Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Perianesth Nurs ; 39(2): 254-262, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37999689

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To examine whether patient involvement using a Patient Decision Aid has a positive effect on pain levels, by giving them an active role in choosing a pain schedule for postoperative pain assessment and pain management. DESIGN: A nonmatched case-control study. METHODS: 101 adults 18 years or older were included to choose between 1 of 3 possible schedules for postoperative pain management. Perioperative variables, for example, patients' assessments of pain were registered at the hospital and further variables after discharge at postoperative day 1 (POD1), POD3, and POD7, for example, patients' ability to sleep and assessment of nausea. FINDINGS: Less pain after discharge was seen among patients choosing pain schedule II at POD1 (P = .0439). A significantly higher consumption of opioids (P = 0010) on POD1 in patients who have chosen pain schedule II. CONCLUSIONS: Improved patient involvement by choosing a user-controlled pain schedule (pain schedule II) in postoperative pain management increased patient empowerment.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Laparoscopia , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Manejo da Dor
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa