Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(4): 644-648, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32146036

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of cystic duct embolization and chemical gallbladder ablation as an alternative to cholecystectomy in high-risk patients with calculous cholecystitis who were not candidates for surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 10 patients with acute cholecystitis (7 males and 3 females) aged 70-91 years (average age, 81.6 years) between 2013 and 2019. A cholecystostomy catheter was inserted during the acute phase, followed by cystic duct coil embolization performed via the existing drainage tube tract. Once asymptomatic, 3% aethoxysklerol was injected into the gallbladder, and the drain was removed upon sonographic confirmation that the gallbladder remained contracted. Each phase of the procedure was performed with an interval of 2-3 weeks. Clinical, cholangiographic, and sonographic data were collected before and after drain removal at 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: Cystic duct embolization was technically successful in all patients, with no immediate post-procedure complications. Gallbladder ablation performed in 10 patients was technically successful in all of them (median follow-up, 11 months). One patient required repeat ablation at 14 months, and the prolonged biliary excretions of 1 other patient ceased only at 8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Cystic duct embolization with gallbladder ablation is a feasible procedure for patients in whom cholecystectomy is contraindicated.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Ablação , Colecistite Aguda/terapia , Ducto Cístico , Embolização Terapêutica , Cálculos Biliares/terapia , Polidocanol/administração & dosagem , Técnicas de Ablação/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colecistectomia/efeitos adversos , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Ducto Cístico/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Cálculos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Polidocanol/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 47(1): 121-128, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30255420

RESUMO

Anticoagulation is often used in superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) associated with cancer (i.e malignant SVCS), even without thrombosis, but its effect on outcomes has not been reported. We aimed to determine factors and outcomes associated with thrombosis and anticoagulation in malignant SVCS. Patients with malignant SVCS diagnosed on computerized tomography (CT) were retrospectively included, indexed at diagnosis and followed for 6 months using medical records. The cohort included 183 patients with malignant SVCS of which 153 (84%) were symptomatic. Thirty of the 127 patients (24%) with a reviewable baseline CT had thrombosis of the SVC or tributaries at diagnosis. Patients with baseline thrombosis more often had symptomatic SVCS (p < 0.01). 70% (21/30) of patients with thrombosis and 52% (49/97) of those without thrombosis at baseline received anticoagulation, most often at therapeutic doses. Thrombosis occurred in 5/39 patients with anticoagulation (13%) compared to 2/18 (11%) of those without, during follow-up (p = 0.85). Anticoagulation was associated with a reduction in risk of SVC stent placement during follow-up that did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.2-1.13, p = 0.09). Major bleeding occurred in 7 (4%) patients, six of whom received anticoagulation (four therapeutic and two intermediate dose). Neither thrombosis nor anticoagulation affected survival. Anticoagulation is commonly used as primary prevention but its benefit remains to be proven. The role of reduced-dose anticoagulation in non-thrombotic malignant SVCS should be prospectively assessed.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias , Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/terapia , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Stents , Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/mortalidade , Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/cirurgia , Análise de Sobrevida , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 43(6): 912-918, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31738208

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify radiological and clinical factors associated with early mortality in malignant superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chest computed tomography studies of 127 patients with malignancy-associated SVCS were retrospectively reviewed. Involvement of SVC and tributaries, pleural and pericardial effusions, pulmonary artery involvement, and ancillary findings were documented. Univariate and multivariate models determined associations between radiological and clinical variables, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality rate was 16.5% (n = 21). Factors associated with 30-day mortality on univariate analysis included age, cancer stage, SVCS clinical severity, left jugular vein obstruction, number of involved veins, pulmonary arteries involvement, and presence of pleural effusions. Age, SVCS clinical severity, number of veins involved, and pleural effusions were positively associated with 30-day mortality on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Selected clinical and radiological variables are associated with early death in malignant SVCS. These factors may identify a subgroup of patients who may benefit from treatment escalation.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/mortalidade , Neoplasias Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Torácicas/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto Jovem
4.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 2024 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670861

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The recommendations for annual mammography for male carriers with gynecomastia are controversial. This study investigated the potential link between gynecomastia and breast cancer in male carriers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The database of a tertiary medical center was retrospectively searched for all male patients who underwent at least 1 digital mammography study from 2016 to 2023. Known carriers of a pathogenic variant in a high-risk breast-cancer gene were identified. Patients were stratified by carrier status, diagnosis of breast cancer, and diagnosis of gynecomastia. Data on demographics, hormone profile, and pathology results were compared. RESULTS: The cohort included 446 men of whom 82 were known carriers. Gynecomastia was diagnosed by mammography in 251 patients: 239/364 noncarriers (66%) and 12/82 carriers (15%) (P < .0001). Breast cancer was found in 21/364 noncarriers (6%) and 6/82 carriers (7%) (P < .6), and in 10/251 patients with gynecomastia (4%) and 17/193 (9%) without gynecomastia (P < .05). Among patients without gynecomastia, the number of breast cancer cases was similar in carriers and noncarriers (P = .3). Among patients with gynecomastia, the rate of breast cancer was higher in carriers (P < .08). On logistic regression analysis, the effect of gynecomastia on carriers was significant (P = .02). The odds ratio for a breast cancer diagnosis was 5.8 in the presence of gynecomastia (95% CI, 1.1-31, P < .04) and 0.52 in the absence of gynecomastia (95% CI, 0.2-1.7, P < .3). CONCLUSION: Gynecomastia may be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in carriers. Larger studies are needed to determine whether and when to screen male carriers.

5.
Tomography ; 10(5): 806-815, 2024 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787021

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the added value of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the assessment of lesions detected by contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary university medical center. All CEM studies including DBT performed between January 2016 and December 2020 were included. Lesions were categorized and scored by four dedicated breast radiologists according to the recent CEM and DBT supplements to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) lexicon. Changes in the BIRADS score of CEM-detected lesions with the addition of DBT were evaluated according to the pathology results and 1-year follow-up imaging study. RESULTS: BIRADS scores of CEM-detected lesions were upgraded toward the lesion's pathology with the addition of DBT (p > 0.0001), overall and for each reader. The difference in BIRADS scores before and after the addition of DBT was more significant for readers who were less experienced. The reason for changes in the BIRADS score was better lesion margin visibility. The main BIRADS descriptors applied in the malignant lesions were spiculations, calcifications, architectural distortion, and sharp or obscured margins. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of DBT to CEM provides valuable information on the enhancing lesion, leading to a more accurate BIRADS score.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Meios de Contraste , Mamografia , Humanos , Mamografia/métodos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mama/patologia , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa