Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 40(1): 461-469, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33232534

RESUMO

AIMS: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of sacral neuromodulation (SNM), and patient characteristics that may predict long-term success or complications. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients who underwent SNM testing and implantation. Outcome results, resolution of symptoms, and device removal were reported. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of success. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors for device removal. RESULTS: Four hundred and thrity four patients underwent SNM test phase of which 241 (median age 48.0 years, 91.7% [221/241] female) had device implantation and were followed up for median [range] time of 4.0 (3 months-20.5 years) years. Multivariable logistic regression showed that male gender (odds ratio: 0.314; 95% confidence interval: 0.164-0.601, p = .0005) was independently associated with decreased peripheral nerve evaluation success. At final follow-up for patients who originally had device implantation, median (interquartile range) percent of symptoms resolution of all patients was 60.0% (0%-90%) and 69.3% (167/241) had SNM successful outcomes. Cox proportional hazards model showed no difference for time to SNM device removal with respect to patient age, gender, or diagnosis. 69.3% (167/241) patients had at least 1 surgical re-intervention. The most common reason at first surgical re-intervention was lead change only (26.3%, 44/167). CONCLUSION: SNM is a minimally invasive procedure with good long-term success rates. There is a high revision rate but overall, SNM has a good safety profile and excellent long-term outcomes.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Plexo Lombossacral/fisiopatologia , Doenças Urológicas/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
World J Urol ; 37(5): 969-974, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30140946

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: High-quality evidence regarding questions of diagnostic accuracy relies on transparent reporting of study results. The quality of reporting for such studies in the urologic literature is unknown. METHODS: In accordance with an a priori protocol, we systematically searched for all articles on diagnostic accuracy studies published in four major urologic journals in 2015. Using the 2015 STAndards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) checklist, two of us independently abstracted data. For each article, we calculated STARD summary scores (scale of 0-30, with higher scores reflecting higher-quality reporting). We compared scores by journal, topic, and sample size. RESULTS: We screened 819 references of which 61 met inclusion criteria. Nearly two-thirds of studies (39/61%; 63.9%) addressed prostate cancer diagnosis or staging; less than one in ten (6/61%; 9.8%) was conducted in non-oncological disease settings. The major focus for the investigation of new index tests lay in imaging modalities (33/61%; 54.1%); over half of these imaging studies addressed magnetic resonance imaging (18/61%; 29.5%). The average STARD score was 18.9 ± 2.4 (range 12-24). Six criteria had poor reporting compliance and were met by less than 20% of studies. We found no association between reporting quality and topic, journal or study size. CONCLUSIONS: The reporting quality of studies of diagnostic accuracy appears modest and independent of topic, journal or study size. There is an urgent need for greater awareness for the reporting quality of these studies among readers, editors, and investigators to raise evidentiary standards on issues of diagnosis.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto , Urologia , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 2: CD012703, 2019 02 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30726554

