RESUMO
BACKGROUND: National Health Service use the Community Mental Health Service User Questionnaire (NHS-CMH) to assess care quality. However, its reliability and internal validity is uncertain. AIMS: To test the NHS-CMH structure, reliability and item-level characteristics. METHODS: We used data from 11,373 participants who answered the 2017 NHS-CMH survey. First, we estimated the NHS-CMH structure using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) in half of the dataset. Second, we tested the best EFA-derived model with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). We tested the internal validity, construct reliability (omega - ω), explained common variance of each factor (ECV), and item thresholds. RESULTS: EFA suggested a 4-factor solution. The structure derived from the EFA was confirmed, demonstrating good reliability for the four correlated dimensions: "Relationship with Staff" (ω = 0.952, ECV = 40.1%), "Organizing Care" (ω = 0.855, ECV = 21.4%), "Medication and Treatments" (ω = 0.837, ECV = 13.3%), and "Support and Well-being" (ω = 0.928, ECV = 25.3%). A second-order model with a high-order domain of "Quality of Care" is also supported. CONCLUSIONS: The NHS-CMH can be used to reliably assess four user-informed dimensions of mental health care quality. This model offers an alternative for its current use (item-level and untested sum scores analysis).
Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Humanos , Medicina Estatal , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Análise Fatorial , Psicometria/métodosRESUMO
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are self-rated scales and indices developed to improve the detection of the patients' subjective experience. Given that a considerable number of PROMs are available, it is important to evaluate their validity and usefulness in a specific research or clinical setting. Published guidelines, based on psychometric criteria, do not fit in with the complexity of clinical challenges, because of their quest for homogeneity of components and inadequate attention to sensitivity. Psychometric theory has stifled the field and led to the routine use of scales widely accepted yet with a history of poor performance. Clinimetrics, the science of clinical measurements, may provide a more suitable conceptual and methodological framework. The aims of this paper are to outline the major limitations of the psychometric model and to provide criteria for clinimetric patient-reported outcome measures (CLIPROMs). The characteristics related to reliability, sensitivity, validity, and clinical utility of instruments are critically reviewed, with particular reference to the differences between clinimetric and psychometric approaches. Of note is the fact that PROMs, rating scales, and indices developed according to psychometric criteria may display relevant clinimetric properties. The present paper underpins the importance of the clini-metric methodology in choosing the appropriate PROMs. CLIPROM criteria may also guide the development of new indices and the validation of existing PROMs to be employed in clinical settings.
Assuntos
Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Humanos , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Exercise can be an effective treatment for depression. Although the efficacy of exercise is well established, little is known concerning the biological changes associated with the antidepressant effects of exercise. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of adding exercise to the usual treatment on the thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) serum levels of severely depressed inpatients. Twenty-six participants were randomized to an exercise group (n=15, exercise+treatment as usual) or a control group (n=11, treatment as usual). The participants in the exercise group completed a targeted dose of 16.5 kcal/kg/week of aerobic exercise, three times per week, throughout their hospitalizations. The control group did not exercise during their hospitalizations. The mean hospitalization length was of 21.63 (4.5)×23.82 (5.7) days for exercise and control groups, respectively. The exercise group performed a median of nine sessions. After adjusting for previous tobacco use, a significant group×time interaction was found for TBARS serum levels (p=0.02). A post hoc Bonferroni test revealed differences between the exercise and control groups at discharge. A significant time effect (p<0.001) but no group×time interaction was found (p=0.13) for BDNF serum levels. Adding exercise to the usual treatment of severely depressed inpatients decreases the TBARS serum levels of severely depressed inpatients after 3 weeks. Adding exercise had no additional effects on BDNF serum levels.
Assuntos
Fator Neurotrófico Derivado do Encéfalo/sangue , Depressão/reabilitação , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Estresse Oxidativo/fisiologia , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Depressão/metabolismo , Depressão/fisiopatologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Consumo de Oxigênio , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Substâncias Reativas com Ácido Tiobarbitúrico/metabolismoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate relative expression of genes with the potential to translate environmental stimuli into long-term alterations in the brain - namely Early Growth Response (EGR)1, EGR3, and Cryptochrome Circadian Regulator 2 (CRY2) - in peripheral blood from patients with Bipolar Disorder (BD), Schizophrenia (SZ), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Thirty individuals ranging from 18 to 60 years were recruited for each group (BD, SZ, MDD or HC) from a Brazilian public hospital. Therefore, individuals' peripheral blood was collected and EGR1, EGR3 and CRY2 gene expression analyzed by PCR Real Time. RESULTS: EGR1 mRNA levels are significantly lower in psychiatric patients when compared to HC, but there is no difference for EGR3 and CRY2. Exploring the findings for each diagnosis, there is a significant difference between each diagnosis group only for EGR1, which was lower in BD, MDD and SZ as compared to HC. No significant correlations were found between gene expression and clinical features. CONCLUSIONS: EGR1 is downregulated in psychiatric patients, regardless of the diagnosis and may be a potential common target in major psychiatric disorders. EGR1, as a transcription factor, modulates many other genes and participates in crucial neuronal and synaptic processes, such as plasticity, neurotransmitters metabolism, vesicular transport and signaling pathways. The study of EGR1 and its upstream regulators in psychiatry might lead to potential new therapeutic targets.
RESUMO
Assessment tools for depression and anxiety usually inquire about the frequency of symptoms. However, evidence suggests that different question framings might trigger different responses. Our aim is to test if asking about symptom's context, ability, duration, and botherment adds validity to Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7, and Patient-Related Outcome Measurement Information Systems depression and anxiety. Participants came from two cross-sectional convenience-sampled surveys (N = 1,871) of adults (66% females, aged 33.4 ± 13.2), weighted to approximate with the state-level population. We examined measurement invariance across the different question frames, estimated whether framing affected mean scores, and tested their independent validity using covariate-adjusted and sample-weighted structural equation models. Validity was tested using tools assessing general disability, alcohol use, loneliness, well-being, grit, and frequency-based questions from depression and anxiety questionnaires. A bifactor model was applied to test the internal consistency of the question frames under the presence of a general factor (i.e., depression or anxiety). Measurement invariance was supported across the different frames. Framing questions as ability (i.e., "How easily ") produced a higher score, compared with framing by context (i.e., "In which daily situations "). Construct and criterion validity analysis demonstrate that variance explained using multiple question frames was similar to using only one. We detected a strong overarching factor for each instrument, with little variances left to be explained by the question frame. Therefore, it is unlikely that using different adverbial phrasings can help clinicians and researchers to improve their ability to detect depression or anxiety. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos
Ansiedade , Depressão , Psicometria , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Brasil , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Depressão/psicologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Adulto Jovem , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Ansiedade/psicologia , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica/normas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
This work redeems, contextualizes and features the social, historical and cultural aspects of the deaf community that uses the Brazilian Sign Language focusing on the social and anthropological model. The scope of this study was to conduct a bibliographical review in scientific textbooks and articles available in the Virtual Health Library, irrespective of the date of publication. 102 articles and 53 books were located, including 33 textbooks and 26 articles (four from the Lilacs database and 22 from the Medline database) that constituted the sample. Today, in contrast with the past, there are laws that guarantee the right to communication and attendance by means of the Brazilian Sign Language. The repercussion, acceptance and inclusion in health policies of the decrees enshrined in Brazilian laws is a major priority.
RESUMO
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common condition that affects the general population over a wide range of ages, regardless of gender and social background. Early-onset of MDD in adulthood, between ages of 18 and 30 years, is associated with worse outcomes and increased years of disability. Stress load and physical health have been associated with age of onset in MDD. We aim to investigate whether early onset MDD might be associated with changes in systemic inflammatory markers. We examined levels of following cytokines: IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-10 and TNFα in 234 patients with MDD. Higher serum levels of TNFα and IL-1ß are associated with the early onset of the disorder in patients with MDD. IL-6 levels were also higher in the early onset group and IL-10 levels were higher in the late onset group, but with no significant difference. Changes in the anti-inflammatory/pro-inflammatory balance have been described in mood disorders and may be implicated in its severity and pattern of progression. Our findings reinforce that higher serum levels of IL-1ß and TNFα may be associated with the earlier onset subgroup of MDD patients. Future research that target inflammatory markers of immune modulation may be, key in the search for novel preventative therapeutics.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Adolescente , Adulto , Idade de Início , Biomarcadores , Citocinas , Humanos , Interleucina-10 , Interleucina-6 , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The process of deinstitutionalization of individuals with mental disorders (MD) brought greater family responsibility in terms of patient care. AIMS: Evaluate the Quality of Life (QoL) and its associated factors of primary caregivers of bipolar and schizophrenic subjects. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 2012 to 2015 with 125 caregivers at an outpatient service of a teaching hospital in the South of Brazil. QoL instruments (WHOQOL-Bref, SF-36), questionnaires regarding socio-demographic, clinical data and depressive symptoms (BDI) were applied. RESULTS: Caregivers of schizophrenic individuals presented lower QoL scores than caregivers of bipolar individuals, with moderate effect in physical, and social domains of WHOQOL-Bref, and in physical functioning, role-physical, and role-emotional domains of SF-36. QoL scores of caregivers were lower when compared with the normative data of the Brazilian population. The factors associated with lower QoL scores were: patient diagnosis of schizophrenia, female gender, presence of clinical disease and presence of depressive symptoms in the caregiver. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder present a significant impairment in their QoL when compared with the general population, highlighting the relevance of developing support programs in the mental health services that include these caregivers.
Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar , Esquizofrenia , Brasil , Cuidadores/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To show the implementation process of IPT-G in primary care, including facilitating and obstructing factors, implementation strategies, and training and supervision of primary care professionals. METHODS: Quantitative (cross-sectional and longitudinal) analysis of pre and post-knowledge tests; qualitative analyses of the training courses; patient recruitment; conduction of IPT-G sessions; supervision of IPT-G therapists; application of a semi-structured questionnaire to assess, investigate, and develop strategies against the identified barriers. RESULTS: About 120 clinicians answered the pre-test; 84 completed the post-test. Pre- and post-test scores of IPT-G knowledge were significantly different. Twenty initially trained clinicians completed additional supervision in IPT-G. Qualitative analysis identified twelve barriers and six facilitators to IPT-G implementation in individual, organizational, and systemic contexts. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of IPT-G in primary care is a complex process with several steps. In the first step, health professionals were successfully trained in IPT-G. However, subsequent steps were more complex. Therefore, careful planning of IPT-G implementation is essential to maximize the success of this innovation.
Assuntos
Psicoterapia Interpessoal , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The definition of population-specific outcomes is an essential precondition for the implementation of value-based health care. We developed a minimum standard outcome set for overall adult health (OAH) to facilitate the implementation of value-based health care in tracking, comparing, and improving overall health care outcomes of adults across multiple conditions, which would be of particular relevance for primary care and public health populations. METHODS: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) convened an international panel (patients, clinicians, and topic experts). Following the development of a conceptual framework, a modified Delphi method (supported by public consultations) was implemented to identify, in sequence, the relevant domains, the best instruments for measuring them, the timing of measurement, and the relevant adjustment variables. FINDINGS: Outcomes were identified in relation to overall health status and the domains of physical, mental, and social health. Three instruments covering these domains were identified: PROMIS Scale v1.2-Global Health (10 items), WHO Wellbeing Index (5 items), and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (12 items). Case-mix variables included a range of sociodemographic and biometric measures. Yearly measurement was proposed for all outcomes and most case-mix variables. INTERPRETATION: The ICHOM OAH Standard Set has been developed through consensus-based methods based on predefined criteria following high standards for the identification and selection of high-quality measures The involvements of a wide range of stakeholders supports the acceptability of the set, which is readily available for use and feasibility testing in clinical settings.
Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Adulto , Consenso , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Assistência Centrada no PacienteRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) face more barriers to engagement in sports and exercise interventions. Evaluating clinical and demographic factors associated with adherence to sports and exercise among MDD outpatients could support development of new options and strategies to increase their participation. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 268 depressed outpatients were evaluated (83.51% females; mean age = 50.74 [standard deviation {SD} = 10.39]). Sports and exercise participation were assessed using a question about participation frequency during the previous month. Clinical and demographic factors were evaluated. Linear regression was used to identify predictors of participation in sports and exercise. RESULTS: MDD patients with mild symptoms of depression (odds ratio [OR] = 2.42; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.00, 5.88; p = 0.04) and patients with mild to moderate symptoms (OR = 3.96; 95%CI 1.41, 11.15; p = 0.009) were more likely to engage regularly in sports and exercise than patients with more severe depression. Moreover, smoking (OR = 0.23; 95%CI 0.67, 0.80; p = 0.007) and being divorced (OR = 0.22; 95%CI 0.57, 0.86; p = 0.03) were associated with lower rates of engagement in sports and exercise. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a significant association between clinical and demographic factors and participation in sports and exercise among MDD outpatients.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Esportes , Estudos Transversais , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes AmbulatoriaisRESUMO
Background Infertility is associated with increased anxiety, depressive symptoms and mood disorders. Unfortunately, mental health is not often addressed in infertility treatment and infertile patients could be at higher risk of self-administration of not prescribed drugs or/and be exposed to alternative emotional treatments. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the use of psychotropic medication and to evaluate the frequency of psychiatric diagnosis among infertile women seeking assisted reproductive technology (ART) therapy. Methods All infertile women starting treatment at an ART clinic who agreed to participate in the study were included. Patients were submitted to a structured psychiatric interview, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.). Current and lifetime use of psychotropic medication were assessed. Results Ninety patients who agreed to participate completed the research protocol. A total of 12/90 were on current use of psychotropic medication.Thirty-six out of ninety patients had at least one psychiatric disorder. Mood disorders were detected in 19 of the 90. Anxiety disorders were highly frequent, reaching 27/90 of the patients, as agoraphobia the most common diagnosis (12/90). Limitations The study has several limitations, such as the absence of a control group of fertile patients and strict inclusion criteria, in which only subjects that spontaneously agreed to participate were enrolled. Conclusion Women suffering from infertility seeking ART treatment are at high risk for depression and anxiety disorders and a considerable number of them are in use of medication. Its implications on infertility treatments and offspring are uncertain.
Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Transtornos de Ansiedade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Técnicas de Reprodução AssistidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In early 2020, Sars-Cov-2 was identified in China as a new coronavirus. Due to its transmission, Sars-Cov-2 has spread rapidly across the world. In the early stage of the disease outbreak, psychiatric symptoms have been reported, including depressive symptoms. In this study, we assessed the prevalence of depressive symptoms in quarantine and its association with sociodemographic variables and known protective factors for depression, such as spirituality, social support, resilience, and quality of life. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based questionnaire was distributed via social media. The instruments consisted of the 8-item EUROHIS-QOL, PHQ-9, Social Support Questionnaire, WHOQoL-SRPB, and CD-RISC. RESULTS: A total of 3,274 participants were included in this study. 23.67% of the participants met the criteria for a depressive episode. Higher age, spirituality, social support, resiliency, and quality of life were associated with less depressive symptoms. Quarantine length; mental health treatment; chronic disease; age; sex; lower levels of spirituality, social support, resilience, quality of life, physical exercise, and education; and unpaid occupation were found to be predictors of depressive symptoms during COVID-19 quarantine. LIMITATIONS: The data are limited to the pandemic initial period, the sample isn't random and the use of self-reported questionnaires are some limitations of our study. CONCLUSIONS: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in Brazil, quarantine time, treatment for mental health, chronic illness, lower levels of education, and unpaid occupation were positively associated with depressive symptoms. Age, sex, spirituality, social support, resilience, quality of life, and physical exercise showed a negative relationship with depressive symptoms.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Depressão , Adulto , Ansiedade , Brasil/epidemiologia , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are associated with impaired quality of life (QOL). However, there are scarce data comparing the magnitude of depression on QOL among persons with different chronic diseases in developing countries. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of depression on QOL in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in hemodialysis. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey conducted in 173 patients: 103 with IHD and 70 in hemodialysis. Depression was diagnosed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-5.0 and depressive symptoms measured by Beck Depression Inventory. QOL was assessed through the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) and World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-brief (WHOQOL-brief). Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association between variables and QOL. RESULTS: Depression prevalence was 14.3% among IHD patients and 9.9% in the hemodialysis group, and depressive symptoms were present in 39 and 36%, respectively. Regardless of the chronic condition, depressed patients presented lower QOL scores than non-depressed ones in all domains, and the most affected were role emotional, mental health and social functioning of SF-36, and psychological domain of WHOQOL-brief. In linear regression analysis, depressive symptoms were predictive for lower QOL in all domains, with the highest standardized beta coefficients (ranging from -0.26 to -0.64). CONCLUSION: Depression is an independent factor associated with worse QOL in IHD and ESRD patients. Among the priorities aiming at improving QOL must be evaluation and management of depressive symptoms.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Falência Renal Crônica/psicologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Depressão , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiologia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Diálise Renal/psicologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the barriers, benefits and correlates of physical activity (PA) in outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). METHODS: Data were collected from outpatients under treatment for MDD at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Barriers and benefits were assessed with the Exercise Barriers/Benefits Scale (EBBS). Objective and self-reported PA were assessed with pedometers and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), respectively. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 65 outpatients (82% female; mean ageâ¯=â¯50.9 years; SDâ¯=â¯10.1). Improvement in physical performance was the most reported benefit (meanâ¯=â¯3.00; SDâ¯=â¯0.3) while the most reported barrier was physical exertion (meanâ¯=â¯2.95; SDâ¯=â¯0.4). Depression symptom severity was negatively correlated with life enhancement (râ¯=â¯-0.337; pâ¯=â¯0.009), physical performance (r=-0.348; pâ¯=â¯0.007), psychological outlook (r=-0.364; pâ¯=â¯0.005), social interaction (r=-0.317; pâ¯=â¯0.015) and preventive health (r=-0.352; pâ¯=â¯0.007). CONCLUSION: Physical exertion is the most perceived barrier for PA in people with MDD. Symptom severity is associated with higher barrier levels, whilst higher current PA levels are associated with more benefits and lesser barriers. Interventions targeting PA promotion should consider the identified benefits and barriers when developing PA programs for people with MDD in outpatient settings.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Exercício Físico/psicologia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/psicologia , Actigrafia , Adulto , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Brasil , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autorrelato , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL)-brief and SF-36 in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Considering that depression is known to be associated with bad outcomes in CAD and it is highly associated with poor Quality of Life (QOL), we tested the correlation between WHOQOL and SF-36 and an instrument to screen depressive symptoms. It is a cross-sectional survey conducted in 103 patients with documented CAD. QOL was measured through WHOQOL-brief and SF-36 and depressive symptoms were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). To evaluate convergent validity, the correlations between both QOL assessment instruments were examined; discriminant validity was assessed through BDI and QOL instruments correlations. Coefficient Cronbach's alpha was used to test reliability. Percentages of floor and ceiling effects were higher in SF-36 scores than the WHOQOL-brief ones. Although WHOQOL-brief showed a maximum of 1% of floor effect and 9% of ceiling effect, SF-36 presented 40 and 32%, respectively. Internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.65 to 0.85 for the WHOQOL-brief and 0.57 to 0.89 for the SF-36. Correlations between subscales of WHOQOL-brief and BDI ranged from -0.74 to -0.61 and correlations between subscales of SF-36 and BDI ranged from -0.68 to -0.26. SF-36 and WHOQOL-brief seem to be valid and consistent QOL measures in patients with CAD. Researchers should define the aims of their studies before choosing which instrument to use, because they appear to measure different constructs of QOL.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Nível de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Depressão , Humanos , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
This paper aims at identifying symptoms of depression in primary health care service users, assessing the association between sociodemographic characteristics and the impact of those symptoms on the quality of life. It is a transversal study with a consecutive sampling of ninety-five patients of a primary health care unit, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and WHOQOL-Bref were used to measure depressive symptoms and quality of life, respectively. No significant association was found among sociodemographic data, depression symptoms, and quality of life. Nevertheless, forty-four patients (46%) had depression symptoms associated to a significantly worse quality of life in all areas (p < 0.001). This finding shows the importance of being aware of the presence of depression, even in primary health care service users, considering the negative impact that depression symptoms have on the quality of life.
Assuntos
Depressão/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Assessing therapeutic response in depression requires scales that adequately measure the core symptoms of depressive symptomatology. The main goal of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) and the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6) in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), bipolar depression and bipolar depression with mixed features. We conducted a reanalysis of a pragmatic clinical trial in an outpatient clinic for mood disorders that included eight weeks of follow-up. A Mokken analysis was performed to evaluate the unidimensionality of the HAM-D17 and HAM-D6, and the Spearman correlation was used to assess concurrent validity between the HAM-D17, the HAM-D6 and quality of life scale (SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF) scores. A total of 237 patients with a mean age of 40.2 years (±11.7) were included. According to the DSM-IV criteria, 58 (24.5%) were diagnosed with MDD and 73 (30.8%) were diagnosed with bipolar depression. Bipolar depression with mixed features was diagnosed in 106 (44.7%) patients according to the DSM-IV and supplemented by the Cincinnati criteria. Only the HAM-D6 scale proved to be unidimensional, showing strong homogeneity for evaluating MDD, moderate homogeneity for bipolar depression and weak homogeneity for bipolar depression with mixed features. Both the HAM-D17 and the HAM-D6 had inverse, significant correlations at baseline with SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF scores. This is the first study to include bipolar depression patients with mixed features in an assessment of HAM-D6 unidimensionality.
Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometria , Qualidade de VidaAssuntos
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Humanos , Psicoterapia , Dissidências e Disputas , Saúde Mental , Pandemias , PesarRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Readmission into inpatient psychiatric beds is a useful outcome for patients, care providers, and policymakers. This study aims to investigate the role of level of symptoms at discharge and type of post-discharge care in determining readmissions after a year before a psychiatric admission. METHODS: We performed a prospective and observational study in a general hospital psychiatric facility. Patients were assessed at admission, discharge, and one year after discharge. We used a multivariable logistic regression to determine predictors of readmission. RESULTS: In total, 488 patients were included at admission, and 401 (82,17%) were accessed in the follow-up period. Psychiatric readmissions occurred in 29.17% of the followed patients. The number of previous admissions represents a 38% higher chance of being readmitted (OR 1.38; CI 1.16-1.60). For patients admitted in a depressive episode, not being in remission at discharge increases 140% the chance to be readmitted (OR 2.40; CI 1.14-5.07) as well as the follow-up at primary (OR 5.27; CI 1.06-26.15). For those with Schizophrenia and related disorders, higher scores in BPRS at discharge increases the chance to be readmitted (OR 1.28, CI 1.11-1.48). CONCLUSION: Level of symptoms at discharge was related to higher chance to be readmitted in patients admitted in a depressive episode and those with schizophrenia and related disorders. Findings of the type of care raise the need for further investigation. Also, this finding confirms the importance of the history of previous admissions in predicting future admissions.