Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet ; 378(9793): 785-94, 2011 Aug 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21820732

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Screening for congenital heart defects relies on antenatal ultrasonography and postnatal clinical examination; however, life-threatening defects often are not detected. We prospectively assessed the accuracy of pulse oximetry as a screening test for congenital heart defects. METHODS: In six maternity units in the UK, asymptomatic newborn babies (gestation >34 weeks) were screened with pulse oximetry before discharge. Infants who did not achieve predetermined oxygen saturation thresholds underwent echocardiography. All other infants were followed up to 12 months of age by use of regional and national registries and clinical follow-up. The main outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of pulse oximetry for detection of critical congenital heart defects (causing death or requiring invasive intervention before 28 days) or major congenital heart disease (causing death or requiring invasive intervention within 12 months of age). FINDINGS: 20,055 newborn babies were screened and 53 had major congenital heart disease (24 critical), a prevalence of 2·6 per 1000 livebirths. Analyses were done on all babies for whom a pulse oximetry reading was obtained. Sensitivity of pulse oximetry was 75·00% (95% CI 53·29-90·23) for critical cases and 49·06% (35·06-63·16) for all major congenital heart defects. In 35 cases, congenital heart defects were already suspected after antenatal ultrasonography, and exclusion of these reduced the sensitivity to 58·33% (27·67-84·83) for critical cases and 28·57% (14·64-46·30) for all cases of major congenital heart defects. False-positive results were noted for 169 (0·8%) babies (specificity 99·16%, 99·02-99·28), of which six cases were significant, but not major, congenital heart defects, and 40 were other illnesses that required urgent medical intervention. INTERPRETATION: Pulse oximetry is a safe, feasible test that adds value to existing screening. It identifies cases of critical congenital heart defects that go undetected with antenatal ultrasonography. The early detection of other diseases is an additional advantage. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal , Oximetria , Adulto , Erros de Diagnóstico , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Oximetria/instrumentação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Gravidez , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal
2.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 98(1): F59-63, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22611113

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Introducing neonatal screening procedures may not be readily accepted by parents and may increase anxiety. The acceptability of pulse oximetry screening to parents has not been previously reported. OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal acceptability of pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects and to identify factors predictive of participation in screening. DESIGN AND SETTING: A questionnaire was completed by a cross-sectional sample of mothers whose babies were recruited into the PulseOx Study which investigated the test accuracy of pulse oximetry screening. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 119 mothers of babies with false-positive (FP) results, 15 with true-positive and 679 with true-negative results following screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Questionnaires included measures of satisfaction with screening, anxiety, depression and perceptions of test results. RESULTS: Participants were predominantly satisfied with screening. The anxiety of mothers given FP results was not significantly higher than that of mothers given true-negative results (median score 32.7 vs 30.0, p=0.09). White British/Irish mothers were more likely to participate in screening, with a decline rate of 5%; other ethnic groups were more likely to decline with the largest increase in declining being for Black African mothers (21%, OR 4.6, 95% CI 3.8 to 5.5). White British mothers were also less anxious (p<0.001) and more satisfied (p<0.001) than those of other ethnicities CONCLUSIONS: Pulse oximetry screening was acceptable to mothers and FP results were not found to increase anxiety. Factors leading to differences in participation and satisfaction across ethnic groups need to be identified so that staff can support parents appropriately.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico , Mães/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adulto , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Oximetria , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa