Operative Trauma Courses: A Scoping Review to Inform the Development of a Trauma Surgery Course for Low-Resource Settings.

BACKGROUND: A multitude of operative trauma courses exist, most of which are designed for and conducted in high-resource settings. There are numerous barriers to adapting such courses to low- and low-middle-income countries (LMICs), including resource constraints and contextual variations in trauma care. Approaches to implementing operative trauma courses in LMICs have not been evaluated in a structured manner. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of the literature including databases (e.g., PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE), grey literature repositories, and structured queries of publicly available course materials to identify records that described operative trauma courses offered since 2000. RESULTS: The search identified 3,518 non-duplicative records, of which 48 relevant reports were included in analysis. These reports represented 23 named and 11 unnamed operative trauma courses offered in 12 countries. Variability existed in course format and resource requirements, ranging from USD 40 to 3,000 per participant. Courses incorporated didactic and laboratory components, which utilized simulations, cadavers, or live animals. Course content overlapped significantly but was not standardized. Data were lacking on course implementation and promulgation, credentialing of instructors, and standardized evaluation metrics. CONCLUSIONS: While many operative trauma courses have been described, most are not directly relatable to LMICs. Barriers include cost-prohibitive fees, lack of resources, limited data collection, and contextual variability that renders certain surgical care inappropriate in LMICs. Gaps exist in standardization of course content as well as transparency of credentialing and course implementation strategies. These issues can be addressed through developing an open-access operative trauma course for low-resource settings.

What trauma patients need: the European dilemma.

There is a need for implementation and maturation of an inclusive trauma system in every country in Europe, with patient centered care by dedicated surgeons. This process should be initiated by physicians and medical societies, based on the best available evidence, and supported and subsequently funded by the government and healthcare authorities. A systematic approach to organizing all aspects of trauma will result in health gain in terms of quality of care provided, higher survival rates, better functional outcomes and quality of life. In addition, it will provide reliable data for both research, quality improvement and prevention programs. Severely injured patients need surgeons with broad technical and non-technical competencies to provide holistic, inclusive and compassionate care. Here we describe the philosophy of the surgical approach and define the necessary skills for trauma, both surgical and other, to improve outcome of severely injured patients. As surgery is an essential part of trauma care, surgeons play an important role for the optimal treatment of trauma patients throughout and after their hospital stay, including the intensive care unit (ICU). However, in most European countries, it might not be obvious to either the general public, patients or even the physicians that the surgeon must assume this responsibility in the ICU to optimize outcomes. The aim of this paper is to define key elements in terms of trauma systems, trauma-specific surgical skills and active critical care involvement, to organize and optimize trauma care in Europe.

Thrombelastography early amplitudes in bleeding and coagulopathic trauma patients: Results from a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Early amplitudes in the viscoelastic hemostatic assays, thrombelastography (TEG) and rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM), provide fast results, which is critical in the resuscitation of bleeding patients. This study investigated associations between TEG early amplitudes and standard TEG variables in a large multicenter cohort of moderately to severely injured trauma patients admitted at three North European Level I Trauma Centers. METHODS: Prospective observational study of 404 trauma patients with clinical suspicion of severe injury from London, UK, Copenhagen, Denmark and Oslo, Norway. Biochemistry and clinical data including outcome and TEG parameters were recorded upon arrival. Kaolin TEG, Rapid TEG, and TEG functional fibrinogen curves were extracted, and early amplitudes A5 and A10 (amplitude at 5 and 10 minutes) were registered. Patients were stratified according to international normalized ratio of 1.2 or less or greater than 1.2, as well as transfusion requirements (nontransfused, 1-9 red blood cell units and ≥10 red blood cell units in 12 hours). RESULTS: In total, 404 patients were included, median Injury Severity Score was 13. There were strong positive correlations between A5/A10 and maximum amplitude in all investigated assays. All TEG values except rTEG maximum amplitude and kTEG maximum amplitude correlated significantly with mortality in transfused patients. Time from initiation of assay to A5 and A10 were lowest for rapid TEG and TEG functional fibrinogen compared with kaolin TEG. Rapid TEG A5 reduced time to result with greater than 50% compared with rapid TEG maximum amplitude. CONCLUSION: We found strong associations between TEG early amplitudes A5/A10 and maximum amplitude in rapid TEG, kaolin TEG, and TEG functional fibrinogen across trauma patients with coagulopathy and massive transfusion requirements. Introducing the use of early amplitudes can reduce time to diagnosis of coagulopathy and may be used in TEG monitoring of trauma patient. Further randomized controlled trials evaluating the role of TEG in guiding hemostatic resuscitation are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III.