Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of epilepsy associated with temporal encephalocele: A systematic review.

Temporal encephaloceles (TE) are an under-identified, potentially intervenable cause of epilepsy. This systematic review consolidates the current data to identify the major clinical, neuroimaging, and EEG features and surgical outcomes of epilepsy associated with TE. Literature searches were carried out using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 7, 2023. Studies were included if they described clinical, neuroimaging, EEG, or surgical data in ≥5 patients with TE and epilepsy. Of 562 studies identified in the search, 24 met the eligibility criteria, reporting 423 unique patients with both epilepsy and TE. Compared to epilepsy patients without TE, those with TE had a higher mean age of seizure onset and were less likely to have a history of febrile seizures. Seizure semiologies were variable, but primarily mirrored temporal lobe onset patterns. Epilepsy patients with TE had a higher likelihood of having clinical or radiographic features of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) than those without. Brain MRI may show ipsilateral mesial temporal sclerosis (16 %). CT scans of the skull base usually revealed bony defects near the TE (90 %). Brain PET scans primarily showed ipsilateral temporal lobe hypometabolism (80 %), mostly in the anterior temporal lobe (67 %). Scalp EEG mostly lateralized ipsilateral to the implicated TE (92 % seizure onset) and localized to the temporal lobe (96 %). Intracranial EEG revealed seizure onset near the TE (11 of 12 cases including TE-adjacent electrodes) with variable timing of spread to the ipsilateral hippocampus. After surgical treatment of the TE, the rate of Engel I or ILAE 1 outcomes at one year was 75 % for lesionectomy, 85 % for anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), and 80 % for ATL with amygdalohippocampectomy. Further studies are needed to better elucidate the relationship between IIH, TE, and epilepsy, improve the identification of TE, and optimize surgical interventions.

Thinking Three-Dimensionally: A Self- and Externally-Controlled Approach to Screening for Drug-Drug-Drug Interactions Among High-Risk Populations.

The global rise in polypharmacy has increased both the necessity and complexity of drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessments, given the growing potential for interactions involving more than two drugs. Leveraging large-scale healthcare claims data, we piloted a semi-automated, high-throughput case-crossover-based approach for drug-drug-drug interaction (3DI) screening. Cases were direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users with either a major bleeding event during ongoing dispensings for potentially interacting, enzyme-inhibiting antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) (Study 1), or a thromboembolic event during ongoing dispensings for potentially interacting, enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (ASMs) (Study 2). 3DI detection was based on screening for additional drug exposures that served as acute outcome triggers. To mitigate direct effects and confounding by concomitant drugs, self-controlled estimates were adjusted using negative cases (external "control" DOAC users with the same outcomes but co-dispensings for non-interacting AHDs or ASMs). Signal thresholds were set based on P-values and false discovery rate q-values to address multiple comparisons. Study 1: 285 drugs were examined among 3,306 episodes. Self-controlled assessments with q-value thresholds yielded 9 3DI signals (cases) and 40 DDI signals (negative cases). External adjustment generated 10 3DI signals from the P-value threshold and no signals from the q-value threshold. Study 2: 126 drugs were examined among 604 episodes. Assessments with P-value thresholds yielded 3 3DI and 26 DDI signals following self-control, as well as 4 3DI signals following adjustment. No 3DI signals met the q-value threshold. The presented self- and externally-controlled approach aimed to advance paradigms for real-world higher order drug interaction screening among high-susceptibility populations with pre-existent DDI risk.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants and Antiseizure Medications for Atrial Fibrillation and Epilepsy and Risk of Thromboembolic Events.

Importance: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly prescribed with antiseizure medications (ASMs) due to concurrency of and the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and epilepsy. However, enzyme-inducing (EI) ASMs may reduce absorption and accelerate metabolism of DOACs, potentially lowering DOAC levels and elevating thromboembolism risk. Objective: To assess the rates of thromboembolic and major bleeding events in adults with AF and epilepsy dispensed DOACs and EI ASMs vs DOACs with non-EI ASMs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This active-comparator, new-user cohort study included US health care data from the Clinformatics Data Mart database from October 2010 to September 2021 for a nationally representative population of adults with AF and epilepsy. Exposure: Evaluations included episodes of contiguous coadministration of DOACs for AF with EI ASMs (exposed) or non-EI ASMs (referent) for epilepsy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thromboembolic events (primary outcome) and major bleeding events (secondary outcome) were identified based on a series of validated, diagnosis-based coding algorithms. Data-adaptive, high-dimensional propensity score matching was used to control for observed confounders and proxies for unobserved confounders. Adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with robust variance estimators to account for clustering within matched pairs. Results: This study included 14 078 episodes (median age, 74 [IQR, 67-81]; 52.4% female) and 14 158 episodes (median age, 74 [IQR, 67-81]; 52.4% female) of incident DOAC and ASM use that met eligibility criteria for assessment of thromboembolic and major bleeding outcomes, respectively. Incidence was 88.5 per 1000 person-years for thromboembolic events and 68.3 per 1000 person-years for bleeding events. Compared with use of non-EI ASMs, use of EI ASMs with DOACs was not associated with a difference in risk of thromboembolic events (AHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.82-1.46) but was associated with a reduction in risk of major bleeding events (AHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.89). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, EI ASMs were not associated with alteration in DOAC efficacy. Further research is needed on the reduction in bleeding risk associated with EI ASMs, as this may suggest that pharmacokinetic interactions are associated with lowering DOAC levels without negating therapeutic effects.