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ureteroscopy combined with laser stone fragmentation and basketing is a common approach for managing renal and ureteral stones. This procedure is associated with some degree of ureteral trauma. Ureteral trauma may lead to swelling, ureteral obstruction, and flank pain and may require subsequent interventions such as hospital admission or secondary ureteral stent placement. To prevent such issues, urologists often place temporary ureteral stents prophylactically, but the value of doing so remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of postoperative ureteral stent placement after uncomplicated ureteroscopy. SEARCH METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings, up to 01 February 2019. We applied no restrictions on publication language or status. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included trials in which researchers randomised participants undergoing uncomplicated ureteroscopy to placement of a ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently classified studies and abstracted data from the included studies. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model. We rated the certainty of evidence (CoE) according to the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcomesStenting may slightly reduce the number of unplanned return visits (16 trials with 1970 participants; very low CoE), but we are very uncertain of this finding.Pain on the day of surgery as measured on a visual analogue scale (scale 0 to 10; higher values reflect more pain) is probably similar (mean difference (MD) 0.32 higher, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13 lower to 0.78 higher; 4 trials with 346 participants; moderate CoE). Pain on postoperative days 1 to 3 may show little to no difference (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.25 higher, 95% CI 0.32 lower to 0.82 higher; 8 trials with 683 participants; low CoE). On postoperative days 4 to 30, stented participants may experience more pain (8 trials with 903 participants; very low CoE), but we are very uncertain of this finding.Stenting may result in little to no difference in the need for secondary interventions (risk ratio (RR) 1.15, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.33; 10 studies with 1435 participants; low CoE); this corresponds to three more interventions per 1000 participants (95% CI 13 fewer to 48 more).Secondary outcomesStenting may reduce the need for narcotics (7 trials with 830 participants; very low CoE), but we are very uncertain of this finding.Rates of urinary tract infection (UTI) up to 90 days are probably not substantially different (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.51; 10 trials with 1207 participants; moderate CoE); this corresponds to three fewer infections per 1000 participants (95% CI 23 fewer to 29 more).Ureteral stricture rates up to 90 days may be slightly reduced (14 trials with 1625 participants; very low CoE), but we are very uncertain of this finding.Rates of hospital admission may be slightly reduced (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.55; 13 studies with 1647 participants; low CoE). This corresponds to 15 fewer admissions per 1000 participants (95% CI 33 fewer to 27 more). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this review illustrate the trade-offs of risks and benefits faced by urologists and their patients when it comes to decision-making about stent placement after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for stone disease. We noted that both desirable and undesirable effects were small in absolute terms, with findings based mostly on low and very low CoE. The main issues reducing our confidence in research findings were study limitations (mostly risk of performance and detection bias) and imprecision. We were unable to conduct any of the preplanned subgroup analyses, in particular those based on stone size, stone location, and use of ureteral dilation, which may be important effect modifiers. Given the importance of this question, higher-quality and sufficiently large trials are needed to better inform decision-making.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Stents , Ureter , Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Obstrução Ureteral/prevenção & controle , Ureteroscopia/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle
4.
BJU Int ; 122(1): 160-166, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29569390

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To use the Fragility Index to evaluate the robustness of statistically significant findings from urological randomised controlled trials (RCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 'Fragility Index' is defined as the minimum number of patients in one arm of a trial whose status would have to change from 'event' to 'non-event', such that a statistically significant result becomes non-significant. We identified all RCTs published in four major urology journals between 2011 and 2015, and we determined the Fragility Index values for those trials reporting statistically significant results of dichotomous outcomes using the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In all, 332 RCTs were identified, and 41 studies met the inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile range) Fragility Index was 3 (1, 4.5), indicating that an addition of only three alternate events to one arm of a typical trial would have eliminated its statistical significance. In 27/40 cases (67.5% of cases), the number of patients lost to follow-up was larger than its Fragility Index. CONCLUSIONS: The results of urology RCTs that study dichotomous outcomes and report statistically significant differences between groups are sometimes fragile and depend on few events. Urologists should interpret these RCTs cautiously, particularly when the number of participants lost to follow-up exceeds the Fragility Index. Routine reporting of Fragility Index values alongside P values may provide additional guidance about the robustness of statistically significant findings.


Assuntos
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Previsões , Humanos
5.
Curr Opin Urol ; 28(3): 273-276, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29613909

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To date it is unclear whether the selectivity of new alpha-blockers to alpha-adrenergic receptor subtypes translates into more clinical benefits and less adverse effects in clinical practice. We performed a systematic review of the two new Abs silodosin and naftopidil. With the availability of numerous alpha-blockers to treat lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia, the findings of this review will be highly relevant to the field of urology. RECENT FINDINGS: Silodosin was found to be more effective than placebo in improving International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life scores and as effective as other alpha-blockers. Although the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events of silodosin was similar compared with placebo and other alpha-blockers (tamsulosin, naftopidil, alfuzosin), the sexual adverse events were more common with silodosin. No placebo-controlled randomized trial exists investigating the effects of naftopidil in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Naftopidil had similar efficacy with regards to IPSS and quality of life compared with tamsulosin. The rate of adverse events was similar compared with tamsulosin. SUMMARY: The two new selective alpha-blockers, silodosin, and naftopidil showed similar efficacy in IPSS and quality of life compared with other alpha-blockers. However, silodosin has more sexual adverse events.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Ejaculação/efeitos dos fármacos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/psicologia , Masculino , Naftalenos/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 10: CD007360, 2018 10 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30306544

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in ageing men that may cause lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Treatment aims are to relieve symptoms and prevent disease-related complications. Naftopidil is an alpha-blocker (AB) that has a high affinity for the A1d receptor that may have advantages in treating LUTS in this setting. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2009. Since that time, several large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been reported, making this update relevant. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of naftopidil for the treatment of LUTS associated with BPH. SEARCH METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, LILAC, and Web of Science), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status up to 31 May 2018 SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all parallel RCTs. We also included cross-over design trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently classified and abstracted data from the included studies. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and interpreted them according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Primary outcomes were urological symptom scores, quality of life (QoL) and treatment withdrawals for any reason; secondary outcomes were treatment withdrawals due to adverse events, acute urinary retention, surgical intervention for BPH, and cardiovascular and sexual adverse events. We considered outcomes measured up to 12 months after randomisation as short term, and later than 12 months as long term. We rated the certainty of the evidence according to the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 22 RCTs with 2223 randomised participants across four comparisons for short-term follow-up. This abstract focuses on only two of four comparisons for which we found data since two comparators (i.e. propiverine and Eviprostat (phytotherapy)) are rarely used. One study comparing naftopidil to placebo did not report any relevant outcomes and was therefore excluded. There were no trials that compared to combination therapy with naftopidil or any 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) to combination therapy with other ABs and any 5-ARIs.All included studies were conducted in Asian countries. Study duration ranged from four to 12 weeks. Mean age was 67.8 years, prostate volume was 35.4 mL, and International Prostate Symptom Score was 18.3. We were unable to perform any of the preplanned subgroup analyses based on age and baseline symptom score.Naftopidil versus tamsulosinBased on 12 studies with 965 randomised participants, naftopidil may have resulted in little or no difference in urological symptom score (mean difference (MD) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to 1.04 measured on a scale from 0 to 35 with higher score representing increased symptoms), QoL (MD 0.11, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.30; measured on a scale from 0 to 6 with higher scores representing worse QoL), and treatment withdrawals for any reason (risk ratio (RR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.34; corresponding to 7 fewer per 1000 participants, 95% CI 32 fewer to 31 more). Naftopidil may have resulted in little to no difference in sexual adverse events (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.22); this would result in 26 fewer sexual adverse events per 1000 participants (95% CI 43 fewer to 13 more). We rated the certainty of evidence as moderate for urological symptom score and low for the other outcomes.Naftopidil versus silodosinBased on five studies with 652 randomised participants, naftopidil may have resulted in little or no difference in the urological symptom scores (MD 1.04, 95% CI -0.78 to 2.85), QoL (MD 0.21, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.66), and treatment withdrawals for any reason (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.23; corresponding to 26 fewer per 1000 participants, 95% CI 62 fewer to 32 more). We rated the certainty of evidence as low for all these outcomes. Naftopidil likely reduced sexual adverse events (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.42; corresponding to 126 fewer sexual adverse events per 1000 participants, 95% CI 139 fewer to 86 fewer). We rated the certainty of evidence as moderate for sexual adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Naftopidil appears to have similar effects in the urological symptom scores and QoL compared to tamsulosin and silodosin. Naftopidil has similar sexual adverse events compared to tamsulosin but has fewer compared to silodosin.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/tratamento farmacológico , Naftalenos/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Prostatismo/tratamento farmacológico , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/efeitos adversos , Benzilatos/efeitos adversos , Benzilatos/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Etamsilato/efeitos adversos , Etamsilato/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Masculino , Naftalenos/efeitos adversos , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Prostatismo/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Tansulosina/efeitos adversos , Tansulosina/uso terapêutico , Agentes Urológicos/efeitos adversos
7.
BJU Int ; 119(4): 638-649, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27611722

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of published systematic reviews in the urology literature (an extension of our previously reported work), as high-quality systematic reviews play a paramount role in informing evidence-based clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our focus was on systematic reviews in the urology literature that incorporated questions of prevention and therapy. To identify such reviews published during a 36-month period (2013-2015), we systematically searched PubMed and hand-searched the table of contents of four major urology journals. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of those reviews, using the 11-point 'Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews' (AMSTAR) instrument. We performed protocol-driven analyses of the data from our present study's 36-month period alone, as well as in aggregate with the data from our previously reported work's study periods (2009-2012 and 1998-2008). RESULTS: In our literature search of the 36-month period (2013-2015), we initially identified 490 possibly relevant reviews, of which 125 met our inclusion criteria. The most common topic of reviews for the 2013-2015 period was oncology (51.2%; n = 64), followed by voiding dysfunction (21.6%; n = 27). The mean [standard deviation (SD)] AMSTAR score in the 2013-2015 period (n = 125) was 4.8 (2.4); 2009-2012 (n = 113), 5.4 (2.3); and 1998-2008 (n = 57), 4.8 (2.0) (P = 0.127). In the 2013-2015 period, the mean (SD) AMSTAR score for the BJU International (n = 25) was 5.6 (2.9); for The Journal of Urology (n = 20), 5.1 (2.6); for European Urology (n = 60), 4.5 (2.2); and for Urology (n = 20), 4.4 (2.2) (P = 0.106). CONCLUSIONS: The number of systematic reviews published in the urology literature has exponentially increased, year by year, but their methodological quality has stagnated. To enhance the validity and impact of systematic reviews, all authors and editors must apply established methodological standards.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto , Urologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Humanos , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/normas
8.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 136(4): 952-61, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26044853

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Allergic diseases are considered a health burden because of their high and constantly increasing prevalence, high direct and indirect costs, and undesirable effects on quality of life. Probiotics have been suggested as an intervention to prevent allergic diseases. OBJECTIVE: We sought to synthesize the evidence supporting use of probiotics for the prevention of allergies and inform World Allergy Organization guidelines on probiotic use. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomized trials assessing the effects of any probiotic administered to pregnant women, breast-feeding mothers, and/or infants. RESULTS: Of 2403 articles published until December 2014 identified in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase, 29 studies fulfilled a priori specified inclusion criteria for the analyses. Probiotics reduced the risk of eczema when used by women during the last trimester of pregnancy (relative risk [RR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84), when used by breast-feeding mothers (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.69), or when given to infants (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.94). Evidence did not support an effect on other allergies, nutrition status, or incidence of adverse effects. The certainty in the evidence according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment Development and Evaluation approach is low or very low because of the risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision of results, and indirectness of available research. CONCLUSION: Probiotics used by pregnant women or breast-feeding mothers and/or given to infants reduced the risk of eczema in infants; however, the certainty in the evidence is low. No effect was observed for the prevention of other allergic conditions.


Assuntos
Eczema/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade/prevenção & controle , Microbiota , Probióticos/administração & dosagem , Animais , Aleitamento Materno , Suplementos Nutricionais , Eczema/imunologia , Eczema/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade/microbiologia , Recém-Nascido , Troca Materno-Fetal , Microbiota/imunologia , Gravidez , Probióticos/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Risco
9.
J Endourol ; 36(8): 1083-1090, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35331023

RESUMO

Purpose: To identify factors associated with stent changes and prognosis in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) undergoing de novo retrograde ureteral stenting. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral center for consecutive MUO patients referred and initially managed with a ureteral stent. Multivariable regression models evaluated factors associated with the following outcomes: number of stent changes, time to first stent change, and overall survival. Results: A total of 120 patients from May 2009 to December 2019 were included; mean age was 63 years, majority (76.7%) were women, median duration of follow-up was 6.1 months. Majority (75%) of patients did not require a stent change at 3 months follow-up. Patients with a history of pelvic radiation (subdistribution hazard rate [sHR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-3.67, p = 0.007) and with a history of bowel resection (sHR 2.06, 95% CI 1.05-4.03, p = 0.036) were independently associated with earlier stent changes. Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy (hazard rate [HR] 14.1, 95% CI 2.66-74.19, p = 0.0019) and proximal ureter obstruction (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.21-5.14, p = 0.0136) were associated with higher rate of all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The majority of patients did not require stent change at their first stent surveillance cystoscopy at 3 months follow-up. Patients with a history of pelvic radiation or bowel resection were more likely to require stent change during their stent surveillance visits. GI malignancy and proximal ureter obstruction were associated with higher rates of mortality.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Ureter , Obstrução Ureteral , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Ureter/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/complicações , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia
11.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 14(2): 61-68, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31348748

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the effects of postoperative ureteral stent placement after uncomplicated ureteroscopy. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search with no restrictions on publication language or status up to February 1, 2019. We only included randomized trials. Two review authors independently examined full-text reports, identified relevant studies, assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE. RESULTS: We included 23 studies with 2656 randomized patients. Primary outcomes: It is uncertain whether stenting reduces the number of unplanned return visits (very low certainty of evidence [CoE]). Pain on the day of surgery is probably similar (mean difference [MD] 0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13-0.78; moderate CoE). Pain on postoperative days 1-3 may show little to no difference (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.25; 95% CI -0.32-0.82; low CoE). It is uncertain whether stented patients experience more pain on postoperative days 4-30 (very low CoE). Stenting may result in little to no difference in the need for secondary interventions (risk ratio [RR] 1.15; 95% CI 0.39-3.33; low CoE). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: We are uncertain whether stenting reduces the need for narcotics and reduces ureteral stricture rates up to 90 days (very low CoE). Rates of hospital admission may be slightly reduced (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.32-1.55; low CoE). This review was limited to patients in whom ureteroscopy was deemed 'uncomplicated.' In addition, time intervals for the grouping for the reported degree of pain were established post-hoc. The CoE for most outcomes was rated as low or very low for methodological reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this review illustrate the tradeoffs of risks and benefits faced by urologists and their patients when it comes to decision-making about stent placement after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for stone disease.

12.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 11(3-4): E138-E142, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28515817

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The palliative effects of cannabis sativa (marijuana), which include appetite stimulation, attenuation of nausea and emesis, and pain relief, are well known. The active components of cannabis sativa (cannabinoids) and their derivatives have received growing interest due to their diverse pharmacological activities, such as cell growth inhibition and tumour regression. The aim of this review is to look at the current evidence on the antiproliferative effects of cannabinoids in urological malignancies, including renal, prostate, bladder, and testicular cancers. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies exploring the effect of cannabinoids on tumour activity, including all study types except expert opinions. A formal search was run on Medline database from 1946 to September 2016, along with a hand-search on PubMed for relevant studies. RESULTS: The search yielded a total of 93 studies from Medline and PubMed, of which 23 studies were included in the final analysis. To date, there are various in vitro studies elucidating the potential mechanism of action of cannabinoids for urological cancers, along with population-based studies specifically for testicular malignancies. To date, no clinical trials have been conducted for urological cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the role of endocannabinoids for urological malignancies is an area of active research. Further research is required not only to evaluate the crosstalk between cancer signaling pathways and cannabinoids, but also large randomized clinical studies with urological patients need to be conducted before cannabinoids can be introduced as potential therapeutic options for urological neoplasms.

13.
Urology ; 99: 210-214, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27450350

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare pyeloplasty outcomes in children with and without "supra-normal" differential renal function (SNDRF) defined as >55% differential renal function (DRF) in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. METHODS: Our prospectively collected pyeloplasty database (2008-2015) was reviewed (n = 151). A total of 140/151 (93%) patients had preoperative renograms and 26/140 (19%) were found to have SNDRF (DRF ≥ 55%). Of 151 patients, 51 (34%) had pre- and postoperative renograms allowing determination of change ≥5% in function. After excluding 2 patients with solitary kidneys, a total of 49 patients defined the study group. RESULTS: Of 49 patients, 12 had SNDRF and 37 did not. Baseline characteristics were similar including mean age at surgery (47.3 months vs 45.4 months) and time to surgery (8.7 months vs 9.8 months). Mean preoperative anteroposterior diameter was significantly different between groups (23.2 mm vs 31.0 mm; P = .04), but postoperative was similar (9.0 mm vs 12.1 mm; P = .14). Mean preoperative DRF was 60.2% in the SNDRF group vs 44.3% in the non-SNDRF. Mean postoperative DRF was 52.4% and 45.3%, respectively (P = .04). There were 9/12 (75%) SNDRF patients who experienced ≥5% loss in function compared to 2/37 (5%) in the non-SNDRF group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Three-quarters of SNDRF patients demonstrated a decline of ≥5%DRF postoperatively when compared to non-SNDRF. This finding may not reflect true elevated renal function, but rather hyperfiltration in the setting of obstruction, which-if unrecognized as such-could result in postponing an otherwise beneficial surgical intervention.


Assuntos
Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/fisiologia , Pelve Renal/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal , Pelve Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Período Pós-Operatório , Renografia por Radioisótopo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureter/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/diagnóstico , Obstrução Ureteral/fisiopatologia , Urodinâmica/fisiologia
14.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 132(3): 266-71, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26643302

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) stage 2-3 is a premalignant lesion that can progress to cervical cancer in 10-20 years if untreated. OBJECTIVES: To conduct systematic reviews of randomized and nonrandomized studies for effects of cryotherapy, loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), and cold knife conization (CKC) as treatment for CIN 2-3. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline, Embase, and other databases were searched to February 2012 for benefits, and to July 2012 for harms. Additionally, experts were contacted. Keywords for CIN, cervical cancer, and the treatments were used. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies of nonpregnant women 18 years or older not previously treated for CIN were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two investigators independently screened and collected data. Relative risks and proportions were calculated and evidence assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). MAIN RESULTS: Recurrence rate was 5.3% 12 months after cryotherapy or LEEP, and 1.4% after CKC. There seemed to be little or no differences in frequency of complications after LEEP or cryotherapy, but they occurred more often after CKC. Evidence suggests premature delivery is most common with CKC, but it also occurs after LEEP and cryotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a comprehensive search, there is very low quality evidence and often no evidence for important outcomes, including reproductive outcomes and complications. Studies assessing these outcomes are needed.


Assuntos
Conização , Crioterapia , Eletrocirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Displasia do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Conização/efeitos adversos , Crioterapia/efeitos adversos , Eletrocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Nascimento Prematuro/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia
15.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 132(3): 259-65, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26851054

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening is offered to women to identify and treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). OBJECTIVES: To support WHO guidelines, a systematic review was performed to compare test accuracy of the HPV test, cytology (cervical smear), and unaided visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA); and to determine test accuracy of HPV and colposcopy impression. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline and Embase were searched up to September 2012, and experts were contacted for references. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies of at least 100 nonpregnant women (aged ≥18years) not previously diagnosed with CIN were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two investigators independently screened and collected data. Pooled sensitivity and specificity, and absolute differences were calculated, and the quality of evidence assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). MAIN RESULTS: High to moderate quality evidence was found. The greatest difference in overtreatment occurred with VIA instead of the cervical smear (58 more per 1000 women). Differences in missed treatment ranged from 2-5 per 1000 women. For 1000 women screened positive and then sent to colposcopy, 464 would be falsely diagnosed with CIN grade 2-3 and treated. CONCLUSIONS: Although differences in sensitivity between tests could be interpreted as large, absolute differences in missed diagnoses were small. By contrast, small differences in specificity resulted in fairly large absolute differences in overtreatment.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Ácido Acético , Colposcopia , Feminino , Humanos , Teste de Papanicolaou , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos
16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27274360

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of allergic diseases is approximately 10 % in infants whose parents and siblings do not have allergic diseases and 20-30 % in those with an allergic first-degree relative. Vitamin D is involved in the regulation of the immune system and it may play a role in the development, severity and course of asthma and other allergic diseases. OBJECTIVE: The World Allergy Organization (WAO) convened a guideline panel to develop evidence-based recommendations addressing the use of vitamin D in primary prevention of allergic diseases. METHODS: Our WAO guideline panel identified the most relevant clinical questions and performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies (NRS), specifically cohort and case-control studies, of vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of allergic diseases. We also reviewed the evidence about values and preferences, and resource requirements (up to January 2015, with an update on January 30, 2016). We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop recommendations. RESULTS: Having reviewed the currently available evidence, the WAO guideline panel found no support for the hypothesis that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of developing allergic diseases in children. The WAO guideline panel suggest not using vitamin D in pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, or healthy term infants as a means of preventing the development of allergic diseases. This recommendation does not apply to those mothers and infants who have other indications for prophylactic or therapeutic use of vitamin D. The panel's recommendations are conditional and supported by very low certainty evidence. CONCLUSIONS: WAO recommendations about vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of allergic diseases support parents, clinicians and other health care professionals in their decisions whether or not to use vitamin D in preventing allergic diseases in healthy, term infants.

17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26962387

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of allergic diseases in infants, whose parents and siblings do not have allergy, is approximately 10 % and reaches 20-30 % in those with an allergic first-degree relative. Intestinal microbiota may modulate immunologic and inflammatory systemic responses and, thus, influence development of sensitization and allergy. Prebiotics - non-digestible oligosaccharides that stimulate growth of probiotic bacteria - have been reported to modulate immune responses and their supplementation has been proposed as a preventive intervention. OBJECTIVE: The World Allergy Organization (WAO) convened a guideline panel to develop evidence-based recommendations about the use of prebiotics in the prevention of allergy. METHODS: The WAO guideline panel identified the most relevant clinical questions about the use of prebiotics for the prevention of allergy. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of prebiotics, and reviewed the evidence about patient values and preferences, and resource requirements (up to January 2015, with an update on July 29, 2015). We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop recommendations. RESULTS: Based on GRADE evidence to decision frameworks, the WAO guideline panel suggests using prebiotic supplementation in not-exclusively breastfed infants and not using prebiotic supplementation in exclusively breastfed infants. Both recommendations are conditional and based on very low certainty of the evidence. We found no experimental or observational study of prebiotic supplementation in pregnant women or in breastfeeding mothers. Thus, the WAO guideline panel chose not to provide a recommendation about prebiotic supplementation in pregnancy or during breastfeeding, at this time. CONCLUSIONS: WAO recommendations about prebiotic supplementation for the prevention of allergy are intended to support parents, clinicians and other health care professionals in their decisions whether or not to use prebiotics for the purpose of preventing allergies in healthy, term infants.

18.
World Allergy Organ J ; 8(1): 4, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25628773

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of allergic diseases in infants, whose parents and siblings do not have allergy, is approximately 10% and reaches 20-30% in those with an allergic first-degree relative. Intestinal microbiota may modulate immunologic and inflammatory systemic responses and, thus, influence development of sensitization and allergy. Probiotics have been reported to modulate immune responses and their supplementation has been proposed as a preventive intervention. OBJECTIVE: The World Allergy Organization (WAO) convened a guideline panel to develop evidence-based recommendations about the use of probiotics in the prevention of allergy. METHODS: We identified the most relevant clinical questions and performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of probiotics for the prevention of allergy. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop recommendations. We searched for and reviewed the evidence about health effects, patient values and preferences, and resource use (up to November 2014). We followed the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework to develop recommendations. RESULTS: Currently available evidence does not indicate that probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of developing allergy in children. However, considering all critical outcomes in this context, the WAO guideline panel determined that there is a likely net benefit from using probiotics resulting primarily from prevention of eczema. The WAO guideline panel suggests: a) using probiotics in pregnant women at high risk for having an allergic child; b) using probiotics in women who breastfeed infants at high risk of developing allergy; and c) using probiotics in infants at high risk of developing allergy. All recommendations are conditional and supported by very low quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: WAO recommendations about probiotic supplementation for prevention of allergy are intended to support parents, clinicians and other health care professionals in their decisions whether to use probiotics in pregnancy and during breastfeeding, and whether to give them to infants.

19.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 8: 119-26, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24493922

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Individuals who experience stroke have a higher likelihood of subsequent stroke events, making it imperative to plan for future medical care. In the event of a further serious health event, engaging in the process of advanced care planning (ACP) can help family members and health care professionals (HCPs) make medical decisions for individuals who have lost the capacity to do so. Few studies have explored the views and experiences of patients with stroke about discussing their wishes and preferences for future medical events, and the extent to which stroke HCPs engage in conversations around planning for such events. In this study, we sought to understand how the process of ACP unfolded between HCPs and patients post-stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using grounded theory (GT) methodology, we engaged in direct observation of HCP and patient interactions on an acute stroke unit and two stroke rehabilitation units. Using semi-structured interviews, 14 patients and four HCPs were interviewed directly about the ACP process. RESULTS: We found that open and continual ACP conversations were not taking place, patients experienced an apparent lack of urgency to engage in ACP, and HCPs were uncomfortable initiating ACP conversations due to the sensitive nature of the topic. CONCLUSION: In this study, we identified lack of engagement in ACP post-stroke, attributable to patient and HCP factors. This encourages us to look further into the process of ACP in order to develop open communication between the patient with stroke, their families, and stroke HCPs.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa