Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mil Med ; 174(8): 874-7, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19743747

RESUMO

Appendicular abscess occurred in 14.2% of patients presenting acute appendicitis. Management of these patients remains controversial, ranging from an emergency appendectomy to a nonoperative treatment. On board French nuclear submarines, the usual treatment for all cases of appendiceal masses, including both appendicitis and appendiceal abscess, is an appendectomy. In the past 5 years, the introduction of ultrasonography (US) on board has enabled the diagnosis of appendiceal abscess with a high rate of accuracy, and the latest studies show that nonoperative treatment is an alternative approach. This nonsurgical treatment, based on intravenous administration of antibiotics, is successful in about 93% of the patients. Failure of nonsurgical treatment is a reliable indication of percutaneous drainage. The proportion of adult patients who need percutaneous drainage of abscesses is about 27%. A successful primary nonoperative treatment may or may not be followed by interval appendectomy at the conclusion of the patrol. Nonsurgical treatment is associated with a significantly lower morbidity than surgery. Considering that the on-board surgical facility is limited, nonsurgical treatment appears to be the best approach for treating a sailor with an appendiceal abscess during a submarine patrol mission.


Assuntos
Abscesso/cirurgia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Apêndice/cirurgia , Militares , Medicina Submarina , Abscesso/diagnóstico por imagem , Abscesso/etiologia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicite/diagnóstico por imagem , Apendicite/tratamento farmacológico , Apendicite/microbiologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , França , Humanos , Masculino , Pasteurella , Ruptura/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura/cirurgia , Ultrassonografia
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 182(3): 323-328, 2018 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30590843

RESUMO

To evaluates the eye-lens radiation exposure of workers during medical interventional procedures and surgery in a military hospital as well as of the equine veterinarians. The measures represent the exposure in a normal workload schedule of ninety randomly selected workers over a 3-month period, extrapolated to 1 year. The eye-lens dosemeters were placed near the eye closest to the radiation source (Carinou, E., Ferrari, P., Bjelac, O. C., Gingaume, M., Merce, M. S. and O'Connor, U. Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H p (3) monitoring. A 2015 review. J. Radiol. Prot. 2015;35(3): R17-R34). Three models of eye-lens dosemeters (Dosilab, Landauer and IRSN) were assessed in term of ergonomics. The annual estimation of eye-lens doses did not reach the annual dose limit of 20 mSv revised by the ICRP, ranged from 0.00 to 18.12 mSv with a mean of 0.96 ± 2.28 mSv. However, these results cannot be representative of a heavy workload or incident situations for which radiation exposure to the eye-lens could exceed this limit. The IRSN dosemeter model was considered the most convenient.


Assuntos
Cristalino/efeitos da radiação , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Exposição à Radiação/análise , Monitoramento de Radiação/métodos , Proteção Radiológica/métodos , Radiologia Intervencionista , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Equipamentos de Proteção , Doses de Radiação , Carga de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa