A Systematic Review Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair.

Introduction: Surgical intervention is the definitive management for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair from 1902. Since this time, two mainstay approaches have been used, open and minimally invasive surgical (MIS) repair. An invasive laparotomy is used in around 91% of cases. So, this systematic review of the published literature will compare the surgical outcomes of open (CDH) repair vs MIS for CDH repair and will determine which approach is superior. Material and Methods: Our literature search across MEDLINE and EMBASE included articles from 2004 to 2022, incorporating pediatric CDH repairs, human subjects only, and English language articles. Primary outcomes analyzed were rate of recurrence, length of surgery, length of hospital stay, use of diaphragmatic patch, mortality, postoperative chylothorax, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use postoperatively. Results: After application of exclusion criteria, 32 articles were reviewed. Comparison of MIS repair versus open repair had a rate of recurrence at 8.6% versus 1.6% (P < .00001). Length of hospital stay was 19.6 days versus 33.6 days (P = .0012), mortality rate at 4.6% versus 16.6% (P < .0001), patch repair required in 19.6% versus 55.4% (P = < .00001), and postoperative ECMO use of 3.7% versus 12.3% (P < .00001), respectively. Conclusion: MIS repair is associated with decreased length of hospital stay, reduced mortality rate, and postoperative ECMO usage. Hernia recurrence is still high among MIS repair groups compared to the open repair groups. Large, multicentered randomized control trials are recommended for further analysis to decipher the true superior surgical intervention.

Triple Atresia, Triple Threat? An Unusual Constellation of Primary Surgical Abnormalities.

We present a case series of two patients with tracheo-oesophageal fistula with oesophageal atresia (TOF/OA), duodenal atresia (DA) and ano-rectal malformation (ARM). This constellation of abnormalities, dubbed triple atresia (TA), is a rare combination with few described cases in the literature. Here we describe our management of these cases, as well as the results of our literature review. Both of our cases had staged surgical procedures and were initially managed with thoracotomy for repair of TOF/OA on day two of life. They subsequently underwent laparotomy for management of their abdominal pathology at day five and seven of life. Both have survived the neonatal period and are awaiting definitive surgery for ARM. Literature review yielded seven cases of TA involving a TOF, DA, and ARM. Four patients underwent staged repair, while three patients underwent repair of TOF/OA, DA and colostomy for ARM at the same time. Of these three patients, two died, representing 22% of the overall cohort. Triple atresia remains a rare subset of patients suspected to have VACTERL association, however mortality may be significantly higher. Our data would suggest a staged approach to be optimal for long term survival.

Influence of birth weight on primary surgical management of newborns with esophageal atresia.

BACKGROUND: To determine if birth-weight (BW) influences primary surgical management of newborns undergoing operation for esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA-TEF). METHODS: Newborns undergoing repair of esophageal atresia at a single specialist centre between 1999 and 2017 were categorised into three groups based on BW; Group A < 1.5 kg, Group B <2.5 kg and Group C >2.5 kg. Outcome data analysed were (i) technical ability of the surgeon to perform primary esophageal anastomosis, (ii) anastomotic leak, (iii) anastomotic stricture, (iv) esophageal replacement, (v) need for other procedures notably fundoplication, aortopexy, tracheostomy and (vi) mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Fisher's exact test and logistic regression. RESULTS: 198 patients underwent surgery for EA-TEF during the study period, Group A (n = 13), Group B (n = 73) and Group C (n = 112). Inability to perform a primary anastomosis was significantly higher in Group A vs Group B (p = 0.003) and Group C (p = 0.004). Birthweight was a significant variable in the ability to perform a primary esophageal anastomosis (OR 1.009, p = 0.004). Mortality rate was significantly higher in Group A vs Group C (P = 0.0158). CONCLUSIONS: Very low birth weight infants are less likely to achieve a definitive primary anastomosis during emergent repair of esophageal atresia, and have a higher mortality.

Does application of topical steroids for lichen sclerosus (balanitis xerotica obliterans) affect the rate of circumcision? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To determine whether treatment of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (LS), with topical steroids reduces the rate of circumcision. METHODS: Two independent reviewers performed a literature search of studies reporting treatment of LS with topical steroids using EMBASE and MEDLINE database(s). INCLUSION CRITERIA: boys aged 0-18 years, clinical diagnosis of LS, treatment with topical steroids. Literature reviews, studies of phimosis without LS and adult patients were excluded. Data analysed for each paper included age, duration of treatment, length of follow up and outcome, notably circumcision or no surgery. RESULTS: The original search identified 26 titles. Application of exclusion criteria left 6 articles for inclusion in the study. Eighty nine patients with LS were treated with topical corticosteroids. Circumcision was avoided in 31/89 (35%; range 0-100%). Median patient age was 6.5 years (1 month-15 years). Median duration of treatment was 2 months (1-23 months); median follow-up 4 months (6 weeks-5 years). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of LS with topical steroids reportedly avoided circumcision in 35% of boys. Duration of medical therapy and patient follow up in analysed studies were, however, short. A prospective randomised trial would provide a definitive answer. TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.