Mucosal immune responses induced by transcutaneous vaccines.

The skin has been investigated as a site for vaccine delivery only since the late 1990s. However, much has been discovered about the cell populations that reside in the skin, their active role in immune responses, and the fate of trans- cutaneously applied antigens. Transcutaneous immunization (TCI) is a safe, effective means of inducing immune responses against a number of pathogens. One of the most notable benefits of TCI is the induction of immune responses in both systemic and mucosal compartments. This chapter focuses on the transport of antigen into and beyond intact skin, the cutaneous sentinel cell populations that play a role in TCI, and the types of mucosal immune responses that have been generated. A number of in vivo studies in murine models have provided information about the broad responses induced by TCI. Cellular and humoral responses and protection against challenge have been noted in the gastrointestinal, reproductive, and respiratory tracts. Clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of this vaccine delivery route in humans. As with other routes of immunization, the type of vaccine formulation and choice of adjuvant may be critical for achieving appropriate responses and can be tailored to activate specific immune-responsive cells in the skin to increase the efficacy of TCI against mucosal pathogens.

Adjuvant selection regulates gut migration and phenotypic diversity of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells following parenteral immunization.

Infectious diarrheal diseases are the second leading cause of death in children under 5 years, making vaccines against these diseases a high priority. It is known that certain vaccine adjuvants, chiefly bacterial ADP-ribosylating enterotoxins, can induce mucosal antibodies when delivered parenterally. Based on this, we reasoned vaccine-specific mucosal cellular immunity could be induced via parenteral immunization with these adjuvants. Here, we show that, in contrast to the Toll-like receptor-9 agonist CpG, intradermal immunization with non-toxic double-mutant heat-labile toxin (dmLT) from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli drove endogenous, antigen-specific CD4+ T cells to expand and upregulate the gut-homing integrin α4ß7. This was followed by T-cell migration into gut-draining lymph nodes and both small and large intestines. We also found that dmLT produces a balanced T-helper 1 and 17 (Th1 and Th17) response, whereas T cells from CpG immunized mice were predominantly Th1. Immunization with dmLT preferentially engaged CD103+ dendritic cells (DCs) compared with CpG, and mice deficient in CD103+ DCs were unable to fully license antigen-specific T-cell migration to the intestinal mucosae following parenteral immunization. This work has the potential to redirect the design of existing and next generation vaccines to elicit pathogen-specific immunity in the intestinal tract with non-mucosal immunization.

Bacterial toxins as mucosal adjuvants.

The use of mucosally administered killed bacteria or viruses as vaccines has a number of attractive features over the use of viable attenuated organisms, including safety, cost, storage and ease of delivery. Unfortunately, mucosally administered killed organisms are not usually effective as vaccines. The use of LT(R192G), a genetically detoxified derivative of LT, as a mucosal adjuvant enables the use of killed bacteria or viruses as vaccines by enhancing the overall humoral and cellular host immune response to these organisms, especially the Th1 arm of the immune response. With this adjuvant, protective responses equivalent to those elicited by live attenuated organisms can be achieved with killed organisms without the potential side effects. These findings have significant implications for vaccine development and further support the potential of LT(R192G) to function as a safe, effective adjuvant for mucosally administered vaccines. There are a number of unresolved issues regarding the use of LT and CT mutants as mucosal adjuvants. Both active-site and protease-site mutants of LT and CT have been constructed and adjuvanticity reported for these molecules in various animal models and with different antigens. There needs to be a side-by-side comparison of CT, LT, active-site mutants, protease-site mutants and recombinant B subunits regarding the ability to induce specific, targeted immunological outcomes as a function of route of immunization and nature of the co-administered antigen. Those side-by-side comparisons have not been carried out and there is a substantial body of evidence indicating that the outcomes may very well be different. With that information, vaccine strategies could be designed employing the optimum adjuvant/antigen formulation and route of administration for a variety of bacterial and viral pathogens. Also lacking is an understanding of the underlying cellular and intracellular signaling pathways activated by these different molecules and an understanding of the mechanisms of adjuvanticity at the cellular level. These are important issues because they take us beyond the phenomenological observations of "enhanced immunity" to a more clear understanding of the mechanisms of adjuvant activity.

Use of nanocarriers for transdermal vaccine delivery.

Transdermal delivery is a safe, noninvasive method of administering vaccines directly onto bare skin, offering several potential advantages over traditional needle delivery. This technology is limited by the relative inefficiency of transport of large-molecular-weight vaccine antigens across intact skin. Recent evidence has shown that this barrier can be overcome by properly structured nanosized particles (nanocarriers). The specialized assembly of each type of nanocarrier gives each unique properties and different interactions within the stratum corneum. The use of nanocarriers for vaccine delivery is a platform technology, applicable to delivery of a variety of existing and potential vaccines.

Mucosal adjuvants.

Induction of immune responses following oral immunization is frequently dependent upon the co-administration of appropriate adjuvants that can initiate and support the transition from innate to adaptive immunity. The three bacterial products with the greatest potential to function as mucosal adjuvants are the ADP-ribosylating enterotoxins (cholera toxin and the heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli), synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides containing unmethylated CpG dinucleotides (CpG ODN), and monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL). The mechanism of adjuvanticity of the ADP-ribosylating enterotoxins is the subject of considerable debate. Our own view is that adjuvanticity is an outcome and not an event. It is likely that these molecules exert their adjuvant function by interacting with a variety of cell types, including epithelial cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and possibly B- and T-lymphocytes. The adjuvant activities of CpG and MPL are due to several different effects they have on innate and adaptive immune responses and both MPL and CpG act through MyD88-dependent and -independent pathways. This presentation will summarize the probable mechanisms of action of these diverse mucosal adjuvants and discuss potential synergy between these molecules for use in conjunction with plant-derived vaccines.