Hypertriglyceridemia Induced Pancreatitis: plasmapheresis or conservative management?

INTRODUCTION: Hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HIAP) may result in severe morbidity and mortality. The most effective management strategy is unknown. While plasmapheresis is often performed, it is possible that a conservative approach which includes fasting, intravenous fluids and high-dose insulin, may be successful. OBJECTIVES: To compare the 28 day mortality and morbidity parameters among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to HIAP when treated conservatively, as compared to patients who were treated with plasmapheresis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed, including all patients at least 18 years of age who were admitted to the ICU between the years 2010 to 2020 with diagnosis of HIAP. Patients underwent plasmapheresis or were managed conservatively. Collected data included patient demographics, chronic illness and medications, hospital and ICU admission times, 28-day mortality, need for ventilation, number of ventilation days, need for inotropic support, daily triglyceride levels, APACHE II score, lactate on admission, need for dialysis, antibiotic treatment, surgical or percutaneous intervention. RESULTS: The study included 29 patients. Twenty two patients were treated conservatively and 7 patients with plasmapheresis. There were no significant statistical differences between the groups regarding demographic parameters, chronic disease and medications. Furthermore, on ICU admission and during the subsequent 4 days APACHE score, serum lactate and triglyceride levels were similar between the groups. There was no significant difference in mortality. However, plasmapheresis was associated with greater morbidity (longer admission times, need for ventilation and number of ventilation days, need for inotropic support and dialysis, and invasive surgical intervention). Finally, when compared to conservative management, the rate of serum triglyceride decrease was not improved following plasmapheresis. CONCLUSION: Efficacy of conservative treatment in lowering the serum triglyceride level in HIAP is similar to plasmapheresis. Due to the small patient cohort further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Failure of conservative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients.

Spinal stenosis syndrome affects mainly patients at their 5th-6th decades of life. There is a strong debate in the literature whether patients with spinal stenosis should be operated or treated conservatively. Our aim was to evaluate patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who were treated conservatively. All patients over 65 years of age who were handled conservatively in the private clinic of the senior author due to spinal stenosis syndrome were evaluated. There were 21 males and 15 females aged between 65 and 88 years. Intermittent claudication was the dominant clinical presentation. The radiological examination showed a frequent narrowing at the level L4-L5. All patients had a severe stenosis of less than 10mm diameter of the spinal canal. All patients underwent a conservative therapy which included physical therapy with ultrasound waves, short waves, and flexion exercises. All patients were offered to undergo an epidural or nerve root injection. Twenty-four patients agreed also to have one of these procedures to relieve their symptoms. All patients were followed between 6 and 10 months after the initial diagnosis. We used the Oswestry index category for evaluation. In all parameters the conservative treatment failed to improve the symptoms in the vast majority of patients. None of the patients was very satisfied with the results of conservative treatment while 33 patients (92%) were not so satisfied or unsatisfied with the results. We conclude that conservative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis is not a success for elderly patients. These patients should be convinced to undergo operative treatment.

Intertwining and knotting of a guidewire with a central venous catheter.

A guidewire, inserted into a 65-year-old patient with multisystem organ failure through the left subclavian vein, intertwined and knotted with an existing central venous catheter previously inserted via the right subclavian vein. Both the guidewire and catheter were removed without any harm to the patient.

Operative treatment for hip fractures in patients 100 years of age and older: is it justified?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a unique group of elderly patients over 100 years of age who had hip fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. SETTINGS: Academic teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All patients who had hip fractures between January 1990 and December 2001 and were over 100 years old were included. INTERVENTION: In this study, we evaluated the age, gender, type of fracture, type of treatment, background disease, rehabilitation, and time until death of all patients over 100 years, whether treated operatively or nonoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (17 females and 6 males) were identified with ages ranging from 100 to 107 (mean: 101.8). The group had 4 subcapital and 19 pertrochanteric fractures and between 1 and 4 major background diseases. Four patients were treated nonoperatively (1 due to major pneumonia and 3 refused the operative procedure). Three of those 4 patients died in the same month of admission, and 1 patient died during the second month. Among the 19 patients who underwent operation, 17 patients have died, living between 0 and 78 months (mean: 13.8) postoperatively. Two are still alive (21 and 45 months) after the operation. Eight patients died prior to 6 months, and 11 lived more than a year after the operation. A comparison between these 2 groups showed greater major background disease in the patients who died prior to 6 months (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Most hip fractures in patients over 100 years of age are pertrochanteric. Patients with 2 or more major background diseases have an increased risk for dying in the first 6 months after the operation. Most patients having operations in this age group had a postoperative reduction in mobility status and in performing basic activities of daily living.

Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients aged 65 years and older.

Spinal stenosis syndrome affects mainly patients at their 5th-6th decades of life. The main goals of surgical treatment in the elderly are to allow the individual to walk longer distances, maintain the activities of daily living (ADL) and social life. Our aim was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients. All patients over 65 years of age who underwent surgery due to spinal stenosis syndrome between 1990 and 1998 were evaluated. There were 29 males and 17 females aged between 65 and 90 years. The clinical presentation included low back pain (89%), intermittent claudication (100%) and neurological involvement (87%). The radiological examination showed a frequent narrowing at the level L4-L5 in 93.5% of the patients. The results of the surgery in a mean follow-up of 22 months were good to excellent in 80% of the patients, fair in 11%, and poor in 9%. An improvement in the intensity of pain and in walking distances was noted in 89 and 85% of the patients, respectively. Improvement was achieved in the level of daily activity and in social lives in 57 and 61%, respectively. Major and minor complication rates were 6.5 and 19.5%, respectively. No mortality was noted in this series. Eighty-seven percent of the patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery. We conclude that Surgery for spinal stenosis is a successful and relatively safe procedure, also for patients aged over 65, and should be considered as a treatment option for these patients.

Video-assisted transthoracic sympathectomy in the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis: friend or foe?

The authors hypothesize that palmar hyperhidrosis is a systemic manifestation of abnormal sudomotor function; consequently, thoracoscopic sympathectomy to alleviate symptoms in the hands may result in heat dissipation because sweating is transferred to other sites. To investigate this phenomenon and to determine whether it adversely affects patient satisfaction, a standard questionnaire was administered to 626 patients who underwent sympathectomy at a university-associated public hospital between 1991 and 1998; only patients treated at least 6 months before questionnaire distribution were included in the study. Replies were received from 336 (53.7%) individuals. The surveyed patients underwent bilateral T2, T3 (palmar sweating), or T3, T4 (axillary sweating) sympathectomy by a standard video-assisted transthoracic technique. Main outcome measures included the incidence of dry hands, compensatory sweating, chest pain, upper-limb muscle weakness, shortness of breath, and gustatory phenomena; in addition, patient perception of the success of the surgical procedure was assessed. After sympathectomy, 97.3% (P < 0.0001) and 29.2% (P < 0.001) of patients reported significant improvement in palmar hyperhidrosis and axillary sweating, respectively. Postsurgery, severe compensatory sweating was experienced in 90% of patients (P < 0.0001). The sites of compensatory sweating were the back (75%), abdomen (51%), feet (23%), groin and thigh (13%), chest (13%), and axillae (8%). Transient whole-body sweating for no apparent reason was experienced in 30% of patients. Thirty-seven patients (11%) regretted having undergone the surgical procedure. In contrast, 25% and 64% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome of the procedure. From the survey results, the authors conclude that palmar hyperhidrosis is a systemic manifestation of abnormal sudomotor function and that thoracic sympathectomy may alleviate symptoms in a large proportion of patients. However, for some individuals, compensatory sweating may prove to be an equally troublesome handicap. Because the occurrence of severe compensatory sweating is unpredictable, a reversible sympathectomy may be desirable.

Rehabilitation after knee immobilization in octogenarians with patellar fractures.

