RESUMO
Localized increases in neuronal activity are supported by the hemodynamic response, which delivers oxygen to the brain tissue to support synaptic functions, action potentials and other neuronal processes. However, it remains unknown if changes in baseline neuronal activity, which are expected to reflect neuronal metabolic demand, alter the relationship between the local hemodynamic and oxygen behaviour. In order to better characterize this system, we examine here the relationship between brain tissue oxygen (PO2) and hemodynamic responses (BOLD functional MRI) under different levels of neuronal activity. By comparing the stimulus-evoked responses during different levels of baseline neuronal activity, the awake state vs isoflurane anesthesia, we were able to measure how a known change in neuronal demand affected tissue PO2 as well as the hemodynamic response to stimulation. We observed a high correlation between stimulus-evoked PO2 and BOLD responses in the awake state. Moreover, we found that the evoked PO2 and BOLD responses were still present despite the elevated tissue oxygen baseline and decreased baseline of neuronal activity under low concentration isoflurane, and that the magnitudes of these responses decreased by similar proportions but the relationship between these signals was distorted. Our findings point to distortion of the BOLD-PO2 relationship due to anesthesia. The feedback mechanism to adjust the level of brain tissue oxygen, as well as the correlation between BOLD and PO2 responses, are impaired even by a small dose of anesthetics.
Assuntos
Isoflurano , Oxigênio , Isoflurano/farmacologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , HemodinâmicaRESUMO
The West Midlands Regional Children's Tumour Registry collects detailed information on all cases of childhood cancer in the West Midlands Health Authority Region (WMHAR). The distribution by electoral ward of all cases diagnosed in the WMHAR between 1980 and 1984 has been determined. Analysis has also been performed for leukaemias/non-Hodgkin's lymphomas alone. We suggest that this latter grouping should be universally employed, owing to the difficulty of accurately separating out cases of leukaemia. Both spatial analyses showed several wards with significantly excessive rates on the basis of their cumulative Poison probability. Observed/expected ratios of 3-35 were seen for cases in significant wards, which are similar to the ratios seen in analysis of incidence around nuclear installations. However, further detailed consideration of these individual significance levels in the light of the number of statistically significant wards which would occur by chance alone, due to the multiple use of the test, accounted completely for the number of wards obtained in each of the groups considered. Thus, apparent 'clustering' of cases could be mere statistical artefact. In the WMHAR, therefore, using the technique of probability mapping, no true spatial pattern of incidence was found, other than that which would occur by chance alone. This, in a large area without nuclear installations and an even mix of rural and industrialised regions, could be seen as control data for those studies which have considered cases of childhood leukaemia around nuclear facilities, where the observation of single point clusters associated with suspected sites restricts assessments of spatial pattern in the rest of the area.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)