Early Use of Sarilumab in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Pneumonia and Features of Systemic Inflammation: the SARICOR Randomized Clinical Trial.

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of early treatment with sarilumab, added to standard of care (SOC), in hospitalized adults with COVID-19. Methods included phase II, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and interleukin (IL)-6 levels ≥ 40 pg/mL and/or d-dimer > 1,500 ng/mL. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive SOC (control group), SOC plus a single subcutaneous dose of sarilumab 200 mg (sarilumab-200 group), or SOC plus a single subcutaneous dose of sarilumab 400 mg (sarilumab-400 group). The primary outcome variable was the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) at day 28. One-hundred and 15 participants (control group, n = 39; sarilumab-200, n = 37; sarilumab-400, n = 39) were included. At randomization, 104 (90%) patients had supplemental oxygen and 103 (90%) received corticosteroids. Eleven (28%) patients in the control group, 10 (27%) in sarilumab-200, and five (13%) in sarilumab-400 developed the primary outcome (hazard ratio [95% CI] of sarilumab-400 vs control group: 0.41 [0.14, 1.18]; P = 0.09). Seven (6%) patients died: three in the control group and four in sarilumab-200. There were no deaths in sarilumab-400 (P = 0.079, log-rank test for comparisons with the control group). In patients recently hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia and features of systemic inflammation, early IL-6 blockade with a single dose of sarilumab 400 mg was safe and associated with a trend for better outcomes. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT04357860.).

Left-sided infective endocarditis caused by Streptococcus agalactiae: rare and serious.

A comparative study of the behaviour of left-sided infective endocarditis (left-sided IE) due to Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) with left-sided IE caused by Staphylococcus aureus (SA). A prospective, multicentre cohort study in eight public hospitals in Spain, from January 1984 to December 2015; comparative analysis and factors associated with mortality. In total, there were 1754 episodes of left-sided IE; 41 (2.3%) caused by GBS vs. 344 (19.6%) due to SA, definitive IE 39 vs. 324 cases, males, 25 vs. 213, respectively. There were no differences in age or comorbidity, and healthcare-associated acquirement was 10% vs. 43%, p 0.001. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed in 95% vs. 96.8% and a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) in 61% vs. 56%. Vegetations were detected in 80% and measured > 1 cm in a similar proportion. It affected native valves in 85.4% vs. 82.6% and late prosthetic valve in 14.6% vs. 9.6%. The course was acute in both groups. There were more skin manifestations in SA left-sided IE, 7.3% vs. 32%, p 0.001. Both groups had similar complications, but in SA, there was more renal failure, 24% vs. 45%, p 0.010. Surgical risk and operated patients were similar. Mortality was proportionally higher in the SA group, without significance 29% vs. 43% (150), p 0.09. Heart failure, septic shock and neurological deterioration conditioned mortality: HR 1.96, 1.69 and 1.37 (CI 95% 1.40-2.73; 1.19-2.39 and 0.99-1.88 respectively) and to a lesser degree SA as aetiology agent and age. Left-sided IE caused by GBS is similar in severity to left-sided IE caused by SA.