RESUMO
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a human disease characterized by progressive and irreversible skeletal muscle degeneration caused by mutations in genes coding for important muscle proteins. Unfortunately, there is no efficient treatment for this disease; it causes progressive loss of motor and muscular ability until death. The canine model (golden retriever muscular dystrophy) is similar to DMD, showing similar clinical signs. Fifteen dogs were followed from birth and closely observed for clinical signs. Dogs had their disease status confirmed by polymerase chain reaction analysis and genotyping. Clinical observations of musculoskeletal, morphological, gastrointestinal, respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal features allowed us to identify three distinguishable phenotypes in dystrophic dogs: mild (grade I), moderate (grade II) and severe (grade III). These three groups showed no difference in dystrophic alterations of muscle morphology and creatine kinase levels. This information will be useful for therapeutic trials, because DMD also shows significant, inter- and intra-familiar clinical variability. Additionally, being aware of phenotypic differences in this animal model is essential for correct interpretation and understanding of results obtained in pre-clinical trials.
Assuntos
Distrofia Muscular Animal/patologia , Fenótipo , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Cães , Músculo Esquelético/patologiaAssuntos
Distrofina/genética , Distrofia Muscular Animal/genética , Mutação Puntual , Processamento Alternativo/genética , Animais , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Cães , Distrofina/deficiência , Força Muscular/genética , Força Muscular/fisiologia , Distrofia Muscular Animal/patologia , Distrofia Muscular Animal/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
Dogs suffering from Golden Retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) present symptoms that are similar to human patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Phenotypic variability is common in both cases and correlates with disease progression and response to therapy. Physical therapy assessment tools were used to study disease progression and assess phenotypic variability in dogs with GRMD. At 5 (T0), 9 (T1), 13 (T2) and 17 (T3)months of age, the physical features, joint ranges of motion (ROM), limb and thorax circumferences, weight and creatine kinase (CK) levels were assessed in 11 dogs with GRMD. Alterations of physical features were higher at 13 months, and different disease progression rates were observed. Passive ROM decreased until 1 year old, which was followed by a decline of elbow and tarsal ROM. Limb and thorax circumferences, which were corrected for body weight, decreased significantly between T0 and T3. These measurements can be used to evaluate disease progression in dogs with GRMD and to help discover new therapies for DMD patients.
Assuntos
Doenças do Cão/fisiopatologia , Distrofia Muscular Animal/fisiopatologia , Patologia Veterinária/métodos , Animais , Brasil , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Progressão da Doença , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico , Doenças do Cão/terapia , Cães , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatologia , Distrofia Muscular Animal/diagnóstico , Distrofia Muscular Animal/terapia , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/fisiopatologia , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/terapia , Fenótipo , Exame Físico/veterinária , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/veterináriaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the effect of physical therapy on joint range of motion (ROM) and muscle fibrosis in GRMD animals. METHODS: This was a nonrandomized blinded study with a control group, with six months of intervention evaluated beforehand and afterwards. Six dystrophic male Golden Retrievers of mean age 10.16±3.46 months and weight 17.75±6.01 kg were divided into a treated group (n=3) and an untreated group. These groups of dogs were named: G1=treated group before treatment; G2=treated group after treatment; G3=untreated group before treatment; and G4=untreated group after treatment. G1 underwent a physical therapy program that consisted of a 300-meter circuit with obstacles. Stifle, tarsal, elbow and carpal ROM were assessed using a goniometer before and after treatment. The area of collagen in the vastus lateralis muscle was measured using histomorphometry. The locations of collagen types I, III and IV were studied using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The tarsal ROM values in G2 presented an increasing trend. The area of muscle collagen differed between the groups after treatment and an increasing trend in these values was observed in G4. Collagen types I and III were the ones most frequently observed, forming broad bands in the perimysium of both G2 and G4. Type I collagen was observed in the endomysium more than type III collagen. Type IV collagen was observed only in the basal layer. CONCLUSION: Physical Therapy seemed to improve tarsal ROM in the treated group without increasing muscular fibrosis.
OBJETIVO: Elucidar o efeito da fisioterapia na Amplitude de Movimento Articular (ADM) e na fibrose muscular em animais GRMD. MÉTODOS: Estudo não randomizado, com grupo controle, cego, seis meses de intervenção, avaliação antes e depois da intervenção. Seis animais da raça Golden Retriever, distróficos, machos, média de idade 10,16±3,46 meses e peso de 17,75±6,01 kg foram separados em grupo tratado (n=3) e não tratado. Esses grupos de animais foram nomeados: G1=grupo tratado antes do tratamento; G2=grupo tratado após tratamento; G3=grupo não tratado antes do tratamento; G4=grupo não tratado após tratamento. O G1 participou do programa de fisioterapia que consistiu em um circuito de 300 metros com obstáculos. As ADMs do joelho, tarso, cotovelo e carpo foram avaliadas com goniômetro antes e após o tratamento. A área de colágeno do músculo vastus lateralis foi mensurada por histomorfometria, e a localização dos tipos de colágeno I, III e IV foi estudada por Imuno-histoquímica (IHC). RESULTADOS: Os valores da ADM do tarso do G2 apresentaram uma tendência a aumentar. A área de colágeno muscular foi diferente entre os grupos após o tratamento, e uma tendência ao aumento desses valores no G4 foi observada. Os colágenos dos tipos I e III foram os mais observados, constituindo feixes largos no perimísio nos dois grupos (G2 e G4). O colágeno do tipo I foi mais observado no endomísio do que o colágeno do tipo III. O colágeno do tipo IV foi observado apenas na lâmina basal. CONCLUSÃO: A Fisioterapia parece aumentar a ADM do tarso dos animais do grupo tratado sem aumentar a fibrose muscular.