Unilateral inline replacement of infected aortofemoral graft limb with femoral vein.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic graft infection remains a formidable challenge for the vascular surgeon. Traditionally, reconstruction with a neoaortoiliac system (NAIS) involves removal of the entire synthetic graft with in situ reconstruction using femoral vein. Whereas the NAIS procedure is durable with excellent graft patency and a low reinfection rate, it can take up to 10 hours and result in a high perioperative complication rate with significant mortality. Not infrequently, the infection is limited to a single limb. In addition, the patient may be too frail to tolerate aortic clamping for a complete graft excision. Under such circumstances, complete excision of the aortofemoral bypass graft (AFBG) may not be indicated. It is hypothesized that local control of infection and limited reconstruction using femoral vein may be acceptable. The objective of this study was to examine the outcomes of all patients who underwent partial AFBG resection and in situ reconstruction with femoral vein. METHODS: A retrospective review of all AFBG infections from 2003 to 2015 treated at a tertiary care facility was undertaken. Patients who underwent unilateral partial graft excision with inline reconstruction using femoral vein at the distal (femoral) anastomosis were included. Complete excisions with bilateral revascularizations using any conduit or any extra-anatomic reconstructions were excluded. The primary end point was successful treatment of infection. Secondary end points were procedure-related mortality, graft patency, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: During a 12-year period, partial graft excision with bypass using the femoral vein was performed in 21 patients (24 limbs). Mean age was 61 ± 12 years. There were 13 men and 8 women. Mean follow-up was 53 ± 27 months. Successful treatment was achieved in 19 of 21 patients. The two treatment failures were due to persistent infection. One of these patients declined complete graft excision and is receiving lifelong suppressive antibiotic therapy. The other patient underwent complete graft excision and an NAIS reconstruction. There were no perioperative or procedure-related deaths. There were no major amputations, and primary graft patency was 92% at 72 months. The most common AFBG culture isolate was Staphylococcus species. Approximately one-third of cultures did not yield any growth. Patients underwent anywhere from 1 to 12 weeks of combined intravenous and oral antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This limited series demonstrates excellent graft patency with a low persistent infection rate. Thus, in patients with localized graft infection, partial excision with preservation of the proximal synthetic graft is an acceptable alternative when patient factors preclude complete graft excision.

High-frequency percussive ventilation improves oxygenation in trauma patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: High-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV), a hybrid of conventional mechanical ventilation and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, has been used to salvage patients with persistent hypoxemia on conventional mechanical ventilation. We hypothesized that oxygenation would improve in injured patients with severe hypoxemia who were converted to HFPV after initial management with conventional ventilation. METHODS: Chart review identified patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) managed with HFPV. Oxygenation parameters (oxygenation index, OI; Pao(2)/Fio(2) ratio, P/F) and mean airway pressures (mPaw) were recorded at baseline and at 1 to 4, 8 to 12, and 12 to 24 hours after initiation of HFPV. Values at baseline and each time point after conversion to HFPV were compared by using analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Twelve patients, over 24 months, were reviewed. Baseline measurements were OI: 42.2 +/- 33, P/F: 70 +/- 31, (median +/- interquartile range), and mPaw: 29 +/- 8 (mean +/- standard deviation) cm H(2)O. After initiation of HFPV, mPaw did not differ from baseline. There was an improvement in OI (P = .01) from baseline at 12 to 24 hours after initiation of HFPV and in P/F at 12 to 24 hours (P = .002) and 8 to 12 hours (P = .001) after initiation of HFPV. CONCLUSIONS: HFPV may improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS without a concomitant increase in mPaw. A randomized trial of HFPV versus conventional ventilation in trauma patients is needed.

Device-specific aneurysm sac morphology after endovascular aneurysm repair: evaluation of contemporary graft materials.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed device-specific aneurysm sac morphology after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with low-permeability devices. METHODS: Between September 2004 and May 2006, 122 patients were treated with EVAR. Three different devices were implanted: 47 Zenith (Cook, Indianapolis, Ind), 46 AneuRx (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) with Resilient Dacron Graft Material, and 29 Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) with low-porosity polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Patients were followed up at 1, 6, and 12 months and then biannually with computed tomography (CT) angiography. Standard axial two-dimensional CT measurements were obtained and compared with preoperative imaging. The preoperative scan served as a baseline, and the minor axis diameter, measured at the largest axial cut of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, was compared with the same measurement at follow-up. RESULTS: Patient age, sex, and preoperative aneurysm morphology were similar among groups. Patients receiving the Zenith endograft had a significantly larger neck diameter; however, there was no difference in the neck length between groups. The rate of type II endoleaks was similar for the Zenith (17%), AneuRx (17%), and Excluder (14%). At 1, 6, 12, and 18 months, all three grafts were associated with sac shrinkage. The resulting decreases in mean aneurysm size at 18 months and corresponding shrinkage were Zenith, 11%, 6.4 +/- 1.8 mm; AneuRx, 18.9%, 12.7 +/- 2.7 mm; and the Excluder, 5.5%, 3.3 +/- 0.9 (P < .05). The sac size in the 19 patients with a type II endoleak decreased 8.06% compared with a 15.43% decrease in sac size in patients without endoleak at 6 months. No significant sac expansion > or =5 mm has been observed among any of the groups to date. CONCLUSIONS: Sac regression with all devices appears to have been favorably influenced by the new generation of graft materials and is improved compared with published reports of older generation graft materials for the AneuRx and Excluder. However, there is a trend toward greater sac regression with devices using Dacron vs PTFE. The relationship of aneurysm morphology and long-term effects on aortic stent grafts is yet to be determined.