ADIPS 2020 guideline for pre-existing diabetes and pregnancy.

This is the full version of the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) 2020 guideline for pre-existing diabetes and pregnancy. The guideline encompasses the management of women with pre-existing type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in relation to pregnancy, including preconception, antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum care. The management of women with monogenic diabetes or cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in relation to pregnancy is also discussed.

A pharmacokinetic assessment of optimal dosing, preparation, and chronotherapy of aspirin in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of aspirin in preventing preeclampsia is well established; however, studies over the years have demonstrated variability in outcomes with its use. Potential contributing factors to this variation in efficacy include dosing, time of dosing, and preparation of aspirin. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the difference in pharmacokinetics of aspirin, through its major active metabolite, salicylic acid, in pregnant women and nonpregnant women, and to examine the effect of dose (100 mg vs 150 mg), preparation (enteric coated vs non-enteric-coated), and chronotherapy of aspirin (morning vs evening) between the 2 groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve high-risk pregnant women and 3 nonpregnant women were enrolled in this study. Pregnant women were in 1 of 4 groups (100 mg enteric coated, 100 mg non-enteric-coated, 150 mg non-enteric-coated morning dosing, and 150 mg non-enteric-coated evening dosing), whereas nonpregnant women undertook each of the 4 dosing schedules with at least a 30-day washout period. Blood samples were collected at baseline (before ingestion) and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours after ingestion of aspirin. Plasma obtained was analyzed for salicylic acid levels by means of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic values of area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours point of maximum concentration, time of maximum concentration, volume of distribution, clearance, and elimination half-life were analyzed for statistical significance with SPSS v25 software. RESULTS: Pregnant women had a 40% ± 4% reduction in area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours (P < .01) and 29% ± 3% reduction in point of maximum concentration (P < .01) with a 44% ± 8% increase in clearance (P < .01) in comparison to that in nonpregnant women when 100 mg aspirin was administered. The reduction in the area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours, however, was minimized with the use of 150 mg aspirin in pregnant women, with which the area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours was closer to that achieved with the use of 100 mg aspirin in nonpregnant women. There was a 4-hour delay (P < .01) in the time of maximum concentration, a 47% ± 3% reduction in point of maximum concentration (P < .01) and a 48% ± 1% increase in volume of distribution (P < .01) with the use of 100 mg enteric-coated aspirin compared to non-enteric-coated aspirin, with no difference in the overall area under the curve. There was no difference in the pharmacokinetics of aspirin between morning and evening dosing. CONCLUSION: There is a reduction in the total drug metabolite concentration of aspirin in pregnancy, and therefore a dose adjustment is potentially required in pregnant women. This is likely due to the altered pharmacokinetics of aspirin in pregnancy, with an increase in clearance. There was no difference in the total drug metabolite concentration of aspirin between enteric-coated and non-enteric-coated aspirin and between morning and evening dosing of aspirin. Further pharmacodynamic and clinical studies are required to examine the clinical relevance of these pharmacokinetic findings.

The ADIPS Pilot National Diabetes in Pregnancy Benchmarking Programme.

BACKGROUND: To test the feasibility of benchmarking the care of women with pregnancies complicated by hyperglycaemia. METHODS: A retrospective audit of volunteer diabetes services in Australia and New Zealand involving singleton pregnancies resulting in live births between 2014 and 2020. Ranges are shown and compared across services. RESULTS: The audit included 10,144 pregnancies (gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) = 8696; type 1 diabetes (T1D) = 435; type 2 diabetes (T2D) = 1013) from 11 diabetes services. Among women with GDM, diet alone was used in 39.4% (ranging among centres from 28.8-57.3%), metformin alone in 18.8% (0.4-43.7%), and metformin and insulin in 10.1% (1.5-23.4%); when compared between sites, all p < 0.001. Birth was by elective caesarean in 12.1% (3.6-23.7%) or emergency caesarean in 9.5% (3.5-21.2%) (all p < 0.001). Preterm births (<37 weeks) ranged from 3.7% to 9.4% (p < 0.05), large for gestational age 10.3-26.7% (p < 0.001), admission to special care nursery 16.7-25.0% (p < 0.001), and neonatal hypoglycaemia (<2.6 mmol/L) 6.0-27.0% (p < 0.001). Many women with T1D and T2D had limited pregnancy planning including first trimester hyperglycaemia (HbA1c > 6.5% (48 mmol/mol)), 78.4% and 54.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Management of maternal hyperglycaemia and pregnancy outcomes varied significantly. The maintenance and extension of this benchmarking service provides opportunities to identify policy and clinical approaches to improve pregnancy outcomes among women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy.

The 15-Epilipoxin-A4 Pathway with Prophylactic Aspirin in Preventing Preeclampsia: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The benefit of aspirin in preventing preeclampsia is increasingly recognized; however, its mechanism of action remains unclear. Nonobstetric studies have described an anti-inflammatory effect of aspirin through the 15-epilipoxin-A4 pathway (aspirin-triggered lipoxin [ATL]). However, the anti-inflammatory mechanism of aspirin in the prevention of preeclampsia remains unknown. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To examine (1) the difference in longitudinal endogenous lipoxin-A4 (En-Lipoxin-A4) concentration in low-risk (LR) and high-risk (HR) pregnancies, and (2) the effect of aspirin on endogenous ATL concentration and the associated effect on cytokine profile of HR women. METHODS: Plasma from 220 HR women was collected at 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36 weeks of gestation. Adherence to aspirin was biochemically verified. Plasma En-Lipoxin-A4 and ATL concentrations were analyzed using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry, and cytokines, interleukin (IL)-10, tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ, IL-8, and IL-1ß, with the high-sensitivity multibead Luminex® assay. RESULTS: HR women have up to 70% lower plasma concentration of En-Lipoxin-A4 (P < 0.001) than LR women. HR women with adequate aspirin adherence (HR-AA) (n = 82) had higher plasma concentration of ATL (P < .001), lower concentration of IL-8 from 16 to 36 weeks of gestation (P < .001), and increased IL-10 concentration from 16 to 28 weeks of gestation (P = .03) compared with high-risk women who were not on aspirin (HR-NA). HR-AA who did not develop preeclampsia had higher plasma En-lipoxin-A4 (P < .001), ATL (P = .02), and IL-10 concentrations (P < .001) with lower IL-8 concentration (P = .004) than HR women who developed preeclampsia. DISCUSSION: Plasma concentration of En-Lipoxin-A4 is lower in HR women than in LR controls. Adequate adherence with aspirin results in an increase in ATL and IL-10 with reduced IL-8 plasma concentration. This study suggests a potential anti-inflammatory role of aspirin through the ATL pathway with prophylactic aspirin in HR pregnant women.

Factors that influence adherence to aspirin therapy in the prevention of preeclampsia amongst high-risk pregnant women: A mixed method analysis.

BACKGROUND: Non-adherence with medications in pregnancy is increasingly recognized and often results in a higher rate of preventable maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Non-adherence with prophylactic aspirin amongst high-risk pregnant women is associated with higher incidence of preeclampsia, preterm delivery and intrauterine growth restriction. Yet, the factors that influences adherence with aspirin in pregnancy, from the women's perspective, remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The study is aimed at understanding the factors, from the women's perspective, that influenced adherence with prophylactic aspirin in their pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: A sequential-exploratory designed mixed methods quantitative (n = 122) and qualitative (n = 6) survey of women with recent high-risk pregnancy necessitating antenatal prophylactic aspirin was utilized. Women recruited underwent their antenatal care in one of three high-risk pregnancy clinics within the South Western Sydney Local Health District, Australia. The quantitative study was done through an electronic anonymous survey and the qualitative study was conducted through a face-to-face interview. Data obtained was analysed against women's adherence with aspirin utilizing phi correlation (φ) with significance set at <0.05. RESULTS: Two key themes, from the women's perspective, that influenced their adherence with aspirin in pregnancy were identified; (1) pill burden and non-intention omission (2) communication and relationship with health care provider (HCP). Pill burden and its associated non-intentional omission, both strongly corelated with reduced adherence (Φ = 0.8, p = 0.02, Φ = 0.8, p<0.01) whilst the use of reminder strategies minimized accidental omission and improved adherence (Φ = 0.9, p<0.01). Consistent communication between HCPs and a good patient-HCP relationship was strongly associated with improved adherence (Φ = 0.7, p = 0.04, Φ = 0.9, p = <0.01) and more importantly was found to play an important role in alleviating factors that had potentials to negatively influence adherence with aspirin in pregnancy. CONCLUSION: This study identified factors that both positively and negatively influenced adherence with aspirin amongst high-risk pregnant women. Is highlights the importance in recognizing the impact of pill burden in pregnancy and the need to counsel women on the utility of reminder strategies to minimize non-intentional omission. Importantly, it emphasizes on the importance of a positive patient-HCP relationship through effective and consistent communication to achieve the desired maternal and fetal outcomes.

Clinical Influence of Nonadherence With Prophylactic Aspirin in Preventing Preeclampsia in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study.

Aspirin nonadherence and its associated increase in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events is well described; however, the prevalence of aspirin nonadherence among high-risk pregnant women at risk of preeclampsia and its influence on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Our study examined the prevalence of aspirin nonadherence and resistance among high-risk pregnant women quantitatively (platelet function analyzer 100 and plasma salicylic acid) and clinical outcomes relative to adherence. High-risk pregnant women were recruited across 3 centers in the South West Sydney Local Health District. Simultaneous clinic data, blood sample, and self-reported adherence assessment were prospectively collected at 4-week intervals from 12 to 36 weeks of gestation. Nonadherence was defined as normal platelet function analyzer 100 and nondetectable plasma salicylic acid in <90% of time points. Value of <90% is based on current data. Two hundred twenty women were recruited over 25 months. No woman was aspirin resistant, and 63 (44%) women demonstrated inadequate adherence. Women with inadequate adherence had higher incidence of early-onset preeclampsia (17% versus 2%; odds ratio [OR], 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1-8.7]; P=0.04), late-onset preeclampsia (41% versus 5%; OR, 4.2 [95% CI, 1.4-19.8]; P=0.04), intrauterine growth restriction (29% versus 5%; OR, 5.8; [95% CI, 1.2-8.3]; P=0.001), preterm delivery (27% versus 10%; OR, 5.2 [95% CI, 1.5-8.7]; P=0.008), and higher likelihood of increase in antihypertensives antenatally (60% versus 10%; OR, 4.6 [95% CI, 1.2-10.5]; P=0.003). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated lower incidence of premature delivery in the ≥90% adherent group (HR, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.2-0.5]; P<0.001).Kappa coefficient agreement between qualitative and quantitative assessment of adherence was moderate (κ=0.48; SE=0.029; P<0.0001). Our data demonstrates that aspirin is an effective prophylactic agent with an absolute risk reduction of 51% (number needed to treat, 2) when adherence is ≥90%, compared with women with inadequate adherence. Women who were <90% adherent had higher rates of preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm delivery, and increase in antenatal antihypertensive requirements. Self-reported adherence does not accurately reflect actual adherence.