Feasibility, Outcomes, and Perceptions of a Virtual Group Exercise Program in Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently report low physical activity and psychosocial support due to concerns with transportation, time, finances, access to services, and lack of caregiver support. These barriers can be addressed by online group interventions; however, utility of such programs in individuals with MS has not been examined yet. The purpose of this retrospective study was, therefore, to ( a ) investigate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of a virtual group exercise program in individuals with MS, and ( b ) explore the participant perceptions after the program. METHODS: Retrospective data from the medical records of 17 individuals with MS (mean [SD] age = 53.5 [12.3] years, body mass index = 28.2 [7.2]) who completed the virtual 13-week group exercise program, pre- and posttraining functional status questionnaires, and the end-of-program feedback were extracted. The exercise program included aerobic, resistance, balance, and flexibility training components recommended for people with MS. Feasibility, safety, outcomes, and participant perceptions were determined by adherence to the prescribed daily exercise dosage, number of adverse events, within-group differences in self-reported functional status, and thematic analysis of the participant feedback, respectively. RESULTS: Participants were adherent (79%), reported minimal adverse effects, and demonstrated significant changes ( P < 0.05) in functional status posttraining. Several themes on the perceived barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for improvement were identified. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A virtual 13-week group exercise program can be feasible, safe, effective, and well received by individuals with MS. Future research should investigate the dose-response effectiveness of telehealth and compare various telehealth models of exercise training using large randomized controlled trials.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1 available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A434 , which demonstrates an overview of the study).

Perinatal Incontinence Assessment Tools: A Psychometric Evaluation and Scoping Review.

Background: Approximately 40% of women report incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum (known as the perinatal period). Due to the lack of an established measurement standard, this scoping review aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of tools, which assess incontinence-related symptoms and quality of life (QOL) during this period. Materials and Methods: Articles in English, which assessed psychometric properties of tools for perinatal incontinence-related symptoms or QOL, were included and evaluated by a 16-item checklist. Nine databases were searched from 2000 to 2020. Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria, and five assessment tools were identified and included in this review. The modified Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (mPFQ), Leakage Index (LI), and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.60, >0.70, and mean inter-item correlations >0.39, respectively). The mPFQ demonstrated moderate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.60). Construct validity of the ICIQ-UI SF was established by significant (p < 0.05) differences across age and obesity, whereas the mPFQ demonstrated significant (p < 0.001) discriminant validity in symptoms prepartum and postpartum. Convergent validity of telephone-administered Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) was established with the written version (p > 0.05, correlation coefficient >0.90). Responsiveness to change was described for the ICIQ-UI SF and mPFQ. Conclusions: The mPFQ and ICIQ-UI SF demonstrated acceptable reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change, therefore suggesting good clinical utility. Since most studies included primiparous women, future research in heterogeneous samples of women with perinatal incontinence may be needed.