Between January 1990 and December 1999, 14 octogenarians (8 women and 6 men) underwent surgery for comminuted patellar fracture. Average patient age was 83 years (range: 80-88 years). Follow-up ranged from 1-8 years (mean: 3.5 years). Ten of 14 patients were totally independent, whereas 4 patients used a cane for mobilization. Twelve patients had background diseases. Patients underwent operative treatment with tension band wires followed by cast immobilization (knee in approximately 10 degrees of flexion) for 6 weeks. Immediate full weight bearing was initiated in all patients, and intense rehabilitation was performed after cast removal to increase range of motion. Complete union was noted for all fractures. All patients but 1 had an active extension lag of 10 degrees-20 degrees before physiotherapy and maximum flexion was 70 degrees. After physiotherapy, 4 patients regained full active extension and all patients achieved >100 degrees of flexion. Twelve of 14 patients returned to their pre-injury functional level. A slight deterioration was noted in 2 patients. Although knee immobilization may cause severe limitation in range of motion, its use in elderly patients followed by intense rehabilitation is advocated and showed good results.

Anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: low-dose epidural bupivacaine plus fentanyl.

To determine the acceptability of epidural bupivacaine-induced sixth thoracic (T6) sensory blockade and the analgesic efficacy of epidural fentanyl 50 microg, 24 parturients undergoing elective caesarean section were given a test dose of lidocaine 60 mg plus epinephrine followed by 10 ml of either 0.5 % bupivacaine (control group) or 0.5 % bupivacaine plus 50 microg fentanyl (fentanyl group) in a randomized double-blind manner. Fifteen minutes later loss of pinprick sensation was determined. Additional local anaesthetic was titrated to achieve T6 sensory blockade. Intraoperative pain intensity was assessed using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS); total dose of bupivacaine and need for i.v. rescue fentanyl were recorded. The incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and pruritus were documented. Mean (+/- SD) volume of bupivacaine was 14.1 +/- 3.05 ml versus 13 +/- 1.48 ml for the control and fentanyl groups respectively. The most severe intraoperative VAS for pain was significantly (P=0.023) lower in the fentanyl group (0.4 +/- 0.08 cm) than in the control group (3.1 +/- 0.3 cm). Rescue fentanyl was administered in 40% and 0% of patients in the control and fentanyl groups respectively. The incidence of side-effects was unaffected by treatment group. Apgar scores were similar in the two groups. We conclude that following administration of 10-15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine plus fentanyl 50 microg, T6 sensory blockade is associated with good intraoperative analgesia without obvious maternal or neonatal respiratory depression.

Delivery room analgesia: an analysis of maternal satisfaction.

On the first post-partum day, 324 mothers completed a questionnaire designed to assess maternal perception of delivery room experience. Antenatal pain expectation, actual pain severity, analgesia received, as well as maternal satisfaction and choice of analgesia for future deliveries were recorded. Forty-five percent of primiparae and 36% of multiparae reported that they anticipated suffering extreme pain during delivery. The incidence of unbearable pain was similar among patients who received no analgesia or intravenous pethidine but significantly (P<0.0001) higher when compared to epidural analgesia. During the first stage of labour, continuous epidural analgesia was associated with severe or unbearable pain in 51% and 58% of primiparae and multiparae, respectively. The incidence of severe or unbearable pain during the second stage of labour was 43% and 46% for primiparae and multiparae, respectively. Patient satisfaction with epidural analgesia did not correlate with subjective pain scores. Among mothers who received continuous epidural analgesia 70% described their experience as good or excellent and 65.8% indicated that they would request similar pain relief in the future. Despite advances in obstetric analgesia, women anticipate and actually experience severe pain during childbirth. However, due to psychological and cultural factors, as well as possible post-partum euphoria, satisfaction with the delivery room experience is high.

Alternating patient position following the induction of obstetric epidural analgesia does not affect local anaesthetic spread.

To assess the influence of gravity on epidural-induced sensory blockade during the first stage of labour, 60 parturients were recruited to a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study. In all cases an epidural catheter was placed with the patient in the left lateral position. Thereafter, patients were randomized to one of three groups. In group supine (S), the epidural injection was performed in the supine position with a 15-20 degrees right flank elevation and the patient remained supine. In group left (L) patients remained in the left lateral position for 10 min after injection. In group left and right (L+R) patients remained in the left lateral position for 5 min and then assumed the right lateral position for 5 min. Thereafter, in groups L and L+R patients lay supine with a 15-20 degrees right flank elevation. All patients received 50 microg fentanyl in 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine. Ten minutes after injection loss of pinprick and temperature sensation were assessed and pain scores measured. Height of sensory deficit 10 min after injection and after maximal blockade were unaffected by patient position. In all cases maximal blockade reached T8 or higher. Time to maximal block was 14.7 +/- 2.3 min, 14.1 +/- 1.6 min and 13.9 +/- 1.5 min for groups L, L+R and S respectively. After maximal blockade, pain scores were significantly (P<0.0001) decreased in all groups, with no differences between them. We conclude that position immediately following local anaesthetic drug administration has little effect on onset and distribution of epidural analgesia.

Alfentanil suppresses coughing and agitation during emergence from isoflurane anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of alfentanil in suppressing coughing and agitation during emergence from isoflurane anesthesia. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Operating rooms at a university medical center. PATIENTS: 34 healthy ASA physical status I and II adult patients scheduled to undergo oral surgical procedures. INTERVENTIONS: During emergence from anesthesia, patients received either alfentanil 15 micrograms/kg (in 10 ml) or saline (10 ml) when the end-tidal isoflurane concentration reached 0.3%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables were measured at one-minute intervals following administration of the study medication. A blinded observer recorded the time for patients to spontaneously open their eyes and to follow commands after discontinuing the isoflurane. The occurrence of coughing and agitation prior to extubation was noted. Patients in the alfentanil treatment group exhibited a reduced incidence of coughing prior to extubation (6% vs. 83%, respectively) and a longer time interval until the onset of spontaneous movements (21.1 +/- 2.6 min vs. 14.6 +/- 1.7 min, respectively). The interval between the onset of movement and orientation was shorter in the alfentanil-treated patients, resulting in similar extubation times for both groups. Alfentanil administration was also associated with lower heart rate, systolic diastolic, and mean arterial pressure values during the emergence period. CONCLUSION: Alfentanil decreased coughing, agitation, and cardiovascular stimulation during emergence from isoflurane anesthesia without prolonging the time of extubation.

Recovery following outpatient anesthesia: use of enflurane versus propofol.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraoperative conditions and postoperative recovery of patients following the use of either propofol-nitrous oxide (N2O) or enflurane-N2O for maintenance of outpatient anesthesia. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: University hospital outpatient surgery center. PATIENTS: 61 ASA physical status I and II, healthy female outpatients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of three anesthetic regimens. Group 1 (control) received thiopental sodium 4 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.), followed by 0.5% to 1.5% enflurane and 67% N2O in oxygen (O2). Group 2 received propofol 2 mg/kg i.v., followed by 0.5% to 1.5% enflurane and 67% N2O in O2. Group 3 received propofol 2 mg/kg i.v., followed by propofol 50 to 160 micrograms/kg/min i.v. and 67% N2O in O2. All patients received succinylcholine 1 mg/kg i.v. to facilitate tracheal intubation and atracurium 10 to 20 mg i.v. to provide adequate relaxation during the maintenance period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Recovery from anesthesia was assessed by a research nurse who was unaware of the anesthetic technique used. The mean +/- SD time to eye opening was significantly longer in the thiopental-enflurane-N2O group (Group 1) than in the propofol-propofol-N2O group (Group 3) (6.1 +/- 2.5 minutes vs. 3.5 +/- 2.8 minutes, respectively). In addition, the mean time to respond to verbal commands was significantly shorter in the propofol induction groups compared with the thiopental induction group. However, the use of enflurane versus propofol for maintenance of anesthesia did not significantly prolong the time from arrival in the recovery room to sitting, tolerating oral fluids, walking, or being judged "fit for discharge." There were no differences among the three groups with respect to postoperative pain or analgesic requirements. Finally, patients who received enflurane for maintenance of anesthesia had a significantly higher frequency of nausea and vomiting than the propofol maintenance group. CONCLUSION: Induction of anesthesia with propofol is associated with a more rapid emergence from anesthesia than induction with thiopental. Maintenance of anesthesia with enflurane did not prolong recovery compared with maintenance with propofol, but enflurane was associated with increased frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

The opioid-sparing effect of diclofenac sodium in outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the opioid-sparing and analgesic effect of diclofenac sodium in ambulatory nonimmersion extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven ASA physical status I and II patients with upper renal tract nephrolithiasis. INTERVENTIONS: ESWL was performed with a sedative-analgesic technique. Diclofenac sodium 75 mg or an equal volume of saline was given intramuscularly 45 minutes prior to the procedure. Fentanyl and midazolam were added to maintain adequate sedation and analgesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographically, both groups were comparable. In the diclofenac sodium group, heart rate was slightly higher, treatment time was shorter, more shock waves were administered (p < 0.02), and less fentanyl was required (p < 0.02). Mean arterial pressure was lower and arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter was higher in the diclofenac sodium group. There were no differences between the groups in voltage, stone size, fragmentation, dose of midazolam administered, or overall assessment by both the doctors and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients administered diclofenac sodium received a greater number of shock waves, required less fentanyl, and showed a marginal improvement in hemodynamic stability and oxygenation during ambulatory nonimmersion ESWL.

Continuous intravenous diclofenac does not induce opioid-sparing or improve analgesia in geriatric patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the analgesic efficacy and perioperative opioid-sparing effects of adjuvant intravenous (IV) diclofenac. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, double-blind study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: 40 ASA physical status I, II, and III geriatric patients (>65 years) undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of subcapital fracture of the femur. INTERVENTIONS: A standardized general anesthetic was administered. On induction of anesthesia, patients in the diclofenac group received an IV bolus of diclofenac (0.7 mg/kg) followed by a constant infusion (0.15 mg/kg/hr) until the end of surgery. In the saline group, an equal volume of saline was administered. "Rescue" fentanyl was administered in response to an increase in mean arterial pressure or heart rate (exceeding 20% of the patient's preinduction "baseline" values) that did not respond to a 30% increase in the inspired isoflurane concentration. Postoperative pain was assessed using a four-point patient-generated pain score (1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) as well as number of attempts and actual morphine delivered via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The two treatment groups were demographically comparable. The perioperative hemodynamic variables, as well as the induction and "rescue" fentanyl dosages, were unaffected by the treatment modality. Pain scores, PCA attempts, and actual morphine delivered were statistically similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant IV diclofenac does not improve intraoperative stability or decrease postoperative opioid requirements in geriatric patients undergoing internal fixation of subcapital fracture of the femur.

Effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on bladder compliance and intraabdominal pressure during transurethral procedures.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of spinal versus general anesthesia on bladder compliance and intraabdominal pressure in elderly males undergoing elective transurethral resection of the prostate. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-label study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 21 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients at least 18 years of age, undergoing transurethral surgery. INTERVENTIONS: According to a computer-generated randomization schedule, patients were allocated to one of two groups. In Group Spinal (S), 10 mg of hyperbaric tetracaine was administered intrathecally. In Group General Anesthesia (GA), patients received, fentanyl intravenous (i.v. 1 to 2 micrograms/kg and propofol i.v. 1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg for induction of anesthesia. Thereafter, a laryngeal mask airway was inserted and, with spontaneous ventilation, anesthesia was maintained by administering isoflurane (end-tidal 0.7% to 1.2%) and 70% nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen. Intraabdominal pressure and bladder compliance were recorded prior to the induction of anesthesia and immediately before the onset of the surgical procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The two groups were demographically comparable. In Group S, mean bladder compliance was significantly (p = 0.003) higher and mean intraabdominal pressure significantly lower (p = 0.007) when compared to baseline preanesthetic values. In Group GA, mean intraabdominal pressure significantly (p = 0.006) decreased when compared to baseline preanesthetic recordings. Following the induction of general anesthesia, a small change in bladder compliance was noted. However, statistical significance was not reached. Data were analyzed and compared using Student's t-test (p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). CONCLUSION: Both spinal and general anesthesia induced a significant decrease in intraabdominal pressure. While both techniques were associated with an increase in bladder compliance, statistical significance was demonstrated only in the spinal anesthesia treatment group.

