Central line-associated bloodstream infections in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: to investigate the association between central line-associated bloodstream infections and clinical and care variables of intensive care unit patients with COVID-19 hospitalized at a reference public health institution. METHOD: a case-control study. RESULTS: the study sample consisted of 70 patients diagnosed with central line-associated bloodstream infections (case group) and 70 non-infected patients (control group). Most patients were male, with mean age of 57.93±13.93 years old and provided with a double lumen catheter. Median time of central line-associated bloodstream infections onset was 11 (8-18) days. Longer time on mechanical ventilation ( P =0.014; OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 0.91-3.51) and prone position ( P =0.017; OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.22-4.81) were associated with central line-associated bloodstream infections onset. CONCLUSION: longer time on invasive mechanical ventilation and prone position contributed to central line-associated bloodstream infections onset in COVID-19 patients.

Central line-associated bloodstream infections in patients with COVID-19 / Infecciones de la circulación sanguínea relacionadas con catéter venoso central en pacientes con COVID-19 / Infecção primária de corrente sanguínea relacionada a cateter venoso central em pacientes com COVID-19

Objective: to investigate the association between central line-associated bloodstream infections and clinical and care variables of intensive care unit patients with COVID-19 hospitalized at a reference public health institution. Method: a case-control study. Results: the study sample consisted of 70 patients diagnosed with central line-associated bloodstream infections (case group) and 70 non-infected patients (control group). Most patients were male, with mean age of 57.93±13.93 years old and provided with a double lumen catheter. Median time of central line-associated bloodstream infections onset was 11 (8-18) days. Longer time on mechanical ventilation ( P =0.014; OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 0.91-3.51) and prone position ( P =0.017; OR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.22-4.81) were associated with central line-associated bloodstream infections onset. Conclusion: longer time on invasive mechanical ventilation and prone position contributed to central line-associated bloodstream infections onset in COVID-19 patients.

Objetivo: investigar la asociación entre infecciones de la circulación sanguínea relacionadas con catéter venoso central y variables clínicas y asistenciales de pacientes con COVID-19 ingresados en la unidad de cuidados intensivos de una institución pública de salud de referencia. Método: un estudio caso-control. Resultados: la muestra del estudio estuvo compuesta por 70 pacientes con diagnóstico de infección de la circulación sanguínea relacionada con catéter venoso central (grupo caso) y 70 pacientes no infectados (grupo control). La mayoría de los pacientes eran del sexo masculino, con edad media de 57,93±13,93 años y provistos de catéter de doble luz. El tiempo medio de aparición de las infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a catéter venoso central fue de 11 (8-18) días. Un mayor tiempo en ventilación mecánica ( P =0,014; RP: 1,79; IC 95%: 0,91-3,51) y en posición de decúbito prono ( P =0,017; RP: 2,41; IC del 95 %: 1,22-4,81) se asociaron con la aparición de infecciones de la circulación sanguínea relacionadas con catéter venoso central. Conclusión: un tiempo más prolongado con ventilación mecánica invasiva y posición de decúbito prono contribuyeron a la aparición de infecciones de la circulación sanguínea relacionadas con catéter venoso central en pacientes con COVID-19.

Objetivo: investigar a associação entre infecção primária de corrente sanguínea relacionada a cateter venoso central e variáveis clínicas e assistenciais de pacientes com COVID-19 internados na unidade de terapia intensiva de uma instituição pública de saúde de referência. Método: estudo caso-controle. Resultados: o estudo foi composto por 70 pacientes com diagnóstico de infecção primária de corrente sanguínea relacionada a cateter venoso central (grupo caso) e 70 pacientes sem infecção (grupo controle). Pacientes predominantemente do sexo masculino, média de idade de 57,93±13,93 anos e portadores de cateter de duplo lúmen. A mediana de tempo de ocorrência das infecções primárias de corrente sanguínea relacionadas a cateter venoso central foi de 11 (8-18) dias. Maior tempo em ventilação mecânica ( P =0,014; RP: 1,79; IC 95%: 0,91-3,51) e posição prona ( P =0,017; RP: 2,41; IC 95%: 1,22-4,81) foram associados à ocorrência de infecções primárias de corrente sanguínea relacionadas a cateter venoso central. Conclusão: maior tempo em ventilação mecânica invasiva e posição prona contribuíram para a ocorrência de infecções primárias de corrente sanguínea relacionadas a cateter venoso central em pacientes com COVID-19.

A clinical decision support system for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at a general hospital in a middle-income country.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact that implementing a combination of a computer-based clinical decision support system and a program of training seminars has on the use of appropriate prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in two phases (prior to and after the implementation of the new VTE prophylaxis protocol) in order to evaluate the impact that the combined strategy had on the use of appropriate VTE prophylaxis. The study was conducted at Nossa Senhora da Conceição Hospital, a general hospital in the city of Porto Alegre, Brazil. We included clinical and surgical patients over 18 years of age who were hospitalized for > 48 h. The pre-implementation and post-implementation phase samples comprised 262 and 261 patients, respectively. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two samples were similar, including the distribution of patients by risk level. Comparing the pre-implementation and post-implementation periods, we found that the overall use of appropriate VTE prophylaxis increased from 46.2% to 57.9% (p = 0.01). Looking at specific patient populations, we observed that the use of appropriate VTE prophylaxis increased more dramatically among cancer patients (from 18.1% to 44.1%; p = 0.002) and among patients with three or more risk factors (from 25.0% to 42.9%; p = 0.008), two populations that benefit most from prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to increase the use of appropriate VTE prophylaxis in economically constrained settings through the use of a computerized protocol adhered to by trained professionals. The underutilization of prophylaxis continues to be a major problem, indicative of the need for ongoing improvement in the quality of inpatient care.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in a general hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in a general hospital. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study at the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, located in the city of Porto Alegre, Brazil, involving a random sample of patients admitted between October of 2008 and February of 2009. We included patients over 18 years of age and hospitalized for more than 48 h. The exclusion criteria were anticoagulant use, pregnancy, puerperium, and a history of thromboembolic disease. The adequacy of prophylaxis was evaluated in accordance with a protocol created by the Hospital and principally based on the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, eighth edition. RESULTS: We included 262 patients. The mean age was 59.1 ± 16.6 years. The most common risk factors were immobilization (in 70.6%), infection (in 44.3%), cancer (in 27.5%), obesity (in 23.3%), and major surgery (in 14.1%). The risk of VTE was classified as high and moderate in 143 (54.6%) and 117 (44.7%) of the patients, respectively. Overall, 46.2% of the patients received adequate prophylaxis, 25% of those with > three risk factors for VTE and 18% of those with cancer, the differences between these last two groups and their counterparts (patients with < three risk factors and those without cancer) being statistically significant (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal that nearly all patients at our hospital were at risk for VTE, and that less than half received adequate VTE prophylaxis, which is in agreement with the literature. It is surprising that inadequate prophylaxis is more common in high-risk patients.

Management of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists in a tertiary hospital outpatient clinic

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the main risk factors for stroke. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) reduce this risk, and the effectiveness of this treatment is directly related to time in therapeutic range (TTR). This study aimed to report the TTR in patients with non-valvular AF at an anticoagulation outpatient clinic; and to describe the profile of this population of patients in terms of risk of stroke, as well as the occurrence of adverse events during the follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study involving patients of the anticoagulation outpatient clinic of the Department of Internal Medicine at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. We evaluated outpatient visits, hospital admissions, and emergency visits from January to December 2011. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were investigated. Their mean age was 74.3±10.9 years. The CHADS2 score was ≥ 4 in 44.5% of the patients; 63.5% of them had a CHA2 DS2 -VASc score ≥ 5. The TTR was 64.8%. During follow-up, the incidence of overall bleeding was 31.7%, with major and minor bleeding rates of 4.8% and 34.9%, respectively. There were no other complications related to AF or anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: The patients achieved a TTR of 64.8% during follow-up, which is deemed appropriate and in agreement with the literature. Patients had high risk for stroke, and the incidence of minor bleeding was higher than the rate found in the literature, whereas the incidence of major bleeding was similar to the one found in previous studies

Sistema de suporte à decisão clínica para um programa para profilaxia de tromboembolia venosa em um hospital geral de um país de renda média / A clinical decision support system for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at a general hospital in a middle-income country

OBJETIVO: Determinar o impacto da implantação de um sistema informatizado de suporte à decisão clínica combinado com seminários instrucionais na utilização de profilaxia para tromboembolia venosa (TEV) de forma adequada. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal em duas fases (antes e depois da implantação de um novo protocolo de profilaxia para TEV) para avaliar o impacto que a estratégia combinada teve na utilização adequada da profilaxia para TEV. O estudo foi conduzido no Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, um hospital geral localizado em Porto Alegre (RS). Foram incluídos pacientes clínicos e cirúrgicos com mais de 18 anos com tempo de hospitalização > 48 h. Nas fases pré e pós-implantação, foram incluídos 262 e 261 pacientes, respectivamente. RESULTADOS: As características de base das duas amostras foram semelhantes, inclusive em relação à distribuição dos pacientes por nível de risco. Comparando-se os períodos pré e pós-implantação, verificou-se que a adequação da profilaxia para TEV aumentou de 46,2% para 57,9% (p = 0,01). Ao se observar populações específicas de pacientes, o uso adequado da profilaxia para TVE aumentou dramaticamente em pacientes com câncer (de 18,1% para 44,1%; p = 0,002) e em pacientes com três ou mais fatores de risco (de 25,0% para 42,9%; p = 0,008), populações essas que mais se beneficiam da profilaxia. CONCLUSÕES: É possível aumentar o uso de profilaxia adequada para TEV em cenários economicamente desfavoráveis através do uso de protocolos informatizados e de profissionais treinados. A subutilização da profilaxia permanece como um problema importante, destacando a necessidade da melhora continuada na qualidade da assistência hospitalar.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact that implementing a combination of a computer-based clinical decision support system and a program of training seminars has on the use of appropriate prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in two phases (prior to and after the implementation of the new VTE prophylaxis protocol) in order to evaluate the impact that the combined strategy had on the use of appropriate VTE prophylaxis. The study was conducted at Nossa Senhora da Conceição Hospital, a general hospital in the city of Porto Alegre, Brazil. We included clinical and surgical patients over 18 years of age who were hospitalized for > 48 h. The pre-implementation and post-implementation phase samples comprised 262 and 261 patients, respectively. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two samples were similar, including the distribution of patients by risk level. Comparing the pre-implementation and post-implementation periods, we found that the overall use of appropriate VTE prophylaxis increased from 46.2% to 57.9% (p = 0.01). Looking at specific patient populations, we observed that the use of appropriate VTE prophylaxis increased more dramatically among cancer patients (from 18.1% to 44.1%; p = 0.002) and among patients with three or more risk factors (from 25.0% to 42.9%; p = 0.008), two populations that benefit most from prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to increase the use of appropriate VTE prophylaxis in economically constrained settings through the use of a computerized protocol adhered to by trained professionals. The underutilization of prophylaxis continues to be a major problem, indicative of the need for ongoing improvement in the quality of inpatient care.

Profilaxia para tromboembolia venosa em um hospital geral / Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in a general hospital

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a prática de profilaxia para tromboembolia venosa (TEV) em pacientes em um hospital geral. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte transversal conduzido no Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, localizado na cidade de Porto Alegre (RS), com uma amostra constituída de pacientes internados selecionados randomicamente entre outubro de 2008 e fevereiro de 2009. Foram incluídos pacientes maiores de 18 anos e internados por mais de 48 h. Os critérios de exclusão foram pacientes em uso de anticoagulantes, história de doença tromboembólica, gestação e puerpério. A adequação da profilaxia foi avaliada seguindo as recomendações de um protocolo criado pela instituição e tendo como base principal a diretriz da American College of Chest Physician, oitava edição. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 262 pacientes com média de idade de 59,1 ± 16,6 anos. Os fatores de risco mais comuns foram imobilização (70,6 por cento), infecção (44,3 por cento), câncer (27,5 por cento), obesidade (23,3 por cento) e cirurgia maior (14,1 por cento). Na avaliação do nível de risco para TEV, 143 (54,6 por cento) e 117 pacientes (44,7 por cento), respectivamente, foram classificados como de risco alto e moderado. No geral, 46,2 por cento dos pacientes tiveram profilaxia adequada, assim como 25 por cento dos pacientes com três ou mais fatores de risco e 18 por cento dos pacientes com câncer, e houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre esses grupos quando comparados àqueles com menos de três fatores de risco e sem câncer (p < 0,001 para ambos). CONCLUSÕES: Os dados demonstram que quase a totalidade dos pacientes do hospital estava em risco para TEV e que menos da metade deles recebeu profilaxia adequada, dados esses semelhantes aos da literatura. A inadequação da profilaxia é surpreendentemente maior em pacientes de alto risco.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in a general hospital. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study at the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, located in the city of Porto Alegre, Brazil, involving a random sample of patients admitted between October of 2008 and February of 2009. We included patients over 18 years of age and hospitalized for more than 48 h. The exclusion criteria were anticoagulant use, pregnancy, puerperium, and a history of thromboembolic disease. The adequacy of prophylaxis was evaluated in accordance with a protocol created by the Hospital and principally based on the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, eighth edition. RESULTS: We included 262 patients. The mean age was 59.1 ± 16.6 years. The most common risk factors were immobilization (in 70.6 percent), infection (in 44.3 percent), cancer (in 27.5 percent), obesity (in 23.3 percent), and major surgery (in 14.1 percent). The risk of VTE was classified as high and moderate in 143 (54.6 percent) and 117 (44.7 percent) of the patients, respectively. Overall, 46.2 percent of the patients received adequate prophylaxis, 25 percent of those with > three risk factors for VTE and 18 percent of those with cancer, the differences between these last two groups and their counterparts (patients with < three risk factors and those without cancer) being statistically significant (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal that nearly all patients at our hospital were at risk for VTE, and that less than half received adequate VTE prophylaxis, which is in agreement with the literature. It is surprising that inadequate prophylaxis is more common in high-risk patients.