Cost-of-Care Conversations During Clinical Visits in Federally Qualified Health Centers: An Observational Study.

Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 10% of the U.S. population delays or avoids health care because of cost concerns. It is unknown whether and how cost-of-care conversations occur in primary encounters, especially settings that provide care to vulnerable patients. Objective: To describe cost-of-care conversations with financially vulnerable (<400% federal poverty level) adult patients during clinical encounters. Design: Five observers shadowed a convenience sample of patients during encounters and then interviewed patients and clinicians after the encounter. Setting: Federally Qualified Health Centers in Texas (n = 2) and Pennsylvania (n = 2). Participants: A convenience sample of 67 adult patients seeking chronic disease management or prenatal care from 9 clinicians (5 medical doctors, 2 physician assistants, and 2 nurse practitioners). Measurements: Self-reported characteristics of patients, and frequency and characteristics of interviewer-observed cost-of-care conversations. Results: Because of missing responses from patient and clinician interviews, data are reported for 67 consenting patients. During 46.3% of encounters, some discussion of costs of care was observed. Discussion of indirect costs (lost work time or transportation) was observed in only 2.9% of encounters. In only 11.9% of encounters did the physician discuss costs of care. When costs were discussed, the conversation was not organized and did not take place in conjunction with the discussion of the treatment plan. Limitations: This exploratory work involved a small convenience sample, and generalizability to other settings is uncertain. Missing data prohibited meaningful analysis of patient and clinician interview data. Conclusion: In the 4 federally funded health centers studied, cost-of-care conversations occurred in a minority of clinical visits, discussions were unorganized, and indirect costs of care were rarely addressed. Whether more frequent discussion of the costs of care improves patient adherence and outcomes requires further study. Primary Funding Source: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Healthcare worker perspectives on COVID-19 vaccines: Implications for increasing vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers and patients.

OBJECTIVE: To understand COVID-19 vaccine perspectives among healthcare workers serving diverse communities. METHODS: A dual English/Spanish survey was distributed to healthcare workers in the United States from 3/12/2021-4/22/2021 by the Migrant Clinicians Network, Society of Refugee Healthcare Providers, a Federally Qualified Healthcare Center, and social media advertisement to general primary care workers. RESULTS: 517 responses were at least 50% complete and included in the analysis. Among these, 88% (457/517) indicated vaccine acceptance. Factors associated with acceptance included not reporting any vaccine concerns, identifying as male, ≥65 years of age, being a physician or advanced practice provider, and interacting directly with patients from refugee, immigrant, and migrant (RIM) communities. Participants identified educational information as most helpful for themselves when making a vaccine decision, but a healthcare provider's recommendation as most helpful for their patients. CONCLUSION: Healthcare workers, especially those serving RIM communities, are vaccine accepting. Tailoring vaccine-related information to healthcare workers may improve vaccine confidence for both themselves and patients who rely on them for information.

Ensuring COVID-19 Vaccines for Migrant and Immigrant Farmworkers.

Migrant and immigrant farmworkers are cornerstones to food security and production in many nations. In the United States, farmworkers have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. Because they are considered essential workers, vaccines may be made imminently available to them and offer an opportunity to reduce these COVID-19-related impacts. It is essential for a successful vaccination campaign to address the unique challenges arising from this workforce's inherently mobile nature and limited access to healthcare. Proposed strategies to overcome these challenges include ensuring farmworkers are prioritized in vaccine allocation and provided cost-free vaccines at convenient locations through partnerships among health authorities, community- and faith-based groups, and health centers with trusted community relationships. Further, a portable immunization record should be used, and coordination of care continued when a farmworker moves to a new geographic location. If implemented well, vaccinating farmworkers can reduce the COVID-19 disease burden among these essential workers, improve public health, and protect food and agriculture production.