Outcomes of descending and thoracoabdominal aortic repair in connective tissue disorder patients.

OBJECTIVES: Open surgical repair (OSR) of descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms carries risks of mortality and major complications. Patients with connective tissue disorders (CTD) are younger and require safe, efficient treatment with long-term durability. This study provides current outcome data to help inform treatment decisions. METHODS: All OSRs of descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) from January 2011 to July 2021 were included in a retrospective cohort study. Primary outcome measures were early and follow-up mortality and reintervention. Secondary outcome measures were major complications. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate reintervention-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 26 OSRs (7 DTAA, 19 TAAA) were performed in 23 patients: 20 (77%) Marfan and 6 (23%) Loeys-Dietz syndrome; median age 43 years. Aortic dissection was present in 100% and 3/26 (12%) were urgent. Early mortality was 1/26 (3.8%). No patient suffered spinal cord ischemia, stroke, vocal cord paralysis, or re-exploration for bleeding. The transient respiratory failure occurred in 19% (5/26) and transient renal replacement therapy in 15% (4/26). Renal function normalized in all patients within 3 months. During follow-up (median 4.6, range 0-11 years) there were no deaths and only one re-intervention on a previously operated aortic segment, resulting in 92% reintervention-free survival at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In dedicated units, open surgical DTAA and TAAA repair in patients with CTD can be performed with a very low risk of death, severe complications and, late re-intervention. For CTD patients with reasonable risk, OSR should remain the first line of treatment.

Measuring pain-Physiological and self-rated measurements in relation to pain stimulation and anxiety.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to investigate how emotions influence pain, measured by one subjective self-rated measure, the numeric rating scale (NRS), and one objective physiological measure, the number of skin conductance responses (NSCR). METHOD: Eighteen volunteers were exposed to conditions with pictorial emotional stimuli (neutral, positive, negative), authentic ICU-sound (noise, no-noise) and electrical stimulation (pain, no-pain) individually titrated to induce moderate pain. When using all combinations of picture inducing emotions, sound, and pain, each of these conditions (12 conditions lasting for 60 seconds each) were followed by pain ratings. Ratings of arousal (low to high) and valence (pleasant to unpleasant) were used as indicators of affective state for each condition. Mean NSCR was also measured throughout the experiment for each condition. RESULTS: Even though NRS and NSCR increased during painful stimuli, they did not correlate during the trial. However, NSCR was positively correlated with the strength of the electrical stimulation, r = 0.48, P = 0.046, whereas NRS showed positive correlations with the anxiety level, assessed by affective ratings (arousal, r = 0.61, P < 0.001, and valence, r = 0.37, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The NRS was strongly influenced by affective state, with higher pain ratings during more anxiety-like states, whereas NSCR correlated to the strength of electrical pain stimulation. That reported pain is moderated by anxiety, puts forward a discussion whether reduction of the anxiety level should be considered during analgesia treatment.

Palmar skin conductance variability and the relation to stimulation, pain and the motor activity assessment scale in intensive care unit patients.

INTRODUCTION: Many intensive care unit (ICU) patients describe pain and other adverse feelings that may impact long-term psychological morbidity. Sympathetically mediated palmar skin conductance variability is related to emotionally induced perspiration and correlates with pain levels in the perioperative setting but has not been studied in ICU patients. METHODS: Twenty non-intubated and 20 intubated general ICU patients were included in this observational study. Patients were monitored with the MED-STORM Pain Monitoring System®. The number of skin conductance fluctuations per second (NSCF) was measured in parallel with bedside observation during one hour of intensive care, including rest, procedures and patient-staff interactions. Arousal-agitation level was monitored with the motor activity assessment scale (MAAS). Pain was monitored with the numeric rating scale (0 to 10) in patients able to communicate or by observation in patients unable to communicate. RESULTS: In non-intubated patients, NSCF increased with increasing stimulation/pain but also with higher MAAS (P=0.002). An interaction effect was found, with increased NSCF response to stimulation/pain with increasing MAAS (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, NSCF may be more useful evaluating emotional distress rather than pain alone. It needs to be assessed whether NSCF monitoring is clinically useful and whether controlling emotional distress with the aid of such monitoring may impact on patient care and outcomes.

Novel method for direct retransfusion reduces blood transfusions in descending and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Allogenic blood product usage is associated with worse outcomes in open repair of descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. This pilot study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel modification of the left heart bypass (LHB) circuit to reduce intraoperative blood transfusions. METHODS: In modified LHB, pump suckers collected shed blood that was directly retransfused through a femoral vein cannula. In standard LHB, cellsavers were used to collect, wash, and retransfuse shed blood. Consecutive patients undergoing elective surgical descending or thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using modified (N.=12) or standard (N.=21) LHB were compared. Intraoperative blood product use was the primary outcome. Hypotensive episodes, lactate levels, and adverse events (early mortality, spinal cord injury, renal and respiratory insufficiency) were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Groups were comparable regarding pre- and intraoperative variables. No perfusion-related adverse events occurred. With modified LHB, intraoperative blood product use was significantly reduced: packed red blood cells by 60% from 10 to 4 units (P=0.002), fresh frozen plasma by 70% from 17 to 5 units (P<0.001) as well as retransfused cellsaver volume by 75%, from 4500 mL to 1110 mL (P<0.001). Hemodynamic instability occurred in 1 (8.3%) vs. 6 (29%), P=0.22 and overall lactate levels were significantly reduced (P=0.045) with modified LHB. Adverse events combined occurred in 1/12 vs. (P=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The novel modified LHB with direct retransfusion was safe and associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood product use, reduced lactate production and improved clinical outcomes as compared to standard LHB and could represent an important clinical improvement.

[Rheumatic heart disease behind life-threatening heart failure in pregnancy]. / Reumatisk hjärtsjukdom bakom livshotande hjärtsvikt hos gravid.

Valvular heart disease constitutes the majority of all causes of heart disease in pregnancy. In the presence of valvular heart disease, the necessary haemodynamic changes of pregnancy might cause heart failure, leading to severe maternal and fetal morbidity and even mortality. In lower-income countries, rheumatic heart disease remains one of the major causes of death related to pregnancy [6]. In low-income countries, rheumatic heart disease is found in 60% to 80% of the pregnant women with heart disease, and 10% to 30% have a congenital disorder including congenital valve disorders [4]. The most common valvular lesion of rheumatic heart disease is mitral stenosis. This valvular lesion can be the cause of extreme disability and even mortality during pregnancy due to an increase in the transvalvular gradient and a rise in left atrial pressure. The maternal mortality associated with mitral stenosis is stratified by New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification: class I, 0.1%; class II, 0.3%; class III, 5.5%; and class IV, 6.0%. Most patients are in class I or II at presentation, but 12% to 25% of patients are in class III or IV [14].