Implementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and hospital charges for patients undergoing total colectomy and ileal pouch/anal anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways are increasingly being used by hospitals to improve efficiency in the care of certain patient populations; however, little prospective data are available to support their use. This study examined whether using a clinical pathway for patients undergoing ileal pouch/anal anastomosis, a complex procedure in which we had extensive practical experience, affected hospital charges or length of stay (LOS). METHODS: A clinical pathway was developed to serve patients undergoing elective total colectomy and ileal pouch/anal anastomosis. All operations were performed by two attending physicians (J.E.F., M.S.N.). Before implementation, 10 pilot patients were prospectively monitored to ensure that hospital charges were accurately generated. In addition, charge audits were performed by an outside agency to verify the accuracy of the hospital bills. The pathway was then implemented, and 14 patients were prospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In all patients the principal diagnosis was ulcerative colitis, with the exception of three patients with familial polyposis. Mean external audit charges were within 2% of the hospital bills; therefore the hospital bills were used in all calculations. The mean LOS decreased from 10.3 days to 7.5 days (p = 0.046) for patients on the pathway versus pilot patients. Mean hospital charges also decreased significantly, from $21,650 to $17,958 per patient (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a clinical pathway, even for an operation in which the surgeon has much experience, is an effective method for reducing LOS and charges for patients. This is likely the result of interdisciplinary cooperation, elimination of unnecessary interventions, and streamlined involvement of ancillary services. These results support the development of clinical pathways for procedures that involve routine preoperative and postoperative care. In addition, the benefits of clinical pathways should increase proportionally with increasing case volume for a particular procedure.

Implementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and cost for bowel resection.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a clinical pathway for small and large bowel resection on cost and length of hospital stay. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical pathways are designed to streamline patient care delivery and maximize efficiency while minimizing cost. Theoretically, they should be most effective in commonly performed procedures, in which volume and familiarity are high. METHODS: A clinical pathway to assist in the management of patients undergoing bowel resection was developed by a multidisciplinary team and implemented. Data about length of stay and cost was collected for all patients undergoing bowel resection 1 year before and 1 year after pathway implementation. Three groups were compared: patients undergoing bowel resection in the year prior to pathway implementation (prepathway), patients in the year after pathway implementation but not included on the pathway (nonpathway), and patients included in the pathway (pathway). RESULTS: The mean cost per hospital stay was $19,997.35 +/- 1244.61 for patients in the prepathway group, $20,835.28 +/- 2286.26 for those in the nonpathway group, and $13,908.53 +/- 1113.01 for those in the pathway group (p < 0.05 vs. other groups). Mean postoperative length of stay was 9.98 +/- 0.62 days (prepathway), 9.68 +/- 0.88 days for (nonpathway), and 7.71 +/- 0.37 days (pathway) (p < 0.05 vs. other groups). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the pathway produced significant decreases in length of stay and cost in the pathway group as compared to the prepathway group. These results support the further development of clinical pathways for general surgical procedures.