Urethral Stricture Formation After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion Is Uncommon in the Absence of Pelvic Radiation.

PURPOSE: Reported rates of urethral stricture development after artificial urinary sphincter erosion are highly variable. We hypothesized that the risk of stricture is commensurate with the degree of erosion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively maintained quality improvement database for all patients with artificial urinary sphincter erosion from 2011 to 2022. The incidence of postoperative stricture development was compared to the severity of erosion using a graded scale: 1, <25% circumference; 2, 25%-50% circumference; 3, >50% and <100% circumference; and 4, 100% circumference. From 862 artificial urinary sphincter surgeries, 102 erosion cases were identified, and 63 with documented erosion severity were included for analysis. Additional analysis was performed on 28 cases without documented erosion severity for validation. RESULTS: Within the main cohort, urethral stricture developed in 22 (34.9%) patients. The incidence of stricture did not vary by grade of erosion (P = .73) and was not significantly higher in men with grade 4 erosion vs lower-grade erosions (32.7% vs 50.0%, P = .34). Radiation exposure was associated with a 41.1% higher incidence of stricture (P < .01) and nearly every stricture occurred in the setting of prior radiation (21 of 22; 95.5%). In the validation group, 10 (35.7%) developed stricture, mostly in the setting of radiation (8 of 10; 80%). Overall, 29 of 32 (90.6%) cases of stricture involved a history of radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial urinary sphincter erosion does not lead to urethral stricture formation in most cases and is not associated with degree of erosion. Those who develop strictures nearly always have a history of pelvic radiation.

Multi-institutional review of non-hypospadiac penile urethral stricture management and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Penile urethral stricture disease not associated with hypospadias is rare, and there is a wide range of commonly used surgical repair techniques for this disease. We sought to compile a multi-institutional database of patients who had surgical correction of strictures in the penile urethra not limited to the meatus, and who had no history of hypospadias, for analysis using the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons length, urethral segment and etiology classification system. METHODS: A retrospective database from 13 institutions was compiled of patients who had undergone surgical correction of Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons length, urethral segment and etiology urethral stricture segments S2b/S2c and excluding E5, with a minimum follow-up time of 4 months. Failure was defined as cystoscopically confirmed recurrence of a stricture measuring less than 16-Fr. RESULTS: We analyzed 222 patients with a median age of 57 years and a follow-up of 49 months. The overall surgical success rate was 80.2%. On multivariate analysis, the two variables identified that were predictive of surgical success were stricture length ≤2 cm as well as use of a buccal mucosa graft as compared to use of a fasciocutaneous flap, which had success rates of 83% and 52%, respectively (P = 0.0004). No statistically significant differences were found based on incisional approach or surgical technique, nor were outcomes different based on etiology or preoperative patient demographics. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of penile urethral strictures of non-hypospadiac origin have a favorable overall success rate, at 80.2%. Regardless of incisional approach or surgical technique, all operations appear to have similar outcomes other than repairs using fasciocutaneous flap, which were statistically less successful than those using buccal mucosa graft.

Characterizing and Quantifying Material Fatigue of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter Pressure Regulating Balloon.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize and quantify changes in elastic properties and in vivo pressure characteristics of pressure regulating balloons (PRB) over time, we conducted an analysis of the mechanical characteristics of the PRB after removal from patients for revision surgery. METHODS: Pressure and elasticity characteristics of new and used 61-70 cm H2O PRBs were analyzed. Pressure-volume curves were generated using commercially available urodynamics equipment. PRB pressures were measured at a standard fill volume (23 cc). Elastance was calculated by the slope of the tangent line at the inflection point of the pressure-volume curve. Tests were repeated 5 times per PRB and intraclass correlations were used to gauge test-retest reliability. Regression models were used for continuous variables based on data distribution. RESULTS: Twenty-seven used PRBs were analyzed after excluding 3 for alternative pressure ratings and 2 for occult pinpoint leaks. Time from artificial urinary sphincter placement to removal ranged from 0.02-17.6 years (median 8.4, interquartile range (IQR) 5.7-10.0). The mean pressure of all extracted PRBs: 58.8 cm H=O (± 7.4), 17 (62.9%) below the standard operating range. Each year of use in-vivo was associated with 1.09 cm H2O pressure loss on linear regression (P <.01 CI -1.52 to -0.65). PRB pressures were not significantly different according to indication for removal (1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) P = .11). Loss of elastance was non-linear, decreasing by 1.9% per year on Poisson regression (P <.01, CI -0.03 to -0.01). When accounting for PRB age, PRB pressure was independently associated with detrusor overactivity. CONCLUSION: In PRBs tested for pressure-volume characteristics, increasing PRB age was associated with decreased pressure and elasticity.

A multimodality review of male urethral imaging: pearls and pitfalls with an update on urethral stricture treatment.

Optimum radiological assessment of the male urethra requires knowledge of the normal urethral anatomy and ideal imaging techniques based on the specific clinical scenario. Retrograde urethrography is the workhorse examination for male urethral imaging, usually utilized as the initial, and often solitary, modality of choice not only in the setting of trauma, but also in the pre- and post-operative evaluation of urethral strictures. There is, however, growing interest in utilization of ultrasound and magnetic resonance for evaluation of the male urethra owing to lack of ionizing radiation and improved delineation of the adjacent tissue. We review the various modalities utilized for imaging of the male urethra for a variety of known or suspected disorders, and provide an update on current treatments of urethral strictures. Additionally, we detail the key information needed by urologists to guide management of urethral strictures. We conclude with a brief discussion of neophallus urethral diseases following female-to-male sexual confirmation surgery.

Evaluation of Missed Clinic Visits at an Academic Multi-Provider Urology Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: In this study we elucidated patient characteristics and reasons for visit associated with missed appointments for patients in a multi-provider urology clinic. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed characteristics of clinic patient data for 4 urologists at 0.5 FTE (full-time equivalent) at a single location between March 18, 2014 and March 18, 2015. Data were collected on new and established patients, including age, health insurance status, time of appointment, reason for clinic visit and gender. The reasons for clinic visit were divided into 27 groups. We used chi-square analysis to evaluate statistical significance (p <0.05) based on expected rates for age, gender, time of appointment, season of appointment, health insurance status, benign vs malignant conditions and new or returning visit. RESULTS: A total of 4,812 clinic visits were analyzed with 999 missed patient appointments for an overall no-show rate of 20.76%. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of attendance based on patient gender, season of appointment, or morning or afternoon appointment. A statistically significant difference was found in no-show rate between benign and malignant conditions (23.23% vs 8.85%, p <0.01) and whether it was a new or returning patient visit (29.78% vs 16.66%, p <0.01). In addition, there was a statistically significant difference in patients based on insurance status (p <0.01). Patients without insurance had the highest no-show rate and those with private insurance had the lowest (38.53% vs 16.35%). CONCLUSIONS: These data reveal identifiable characteristics associated with missed clinic visits.