Efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with liposomal doxorubicin or paclitaxel versus liposomal doxorubicin or paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

AIM: Apatinib is an effective treatment for patients with gynecological cancers. This study aimed to further explore the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus chemotherapy in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). METHODS: Totally, 105 patients with recurrent PROC receiving apatinib plus chemotherapy (N = 51) and chemotherapy alone (N = 54) were retrospectively enrolled in this cohort study. RESULTS: Objective response rate (37.3% vs. 14.8%) (p = 0.009) and disease control rate (80.4% vs. 61.1%) (p = 0.030) were increased in the apatinib plus chemotherapy group versus the chemotherapy group. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.5 (3.4-7.6) and 21.4 (16.2-26.6) months in the apatinib plus chemotherapy group, and they were 3.8 (3.0-4.6) and 14.8 (11.9-17.7) months in the chemotherapy group. Meanwhile, the Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that PFS (p = 0.008) and OS (p = 0.012) were prolonged in the apatinib plus chemotherapy group versus the chemotherapy group. This finding was confirmed by multivariate Cox's proportional regression analyses: enter method (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.515, p = 0.007 for PFS; HR = 0.222, p < 0.001 for OS) and step-forward method (HR = 0.608, p = 0.019 for PFS; HR = 0.346, p = 0.001 for OS). Additionally, the incidence of hypertension was increased in the apatinib plus chemotherapy group versus the chemotherapy group (p = 0.038), while others were not different between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Grades 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia, hypertension, leukopenia, hand-foot syndrome, nausea and vomiting, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and anemia in the apatinib plus chemotherapy group. CONCLUSION: Apatinib combined with chemotherapy is a superior choice over chemotherapy alone for recurrent PROC management.

Apatinib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer treatment: A retrospective cohort study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Apatinib, an oral antiangiogenic drug, exerts potential anti-tumour effects on platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC). This study intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel monotherapy in PROC patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study reviewed 70 PROC patients who received apatinib plus paclitaxel (apatinib plus paclitaxel group) (N = 32) or paclitaxel monotherapy (paclitaxel monotherapy group) (N = 38). The recommended regimens were as follows: paclitaxel (60 mg/m2 ) administrated once a week with a maximum of 18 weeks; apatinib (250-375 mg/day) administrated until disease progression or patient intolerance. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Disease control rate was elevated (84.4% vs. 60.5%, P = 0.028), whereas objective response rate only disclosed an increasing trend (lacked statistical significance) (37.5% vs. 18.4%, P = 0.074) in apatinib plus paclitaxel group compared with paclitaxel monotherapy group. Progression-free survival (median [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 5.0 [2.5-7.5] months vs. 3.8 [2.4-5.2] months, P = 0.033) and overall survival (median [95% CI]: 21.1 [13.2-29.0] months vs. 14.8 [11.4-18.2] months, P = 0.032) were both prolonged in apatinib plus paclitaxel group compared to paclitaxel monotherapy group, which were further verified in the multivariate Cox's proportional hazard regression analyses (both P < 0.050). Additionally, the incidence of each adverse event was not different between the two groups (all P > 0.050). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Apatinib plus paclitaxel exhibits better efficacy and acceptable toxicity compared with paclitaxel monotherapy in PROC patients.

miR-29a-3p inhibits endometrial cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting VEGFA/CD C42/PAK1.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of miR-29a-3p in regulating endometrial cancer (EC) progression. METHODS: A total of 72 EC patients were enrolled. EC cells were transfected. Cells proliferation, cloning ability, migration and invasion were researched by MTT assay, colony formation experiment, cell scratch test and Transwell experiment respectively. Dual-luciferase reporter assay was performed. Xenograft experiment was conducted using nude mice. miR-29a-3p, VEGFA, CDC42, PAK1 and p-PAK1 expression in cells/tissues was investigated by qRT-PCR and Western blot. RESULTS: miR-29a-3p expression was aberrantly reduced in EC patients, which was associated with poor outcome. miR-29a-3p inhibited EC cells proliferation, cloning formation, migration and invasion (P <  0.05 or P <  0.01 or P <  0.001). miR-29a-3p inhibited CDC42/PAK1 signaling pathway activity in EC cells (P <  0.01). VEGFA expression was directly inhibited by miR-29a-3p. miR-29a-3p suppressed EC cells malignant phenotype in vitro and growth in vivo by targeting VEGFA/CDC42/PAK1 signaling pathway (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: miR-29a-3p inhibits EC cells proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting VEGFA/CDC42/PAK1 signaling pathway.

Neoadjuvant apatinib plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S­1)/oxaliplatin chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma.

The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (SOX) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma (LAGC). Therefore, patients with LAGC treated with neoadjuvant apatinib plus SOX chemotherapy (apatinib + SOX group; n=25) or SOX chemotherapy (SOX group; n=35) were enrolled in the present study. Subsequently, the objective response (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR), pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were recorded. The results showed that patients in the apatinib + SOX group exhibited a higher ORR (64.0 vs. 37.1%; P=0.040), but a similar DCR (96.0 vs. 88.6%; P=0.580), compared with those in the SOX group. The pathological response rates in patients with grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 LAGC were 0.0, 20.8, 62.5 and 16.7%, respectively, in the apatinib + SOX group, while in those treated with SOX alone they were 9.1, 39.4, 42.4 and 9.1%, respectively. By contrast, the pathological response was elevated in the apatinib + SOX group compared with the SOX group (P=0.030). During a median follow-up period of 21.0 months (range, 6.4-38.1 months), median DFS and OS were not reached. More specifically, the 1-, 2- and 3-year DFS rates were 91.7, 75.2 and 75.2% in the apatinib + SOX group and 71.8, 59.6 and 44.7% in the SOX group, respectively. In addition, the 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 100.0, 89.6 and 78.4% in the apatinib + SOX group, while those in the SOX group were 90.3, 69.2 and 55.4%, respectively. However, no differences in DFS (P=0.094) or OS (P=0.155) were observed between the two groups. Additionally, the most common adverse events in the SOX group were mild leukopenia (42.9%) and fatigue (34.3%), while those in the apatinib + SOX group were tolerable leukopenia (44.0%) and hypertension (44.0%). In conclusion, the present study suggested that neoadjuvant apatinib plus SOX chemotherapy could be more effective and tolerable compared with SOX chemotherapy alone in patients with LAGC.