Evaluation of Skin Wound Healing with Biosheets Containing Somatic Stem Cells in a Dog Model: A Pilot Study.

The administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has a positive effect on wound healing; however, the lack of adequate MSC engraftment at the wound site is a major limiting factor in current MSC-based therapies. In this study, a biosheet prepared using in-body tissue architecture (iBTA) was used as a material to address these problems. This study aimed to assess and evaluate whether biosheets containing somatic stem cells would affect the wound healing process in dogs. Biosheets were prepared by subcutaneously embedding molds in beagles. These were then evaluated grossly and histologically, and the mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines, interleukins, and Nanog was examined in some biosheets. Skin defects were created on the skin of the beagles to which the biosheets were applied. The wound healing processes of the biosheet and control (no biosheet application) groups were compared for 8 weeks. Nanog mRNA was expressed in the biosheets, and SSEA4/CD105 positive cells were observed histologically. Although the wound contraction rates differed significantly in the first week, the biosheet group tended to heal faster than the control group. This study revealed that biosheets containing somatic stem cells may have a positive effect on wound healing.

Dramatic Wound Closing Effect of a Single Application of an iBTA-Induced Autologous Biosheet on Severe Diabetic Foot Ulcers Involving the Heel Area.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic wounds caused by diabetes or lower-extremity artery disease are intractable because the wound healing mechanism becomes ineffective due to the poor environment of the wound bed. Biosheets obtained using in-body tissue architecture (iBTA) are collagen-based membranous tissue created within the body and which autologously contain various growth factors and somatic stem cells including SSEA4-posituve cells. When applied to a wound, granulation formation can be promoted and epithelialization may even be achieved. Herein, we report our clinical treatment experience with seven cases of intractable diabetic foot ulcers. CASES: Seven patients, from 46 to 93 years old, had large foot ulcers including in the heel area, which were failing to heal with standard wound treatment. METHODS: Two or four Biosheet-forming molds were embedded subcutaneously in the chest or abdomen, and after 3 to 6 weeks, the molds were removed. Biosheets that formed inside the mold were obtained and applied directly to the wound surface. RESULTS: In all cases, there were no problems with the mold's embedding and removal procedures, and Biosheets were formed without any infection or inflammation during the embedding period. The Biosheets were simply applied to the wounds, and in all cases they adhered within one week, did not fall off, and became integrated with the wound surface. Complete wound closure was achieved within 8 weeks in two cases and within 5 months in two cases. One patient was lost due to infective endocarditis from septic colitis. One case required lower leg amputation due to wound recurrence, and one case achieved wound reduction and wound healing in approximately 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Biosheets obtained via iBTA promoted wound healing and were extremely useful for intractable diabetic foot ulcers involving the heel area.

Pre-implantation evaluation of a small-diameter, long vascular graft (Biotube®) for below-knee bypass surgery in goats.

There are no small-diameter, long artificial vascular grafts for below-knee bypass surgery in chronic limb-threatening ischemia. We have developed tissue-engineered vascular grafts called "Biotubes®" using a completely autologous approach called in-body tissue architecture (iBTA). This study aimed at pre-implantation evaluation of Biotube and its in vivo preparation device, Biotube Maker, for use in below-knee bypass surgery. Forty nine makers were subcutaneously embedded into 17 goats for predetermined periods (1, 2, or 3 months). All makers produced Biotubes as designed without inflammation over all periods, with the exception of a few cases with minor defects (success rate: 94%). Small hole formation occurred in only a few cases. All Biotubes obtained had an inner diameter of 4 mm and a length of 51 to 52 cm with a wall thickness of 594 ± 97 µm. All Biotubes did not kink when completely bent under an internal pressure of 100 mmHg and did not leak without any deformation under a water pressure of 200 mmHg. Their burst strength was 2409 ± 473 mmHg, and suture retention strength was 1.75 ± 0.27 N, regardless of the embedding period, whereas tensile strength increased from 7.5 ± 1.3 N at 1 month to 9.7 ± 2.0 N at 3 months with the embedding period. The amount of water leakage from the needle holes prepared in the Biotube wall was approximately 1/7th of that in expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular grafts. The Biotubes could be easily connected to each other without cutting or anastomosis leaks. They could be stored for at least 1 year at room temperature. This study confirmed that even Biotubes formed 1 month after embedding of Biotube Makers had properties comparable to arteries.

Urinary bladder reconstruction using autologous collagenous connective tissue membrane "Biosheet®" induced by in-body tissue architecture: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: In-body tissue architecture (iBTA) technology, based on cell-free tissue engineering, can produces collagenous tissues for implantation by subcutaneous embedding a designed mold. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of iBTA-induced "Biosheet®" collagenous sheets, as scaffold materials for bladder reconstruction. METHODS: Canine Biosheet® implants were prepared by embedding molds into subcutaneous pouches in beagles for 8 weeks. A part of canine bladder wall was excised (2 × 2 cm) and repaired by patching the same sized autologous Biosheet®. The Biosheet® implants were harvested 4 weeks (n = 1) and 12 weeks (n = 3) after the implantation and evaluated histologically. RESULTS: No disruption of the patched Biosheet® implants or urinary leakage into the peritoneal cavity was observed during the entire observation periods. There were no signs of chronic inflammation or Biosheet® rejection. The urine-contacting surface of luminal surface of the Biosheet® was covered with a multicellular layer of urothelium cells 4 weeks after implantation. α-SMA-positive muscle cells were observed at the margin of the Biosheet® implants at 12 weeks after the implantation. In addition, in the center of the Biosheet® implants, the formation of microvessels stained as α-SMA-positive was observed. CONCLUSION: Biosheet® implants have biocompatibility as a scaffold for bladder reconstruction, indicating that they may be applicable for full-thickness bladder wall substitution. Further studies are required for definitive evaluation as a scaffold for bladder reconstruction.