Validation of a simplified comorbidity evaluation predicting clinical outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 - A multicenter retrospective observation study.

OBJECTIVES: We compared and validated the performance accuracy of simplified comorbidity evaluation compared to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) predicting COVID-19 severity. In addition, we also determined whether risk prediction of COVID-19 severity changed during different COVID-19 pandemic outbreaks. METHODS: We enrolled all patients whose SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were performed at six different hospital Emergency Departments in 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on the various COVID-19 outbreaks in the US (first wave: March-May 2020, second wave: June-September 2020, and third wave: October-December 2020). A simplified comorbidity evaluation was used as an independent risk factor to predict clinical outcomes using multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 22,248 patients were included, for which 7023 (32%) patients tested COVID-19 positive. Higher percentages of COVID-19 patients with more than three chronic conditions had worse clinical outcomes (i.e., hospital and intensive care unit admissions, receiving invasive mechanical ventilations, and in-hospital mortality) during all three COVID-19 outbreak waves. CONCLUSIONS: This simplified comorbidity evaluation was validated to be associated with COVID clinical outcomes. Such evaluation did not perform worse when compared with CCI to predict in-hospital mortality.

Impact of emergency department opioid use on future health resource utilization among patients with migraine.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the subsequent health resource utilization (HRU) between patients with migraine who received opioid medications at their emergency department (ED) visits ("opioid recipients") versus patients with migraine who did not receive opioid medications at their ED visits ("non-recipients"). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found that opioid use is common among patients with migraine at emergency settings. Medication overuse, especially the use of opioids, is associated with migraine progression, which can ultimately lead to substantial health resource use and costs. There is limited evidence on opioid use specifically in emergency settings and its impact on future HRU among people with migraine. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from the Baylor Scott & White Health between December 2013 and April 2017. Adult patients who had at least 6 months of continuous enrollment before (baseline or pre-index) and after (follow-up) the first date they had an ED visit with a diagnosis of migraine (defined as index date) were enrolled in the study. Opioid use and HRU during follow-up period between opioid recipients and non-recipients were summarized and compared. RESULTS: A total of 788 patients met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study. During the 6-month follow-up period, compared to patients with migraine who were non-recipients at their index ED visits, opioid recipients had significantly more all-cause (3.6 [SD = 6.3] vs. 1.9 [SD = 4.8], p < 0.0001) and migraine-related (1.6 [SD = 4.2] vs. 0.6 [SD = 2.1], p < 0.0001) opioid prescriptions (RXs), and more all-cause (2.6 [SD = 4.3] vs. 1.6 [SD = 2.6], p = 0.002) and migraine-related (0.6 [SD = 1.4] vs. 0.3 [SD = 0.8], p = 0.001) ED visits. In addition, opioid recipients had higher risk of future migraine-related ED visits controlling for covariates (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.09-2.03, p = 0.013). Factors that were significantly (p < 0.05) related to future migraine-related ED visits include previous opioid use (HR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.24-3.65, p = 0.007), previous ED visits (HR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.23-4.58, p = 0.010), hypertension (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.07-2.00, p = 0.017), age between 45 and 64 years (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48-0.97, p = 0.033), female sex (HR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.12-2.86, p = 0.015), and tobacco use disorder (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.07-1.97, p = 0.017). Sub-analyses were restricted to the group of patients who were opioid naïve at baseline (n = 274, defined as having ≤1 opioid RXs during the 6-month pre-index period). Patients who were baseline opioid naïve but received opioids during their index ED visits were more likely to have future migraine-related ED visits compared to patients who were baseline opioid naïve and did not receive any opioids during their index ED visits, controlling for covariates (HR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.54-5.46, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Opioid use among patients with migraine presenting to the ED is associated with increased future HRU, which highlights the need for optimizing migraine management in emergency settings.