The effect of tourniquet application, tranexamic acid, and desmopressin on the procoagulant and fibrinolytic systems during total knee replacement.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of tourniquet inflation-deflation as well as desmopressin and tranexamic acid (TA) administration on prothrombin fragment 1.2, fibrinogen, plasmin antiplasmin complex, and D-dimer concentrations during total knee replacement. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: 30 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients undergoing total knee replacement. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups. Patients received either tranexamic acid, desmopressin, or an equal volume of saline, intravenously. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cubital blood was drawn immediately before induction of anesthesia, 1 hour after tourniquet application, and 2 and 15 minutes after tourniquet deflation. Fibrinogen and D-dimer levels were measured using the Clauss Method and latex agglutination, respectively. Plasmin antiplasmin complex and prothrombin fragment 1.2 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). All assays were performed in duplicate, and intra-assay variability was documented. No statistically significant difference in fibrinogen, D-dimer, plasmin antiplasmin complex, or prothrombin fragment 1.2 levels was demonstrated among the groups. Similarly, within each group there were no statistically significant differences in the variables studied. However, despite the lack of statistical significance, when compared with their levels during tourniquet application, an increase in D-dimer and plasmin antiplasmin complex levels was observed in all three groups at 2 and 15 minutes after tourniquet release. In contrast, no increase in prothrombin fragment 1.2 generation was noted. Significantly more allogeneic blood was transfused in the Control and Desmopressin Groups when compared with the tranexamic acid group (p< 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of tourniquet-induced fibrinolysis or thrombin generation was demonstrated in the systemic circulation. Desmopressin and tranexamic acid had no significant effect on the variables measured.

Influence of thiopental and propofol on postoperative cognitive recovery in the elderly patient undergoing general anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess mental and psychomotor recovery following induction of anesthesia with thiopental or propofol in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-blind study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: 40 elderly patients ASA physical status I-III (> 65 years) undergoing abdominopelvic surgery with an estimated surgical time of at least 90 minutes. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received combined epidural-general anesthesia. After establishing a T6 sensory blockade, patients were randomized to receive either thiopental or propofol for induction of general anesthesia. The induction drug was slowly titrated until loss of eyelash reflex was noted. Thereafter, all patients received desflurane (2% to 3% end-tidal) and 70% nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen for maintenance of general anesthesia. To facilitate tracheal intubation, intravenous alfentanil 10 micrograms/kg and atracurium 0.4 mg/kg were administered. Perioperative analgesia was maintained with epidural bupivacaine. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A digit substitution test (DSST) and shape-sorter test, as well as patient-generated 100-mm visual analog score (VAS; 0 = minimal and 100 = maximal) for anxiety, sleepiness, and coordination, were performed during the preanesthetic interview, on postanesthesia care unit admission, and at 15, 45, 90, and 120 minutes thereafter. To induce loss of consciousness, either thiopental 2.5 +/- 1.0 mg/kg or propofol 1.6 +/- 0.6 mg/kg was administered. The mean anesthetic time was 109 +/- 30 minutes and 114 +/- 38 minutes for the thiopental and propofol groups, respectively. Emergence, extubation, and orientation times, as well as time to follow commands, were unaffected by patient randomization. Similarly, the DSST and shape-sorter tests, in addition to the patient-generated VAS for pain, anxiety, and coordination, were similar among groups. However, irrespective of treatment modality, return to baseline digit substitution and shape-sorter scores were significantly delayed (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: When compared to thiopental, propofol does not facilitate improved cognitive recovery in geriatric patients undergoing prolonged surgery.

The induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics of spinal versus general anesthesia in elderly patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the induction and recovery profiles of three combinations of general anesthesia when used as an alternative to spinal anesthesia for elderly patients. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, open-label study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: 100 [ASA physical status I, II, and III] patients over 60 years of age undergoing brief transurethral surgery. INTERVENTIONS: In Groups Propofol-Propofol (P-P), Propofol-Isoflurane (P-I), and Propofol-Desflurane (P-D), anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (1 to 2 micrograms/kg i.v.) and propofol (1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg i.v.) and maintained with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen and either a propofol infusion (75 to 150 micrograms/kg/min) or isoflurane (end-tidal 0.7% to 1.2%) or desflurane (end-tidal 1% to 4%), respectively. After induction, a laryngeal mask airway was placed and spontaneous ventilation was maintained. In Group Spinal (S), 1.5 ml 4% lidocaine (60 mg), in an equal volume of 10% dextrose, was administered intrathecally. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Induction and recovery characteristics were compared. Induction with propofol was technically easier and significantly (medp < 0.0001) faster (4.6 +/- 1.7 min, 4.7 +/- 2.2 min, and 3.8 +/- 1.4 min for Groups P-P, P-I, and P-D, respectively) than induction of spinal anesthesia (9.3 +/- 3.4 min). During the induction period, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were significantly higher in Group S. Emergence, extubation, and orientation times were similar among the general anesthesia treatment groups. In Group S, patient-generated pain scores were lower (p < 0.05) and recovery room admission longer (p < 0.001). Time to return to baseline digit symbol substitution test (DSST) scores was marginally improved in Groups P-P and P-D when compared to Group P-I. Postoperative nausea, sleepiness, anxiety, and coordination were unaffected by the treatment modality. CONCLUSION: General anesthesia with propofol and desflurane facilitates shorter induction and recovery times without adversely affecting patient comfort. Therefore, this technique may be preferable to spinal anesthesia for elderly patients undergoing short transurethral surgical procedures.

The effect of repeated epidural sympathetic nerve block on "failed back surgery syndrome" associated chronic low back pain.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the therapeutic benefits of repeated epidural local anesthetic administration on pain perception and straight leg raise (SLR) in patients suffering from chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study protocol. PATIENTS: 50 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients at least 18 years of age, who had previously undergone spine surgery. INTERVENTIONS: All participants were admitted to hospital for the 5-day duration of the study. Following epidural catheterization, fluoroscopy was performed to verify correct placement of the epidural catheter. On the first study day, all patients received depomedrol 80 mg, in 10-ml 1% lidocaine, epidurally. Thereafter, patients were randomized into two equal groups. In Group Bupivacaine (B) 10-ml 0.125% bupivacaine was administered. In Group Saline (S), an equal volume of saline was administered. Epidural injections were performed twice daily (09H00 and 14H00) for 4 days. Sympathetic blockade was confirmed by the presence of peripheral vasodilatation. Sensory blockade was assessed using loss of pin prick and temperature sensation. SLR as well as patient-generated 100-mm visual analog score (VAS) for pain were performed prior to each injection, at 15 minutes after injection, and hourly for 2 hours thereafter. Similar parameters were measured 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 46 patients completed the study. VAS for pain was marginally lower in Group B. However, statistical significance was not demonstrated. During the hospitalization period, the SLR in both study groups significantly (0.008) improved with time. However, no difference between the groups was demonstrated. In both groups, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after discharge, the SLR was comparable to prestudy recordings. In Group B, at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after discharge, patient-generated VAS for pain were significantly (p = 0.002) higher when compared to pain scores at the time of patient discharge.

Intravenous line diameter: is bigger really better?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the size of an intravenous catheter influences the cannulation success rate and procedure duration among military medics. METHODS: According to a prospective, randomized, controlled crossover study design, 114 military medic cadets were paired and inserted 14-gauge (14G) and 16G intravenous catheters into veins in the antecubital fossa. Success rate and procedure duration were determined. RESULTS: The overall success rate for 14G and 16G catheters was 80 and 86%, respectively. Average procedure duration was 33 +/- 14.7 and 35.2 +/- 14.9 seconds, respectively. No significant differences were found in either success rate or procedure duration between the examined catheter sizes. CONCLUSION: Successful intravenous cannulation was unaffected by catheter size. Therefore, 14G intravenous catheters are recommended for use by military medics on the battlefield.