Use of Temporary Abdominal Closure in Non-Trauma Surgery: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Damage control surgery in trauma is widely used but the evidence for the use of laparostomy in non-trauma abdominal emergencies is limited. This study aimed to characterise outcomes in emergency abdominal surgery by comparing laparostomy to one-stage laparotomy for patients of similar illness severity. METHODS: A retrospective study of adult patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery and post-operative intensive care stay was performed between 2016 and 2020 at a major Australian metropolitan hospital. Case selection was from a prospectively maintained database, and case notes were reviewed. Patients having delayed abdominal closure were compared with those having one-stage abdominal closure. The primary outcome was odds of in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), overall hospital LOS, definitive stoma rate and discharge destination. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for potentially confounding variables. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen patients met inclusion criteria (80 laparostomy and 138 non-laparostomy). The most common indications for laparostomy were bowel ischaemia (41.3%), sepsis (26.3%) and physiological instability (22.5%). There was no evidence of difference in odds of in-hospital mortality between groups (adjusted OR = 1.67, CI: 0.85-3.28; p = 0.138). Patients requiring laparostomy had a slightly longer median ICU LOS (4 vs. 3 days; p < 0.001), similar median hospital LOS (19 vs. 14 days, p = 0.245) and similar discharge destination. There was no difference in stoma rate (35.0% vs. 35.5%). CONCLUSION: Compared with standard one-stage laparotomy, laparostomy resulted in similar odds of in-hospital mortality in emergency abdominal surgery patients requiring intensive care.

Body mass index and postoperative complications in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing number of overweight and obese patients receiving kidney transplants, despite elevated body mass index (BMI) being associated with postoperative complications. Understanding associations between BMI and complications would allow more objectivity when recommending patients for transplantation or otherwise. METHODS: We analysed a retrospective cohort of 508 adult patients who received primary kidney grafts at a single centre in South Australia, 2002-2009, using hospital records and Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) data. Complications within 1 year of transplantation were classified into: surgical, wound, urological, delayed graft function, early nephrectomy and admission to intensive care unit (ICU). RESULTS: Overall, 62% of transplant recipients had a BMI above 25 kg/m(2) at transplant. Higher BMI was associated with an increased risk of wound complications (P < 0.001), early nephrectomy (P = 0.002) and delayed graft function (P = 0.03), but not associated with surgical or urological complications, or ICU admission. These associations were stronger for Indigenous Australians than other patients, especially for surgical complications. There was no BMI value above which risks of complications increase substantially. CONCLUSION: Delayed graft function is an important determinant of patient outcomes. Wound complications can be serious, and are more common in patients with higher BMI. This may justify the use of elevated BMI as a contraindication for transplantation, although no obvious cut-off value exists. Investigations into other measures of body fat composition and distribution are warranted.

Operative experience in essential emergency general surgery procedures: is autonomy achievable during surgical training?

BACKGROUND: Readiness for practice is an ongoing concern in surgery. Surgeons who have completed general surgery training are expected to be proficient in performing common emergency procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the experience and autonomy of general surgery trainees in New Zealand in 10 emergency general surgery procedures, and identify factors associated with reaching primary operator (PO) thresholds. METHODS: Operative logbook data from all New Zealand general surgery trainees from 2013 to 2017 were analysed. Data for 10 emergency general surgery procedures were extracted to determine PO and autonomous PO (mentor not scrubbed) rates. A threshold of 70% for PO and APO rates was used to define two levels of proficiency. RESULTS: A total of 120 trainees performed 40 865 included procedures. Trainees met the PO threshold for all procedures by Surgical Education and Training (SET) 5. The APO threshold was met for three of 10 procedures (appendicectomy, drainage of perianal abscess and perforated peptic ulcer repair). Final APO rates for the other procedures ranged from 18% to 58%. On multivariate analysis, SET year and case volume were associated with increased odds of meeting the PO and APO thresholds. Female trainees were less likely to reach the PO and APO thresholds for three of 10 and four of 10 procedures, respectively. CONCLUSION: Trainees had increasing PO and autonomous PO rates over the course of their training. Graduating New Zealand general surgeons likely have sufficient operative experience in emergency general surgery procedures. However, rates of autonomy are lower, and further research is needed to determine whether this affects readiness for independent practice.