Effect of Out-of-Hospital Tranexamic Acid vs Placebo on 6-Month Functional Neurologic Outcomes in Patients With Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Importance: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability due to trauma. Early administration of tranexamic acid may benefit patients with TBI. Objective: To determine whether tranexamic acid treatment initiated in the out-of-hospital setting within 2 hours of injury improves neurologic outcome in patients with moderate or severe TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 20 trauma centers and 39 emergency medical services agencies in the US and Canada from May 2015 to November 2017. Eligible participants (N = 1280) included out-of-hospital patients with TBI aged 15 years or older with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 or less and systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Interventions: Three interventions were evaluated, with treatment initiated within 2 hours of TBI: out-of-hospital tranexamic acid (1 g) bolus and in-hospital tranexamic acid (1 g) 8-hour infusion (bolus maintenance group; n = 312), out-of-hospital tranexamic acid (2 g) bolus and in-hospital placebo 8-hour infusion (bolus only group; n = 345), and out-of-hospital placebo bolus and in-hospital placebo 8-hour infusion (placebo group; n = 309). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was favorable neurologic function at 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score >4 [moderate disability or good recovery]) in the combined tranexamic acid group vs the placebo group. Asymmetric significance thresholds were set at 0.1 for benefit and 0.025 for harm. There were 18 secondary end points, of which 5 are reported in this article: 28-day mortality, 6-month Disability Rating Scale score (range, 0 [no disability] to 30 [death]), progression of intracranial hemorrhage, incidence of seizures, and incidence of thromboembolic events. Results: Among 1063 participants, a study drug was not administered to 96 randomized participants and 1 participant was excluded, resulting in 966 participants in the analysis population (mean age, 42 years; 255 [74%] male participants; mean Glasgow Coma Scale score, 8). Of these participants, 819 (84.8%) were available for primary outcome analysis at 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome occurred in 65% of patients in the tranexamic acid groups vs 62% in the placebo group (difference, 3.5%; [90% 1-sided confidence limit for benefit, -0.9%]; P = .16; [97.5% 1-sided confidence limit for harm, 10.2%]; P = .84). There was no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality between the tranexamic acid groups vs the placebo group (14% vs 17%; difference, -2.9% [95% CI, -7.9% to 2.1%]; P = .26), 6-month Disability Rating Scale score (6.8 vs 7.6; difference, -0.9 [95% CI, -2.5 to 0.7]; P = .29), or progression of intracranial hemorrhage (16% vs 20%; difference, -5.4% [95% CI, -12.8% to 2.1%]; P = .16). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with moderate to severe TBI, out-of-hospital tranexamic acid administration within 2 hours of injury compared with placebo did not significantly improve 6-month neurologic outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01990768.

The effect of vertical split-flow patient management on emergency department throughput and efficiency.

BACKGROUND: To address emergency department overcrowding operational research seeks to identify efficient processes to optimize flow of patients through the emergency department. Vertical flow refers to the concept of utilizing and assigning patients virtual beds rather than to an actual physical space within the emergency department to care of low acuity patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of vertical flow upon emergency department efficiency and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Prospective pre/post-interventional cohort study of all intend-to-treat patients presenting to the emergency department during a two-year period before and after the implementation of a vertical flow model. RESULTS: In total 222,713 patient visits were included in the analysis with 107,217 patients presenting within the pre-intervention and 115,496 in the post-intervention groups. The results of the regression analysis demonstrate an improvement in throughput across the entire ED patient population, decreasing door to departure time by 17 min (95% CI 15-18) despite an increase in patient volume. No statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction scores were found between the pre- and post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of a vertical split flow model was associated with improved ED efficiency.

Secondary traumatic stress in emergency medicine clinicians.

Previously called Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS), secondary exposure to trauma is now considered a valid DSM-5 Criterion A stressor for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Previous studies have found high rates of STS in clinicians who treat traumatically injured patients. However, little research has examined STS among Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs). The current study enrolled EM providers (N = 118) working in one of 10 hospitals to examine risk factors, protective factors, and the prevalence of STS in this understudied population. Most of the participants were physicians (72.9%), Caucasian (85.6%), and male (70.3%) with mean age of 39.7 (SD = 8.9). Overall, 12.7% of the sample screened positive for STS with clinical levels of intrusion, arousal, and avoidance symptom clusters, and 33.9% had at least one symptom cluster at clinical levels. Low resilience and a history of personal trauma were positively associated with positive STS screens and STS severity scores. Borderline significance suggested that female gender and spending ≥10% of one's time with trauma patients could be additional risk factors. Findings suggest that resilience-building interventions may be beneficial.

Pilot study of a protocol to administer inhaled nitric oxide to treat severe acute submassive pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVE: Inhaled nitric oxide has been reported to benefit patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). To date, all published literature has derived from case reports or case series conducted without a structured protocol. Here we report the results of a phase I trial with a predefined clinical protocol to treat patients with CT-demonstrated, submassive PE and moderate to severe dyspnoea. METHODS: Patients were recruited from the emergency department of an academic teaching hospital. Informed consent and the entire treatment protocol was administered by a study physician. Nitric oxide was administered using a commercial device (Inovent) and a custom-made non-rebreathing face mask. The NO concentration was increased at 1 ppm/min (parts per million) until a maximum of 25 ppm and continued for 120 min and then weaned at 1 ppm/min. Dyspnoea was assessed with the Borg score, oxygenation by pulse oximetry, and haemodynamic status by shock index (HR/SBP). RESULTS: Eight patients were enrolled. All patients tolerated the entire protocol without adverse events, and all had decreased numerical Borg score by >50%. The changes from baseline to 155 min were as follows: Borg score 7.5±2.5 to 2.3±1.9 (p=0.06, Signed rank test), SaO2% 93±5 to 97±3 and shock index 1.0±0.11 to 0.86±0.09. No patient experienced worsening during weaning. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled NO reduced dyspnoea without adverse events in eight patients with severe submassive PE. This protocol can serve as the basis for a phase II trial or for a compassionate use protocol.

Validation of clinical prediction scores in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Initial reports of the FUNC score suggest that it may accurately identify those patients suffering from intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with an ultra low chance of functional neurologic recovery. This study's aim is to validate the FUNC score and determine if it accurately identifies the cohort of patients with an ultra low chance of survival with good neurologic recovery. METHODS: Retrospective review of 501 consecutive primary ICH patients admitted from the Emergency Department to a large healthcare system. Performance of the FUNC, ICH-GS, and oICH scores was determined by calculating areas under the receiver-operator-characteristic curves. Patients with a predicted 100 % chance of poor neurologic outcome (PNO) (FUNC <4 and ICH-GS >10) scores were evaluated to determine if DNR impacted 90 day survival or rate of survival with a Glasgow Outcome Score of <3. RESULTS: In 366 cases of primary ICH who presented during the study period, 222(61 %) survived to discharge. Both the FUNC (AUC: 0.873) and ICH-GS (AUC: 0.888) outperformed the oICH (AUC: 0.743) in predicting 90-day mortality (p = <0.001). Of 68 patients with a FUNC score <4, 67 (98.5 %) had PNO at discharge. The presence of DNR was not associated with a significant difference in the rate of PNO at discharge (40/40 = 100 % vs. 27/28 = 96.4 % p = 0.42) or 90-day mortality (40/40 = 100 % vs. 21/28 = 75 %, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The FUNC and ICH-GS appear superior to the oICH in predicting outcome in patients with primary ICH. In addition, the FUNC score appears to accurately identify patients with low chance of functional neurologic recovery at discharge.

Anaphylaxis due to Hymenoptera sting progressing to thoracic aortic dissection.

Here we present an 83-year-old woman with truncal pain, hypoxemia, and nausea after a Hymenoptera sting. Due to progressive truncal pain, emergent computed tomography angiography was ordered and confirmed an acute Stanford type A aortic dissection extending from the aortic root and terminating in the left common iliac artery. She was emergently transferred to a quaternary care center and managed surgically. This case highlights anaphylaxis as a unique potential trigger of aortic dissection and the need for a high index of suspicion for early diagnosis.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection and acute myocardial infarction in women.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is increasingly recognized as a cause of acute coronary syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, and sudden death in young patients, particularly women, presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. It is the most common cause of nonatherosclerotic coronary artery disease in women <50 years of age. Current guidelines for SCAD management come from case series that have demonstrated low success rates and high rates of complications with percutaneous coronary intervention. Expert consensus suggests conservative care, and observation is preferred in many patients. However, patients with ongoing symptoms of cardiac ischemia or hemodynamic or electrical instability with compromised myocardial perfusion remain challenging. With this case report, we aim to increase awareness of SCAD and critical aspects of its diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Further investigation is needed to clarify the ideal candidates for revascularization to optimize outcomes and limit morbidity and mortality.

Effectiveness of an algorithm-based care pathway for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation presenting to the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) carries substantial morbidity and mortality. Evidence-based guidelines have been synthesized into emergency department (ED) AF care pathways, but the effectiveness and scalability of such approaches are not well established. We thus evaluated the impacts of an algorithmic care pathway for ED management of non-valvular AF (EDAFMP) on hospital use and care process measures. METHODS: We deployed a voluntary-use EDAFMP in 4 EDs (1 tertiary hospital, 1 cardiac hospital, 2 community hospitals) of an integrated delivery organization using a multifaceted implementation approach. We compared outcomes between patients with AF treated using the EDAFMP and historical and contemporaneous "usual care" controls, using a propensity-score adjusted generalized estimating equation. Patients with an index ED encounter for a primary visit reason of non-valvular AF (and no excluding concurrent diagnoses) were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Preimplementation (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2016), 628 AF patients were eligible; postimplementation (September 1, 2017-June 30, 2019), 1296, including 271 (20.9%) treated with the EDAFMP, were eligible. EDAFMP patients were less likely to be admitted than both historical (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45, 0.29-0.71) and contemporaneous controls (aOR, 95%CI: 0.63, 0.46-0.86). ED visits and hospital readmissions over 90 days subsequent to index ED encounters were similar between postimplementation EDAFMP and usual care groups. EDAFMP patients were more likely to be prescribed anticoagulation (38% v. 5%, P < 0.001) and be referred to a cardiologist (93% vs 29%, P < 0.001) versus the comparator group. CONCLUSION: EDAFMP use is associated with decreased hospital admission during an index ED encounter for non-valvular AF, and improved delivery of AF care processes.

Comparison of first-attempt success between tibial and humeral intraosseous insertions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Intraosseous (IO) needle insertion is often utilized in the adult population for critical resuscitation purposes. Standard insertion sites include the proximal humerus and proximal tibia, for which limited comparison data are available. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the frequencies of IO first-attempt success between humeral and tibial sites in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: This observational study was conducted in an urban setting between August 28, 2009, and October 31, 2009, and included all medical cardiac arrest patients for whom resuscitative efforts were performed. Cardiac arrest protocols stipulate that paramedics insert an IO line for initial vascular access. During the first month of the study, the proximal humerus was the preferred primary insertion site, whereas the tibia was preferred throughout the second month. The primary outcome was first-attempt success, defined as secure IO needle position in the marrow cavity and normal fluid flow. Any needle dislodgment during resuscitation was also recorded. The association between first-attempt IO success and initial IO insertion location was analyzed using a test of independent proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the difference in proportions. RESULTS: There were 88 cardiac arrest patients receiving IO placement, with 58 (65.9%) patients receiving their initial IO attempt in the tibia. The rate of first-time IO success at the tibia was significantly higher than that observed at the humerus (89.7% vs. 60.0%; p < 0.01). There were 18 initial successes at the humerus; for six (33.3%) of these, the needle became dislodged during resuscitation, compared with 52 initial successes at the tibia, with three (5.8%) dislodgments. The rate of total success for initial IO placements was significantly lower for the humerus (40.0%) compared with that for the tibia (84.5%; p < 0.01) during resuscitation efforts. CONCLUSIONS: In this subset of patients, tibial IO needle placement appeared to be a more effective insertion site than the proximal humerus. Success rates were higher with a lower incidence of needle dislodgments. Further randomized studies are required in order to validate these results.

The association between ambulance hospital turnaround times and patient acuity, destination hospital, and time of day.

INTRODUCTION: The availability of ambulances to respond to emergency calls is related to their ability to return to service from the hospital. Extended hospital turnaround times decrease the number of available unit hours ambulances are deployed, which in turn can increase coverage costs or sacrifice coverage. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ambulance turnaround times were associated with patient acuity, destination hospital, and time of day. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of ambulance hospital turnaround times utilized 12 months of data from a single, countywide, metropolitan emergency medical services (EMS) service. Turnaround time was defined as the interval between the time of ambulance arrival at the hospital and the time the ambulance became available to respond to another call. Independent variables included patient acuity (low [BLS nonemergency transport], medium [ALS care and nonemergency transport], and high [ALS care and emergency transport]), destination hospital (seven regional hospitals), and time of day (one-hour intervals). Data analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, t-tests, and linear regression. RESULTS: Of the 61,094 patient transports, the mean turnaround time was 35.6 minutes (standard deviation [SD] = 16.5). Turnaround time was significantly associated with patient acuity (p < 0.001). High-acuity calls had a mean turnaround time of 52.5 minutes (SD = 21.5), whereas moderate-acuity and low-acuity calls had mean turnaround times of 42.0 minutes (SD = 16.4) and 32.5 minutes (SD = 14.4), respectively. A statistically significant relationship between destination hospital and turnaround time was found, with the differences in means ranging from 30 seconds to 8 minutes. Similarly, time of day was associated with turnaround time, with the longest turnaround times occurring between 0600 and 1500 hours. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patient acuity, destination hospital, and time of day were associated with variation in ambulance turnaround times. Research describing other system characteristics such as current emergency department census and patient handoff procedures may further demonstrate areas for improvement in HTAT. Results from this analysis may be used to inspire EMS administrators and EMS medical directors to start tracking these times to create a predictive model of EMS staffing needs.

Timing of Oversedation Events Following Opiate Administration in Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Unintended overdoses of opiate medications are potentially lethal events. Monitoring patients for oversedation is fundamental to ensuring safe use of opiates, and the timing of this evaluation is guided by the onset of action, time to max effect and duration of action of the opiate. The study's aim was to describe the timing of oversedation in relation to the predicted duration of action of the administered opiate. METHODS: This study was conducted as a retrospective review of all opiate-related oversedation events during a 2-year period involving patients admitted to an urban teaching hospital. RESULTS: Of the 53 opiate-related oversedation events evaluated, 47% occurred after the predicted maximal duration of action of the administered opiate. CONCLUSION: Opiate-induced oversedation routinely occurs after predicted based upon duration of action. The study findings have profound implications upon nursing practice regarding duration of time required to monitor for opiate-induced oversedation.

Monotherapy Anticoagulation to Expedite Home Treatment of Patients Diagnosed With Venous Thromboembolism in the Emergency Department: A Pragmatic Effectiveness Trial.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to test if low-risk emergency department patients with vitamin K antagonist (venous thromboembolism [VTE]; including venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism [PE]) can be safely and effectively treated at home with direct acting oral (monotherapy) anticoagulation in a large-scale, real-world pragmatic effectiveness trial. METHODS: This was a single-arm trial, conducted from 2016 to 2019 in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies guideline in 33 emergency departments in the United States. Participants had newly diagnosed VTE with low risk of death based upon either the modified Hestia criteria, or physician judgment plus the simplified PE severity index score of zero, together with nonhigh bleeding risk were eligible. Patients had to be discharged within 24 hours of triage and treated with either apixaban or rivaroxaban. Effectiveness was defined by the primary efficacy and safety outcomes, image-proven recurrent VTE and bleeding requiring hospitalization >24 hours, respectively, with an upper limit of the 95% CI for the 30-day frequency of VTE recurrence below 2.0% for both outcomes. RESULTS: We enrolled 1421 patients with complete outcomes data, including 903 with venous thrombosis and 518 with PE. The recurrent VTE requiring hospitalization occurred in 14/1421 (1.0% [95% CI, 0.5%-1.7%]), and bleeding requiring hospitalization occurred in 12/1421 (0.8% [0.4%-1.5%). The rate of severe bleeding using International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria was 2/1421 (0.1% [0%-0.5%]). No patient died, and serious adverse events occurred in 2.5% of venous thrombosis patients and 2.3% of patients with PE. Medication nonadherence was reported by patients in 8.0% (6.6%-9.5%) and was associated with a risk ratio of 6.0 (2.3-15.2) for VTE recurrence. Among all patients diagnosed with VTE in the emergency department during the period of study, 18% of venous thrombosis patients and 10% of patients with PE were enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy treatment of low-risk patients with venous thrombosis or PE in the emergency department setting produced a low rate of bleeding and VTE recurrence, but may be underused. Patients with venous thrombosis and PE should undergo risk-stratification before home treatment. Improved patient adherence may reduce rate of recurrent VTE. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03404635.

Over-Testing for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in American Emergency Departments: The Continuing Epidemic.

BACKGROUND: No recent data have investigated rates of diagnostic testing for pulmonary embolism (PE) in US emergency departments (EDs), and no data have examined computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) rates in subgroups at high risk for adverse imaging outcomes, including young women and children. We hypothesized that over-testing for PE remains a problem. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used electronic health record and billing data for 16 EDs in Indiana and 11 hospitals in the Dallas-Fort Worth area from 2016 to 2019 to locate ED patients who had any of the following: D-dimer, CTPA, scintillation ventilation perfusion lung scanning or formal pulmonary angiography. The primary outcomes were ED encounter volume-adjusted CTPA rate, PE yield rate with subgroup reporting for children (<18 years) and women under 45 years. We also examined the most frequent diagnoses. From a total visit volume of 1 828 010 patient encounters, 97 125 (5.3% of the total volume) had a diagnostic test for PE, including 25 870 patients who had CTPA order without D-dimer (59% of all tests for PE). The yield rate for PE from CTPA scans was 1.3% (1.1%-1.5%) in Indiana and 4.8% (4.2%-5.1%) in Dallas-Fort Worth (pooled rate 3.1%). Linear regression showed that increased D-dimer ordering correlated with increased PE yield rate (Pearson's R2=0.43; P<0.001). From the pooled sample, 59% of CTPAs done were in women, with 21% of all CTPAs performed on women under 45 years of age, and 1.4% (1.3%-1.5%) on children. The most frequent diagnoses were symptom-based descriptions of chest pain (34%) and shortness of breath (6.5%) and the condition-based diagnosis of pneumonia (4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Over-testing for PE in American EDs remains a major public health problem. Centers with higher D-dimer ordering had higher yield of PE on CTPA. These data suggest the potential for implementation of D-dimer based protocols to reduce low-yield CTPA ordering.

Tranexamic acid administration in the field does not affect admission thromboelastography after traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: No Food and Drug Administration-approved medication improves outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI). A forthcoming clinical trial that evaluated the effects of two prehospital tranexamic acid (TXA) dosing strategies compared with placebo demonstrated no differences in thromboelastography (TEG) values. We proposed to explore the impact of TXA on markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with moderate to severe TBI. METHODS: Data were extracted from a placebo-controlled clinical trial in which patients 15 years or older with TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale, 3-12) and systolic blood pressure of ≥90 mm Hg were randomized prehospital to receive placebo bolus/placebo infusion (placebo), 1 g of TXA bolus/1 g of TXA infusion (bolus maintenance), or 2 g of TXA bolus/placebo infusion (bolus only). Thromboelastography was performed, and coagulation measures including prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international ratio, fibrinogen, D-dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin (PAP), thrombin antithrombin, tissue plasminogen activator, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 were quantified at admission and 6 hours later. RESULTS: Of 966 patients receiving study drug, 700 had laboratory tests drawn at admission and 6 hours later. There were no statistically significant differences in TEG values, including LY30, between groups (p > 0.05). No differences between prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international ratio, fibrinogen, thrombin antithrombin, tissue plasminogen activator, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 were demonstrated across treatment groups. Concentrations of D-dimer in TXA treatment groups were less than placebo at 6 hours (p < 0.001). Concentrations of PAP in TXA treatment groups were less than placebo on admission (p < 0.001) and 6 hours (p = 0.02). No differences in D-dimer and PAP were observed between bolus maintenance and bolus only. CONCLUSION: While D-dimer and PAP levels reflect a lower degree of fibrinolysis following prehospital administration of TXA when compared with placebo in a large prehospital trial of patients with TBI, TEG obtained on admission and 6 hours later did not demonstrate any differences in fibrinolysis between the two TXA dosing regimens and placebo. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic test, level III.

Computed Tomography Imaging in Aortic Dissection.

Emergency physicians often rely on a "triple-rule-out" computed tomography (CT) where image acquisition is timed to obtain image quality equivalent to dedicated coronary CT angiography, pulmonary CT angiography, and thoracic aorta CT angiography. This case highlights the importance of obtaining CT angiography dedicated to the aorta in the setting of high clinical suspicion for aortic disease if initial CT pulmonary angiogram is negative for aortic disease.

The effect of a quantitative resuscitation strategy on mortality in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative resuscitation consists of structured cardiovascular intervention targeting predefined hemodynamic end points. We sought to measure the treatment effect of quantitative resuscitation on mortality from sepsis. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic review of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, conference proceedings, clinical practice guidelines, and other sources using a comprehensive strategy. STUDY SELECTION: We identified randomized control trials comparing quantitative resuscitation with standard resuscitation in adult patients who were diagnosed with sepsis using standard criteria. The primary outcome variable was mortality. DATA ABSTRACTION: Three authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality using standardized instruments; consensus was reached by conference. Preplanned subgroup analysis required studies to be categorized based on early (at the time of diagnosis) vs. late resuscitation implementation. We used the chi-square test and I to assess for statistical heterogeneity (p < 0.10, I > 25%). The primary analysis was based on the random effects model to produce pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The search yielded 29 potential publications; nine studies were included in the final analysis, providing a sample of 1001 patients. The combined results demonstrate a decrease in mortality (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.96); however, there was statistically significant heterogeneity (p = 0.07, I = 45%). Among the early quantitative resuscitation studies (n = 6) there was minimal heterogeneity (p = 0.40, I = 2.4%) and a significant decrease in mortality (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.69). The late quantitative resuscitation studies (n = 3) demonstrated no significant effect on mortality (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.60-2.22). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found that applying an early quantitative resuscitation strategy to patients with sepsis imparts a significant reduction in mortality.

Overall survival and brain death frequency following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major cause of mortality that is responsible for over 300,000 deaths in the United States each year. Underlying cardiac etiologies remain the most common culprit. Despite medical advances in the treatment of coronary artery disease, the mortality following OHCA remains dismal. Additionally, of those who survive the initial event, many are left with debilitating and irreversible anoxic brain injuries. Therefore, improving survival as well as neurologic outcome is of primary importance in this group. Our goal was to evaluate the underlying etiologies, neurologic outcomes, and cardiac interventions being performed in patients with OHCA presenting to our large tertiary care center. We retrospectively reviewed 181 charts of patients presenting to our emergency department over a 1-year time period with a diagnosis of OHCA. Following exclusion criteria, 130 patients remained, with 17 of those surviving to hospital admission. Of the 17 initial survivors, only 9 survived to hospital discharge and only 6 of those obtained good neurologic outcomes. Additionally, there was no mortality benefit in the 4 patients who had coronary angiography or percutaneous intervention.

Comparison of outcomes in patients with intracranial hemorrhage on factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists treated with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate.

The relative clinical efficacy of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in oral anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage is unknown, especially for factor Xa-inhibiting anticoagulants. We report short-term outcomes of patients with oral anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage on vitamin K antagonists and factor Xa inhibitors who were treated with 4F-PCC. This multicenter, observational study involved patients presenting to the emergency department in nine hospitals in an integrated health care delivery system in Texas between July 2013 and December 2015. Forty-two patients diagnosed with oral anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage-24 taking a vitamin K antagonist and 14 taking a factor Xa inhibitor-were treated with 4F-PCC as part of usual care. Study patients had similar baseline demographics, with the exception of suspected etiology of hemorrhage. Outcomes of the vitamin K antagonist group were similar to those of the factor Xa inhibitor group, with no significant differences in overall in-hospital mortality (32.1% vs 14.2%, respectively), length of stay, or rates of hemorrhagic expansion, thromboembolism, or discharge to home. In conclusion, this small sample of patients with oral factor Xa inhibitor and vitamin K antagonist-associated intracranial hemorrhage treated with 4F-PCC had similar mortality and neurological outcomes, with no venous thromboembolic events.