Abductor Biomechanics Clinically Impact the Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Rate: A Prospective Long-Term Study.

BACKGROUND: Factors related to the patient, implant, and surgery have been associated to the rate of dislocation for total hip arthroplasty (THA). We ask if the position of the cup and the reconstruction of the abductor mechanism actually lower the THA dislocation rate. METHODS: We evaluated 1318 patients (1414 hips) undergoing cementless THA between 1992 and 2012. All THAs had a 28- or a 32-mm femoral head size. Hip reconstruction was radiologically assessed evaluating cup position and the hip rotation center according to Ranawat. The reconstruction of the abductor mechanism was measured using 2 variables: the lever arm distance and the height of the greater trochanter. RESULTS: There were 38 dislocations (2.7%). After controlling the relevant confounding variables, such as demographic and implant data, multivariate regression analysis showed that the most important factors associated with dislocation were a greater distance to the anatomic hip rotation center and hips outside 2 safe windows for cup position (acetabular inclination and version angles) and abductor mechanism (lever arm distance and height of the greater trochanter). CONCLUSION: A proper reconstruction of the hip is essential to decrease the risk of dislocation after primary THA. The weakness of the abductor muscles of the hip may be one of the most important causes for dislocation.

THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.

BACKGROUND: Most acetabular revisions are managed with cementless hemispherical or elliptical metal implants relying on bone ingrowth. Nonetheless, loss of acetabular bone stock and inability to achieve secure component fixation represent challenges in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) using allograft represents one option for treatment of this problem. However, cup migration and bone graft resorption are limitations when IBG is used for large segmental defects, and the precise role of IBG as well as the use of mesh (and the kinds of defects for which mesh does not work well) in this setting remains unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore evaluated patients undergoing acetabular revision surgery using IBG and a cemented cup in large bone defects to determine (1) the frequency with which the hip center could be restored in hips with Paprosky 3A and 3B defects and in hips with or without the use of metallic mesh during surgery; (2) survivorship of IBG acetabular-revision reconstructions in patients with severe Paprosky 3A and 3B defects; and (3) risk factors for failure of the reconstruction, including the use of mesh and defect severity (3A versus 3B). METHODS: Between 1997 and 2009, we performed 226 acetabular revisions using IBG. During that time, indications for using IBG in this setting included Paprosky 3A and 3B defects without pelvic discontinuity. Of these, 204 (90.2%) were available for followup at a minimum of 5 years (mean, 10 years; range, 5-17 years). There were 100 hips with an intraoperative bone defect of Paprosky 3A and 104 with a 3B. Medial or rim acetabular uncontained defects were treated with medial and/or lateral metallic mesh in 142 hips. We determined the postoperative radiological cup position and acetabular reconstruction of the hip center according to Ranawat in both groups. We assessed the appearance of cup loosening and the possible risk factors with regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean postoperative acetabular abduction angle and vertical, horizontal, and hip rotation center distances improved (p < 0.001 in all parameters). Nine hips showed radiological loosening in the group with bone defect 3A and 16 in Group 3B. The survival rate for loosening at 15 years was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71%-95%) for Group 3A and 73% (95% CI, 60%-84%) for Group 3B (p = 0.04). The survivorship for loosening when using mesh or not at 15 years was: no mesh 89% (95% CI, 74%-99%), medial mesh 85% (95% CI, 72%-97%), lateral mesh 80% (95% CI, 67%-91%), and medial and lateral meshes 54% (95% CI, 31%-76%) (p = 0.008). After controlling the most relevant confounding variables we found that the most important factor associated with loosening was lateral mesh use (p = 0.008; hazard ratio, 2.942; 95% CI, 1.328-6.516). CONCLUSIONS: IBG provides an improvement in reconstruction of the hip rotation center in acetabular revision surgery. Although results are good for contained or medial large defects, hips with a rim or lateral segmental defect may need other options for reconstruction of these challenging surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

The evolution of the technique of impaction bone grafting in femoral revision surgery has improved clinical outcome. A prospective mid-term study.

Ninety-three patients (97 hips) underwent impaction bone grafting (IBG) using a cemented tapered femoral stem at our institution. Forty-one hips were operated between 1993 and 1998 (group 1) and 56 hips between 1999 and 2007 (group 2). The use of an extended trochanteric osteotomy and a long stem was more frequent in group 2. Group 2 hips showed a better clinical result. One hip was revised for aseptic loosening and most failures were early periprosthetic fractures. The survival rate for reoperation for any cause was 82.9% for group 1 and 84.3% for group 2. Patients in group 1 had a higher risk for periprosthetic fractures and radiological subsidence >5mm. Experience and the evolution of the IBG technique have improved the good long-term outcome.

Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty in severe congenital hip disease: A ten- to 20-year follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of bone deformities, previous surgeries, and the surgical technique in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) at a long-term has not been clearly defined yet. In this single-centre observational study we sought to assess patients undergoing THA due to osteoarthritis secondary to severe CDH with low or high dislocation ten- to 20-years after surgery. To determine this purpose, we assessed: (1) THA-related complications and reoperations; (2) the clinical outcome, patients' satisfaction and radiological results; and (3) the possible risk factors for reoperation with particular attention to the surgical technique and the influence of prior surgeries. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that an anatomical reconstruction of the hip would decrease the reoperations rates in patients undergoing THA with severe CDH. METHODS: Seventy-five patients (85 hips) operated between 1999 and 2012 at our large tertiary hospital were analyzed. Fifty-six hips were diagnosed as low dislocation (group 1) and 29 hips as high dislocation (group 2). The existence of prior surgeries was frequent: group 1, pelvic osteotomies 6 hips, femoral osteotomies 7, tectoplasty (shelf) 6, resection arthroplasty 1 and lowering of the greater trochanter 1; group 2 included pelvic osteotomies 10 hips, femoral osteotomies 10, and a femoral lengthening 2. The number of additional procedures during THA was: group 1 (19/56 [34%]), acetabular roof bone autograft 8 hips, acetabular medial wall autograft 2, hardware removal 6, extended femoral osteotomy 2, and a femoral shortening 1; group 2 (20/29 [69%]), acetabular bone autograft 12 hips, medial autograft 1, hardware removal 1, extended femoral osteotomy 2, and a femoral shortening 4 hips. The clinical and the radiological analysis were compared in both groups for a minimum follow-up of ten years. Cox regression models were used to detect risk factors for reoperation. RESULTS: Nine patients (13.8%) required reoperation for the following reasons: cup loosening (5 hips), periprosthetic femoral fracture (3) and stem loosening (1); seven had prior surgeries. The 12-year survival rate for reoperation for any reason was 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.2-100) in group 1 and 75.7% (95% CI, 65.8-90.8) in group 2 (p=0.003). Patients with high dislocation (p=0.02, hazard ratio [HR]: 6.25, 95% CI, 1.26-30.9) and those with an acetabular component inclination placed out of the target zone between 35° and 50° (p=0.03, HR: 4.27, 95% CI, 1.13-16.1) had a higher risk of reoperation. DISCUSSION: An optimal placement of the acetabular component decreased the reoperation rates in patients undergoing THA for severe CDH. Hips with high dislocation and the existence of prior surgery can affect THA implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective; comparative.

Spinopelvic interactions in total hip arthroplasty: 295 patients followed for a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent spinal pathology is frequent in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study we examined whether spinopelvic interactions affect THA outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 295 patients with a mean age of 63.3 (range 56‒80) years receiving a THA between 2006 and 2009 were assessed. Of these, 195 had mild lumbar disc degeneration and 100 had advanced lumbar spondylosis. We analysed the changes in the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the survival rate for postoperative low back pain (LBP) and dislocation. Changes in acetabular component position, sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) and pelvic obliquity (PO) angles were assessed with radiological images. RESULTS: The mean HHS was lower in female patients (p = 0.009), patients >65 years of age (p < 0.001) and those with advanced lumbar spondylosis (p = 0.002). 52 (71.2%) of the patients reporting preoperative LBP experienced improvement after THA while 47 (21.1%) of those without preoperative LBP postoperatively reported new onset LBP. Female patients (p = 0.025; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.831; 95% CI, 1.081-3.101) and those with preoperative LBP (p = 0.007; HR 2.068; 95% CI, 1.221-3.504) were at a higher risk of developing postoperative LBP at 10 years. 4 out of 9 THA dislocations were late and had shown decreasing SFP angle values over time. Acetabular component inclination and anteversion angles increased over time, whereas the SFP angle was associated with sex and age and the PO angle with age and the severity of any preoperative lumbar degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent spinal pathology influences THA outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Sex, age, and associated lumbar degeneration can affect clinical and radiological changes over time. A decrease in SFP angle values over time was found in patients sustaining late dislocation.

Increase of cortical bone after a cementless long stem in periprosthetic fractures.

BACKGROUND: Healing and functional recovery have been reported using an extensively porous-coated stem in Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures; however, loss of cortical bone has been observed when using these stems in revision surgery for aseptic loosening. However, it is unclear whether this bone loss influences subsequent loosening. QUESTION/PURPOSES: We analyze the healing fracture rate and whether the radiographic changes observed around and extensively porous-coated stem used for periprosthetic fractures affect function or loosening. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients with periprosthetic fractures (20 Vancouver B2 and 15 Vancouver B3). Patients' mean age at surgery was 80 years (range, 51-86 years). No cortical struts were used in this series. We evaluated radiographs for signs of loosening or subsidence. The cortical index and the femoral cortical width were measured at different levels on the immediate pre- and postoperative radiographs and at different periods of followup. The minimum followup was 3 years (mean, 8.3 years; range, 3-17 years). RESULTS: All fractures had healed, and all stems were clinically and radiographically stable at the end of followup. Nineteen hips showed nonprogressive radiographic subsidence during the first 3 postoperative months without clinical consequences. The cortical index and the lateral and medial cortical thickness increased over time. Increase of femoral cortex thicknesses was greater in cases with moderate preoperative osteoporosis and in cases with stems less than 16 mm in thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest an extensively porous-coated stem for Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures leads to a high rate of union and stable fixation. Cortical index and lateral cortex thickness increased in these patients with periprosthetic fractures. Patients with moderate osteoporosis and those using thin stems showed a major increase in femoral cortex thickness over time.

Reconstruction of the rotation center of the hip after oblong cups in revision total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The preoperative bone defect and the reconstruction of the center of rotation of the hip are critical in acetabular revision surgery. Uncemented oblong cups are employed in order to manage these issues. We analyzed the clinical results and rates of revision of two different uncemented oblong cups, the reconstruction of the center of rotation of the hip, as well as the rate of radiological loosening and possible risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients (46 hips) underwent acetabular revision surgery using two different uncemented oblong cups. We assessed the clinical results and the survival rate for revision and aseptic loosening. Intraoperative bone loss was classified according to Paprosky, and acetabular reconstruction was assessed according to Ranawat. The mean follow-up was 7.2 years (range 4-11 years). RESULTS: There were four re-revisions (three due to aseptic loosening); the survival rate for re-revision due to aseptic loosening was 60.1 % at seven years. The mean distance between the center of the femoral head prosthesis and the approximate center of the femoral head improved from 21.5 to 10.2 mm. Thirteen cups showed radiological loosening; the survival rate for radiological loosening at seven years was 40.54 %. A smaller postoperative horizontal distance was correlated with cup loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Although optimal acetabular reconstruction can be achieved by using oblong uncemented cups in revision hip surgery, the clinical and radiological results are not encouraging. Excessive medialization of the cup may increase the rate of loosening.

1st EFORT European Consensus "Medical & Scientific Research Requirements for the Clinical Introduction of Artificial Joint Arthroplasty Devices": Background, Delphi Methodology & Consensus process.

The objectives of the 1st EFORT European Consensus on 'Medical and Scientific Research Requirements for the Clinical Introduction of Artificial Joint Arthroplasty Devices' were foremost to focus on patient safety by establishing performance requirements for medical devices. The 1st EFORT European Consensus applied an a priori-defined, modified Delphi methodology to produce unbiased, high-quality recommendation statements, confirmed by consensus voting of a European expert panel. Intended key outcomes are practical guidelines justified by the current stage of knowledge and based on a broad European Expert Consensus, to maintain innovation and optimisation of orthopaedic devices within the boundaries of MDR 2017/745. Twenty-one main research areas of relevance were defined relying on input from the EFORT IPSI WG1 'Introduction of Innovation' recommendations and a related survey. A modified Delphi approach with a preparatory literature review and work in small groups were used to prepare answers to the research questions in the form of 32 draft Consensus statements. A Consensus Conference in a hybrid format, on-site in the Carl Gustav Carus University of Dresden was organised to further refine the draft statements and define consensus within the complete group of participants by final voting, intended to further quantify expert opinion knowledge. The modified Delphi approach provides practical guidelines for hands-on orientation for orthopaedic surgeons, research institutes and laboratories, orthopaedic device manufacturers, patient representatives, Notified Bodies, National Institutes and authorities. For the first time, initiated by the EFORT IPSI (WG1 'Introduction of Innovation'), knowledge of all related stakeholders was combined in the 1st EFORT European Consensus to develop guidelines and result in a comprehensive set of recommendations.

Cup press fit in uncemented THA depends on sex, acetabular shape, and surgical technique.

BACKGROUND: Uncemented press-fit cups provide bone fixation in primary THA, but the use of screws is sometimes necessary to achieve primary stability of the socket. However, it is unclear whether and when screws should be used. QUESTION/PURPOSES: We analyzed the factors related to screw use with a press-fit uncemented cup and assessed whether screw use is associated with the same rates of loosening and revision as a press-fit technique. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 248 patients who underwent THA using the same prosthetic design. Eighty-eight hips had screws to achieve primary cup fixation (Group 1), and 189 did not (Group 2). Mean age was 50 years (range, 14-73 years). We analyzed factors related to the patient, acetabular type, and reconstruction of the rotation center of the hip. Minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 8.9 years; range, 5-12 years). RESULTS: We found higher screw use in women, patients with less physical activity, Acetabular Types A or C, and a distance from the center of the prosthetic femoral head to the normal center of rotation of more than 3 mm. There were four revisions in Group 1 and five in Group 2. Eight hips had radiographic loosening in Group 1 and nine in Group 2. Cups with a postoperative abduction angle of more than 50° had a higher risk for loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Press fit was achieved less frequently in women and patients with Acetabular Types A or C and less physical activity; a closer distance to the normal center of rotation decreased screw use. Screw use to augment fixation achieved survival similar to that of a press-fit cup. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Alumina-on-alumina THA in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a 5-year followup study.

BACKGROUND: THA is a concern in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) owing to patients' youth, poor bone stock, and small physical size. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) uncemented alumina-on-alumina THAs have good clinical and radiographic results at midterm followup in young patients with inflammatory arthritis and end-stage hip disease secondary to JIA, and (2) the anatomic center of rotation of the hip could be reconstructed in patients with acetabular protrusion. We also assessed the rate of surgical complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 31 alumina-on-alumina THAs in 21 patients with a mean age of 30.9 years (range, 14-48 years). Minimum followup until the time of revision of any component or the latest evaluation was 16 months. For nonrevised cases, the minimum followup was 60 months (range, 60-108 months). Acetabular protrusion was mild in 17 hips (Group 1) and moderate-severe in 14 (Group 2). Bone autograft was used to reconstruct the acetabulum in Group 2. Acetabular reconstruction was evaluated according to Ranawat et al. RESULTS: One cup was revised owing to aseptic loosening at 16 months; the remaining hips showed good clinical and radiographic results. The mean postoperative horizontal distance and the distance between the center of the head of the prosthesis and the true center of the femoral head improved in Group 2. There were no complications related to alumina. CONCLUSIONS: Although THA is a technically demanding procedure in patients with JIA, uncemented alumina-on-alumina THA provides pain relief and improves quality of life. In patients with acetabular protrusion, bone grafts enable anatomic cup positioning. Continued followup will be required to determine whether the alumina-on-alumina bearings in patients with JIA result in less osteolysis and loosening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

New polyethylenes in total hip arthroplasty : a 20- to 22-year follow-up study.

AIMS: A significant reduction in wear at five and ten years was previously reported when comparing Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene with nitrogen-sterilized Sulene polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated whether the improvement observed at the earlier follow-up continued, resulting in decreased osteolysis and revision surgery rates over the second decade. METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2001, 90 patients underwent surgery using the same acetabular and femoral components with a 28 mm metallic femoral head and either a Durasul or Sulene liner. A total of 66 hips of this prospective randomized study were available for a minimum follow-up of 20 years. The linear femoral head penetration rate was measured at six weeks, one year, and annually thereafter, using the Dorr method on digitized radiographs with a software package. RESULTS: In the Durasul group, no patients underwent revision due to loosening or showed radiological evidence of osteolysis. In the Sulene group, four patients (four hips) were revised due to femoral component loosening. The 20-year cumulative failure incidence in the presence of the competing event of death for revision surgery was 4.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8 to 13.6) in the Durasul group, and 8.9% (95% CI 2.8 to 19.5) in the Sulene group. The mean wear one year after surgery was 0.09 mm (SD 0.007) in the Durasul group and 0.24 (SD 0.015) in the Sulene group (p < 0.001). From one to 20 years after surgery, the mean total penetration was 0.32 mm (SD 0.045) in the Durasul group and 1.07 mm (SD 0.13) in the Sulene group (p < 0.001). Mean femoral head penetration at 20 years was approximately 70.0% less in the Durasul group than the Sulene group. CONCLUSION: The significant reduction in femoral head penetration obtained with the Durasul compared with Sulene in uncemented THA resulted in lower osteolysis and revision rates after 20 years.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(9):1032-1038.

The fate of sagittal alignment in tapered uncemented femoral components in total hip arthroplasty: 889 hips followed for a minimum of 10 years.

PURPOSE: Aseptic loosening is rare after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with mostly uncemented tapered stems; however, different factors can modify the results. We question whether 3 different current femoral components and/or the surgical technique affect the clinical and radiological outcome after a minimum follow-up of 10 years. METHODS: 889 uncemented tapered stems implanted from 1999 to 2007 were evaluated for a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Group 1 (273 hips) shared a conical shape and a porous-coated surface, group 2 (286 hips) a conical splined shape and group 3 (330 hips) a rectangular grit-blasted stem. Groups 1 and 2 were implanted through a posterolateral approach and group 3 using an anterolateral approach. Clinical outcomes and anteroposterior and sagittal radiographic analyses were compared. RESULTS: No thigh pain was reported in unrevised patients. Mean Harris Hip score was lower for patients in group 3 for pain and function at all intervals. 14-year implant survival for aseptic loosening was 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96.2-100) in group 3. No revision for aseptic loosening was found with the other designs. A stem position outside neutral limits in the sagittal alignment (p = 0.001, hazard ratio: 6.17, 95% CI, 2.05-18.61) was associated with aseptic loosening in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Most current uncemented straight tapered femoral components can provide adequate bone fixation in primary THA after 10 years. Conical stems inserted through a posterolateral approach are more reliable than rectangular ones inserted through an anterolateral approach.

Ceramic-on-ceramic cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients aged 40 years or under: Do preoperative conditions affect long-term results?

INTRODUCTION: Underlying diseases, bone deformities and polyethylene wear affect outcome in young patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). These issues are not widely confirmed for ceramic - on-ceramic THA, particularly regarding cup fixation. Therefore, we did a retrospective long-term investigation on a large population of cementless ceramic-on-ceramic THA in patients aged 40 years or younger aiming to analyze: 1) the complication rate; 2) clinical results; and 3) survival for cup loosening with regard to their preoperative conditions. HYPOTHESIS: Cup loosening could be related to preoperative diagnosis in young patients with a cementless ceramic-on-ceramic THA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and seven hips in 171 patients (97 men and 74 women) underwent a cementless ceramic-on-ceramic THA at a mean age of 31.6±6.8 years. The most frequent diagnoses were avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head (74 hips), pediatric hip diseases (35 hips), severe congenital hip dysplasia (CHD) (31 hips), juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (30 hips) and mild CHD (26 hips). The prosthesis included a press-fit metal backed cup with a hydroxyapatite coating and a macrotexture surface on either the equatorial region (93 cups) or the entire surface of the shell (114 cups). Ceramics were made of pure alumina and had a femoral head size of 28 (60 hips) or 32mm (147 hips). In all cases same the straight cementless tapered stem was inserted. RESULTS: There were three early dislocations, one requiring cup revision No hip was revised due to infection, ceramic fracture, or femoral component loosening. Eight cups were revised for aseptic loosening (3,8%). The mean preoperative Harris Hip score was 52.8±6.2 and 93.4±6.9 at the end of follow-up. It was better in AVN (95.7±2.3) and worst in severe CHD (88.8±11.8) (p=0.001). If the end-point was cup aseptic loosening, the survival rate at 17 years was 95.1% (95% CI: 91.3-98.9), 100% for AVN and post-traumatic arthritis, and 86.8% (95% CI: 74.9-98.7) for severe CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite diagnoses frequently causing technical difficulties at the surgery, outcome of cementless ceramic-on-ceramic THA in patients under the age of 40 years is satisfactory over ten years of follow up. Cup aseptic loosening was the main cause of failure and appears more related to the initial hip diseases than the age of the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective comparative study.

Impaction bone grafting in hip re-revision surgery.

AIMS: Bone stock restoration of acetabular bone defects using impaction bone grafting (IBG) in total hip arthroplasty may facilitate future re-revision in the event of failure of the reconstruction. We hypothesized that the acetabular bone defect during re-revision surgery after IBG was smaller than during the previous revision surgery. The clinical and radiological results of re-revisions with repeated use of IBG were also analyzed. METHODS: In a series of 382 acetabular revisions using IBG and a cemented component, 45 hips (45 patients) that had failed due to aseptic loosening were re-revised between 1992 and 2016. Acetabular bone defects graded according to Paprosky during the first and the re-revision surgery were compared. Clinical and radiological findings were analyzed over time. Survival analysis was performed using a competing risk analysis. RESULTS: Intraoperative bone defect during the initial revision included 19 Paprosky type IIIA and 29 Paprosky type IIIB hips; at re-revision, seven hips were Paprosky type II, 27 type IIIA and 11 were type IIIB (p = 0.020). The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 45.4 (SD 6.4), becoming 80.7 (SD 12.7) at the final follow-up. In all, 12 hips showed radiological migration of the acetabular component, and three required further revision surgery. The nine-year cumulative failure incidence (nine patients at risk) of the acetabular component for further revision surgery was 9.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9 to 21.0) for any cause, and 7.5% (95% CI 1.9 to 18.5) for aseptic loosening. Hips with a greater hip height had a higher risk for radiological migration (odds ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.17; p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Bone stock restoration can be obtained using IBG in revision hip surgery. This technique is also useful in re-revision surgery; however, a better surgical technique including a closer distance to hip rotation centre could decrease the risk of radiological migration of the acetabular component. A longer follow-up is required to assess potential fixation deterioration. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):492-499.

Osteoblast function in patients with idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head : implications for a possible novel therapy.

AIMS: To investigate whether idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is related to impaired osteoblast activities. METHODS: We cultured osteoblasts isolated from trabecular bone explants taken from the femoral head and the intertrochanteric region of patients with idiopathic ONFH, or from the intertrochanteric region of patients with osteoarthritis (OA), and compared their viability, mineralization capacity, and secretion of paracrine factors. RESULTS: Osteoblasts from the intertrochanteric region of patients with ONFH showed lower alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineralization capacity than osteoblasts from the same skeletal site in age-matched patients with OA, as well as lower messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of genes encoding osteocalcin and bone sialoprotein and higher osteopontin expression. In addition, osteoblasts from patients with ONFH secreted lower osteoprotegerin (OPG) levels than those from patients with OA, resulting in a higher receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) ligand (RANKL)-to-OPG ratio. In patients with ONFH, osteoblasts from the femoral head showed reduced viability and mineralized nodule formation compared with osteoblasts from the intertrochanteric region. Notably, the secretion of the pro-resorptive factors interleukin-6 and prostaglandin E2 as well as the RANKL-to-OPG ratio were markedly higher in osteoblast cultures from the femoral head than in those from the intertrochanteric region. CONCLUSION: Idiopathic ONFH is associated with a reduced mineralization capacity of osteoblasts and increased secretion of pro-resorptive factors. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(9):619-628.

Wear of hip prostheses increases serum IGFBP-1 levels in patients with aseptic loosening.

The biological mechanisms involved in aseptic loosening include inflammation-associated and bone resorption-associated processes. Coordinated cellular actions result in biochemical imbalances with devastating consequences for the joint. Given that this condition is not known for showing systemic signs, we investigated whether circulating levels of inflammation-related proteins are altered in patients with aseptic loosening. Our study included 37 patients who underwent revision surgery due to hip osteolysis and aseptic loosening and 31 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. Using antibody arrays, we evaluated the serum levels of 320 proteins in four patients from each group. The results showed differences in insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) concentrations, which we then quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests in all study patients. The results confirmed that serum IGFBP-1 concentrations were higher in the revision surgery patients than in the hip arthroplasty patients. In vitro studies showed that exposure of human osteoblasts to titanium particles induced an IGFBP-1 release that further increased when exposure to particles was performed in media conditioned by human M1 macrophages. These findings suggest that elevated serum IGFBP-1 levels in patients with aseptic loosening can arise from increased local IGFBP-1 production in the inflammatory environment of the periprosthetic bed.

Do trabecular metal cups achieve better results when compared to hemispherical porous titanium cups in acetabular revision surgery?

BACKGROUND: Trabecular metal (TM) cups were introduced in order to achieve better ingrowth and stability of the cup in acetabular revision surgery. As their use has evolved over time, we have queried whether TM cups would improve results in terms of the rate of aseptic loosening when compared to historical uncemented porous titanium cups used in revision surgery for acetabular bone loss in Hospital La Paz (Madrid, Spain). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 197 acetabular revisions performed between 1991 and 2015. Titanium cups were used in 81 cases and TM cups in 116. The mean follow-up was 8.1 years (range 1-15); 12.0 ± 7.8 for titanium group and 5.4 ± 3.1 for TM group. The most common reason for revision was aseptic loosening. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the survival of the cup, with radiological failure and re-revision due to aseptic loosening as the endpoints. Cox multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess different risk factors for failure. RESULTS: 1 TM cup and 1 titanium cup were re-revised due to aseptic loosening (p = 0.61). Radiological cup loosening was observed in 4 TM cups and 2 titanium cups (p = 1.0). At 6 years, the probability of not having radiological cup loosening was 97.4% (95% CI, 93.9-100) for the titanium cups and 95.1% for the TM cups (95% CI, 90.1-99.9) (p = 0.59). Another 5 cups were re-revised due to dislocation. Hips with a greater Paprosky defect showed a higher risk of loosening (p < 0.05, hazard risk (HR) 3.04; 95% CI, 0.97-9.54). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows there was no significant difference in re-revision due to aseptic loosening or radiological loosening between titanium and TM cups in revision surgery for acetabular bone loss. Both types of cups demonstrate excellent results with a low failure rate and minimal complications.

Results after late polymicrobial, gram-negative, and methicillin-resistant infections in knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of knee arthroplasty infections caused by high-virulence organisms suggest poor outcomes. Polymicrobial and Gram-negative infections are less studied. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study compared the results of treatment of knee arthroplasty infections by single versus polymicrobial isolates, Gram-positive versus Gram-negative, and methicillin-resistant versus -sensitive Staphylococci. METHODS: We prospectively followed 47 patients with late knee arthroplasty infections. The mean age was 72 years (range, 20-87 years). The treatment protocol included two-stage exchange and a combination of two oral antibiotics given for 6 months. Minimum followup was 1 year (average, 4.8 +/- 3 years; range, 1-12 years). Control of the infection was judged by absence of clinical, serologic, and radiologic signs of infection. The functional outcome was evaluated by Knee Society score at the last followup. RESULTS: Infection was controlled in all 15 patients with polymicrobial and in 28 of 32 (88%) with monomicrobial infections, in eight of nine patients with Gram-negative and in 35 of 38 (92%) with Gram-positive isolates. Control was also achieved in 22 of 25 patients (88%) infected by methicillin-resistant Staphylococci and in 14 of 14 by methicillin-sensitive Staphylococci. The Knee Society scores averaged 81-63 in patients with polymicrobial infections and were higher than in monomicrobial infections (75-52). The mean KSS was 85-59 in Gram-negative infections compared to 75-55 in Gram-positive infections. The mean KSS was similar in methicillin-resistant (78-54) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococci (73-56) infections. CONCLUSIONS: Polymicrobial and Gram-negative infections can be controlled in late knee arthroplasty infections. On the other hand, infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococci are less likely to be controlled by the regimens we used. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.

BACKGROUND: Impaction bone grafting has been used for acetabular reconstruction in revision surgery. However, most series do not establish differences in survival in revisions with differing severity of bone loss. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined (1) the survival rate for rerevision associated with varying degrees of bone loss; (2) the frequency with which bone graft resorption occurred; and (3) whether the reconstruction restored the anatomic center of rotation of the hip. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 165 patients (181 hips) who underwent rerevision for major bone loss. Using the classification of Paprosky et al. 98 hips had a Grade 3A defect and 83 a Grade 3B. We determined survival rates for revision and graft resorption. Cup position was determined measuring vertical and horizontal positions and the distance from the center of the prosthetic femoral head to the normal center of rotation of the hip in both groups according to Ranawat. The minimum followup until rerevision or the latest evaluation was 0.3 years months (mean, 7.5 years; range, 0.3-17.7 years). RESULTS: The survival rate for revision at 8 years was 84% (95% confidence interval: 61-100) for Grade 3A and 82% (95% confidence interval: 68-100) for Grade 3B. Twelve hips were rerevised. Seventeen grafts showed bone resorption. Acetabular cup position was anatomically restored in both Grades 3A and 3B. CONCLUSIONS: The midterm results for impacted bone allograft and cemented all-polyethylene cups were similar in both Grade 3A and Grade 3B hips. Acetabular reconstruction allows anatomic positioning of the cups and is associated with a low rate of rerevision.