam through a peripheral line in an emergency department from August 2016 through November 2017. RESULTS: A total of 1,813 patients received 1 dose of IVP piperacillin/tazobactam during the study timeframe. Three hundred patients were randomly selected for assessment of safety and tolerability. Two hundred ninety-nine patients (99.7%) tolerated IVP piperacillin/tazobactam. One patient had an allergic reaction that included itching and hives. No infusion-related reactions were documented. CONCLUSION: IVP administration of piperacillin/tazobactam through a peripheral site is safe and tolerable for adult patients.


Assuntos
Administração Intravenosa/métodos , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/administração & dosagem , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/métodos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Urticária/induzido quimicamente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa