Recreating the village: the patient experience with a hybrid model of Group Perinatal Care (GPPC) in an academic family health team.

BACKGROUND: Group prenatal care (GPC) has been shown to have a positive impact on social support, patient knowledge and preparedness for birth. We developed an interprofessional hybrid model of care whereby the group perinatal care (GPPC) component was co-facilitated by midwives (MW) and family medicine residents (FMR) and alternating individual visits were provided by family physicians (FP's) within our academic family health team (FHT) In this qualitative study, we sought to explore the impact of this program and how it supports patients through pregnancy and the early newborn period. METHODS: Qualitative study that was conducted using semi-structured telephone interviews with 18 participants who had completed GPPC in the Mount Sinai Academic Family Health Team in Toronto, Canada and delivered between November 2016 and October 2018. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted by team members using grounded theory. RESULTS: Four over-arching themes emerged from the data: (i) Participants highly valued information they received from multiple trusted sources, (ii) Participants felt well cared for by the collaborative and coordinated interprofessional team, (iii) The design of GPPC enabled a shared experience, allowing for increased support of the pregnant person, and (iv) GPPC facilitated a supportive transition into the community which positively impacted participants' emotional well- being. CONCLUSIONS: The four constructs of social support (emotional, informational, instrumental and appraisal) were central to the value that participants found in GPPC. This support from the team of healthcare providers, peers and partners had a positive impact on participants' mental health and helped them face the challenges of their transition to parenthood.

Professional identity formation: linking meaning to well-being.

Trainee distress and burnout continue to be serious concerns for educational programs in medicine, prompting the implementation of numerous interventions. Although an expansive body of literature suggests that the experience of meaning at work is critical to professional wellbeing, relatively little attention has been paid to how this might be leveraged in the educational milieu. We propose that professional identity formation (PIF), the process by which trainees come to not only attain competence, but additionally to "think, act and feel" like physicians, affords us a unique opportunity to ground trainees in the meaningfulness of their work. Using the widely accepted tri-partite model of meaning, we outline how this process can contribute to wellbeing. We suggest strategies to optimize the influence of PIF on wellbeing, offering curricular suggestions, as well as ideas regarding the respective roles of communities of practice, teachers, and formative educational experiences. Collectively, these encourage trainees to act as intentional agents in the making of their novel professional selves, anchoring them to the meaningfulness of their work, and supporting their short and long-term wellbeing.

"Rater training" re-imagined for work-based assessment in medical education.

In this perspective, the authors critically examine "rater training" as it has been conceptualized and used in medical education. By "rater training," they mean the educational events intended to improve rater performance and contributions during assessment events. Historically, rater training programs have focused on modifying faculty behaviours to achieve psychometric ideals (e.g., reliability, inter-rater reliability, accuracy). The authors argue these ideals may now be poorly aligned with contemporary research informing work-based assessment, introducing a compatibility threat, with no clear direction on how to proceed. To address this issue, the authors provide a brief historical review of "rater training" and provide an analysis of the literature examining the effectiveness of rater training programs. They focus mainly on what has served to define effectiveness or improvements. They then draw on philosophical and conceptual shifts in assessment to demonstrate why the function, effectiveness aims, and structure of rater training requires reimagining. These include shifting competencies for assessors, viewing assessment as a complex cognitive task enacted in a social context, evolving views on biases, and reprioritizing which validity evidence should be most sought in medical education. The authors aim to advance the discussion on rater training by challenging implicit incompatibility issues and stimulating ways to overcome them. They propose that "rater training" (a moniker they suggest be reserved for strong psychometric aims) be augmented with "assessor readiness" programs that link to contemporary assessment science and enact the principle of compatibility between that science and ways of engaging with advances in real-world faculty-learner contexts.

Impact of early waves of the COVID-19 pandemic on family medicine residency training: Analysis of survey data.

OBJECTIVE: To identify how graduating and incoming family medicine residents (FMR) experienced changes to their education during the early waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: The Family Medicine Longitudinal Survey was modified with questions related to the impact of COVID-19 on FMR and their training. Short-answer responses underwent thematic analysis. Responses to Likert scale and multiple-choice questions were reported as summary statistics. SETTING: Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Graduating FMR in spring 2020 and incoming FMR in fall 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Residents' perceptions of the impact of COVID-19 on clinical skills acquisition and preparedness for practice. RESULTS: Surveys response rates were 124 of 167 (74%) and 142 of 162 (88%) for graduating and incoming residents, respectively. Important themes for both cohorts included reduced access to clinical environments, reduced patient volumes, and lack of exposure to procedural skills. While the graduating cohort indicated they felt confident to begin practising family medicine, they described being impacted by the loss of a tailored learning environment, including canceled or altered electives. In contrast, incoming residents reported the loss of core skills, such as physical examination competency, as well as the loss of face-to-face communication, rapport, and relationship-building opportunities. However, both cohorts endorsed gaining new skills during the pandemic, including conducting telemedicine appointments, pandemic planning, and interfacing with public health. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, residency programs can specifically tailor solutions and modifications to address common themes across cohorts to facilitate optimal learning environments in pandemic times.

Adapting obstetric and neonatal services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The provision of care to pregnant persons and neonates must continue through pandemics. To maintain quality of care, while minimizing physical contact during the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-related Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic, hospitals and international organizations issued recommendations on maternity and neonatal care delivery and restructuring of clinical and academic services. Early in the pandemic, recommendations relied on expert opinion, and offered a one-size-fits-all set of guidelines. Our aim was to examine these recommendations and provide the rationale and context to guide clinicians, administrators, educators, and researchers, on how to adapt maternity and neonatal services during the pandemic, regardless of jurisdiction. METHOD: Our initial database search used Medical subject headings and free-text search terms related to coronavirus infections, pregnancy and neonatology, and summarized relevant recommendations from international society guidelines. Subsequent targeted searches to December 30, 2020, included relevant publications in general medical and obstetric journals, and updated society recommendations. RESULTS: We identified 846 titles and abstracts, of which 105 English-language publications fulfilled eligibility criteria and were included in our study. A multidisciplinary team representing clinicians from various disciplines, academics, administrators and training program directors critically appraised the literature to collate recommendations by multiple jurisdictions, including a quaternary care Canadian hospital, to provide context and rationale for viable options. INTERPRETATION: There are different schools of thought regarding effective practices in obstetric and neonatal services. Our critical review presents the rationale to effectively modify services, based on the phase of the pandemic, the prevalence of infection in the population, and resource availability.

N° 367-2019 Lignes Directrices Canadiennes Sur L'activité Physique Durant La Grossesse.

OBJECTIF: L'objectif est de guider les femmes enceintes et les professionnels de l'obstétrique et de l'exercice en ce qui concerne l'activité physique prénatale. RéSULTATS: Les issues évaluées étaient la morbidité maternelle, fœtale ou néonatale et la mortalité fœtale pendant et après la grossesse. DONNéES: Nous avons interrogé MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, la Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, le Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus et la Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, ERIC, SPORTDiscus, ClinicalTrials.gov de leur création jusqu'au 6 janvier 2017. Les études primaires de tous types étaient admissibles, à l'exception des études de cas. Seules les publications en anglais, en espagnol et en français ont été retenues. Les articles liés à l'activité physique durant la grossesse qui abordaient la morbidité maternelle, fœtale ou néonatale ou la mortalité fœtale étaient admissibles. La qualité des données probantes a été évaluée au moyen de l'approche GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). VALEURS: Le groupe d'experts responsable des lignes directrices a recueilli les commentaires d'utilisateurs finaux (fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux, professionnels de l'exercice, chercheurs, organismes responsables de politiques, et femmes enceintes et en période postpartum). La directive clinique a été élaborée au moyen de l'outil Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation (AGREE) II. AVANTAGES, INCONVéNIENTS, ET COûTS: Les avantages de l'activité physique prénatale sont modérés, et aucun inconvénient n'a été relevé; la différence entre les conséquences désirables et indésirables (avantage net) devrait donc être modérée. La majorité des intervenants et des utilisateurs finaux ont indiqué qu'il serait faisable, acceptable et équitable de suivre ces recommandations, qui nécessitent généralement des ressources minimes de la part des personnes et des systèmes de santé. PRÉAMBULE: Les présentes lignes directrices contiennent des recommandations fondées sur des données probantes au sujet de l'activité physique durant la grossesse visant à favoriser la santé maternelle, fœtale et néonatale. En l'absence de contre-indications (voir la liste détaillée plus loin), le fait de suivre ces lignes directrices est associé à : 1) moins de complications pour le nouveau-né (p. ex., gros par rapport à l'âge gestationnel); et 2) des bienfaits pour la santé maternelle (p. ex., diminution du risque de prééclampsie, d'hypertension gravidique, de diabète gestationnel, de césarienne, d'accouchement opératoire, d'incontinence urinaire, de gain de poids excessif durant la grossesse et de dépression; amélioration de la glycémie; diminution du gain de poids total durant la grossesse; et diminution de la gravité des symptômes dépressifs et de la douleur lombo-pelvienne). L'activité physique n'est pas associée à la fausse couche, à la mortinaissance, au décès néonatal, à l'accouchement prématuré, à la rupture prématurée préterme des membranes, à l'hypoglycémie néonatale, au poids insuffisant à la naissance, aux anomalies congénitales, au déclenchement du travail, ou aux complications à la naissance. En général, une augmentation de l'activité physique (fréquence, durée ou volume) est liée à une augmentation des bienfaits. Cependant, nous n'avons pas trouvé de données probantes concernant l'innocuité ou l'avantage accru de l'exercice à des niveaux considérablement supérieurs aux recommandations. L'activité physique prénatale devrait être vue comme un traitement de première ligne pour réduire le risque de complications de la grossesse et améliorer la santé physique et mentale de la mère. Pour les femmes enceintes qui n'atteignent actuellement pas le niveau recommandé, nous recommandons une augmentation progressive pour l'atteindre. Les femmes déjà actives peuvent continuer de l'être tout au long de la grossesse. Elles pourraient devoir modifier le type d'activité à mesure que leur grossesse avance. Il peut devenir impossible de suivre les lignes directrices pendant certaines périodes en raison de la fatigue ou des inconforts de la grossesse; nous encourageons les femmes à faire ce qu'elles peuvent et à revenir aux recommandations lorsqu'elles en sont capables. Les recommandations qui suivent reposent sur une revue systématique approfondie de la littérature, l'opinion d'experts, la consultation d'utilisateurs finaux et des considérations de faisabilité, d'acceptabilité, de coût et d'équité. RECOMMANDATIONS: Les recommandations des Lignes directrices canadiennes sur l'activité physique durant la grossesse 2019 sont fournies ci-dessous avec des énoncés indiquant la qualité des données probantes utilisées et la force des recommandations (des explications suivent). CONTRE-INDICATIONS: Toutes les femmes enceintes peuvent faire de l'activité physique durant la grossesse, sauf celles qui présentent des contre-indications (voir ci-dessous). Celles présentant des contre-indications absolues peuvent poursuivre leurs activités quotidiennes habituelles, mais ne devraient pas faire d'activités plus vigoureuses. Celles présentant des contre-indications relatives devraient discuter des avantages et des inconvénients de l'activité physique d'intensité modérée à vigoureuse avec leur fournisseur de soins obstétricaux avant d'y prendre part. CONTRE-INDICATIONS ABSOLUES: Contre-indications relatives FORCE DES RECOMMANDATIONS: Nous avons utilisé le système GRADE pour évaluer la force des recommandations. Les recommandations sont jugées fortes ou faibles en fonction de : 1) l'équilibre entre les avantages et les inconvénients; 2) la qualité globale des données probantes; 3) l'importance des issues (valeurs et préférences des femmes enceintes); 4) l'utilisation de ressources (coût); 5) l'incidence sur l'équité en matière de santé; 6) la faisabilité et 7) l'acceptabilité. Recommandation forte : La majorité ou la totalité des femmes enceintes auraient avantage à suivre la recommandation. Recommandation faible : Les femmes enceintes n'auraient pas toutes avantage à suivre la recommandation; il faut tenir compte d'autres facteurs comme la situation, les préférences, les valeurs, les ressources et le milieu de chaque personne. La consultation d'un fournisseur de soins obstétricaux peut faciliter la prise de décisions. QUALITé DES DONNéES PROBANTES: La qualité des données probantes fait référence au degré de confiance dans les données et va de très faible à élevée. Qualité élevée : Le groupe d'experts responsable des lignes directrices est très convaincu que l'effet estimé de l'activité physique sur l'issue de santé est près de l'effet réel. Qualité moyenne : Le groupe d'experts responsable des lignes directrices a moyennement confiance en l'effet estimé de l'activité physique sur l'issue de santé; l'effet estimé est probablement près de l'effet réel, mais il est possible qu'il soit très différent. Qualité faible : Le groupe d'experts responsable des lignes directrices a peu confiance en l'effet estimé de l'activité physique sur l'issue de santé; l'effet estimé pourrait être très différent de l'effet réel. Qualité très faible : Le groupe d'experts responsable des lignes directrices a très peu confiance en l'effet estimé de l'activité physique sur l'issue de santé; l'effet estimé est probablement très différent de l'effet réel. a Il s'agit d'une recommandation faible parce que la qualité des données probantes était faible et que l'avantage net entre les femmes qui étaient physiquement actives et celles qui ne l'étaient pas était petit. b Il s'agit d'une recommandation forte parce que, malgré le fait que les données probantes appuyant l'activité physique durant la grossesse pour les femmes en surpoids ou obèses étaient de qualité faible, des données tirées d'essais cliniques randomisés démontraient une diminution du gain de poids durant la grossesse et une amélioration de la glycémie. c On parle d'intensité modérée lorsque l'activité est assez intense pour augmenter la fréquence cardiaque de façon perceptible; une personne peut parler, mais pas chanter durant les activités de cette intensité. Pensons par exemple à la marche rapide, à la gymnastique aquatique, au vélo stationnaire (effort modéré), à l'entraînement musculaire, au port de charges modérées et aux travaux ménagers (p. ex., jardinage, lavage de fenêtres). d Il s'agit d'une recommandation faible parce que l'incontinence urinaire n'était pas jugée comme étant une issue « critique ¼ et que les données étaient de qualité faible. e Il s'agit d'une recommandation faible parce que : 1) la qualité des données probantes était très faible; et 2) bien que nous ayons étudié les inconvénients, il y avait peu de renseignements disponibles sur l'équilibre entre les avantages et les inconvénients. Cette recommandation était principalement fondée sur l'opinion d'experts.

No. 367-2019 Canadian Guideline for Physical Activity throughout Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to provide guidance for pregnant women, and obstetric care and exercise professionals, on prenatal physical activity. OUTCOMES: The outcomes evaluated were maternal, fetal, or neonatal morbidity or fetal mortality during and following pregnancy. EVIDENCE: Literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus with Full-text, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, ERIC, Sport Discus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Trip Database from database inception up to January 6, 2017. Primary studies of any design were eligible, except case studies. Results were limited to English, Spanish, or French language materials. Articles related to maternal physical activity during pregnancy reporting on maternal, fetal, or neonatal morbidity or fetal mortality were eligible for inclusion. The quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. VALUES: The Guidelines Consensus Panel solicited feedback from end-users (obstetric care providers, exercise professionals, researchers, policy organizations, and pregnant and postpartum women). The development of this guideline followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The benefits of prenatal physical activity are moderate, and no harms were identified; therefore, the difference between desirable and undesirable consequences (net benefit) is expected to be moderate. The majority of stakeholders and end-users indicated that following these recommendations would be feasible, acceptable, and equitable. Following these recommendations is likely to require minimal resources from both individual and health systems perspectives. PREAMBLE: This guideline provide evidence-based recommendations regarding physical activity throughout pregnancy in the promotion of maternal, fetal, and neonatal health. In the absence of contraindications (see later for a detailed list), following this guideline is associated with: (1) fewer newborn complications (i.e., large for gestational age); and (2) maternal health benefits (i.e., decreased risk of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, Caesarean section, instrumental delivery, urinary incontinence, excessive gestational weight gain, and depression; improved blood glucose; decreased total gestational weight gain; and decreased severity of depressive symptoms and lumbopelvic pain). Physical activity is not associated with miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, preterm birth, preterm/prelabour rupture of membranes, neonatal hypoglycemia, low birth weight, birth defects, induction of labour, or birth complications. In general, more physical activity (frequency, duration, and/or volume) is associated with greater benefits. However, evidence was not identified regarding the safety or additional benefit of exercising at levels significantly above the recommendations. Prenatal physical activity should be considered a front-line therapy for reducing the risk of pregnancy complications and enhancing maternal physical and mental health. For pregnant women not currently meeting this guideline, a progressive adjustment toward them is recommended. Previously active women may continue physical activity throughout pregnancy. Women may need to modify physical activity as pregnancy progresses. There may be periods when following the guideline is not possible due to fatigue and/or discomforts of pregnancy; women are encouraged to do what they can and to return to following the recommendations when they are able. This guideline were informed by an extensive systematic review of the literature, expert opinion, end-user consultation and considerations of feasibility, acceptability, costs, and equity. RECOMMENDATIONS: The specific recommendations in this 2019 Canadian Guideline for Physical Activity Throughout Pregnancy are provided below with corresponding statements indicating the quality of the evidence informing the recommendations and the strength of the recommendations (explanations follow). CONTRAINDICATIONS: All pregnant women can participate in physical activity throughout pregnancy with the exception of those who have contraindications (listed below). Women with absolute contraindications may continue their usual activities of daily living but should not participate in more strenuous activities. Women with relative contraindications should discuss the advantages and disadvantages of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity with their obstetric care provider prior to participation. Absolute contraindications to exercise are the following: Relative contraindications to exercise are the following: STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS: The GRADE system was utilized to grade the strength of the recommendations. Recommendations are rated as strong or weak based on the: (1) balance between benefits and harms; (2) overall quality of the evidence; (3) importance of outcomes (i.e., values and preferences of pregnant women); (4) use of resources (i.e., cost); (5) impact on health equity; (6) feasibility, and (7) acceptability. Strong recommendation: Most or all pregnant women will be best served by the recommended course of action. Weak recommendation: Not all pregnant women will be best served by the recommended course of action; there is a need to consider other factors such as the individual's circumstances, preferences, values, resources available, or setting. Consultation with an obstetric care provider may assist in decision-making. QUALITY OF THE EVIDENCE: The quality of the evidence refers to the level of confidence in the evidence and ranges from very low to high. High quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel is very confident that the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome is close to the true effect. Moderate quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel is moderately confident in the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome; the estimate of the effect is likely to be close to the true effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel's confidence in the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome is limited; the estimate of the effect may be substantially different from the true effect. Very low quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel has very little confidence in the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome; the estimate of the effect is likely to be substantially different from the true effect. aThis was a weak recommendation because the quality of evidence was low, and the net benefit between women who were physically active and those who were not was small. bThis was a strong recommendation because, despite low quality evidence supporting physical activity during pregnancy for women categorized as overweight or obese, there was evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrating an improvement in gestational weight gain and blood glucose. cModerate-intensity physical activity is intense enough to noticeably increase heart rate; a person can talk but not sing during activities of this intensity. Examples of moderate-intensity physical activity include brisk walking, water aerobics, stationary cycling (moderate effort), resistance training, carrying moderate loads, and household chores (e.g., gardening, washing windows). dThis was a weak recommendation because urinary incontinence was was not rated as a "critical" outcome and the evidence was low quality. eThis was a weak recommendation because: (1) the quality of evidence was very low; and (2) although harms were investigated there was limited available information to inform the balance of benefits and harms. This recommendation was primarily based on expert opinion.

2019 Canadian guideline for physical activity throughout pregnancy.

The objective is to provide guidance for pregnant women and obstetric care and exercise professionals on prenatal physical activity. The outcomes evaluated were maternal, fetal or neonatal morbidity, or fetal mortality during and following pregnancy. Literature was retrieved through searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, Education Resources Information Center, SPORTDiscus, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Trip Database from inception up to 6 January 2017. Primary studies of any design were eligible, except case studies. Results were limited to English-language, Spanish-language or French-language materials. Articles related to maternal physical activity during pregnancy reporting on maternal, fetal or neonatal morbidity, or fetal mortality were eligible for inclusion. The quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. The Guidelines Consensus Panel solicited feedback from end users (obstetric care providers, exercise professionals, researchers, policy organisations, and pregnant and postpartum women). The development of these guidelines followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. The benefits of prenatal physical activity are moderate and no harms were identified; therefore, the difference between desirable and undesirable consequences (net benefit) is expected to be moderate. The majority of stakeholders and end users indicated that following these recommendations would be feasible, acceptable and equitable. Following these recommendations is likely to require minimal resources from both individual and health systems perspectives.

What influences success in family medicine maternity care education programs? Qualitative exploration.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain how program leaders in family medicine characterize success in family medicine maternity care education and determine which factors influence the success of training programs. DESIGN: Qualitative research using semistructured telephone interviews. SETTING: Purposive sample of 6 family medicine programs from 5 Canadian provinces. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen departmental leaders and program directors. METHODS: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with program leaders in family medicine maternity care. Departmental leaders identified maternity care programs deemed to be "successful." Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Team members conducted thematic analysis. MAIN FINDINGS: Participants considered their education programs to be successful in family medicine maternity care if residents achieved competency in intrapartum care, if graduates planned to include intrapartum care in their practices, and if their education programs were able to recruit and retain family medicine maternity care faculty. Five key factors were deemed to be critical to a program's success in family medicine maternity care: adequate clinical exposure, the presence of strong family medicine role models, a family medicine-friendly hospital environment, support for the education program from multiple sources, and a dedicated and supportive community of family medicine maternity care providers. CONCLUSION: Training programs wishing to achieve greater success in family medicine maternity care education should employ a multifaceted strategy that considers all 5 of the interdependent factors uncovered in our research. By paying particular attention to the informal processes that connect these factors, program leaders can preserve the possibility that family medicine residents will graduate with the competence and confidence to practise full-scope maternity care.

Digitally mediated relationships: How social representation in technology influences the therapeutic relationship in primary care.

Relationships, built on trust, knowledge, regard, and loyalty, have been demonstrated to be fundamental to health care delivery. Strong relationships between patients and providers have been linked to more compassionate care delivery, and better patient experience and outcomes, and may be particularly important in primary care. The rapid adoption of digital technologies since the onset of COVID-19 has led health care systems to seriously consider a "digital-first" primary care delivery model. Questions remain regarding what impact this transformation will have on the therapeutic relationship. Using a rapid ethnographic approach this study explores how patient and provider understandings of therapeutic relationships and digital health technologies may influence relationship-building or maintenance between patients with complex care needs and their care providers. Three team-based primary care sites in Toronto, Ontario, Canada were included in the study. Across the three sites 9 patients with chronic health conditions, 1 caregiver, and 10 healthcare providers (including family physicians, family medicine residents, social workers, and nurse practitioners) participated. Interviews were conducted with all participants and 8 observations of virtual clinical encounters (phone and video visits) were conducted. Using social representation theory as a lens, analysis revealed that participants' constructions of therapeutic relationships and digital technologies were informed by their identities, experiences, and expectations. For participants to see technologies as enabling to the therapeutic relationship, there needed to be alignment between how participants viewed the role of technology in care and in their lives, and how they recognized (or constructed) a good therapeutic relationship. This exploratory work suggests the need to think about how both patients' and providers' views of technology may determine whether digital technologies can be leveraged to meet patient needs while maintaining, or building, strong therapeutic relationships.

Detour or New Direction: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Professional Identity Formation of Postgraduate Residents.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in numerous disruptions to health professions education training programs. Much attention has been given to the impact of these disruptions on formal learning opportunities in training; however, little attention has been given to the impact on professional socialization and professional identity formation. This study explored the impact of the pandemic and resultant curricular changes on the professional identity of family medicine residents. METHOD: 23 family medicine residents at the University of Toronto were interviewed between September 2020 and September 2022. Using symbolic interactionism as a theoretical framework, thematic analysis explored the meanings residents attributed to both experiences that were disrupted due to the pandemic, and new experiences that resulted from these disruptions. RESULTS: Participant responses reflected that disruptions in training did not always align with their expectations for family medicine and plans for future practice; however, these new experiences also reinforced their understanding of what it means to be a family physician. While participants felt the pandemic represented a loss of agency and negatively impacted relationships in their training program, it also provided a sense of belonging and membership in their profession. Finally, these new experiences continually blurred the line between professional and personal identities through the impact of the pandemic on participants' sense of well-being and safety. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of the pandemic on training experiences extends beyond the loss of formal learning opportunities. Participant responses reflect the collective influence of the formal, informal, and hidden curriculum on the professional socialization and professional identity formation of residents-and how these different curricular influences were disrupted due to the pandemic. These training experiences have important implications for the future practice of residents who completed their training during the pandemic and highlight the role of training programs in supporting the professional identity formation of residents.

Routine childhood vaccination rates in an academic family health team before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a pre-post analysis of a retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: There has been concern about declining routine vaccination rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on early childhood vaccination rates at 2 sites of an academic family health team in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, serving both an urban and suburban patient population. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post analysis of vaccination records from Jan. 1, 2018, to Nov. 30, 2020, for a cohort of children born between Jan. 1, 2018, and Aug. 31, 2020, from the electronic medical record (EMR) of the Mount Sinai Academic Family Health Team (including an urban academic site in Toronto and a suburban community site in Vaughan, Ontario). We estimated the proportion of children receiving timely, delayed or no vaccination for 10 publicly funded vaccines in the Ontario immunization schedule for the pre-COVID-19 (Jan. 1, 2018, to Mar. 16, 2020) and COVID-19 (Mar. 17 to Nov. 30, 2020) pandemic periods. We determined timeliness in accordance with the recommended age of administration, with a 28-day window; we considered vaccines administered after this window to be delayed. We estimated the median time to vaccination for each vaccine and present cumulative incidence curves. RESULTS: The patient population was balanced between boys (52.4%) and girls (47.6%), with an average age of 18.5 months and representation across low-, middle- and high-income groups. Of the 506 children in our cohort, 422 were up to date with vaccinations (83.4%) by the end of the study period. Comparatively, 308 (83.2%) of the 370 eligible patients were up to date for all required vaccinations by the end of the pre-COVID-19 period. Among children younger than 12 months, vaccination rates were similar in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 pandemic periods. Lower rates of timely vaccination for children between 12 and 18 months of age were amplified during the pandemic. Cumulative incidence curves were suggestive of a decrease in the timeliness of vaccinations in the COVID-19 period for the vaccines administered at 12, 15 and 18 months, compared with the pre-COVID-19 period. INTERPRETATION: Our local findings suggest a deterioration in the uptake of routine childhood vaccines in children aged 12 to 18 months in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further study is needed to determine the extent of the vaccination gap in children across Canada, including the impact of subsequent waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on routine immunization coverage in children under 2 years old in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a disruption in childhood immunization coverage around the world. This study aimed to determine the change in immunization coverage for children under 2 years old in Ontario, Canada, comparing time periods pre-pandemic to during the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: Observational retrospective open cohort study, using primary care electronic medical record data from the University of Toronto Practice-Based Research Network (UTOPIAN) database, from January 2019 to December 2020. Children under 2 years old who had at least 2 visits recorded in UTOPIAN were included. We measured up-to-date (UTD) immunization coverage rates, overall and by type of vaccine (DTaP-IPV-Hib, PCV13, Rota, Men-C-C, MMR, Var), and on-time immunization coverage rates by age milestone (2, 4, 6, 12, 15, 18 months). We compared average coverage rates over 3 periods of time: January 2019-March 2020 (T1); March-July 2020 (T2); and August-December 2020 (T3). RESULTS: 12,313 children were included. Overall UTD coverage for all children was 71.0% in T1, dropped by 5.7% (95% CI: -6.2, -5.1) in T2, slightly increased in T3 but remained lower than in T1. MMR vaccine UTD coverage slightly decreased in T2 and T3 by approximately 2%. The largest decreases were seen at ages 15-month and 18-month old, with drops in on-time coverage of 14.7% (95% CI: -18.7, -10.6) and 16.4% (95% CI: -20.0, -12.8) respectively during T2. When stratified by sociodemographic characteristics, no specific subgroup of children was found to have been differentially impacted by the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Childhood immunization coverage rates for children under 2 years in Ontario decreased significantly during the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic and only partially recovered during the rest of 2020. Public health and educational interventions for providers and parents are needed to ensure adequate catch-up of delayed/missed immunizations to prevent potential outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases.