Utility of a Benchmarking Report for Balancing Infection Prevention and Antimicrobial Stewardship in Children with Complicated Appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a severity-adjusted, hospital-level benchmarking comparative performance report for postoperative organ space infection and antibiotic utilization in children with complicated appendicitis. BACKGROUND: No benchmarking data exist to aid hospitals in identifying and prioritizing opportunities for infection prevention or antimicrobial stewardship in children with complicated appendicitis. METHODS: This was a multicenter cohort study using NSQIP-Pediatric data from 16 hospitals participating in a regional research consortium, augmented with antibiotic utilization data obtained through supplemental chart review. Children with complicated appendicitis who underwent appendectomy from 07/01/2015 to 06/30/2020 were included. Thirty-day postoperative OSI rates and cumulative antibiotic utilization were compared between hospitals using observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios after adjusting for disease severity using mixed effects models. Hospitals were considered outliers if the 95% confidence interval for O/E ratios did not include 1.0. RESULTS: 1790 patients were included. Overall, the OSI rate was 15.6% (hospital range: 2.6-39.4%) and median cumulative antibiotic utilization was 9.0 days (range: 3.0-13.0). Across hospitals, adjusted O/E ratios ranged 5.7-fold for OSI (0.49-2.80, P=0.03) and 2.4-fold for antibiotic utilization (0.59-1.45, P<0.01). Three (19%) hospitals were outliers for OSI (1 high and 2 low performers), and eight (50%) were outliers for antibiotic utilization (5 high and 3 low utilizers). Ten (63%) hospitals were identified as outliers in one or both measures. CONCLUSIONS: A comparative performance benchmarking report may help hospitals identify and prioritize quality improvement opportunities for infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship, as well as identify exemplar performers for dissemination of best practices.

Use of Antipseudomonal Antibiotics is not Associated with Lower Rates of Postoperative Drainage Procedures or More Favorable Culture Profiles in Children with Complicated Appendicitis: Results from a Multicenter Regional Research Consortium.

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of postoperative drainage and culture profiles in children with complicated appendicitis treated with the two most common antibiotic regimens with and without antipseudomonal activity (piperacillin-tazobactam [PT] and ceftriaxone with metronidazole [CM]). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Variation in use of antipseudomonal antibiotics has been driven by a paucity of multicenter data reporting clinically relevant, culture-based outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with complicated appendicitis (7/2015-6/2020) using NSQIP-Pediatric data from 15 hospitals participating in a regional research consortium. Operative report details, antibiotic utilization, and culture data were obtained through supplemental chart review. Rates of 30-day postoperative drainage and organism-specific culture positivity were compared between groups using mixed effects regression to adjust for clustering after propensity matching on measures of disease severity. RESULTS: 1002 children met criteria for matching (58.9% received CM and 41.1% received PT). In the matched sample of 778 patients, children treated with PT had similar rates of drainage overall (PT: 11.8%, CM: 12.1%; OR 1.44 [OR:0.71-2.94]) and higher rates of drainage associated with growth of any organism (PT: 7.7%, CM: 4.6%; OR 2.41 [95%CI:1.08-5.39]) and Escherichia coli (PT: 4.6%, CM: 1.8%; OR 3.42 [95%CI:1.07-10.92]) compared to treatment with CM. Rates were similar between groups for drainage associated with multiple organisms (PT: 2.6%, CM: 1.5%; OR 3.81 [95%CI:0.96-15.08]) and Pseudomonas (PT: 1.0%, CM: 1.3%; OR 3.42 [95%CI:0.55-21.28]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Use of antipseudomonal antibiotics is not associated with lower rates of postoperative drainage procedures or more favorable culture profiles in children with complicated appendicitis.

High-Frequency Positive Pressure Ventilation as Primary Rescue Strategy for Patients with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Comparison to High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to evaluate high-frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) compared with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) as a rescue ventilation strategy for patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). HFPPV is a pressure-controlled conventional ventilation method utilizing high respiratory rate and low positive end-expiratory pressure. STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-seven patients diagnosed with CDH from January 2005 to September 2019 who were treated with stepwise progression from HFPPV to HFOV versus only HFOV were included. Fisher's exact test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Patients treated with HFPPV + HFOV had higher survival to discharge (80 vs. 50%, p = 0.007) and to surgical intervention (95.6 vs. 68.8%, p = 0.003), with average age at repair 2 days earlier (p = 0.004). Need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p = 0.490), inhaled nitric oxide (p = 0.585), supplemental oxygen (p = 0.341), and pulmonary hypertension medications (p = 0.381) were similar. CONCLUSION: In CDH patients who fail respiratory support with conventional ventilation, HFPPV may be used as an intermediary mode of rescue ventilation prior to HFOV without adverse effects. KEY POINTS: · HFPPV may be used as an intermediary mode of rescue ventilation prior to HFOV without adverse effect.. · HFPPV is more widely available and can mitigate the limitations faced when using HFOV.. · HFPPV allows for intra- or interhospital transfer of neonates with CDH..

Postoperative Antibiotics, Outcomes, and Resource Use in Children With Gangrenous Appendicitis.

Importance: Gangrenous, suppurative, and exudative (GSE) findings have been associated with increased surgical site infection (SSI) risk and resource use in children with nonperforated appendicitis. Establishing the role for postoperative antibiotics may have important implications for infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship. Objective: To compare SSI rates in children with nonperforated appendicitis with GSE findings who did and did not receive postoperative antibiotics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study using American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-Pediatric Appendectomy Targeted data from 16 hospitals participating in a regional research consortium. NSQIP data were augmented with operative report and antibiotic use data obtained through supplemental medical record review. Children with nonperforated appendicitis with GSE findings who underwent appendectomy between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2020, were identified using previously validated intraoperative criteria. Data were analyzed from October 2022 to July 2023. Exposure: Continuation of antibiotics after appendectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of 30-day postoperative SSI including both incisional and organ space infections. Complementary hospital and patient-level analyses were conducted to explore the association between postoperative antibiotic use and severity-adjusted outcomes. The hospital-level analysis explored the correlation between postoperative antibiotic use and observed to expected (O/E) SSI rate ratios after adjusting for differences in disease severity (presence of gangrene and postoperative length of stay) among hospital populations. In the patient-level analysis, propensity score matching was used to balance groups on disease severity, and outcomes were compared using mixed-effects logistic regression to adjust for hospital-level clustering. Results: A total of 958 children (mean [SD] age, 10.7 [3.7] years; 567 male [59.2%]) were included in the hospital-level analysis, of which 573 (59.8%) received postoperative antibiotics. No correlation was found between hospital-level SSI O/E ratios and postoperative antibiotic use when analyzed by either overall rate of use (hospital median, 53.6%; range, 31.6%-100%; Spearman ρ = -0.10; P = .71) or by postoperative antibiotic duration (hospital median, 1 day; range, 0-7 days; Spearman ρ = -0.07; P = .79). In the propensity-matched patient-level analysis including 404 patients, children who received postoperative antibiotics had similar rates of SSI compared with children who did not receive postoperative antibiotics (3 of 202 [1.5%] vs 4 of 202 [2.0%]; odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.16-3.39; P = .70). Conclusions and Relevance: Use of postoperative antibiotics did not improve outcomes in children with nonperforated appendicitis with gangrenous, suppurative, or exudative findings.

Prenatal ultrasound-and MRI-based imaging predictors of respiratory symptoms at birth for congenital lung malformations.

BACKGROUND: Congenital lung malformations (CLM) are rare developmental anomalies of the fetal lung with a minority of patients exhibiting symptoms around the time of birth. Although ultrasound remains the gold standard, fetal MRI has recently been incorporated as an adjunct imaging modality in the workup and prenatal counseling of patients with CLM as it is thought to more accurately delineate lesion boundaries and diagnose lesion type. We evaluate what prenatal variables correlate with postnatal respiratory symptoms. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with prenatal diagnosis of CLM treated at our institution between 2006-2020. Fetal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters including maximal congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio (CVR), absolute cyst volume, and observed to expected normal fetal lung volume (O/E NFLV) were correlated with outcomes including postnatal respiratory symptoms, need for supplementary oxygen or mechanical ventilation, delay in tolerating full feeds, resection in the neonatal period. RESULTS: Our study included 111 patients, all of whom underwent fetal ultrasound with 64 patients additionally undergoing fetal MRI. Postnatal respiratory symptoms were noted in 22.5% of patients, 19.8% required supplemental oxygen, 2.7% mechanical ventilation and two patients requiring urgent resection. Ultrasound parameters including absolute cyst volume and maximal CVR correlated with need for mechanical ventilation (p=0.034 and p=0.024, respectively) and for urgent resection (p=0.018 and p=0.023, respectively) and had a marginal association with postnatal respiratory symptoms (p=0.050 and p=0.052). Absolute cyst volume became associated with postnatal respiratory symptoms (p=0.017) after multivariable analysis controlling for maternal steroid administration and gestational age. O/E NFLV did not correlate with perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: We have found that ultrasound-based measurements correlate with postnatal respiratory symptoms, while MRI derived O/E NFLV does not. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of MRI in the prenatal workup of congenital lung malformations. TYPE OF STUDY: Study of Diagnostic Test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Emergency department thoracotomy in children: A Pediatric Trauma Society, Western Trauma Association, and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma systematic review and practice management guideline.

BACKGROUND: The role of emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy (EDT) in traumatically injured children has not been elucidated. We aimed to perform a systematic review and create evidence-based guidelines to answer the following PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) question: should pediatric patients who present to the emergency department pulseless (with or without signs of life [SOL]) after traumatic injuries (penetrating thoracic, penetrating abdominopelvic, or blunt) undergo EDT (vs. no EDT) to improve survival and neurologically intact survival? METHODS: Using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology, a group of 12 pediatric trauma experts from the Pediatric Trauma Society, Western Trauma Association, and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma assembled to perform a systematic review. A consensus conference was conducted, a database was queried, abstracts and manuscripts were reviewed, data extraction was performed, and evidence quality was determined. Evidence tables were generated, and the committee voted on guideline recommendations. RESULTS: Three hundred three articles were identified. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria and were used for guideline creation, providing 319 pediatric patients who underwent EDT. No data were available on patients who did not undergo EDT. For each PICO, the quality of evidence was very low based on the serious risk of bias and serious or very serious imprecision. CONCLUSION: Based on low-quality data, we make the following recommendations. We conditionally recommend EDT when a child presents pulseless with SOL to the emergency department following penetrating thoracic injury, penetrating abdominopelvic injury and after blunt injury if emergency adjuncts point to a thoracic source. We conditionally recommend against EDT when a pediatric patient presents pulseless without SOL after penetrating thoracic and penetrating abdominopelvic injury. We strongly recommend against EDT in the patient without SOL after blunt injury.

Outcomes and Resource Utilization Associated with Use of Routine Pre-Discharge White Blood Cell Count for Clinical Decision-Making in Children with Complicated Appendicitis: A Multicenter Hospital-Level Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to explore the hospital-level relationship between routine pre-discharge WBC utilization (RPD-WBC) and outcomes in children with complicated appendicitis. METHODS: Multicenter analysis of NSQIP-Pediatric data from 14 consortium hospitals augmented with RPD-WBC data. WBC were considered routine if obtained within one day of discharge in children who did not develop an organ space infection (OSI) or fever during the index admission. Hospital-level observed-to-expected ratios (O/E) for 30-day outcomes (antibiotic days, imaging utilization, healthcare days, and OSI) were calculated after adjusting for appendicitis severity and patient characteristics. Spearman correlation was used to explore the relationship between hospital-level RPD-WBC utilization and O/E's for each outcome. RESULTS: 1528 children were included. Significant variation was found across hospitals in RPD-WBC use (range: 0.7-100%; p < 0.01) and all outcomes (mean antibiotic days: 9.9 [O/E range: 0.56-1.44, p < 0.01]; imaging: 21.9% [O/E range: 0.40-2.75, p < 0.01]; mean healthcare visit days: 5.7 [O/E 0.74-1.27, p < 0.01]); OSI: 14.1% [O/E range: 0.43-3.64, p < 0.01]). No correlation was found between RPD-WBC use and antibiotic days (r = +0.14, p = 0.64), imaging (r = -0.07, p = 0.82), healthcare days (r = +0.35, p = 0.23) or OSI (r = -0.13, p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Increased RPD-WBC utilization in pediatric complicated appendicitis did not correlate with improved outcomes or resource utilization at the hospital level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical Research.

Assessment of the Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant Patients: A Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) can significantly influence a patient's nutritional status, leading to malnutrition. Malnutrition is associated with an increase in morbidity and hospital admissions, as well as a decrease in functional status. All these factors impact emotional, physical, and psychosocial health, leading to a lower quality of life (QOL). The aim of the study was to assess the nutritional status and QOL in patients with CKD compared to patients after kidney transplantation and determine what factors influence nutritional status and QOL in this patient population. METHODS: The study included 167 patients: 39 pre-dialysis patients-group 1; 65 dialysis patients-group 2; 63 kidney transplant patients-group 3. Patients completed the Kidney Disease Quality of Life questionnaire (KDQoL) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment questionnaire (MNA). RESULTS: A comparative analysis of the QOL of patients in the three study groups showed no statistically significant differences in the overall KDQoL scores. Factors that affected quality of life included the designated group, determined by disease status, MNA score, patient age, and WHR. Nearly 1/3 of patients from groups 2 and 3 were at risk of malnutrition. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic assessment of nutritional status and monitoring of QOL should be integrated into the standard management guidelines for CKD patients.

Long-term outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A single institution experience.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: As survival rates for patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) increase, long-term sequelae become increasingly prevalent. We present the outcomes of patients who underwent CDH repair at our institution and discuss standardization of follow-up care in our long-term multidisciplinary follow-up clinic. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients followed in multidisciplinary clinic after CDH repair at our institution from January 1, 2005 to December 1, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients met inclusion criteria, 73 females (37.8%) and 120 males (62.2%). Left-sided defects were most common (75.7%), followed by right-sided defects (20.7%). Median age at repair was 4 days (IQR 3-6) and 59.6% of all defects required patch repair. Median length of stay was 29 days (IQR 16.8-50.0). Median length of follow up was 49 months (IQR 17.8-95.3) with 25 patients followed for more than 12 years. Long-term outcomes included gastroesophageal reflux disease (42.0%), diaphragmatic hernia recurrence (10.9%), asthma (23.6%), neurodevelopmental delay (28.6%), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (7.3%), autism (1.6%), chest wall deformity (15.5%), scoliosis (11.4%), and inguinal hernia (6.7%). CONCLUSION: As survival of patients with CDH improves, long-term care must be continuously studied and fine-tuned to ensure appropriate surveillance and optimization of long-term outcomes.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and its complications in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is offered to patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) who are in severe respiratory and cardiac failure. We aim to describe the types of complications among these patients and their impact on survival. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of CDH patients cannulated onto ECMO between January 2005 and November 2020 was conducted. ECMO complications, as categorized by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), were correlated with survival status. Descriptive statistics were used to compare observed complications between survivors and non-survivors. RESULTS: In our cohort of CDH neonates, 21% (54/258) were supported with ECMO, of whom, 61% (33/54) survived. Survivors and non-survivors were similar in baseline characteristics except for birthweight z-score (p = 0.043). Seventy percent of CDH neonates experienced complications during their ECMO run, with the most common categories being metabolic (48.1%) and mechanical (38.9%), followed by hemorrhage (22.2%), neurological (18.5%), renal (11.1%), pulmonary (7.4%), and cardiovascular (7.4%). The median number of complications per patient was higher in the non-survivor group  (2 (IQR: 1-4) vs 1 (IQR: 0-2), p = 0.043). In addition, mechanical (57.1% vs 27.3%, p = 0.045) and renal (28.6% vs 0%, p = 0.002) complications were more common among non-survivors compared to survivors. CONCLUSION: Complications occur frequently among ECMO-treated newborns with CDH, some of which have serious long-term consequences. Survivors had higher birth weight z-scores, shorter ECMO runs, and fewer complications per patient. Mechanical and renal complications were independently associated with mortality, emphasizing the utility of more focused strategies to target fluid balance and renal protection and to prevent circuit and cannula complications.

Primary gastrojejunostomy tube placement using laparoscopy with endoscopic assistance: A novel technique.

BACKGROUND: Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tubes are commonly used to provide postpyloric enteral nutrition in pediatric patients who cannot tolerate gastric feeds. Most techniques depend on a preexisting gastrostomy tube (GT) site to convert to a gastrojejunostomy. Several minimally invasive techniques have been described; however, their risk profile varies widely. DESCRIPTION OF THE OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: We present a technique for primary laparoscopic GJ tube placement that minimizes the risk of hollow viscus injury and the use of fluoroscopy through endoscopic assistance. RESULTS: Eleven GJ tubes were placed using this technique in patients ranging from 5 months to 17 years of age and weighing 6.3 to 46.0 kg. Endoscopy through the gastrostomy site allowed direct visualization of wire and tube placement. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications within 30 days of operation. Use of fluoroscopy was limited with minimal total radiation exposure. CONCLUSION: The described technique of laparoscopic primary gastrojejunostomy tube placement with endoscopic assistance was associated with a low complication rate and minimal use of fluoroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Delayed presentation and sub-optimal outcomes of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Early presentation and prompt diagnosis of acute appendicitis are necessary to prevent progression of disease leading to complicated appendicitis. We hypothesize that patients had a delayed presentation of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic, which affected severity of disease on presentation and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who were treated for acute appendicitis at Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital (MSCH) between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic was at its peak in New York City (NYC). For comparison, we reviewed patients treated from March 1, 2019 to May 31, 2019, prior to the pandemic. Demographics and baseline patient characteristics were analyzed for potential confounding variables. Outcomes were collected and grouped into those quantifying severity of illness on presentation to our ED, type of treatment, and associated post-treatment outcomes. Fisher's Exact Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test were used for univariate analysis while cox regression with calculation of hazard ratios was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were included in this study, 41 patients were treated for appendicitis from March 1 to May 31 of 2019 (non-pandemic) and 48 were treated during the same time period in 2020 (pandemic). Duration of symptoms prior to presentation to the ED was significantly longer in patients treated in 2020, with a median of 2 days compared to 1 day (p = 0.003). Additionally, these patients were more likely to present with reported fever (52.1% vs 24.4%, p = 0.009) and had a higher heart rate on presentation with a median of 101 beats per minute (bpm) compared to 91 bpm (p = 0.040). Findings of complicated appendicitis on radiographic imaging including suspicion of perforation (41.7% vs 9.8%, p < 0.001) and intra-abdominal abscess (27.1% vs 7.3%, p = 0.025) were higher in patients presenting in 2020. Patients treated during the pandemic had higher rates of non-operative treatment (25.0% vs 7.3%, p = 0.044) requiring increased antibiotic use and image-guided percutaneous drain placement. They also had longer hospital length of stay by a median of 1 day (p = 0.001) and longer duration until symptom resolution by a median of 1 day (p = 0.004). Type of treatment was not a predictor of LOS (HR = 0.565, 95% CI = 0.357-0.894, p = 0.015) or duration until symptom resolution (HR = 0.630, 95% CI = 0.405-0.979, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Patients treated for acute appendicitis at our children's hospital during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic presented with more severe disease and experienced suboptimal outcomes compared to those who presented during the same time period in 2019. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Crisis Standards of Care.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed extraordinary strain on global healthcare systems. Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients with severe respiratory or cardiac failure attributed to COVID-19 has been debated due to uncertain survival benefit and the resources required to safely deliver ECMO support. We retrospectively investigated adult patients supported with ECMO for COVID-19 at our institution during the first 80 days following New York City's declaration of a state of emergency. The primary objective was to evaluate survival outcomes in patients supported with ECMO for COVID-19 and describe the programmatic adaptations made in response to pandemic-related crisis conditions. Twenty-two patients with COVID-19 were placed on ECMO during the study period. Median age was 52 years and 18 (81.8%) were male. Twenty-one patients (95.4%) had severe ARDS and seven (31.8%) had cardiac failure. Fifteen patients (68.1%) were managed with venovenous ECMO while 7 (31.8%) required arterial support. Twelve patients (54.5%) were transported on ECMO from external institutions. Twelve patients were discharged alive from the hospital (54.5%). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used successfully in patients with respiratory and cardiac failure due to COVID-19. The continued use of ECMO, including ECMO transport, during crisis conditions was possible even at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Allocation of resources and development of guidelines for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): Experience from a pediatric center in the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has exceeded the standard capacity of many hospital systems and led to an unprecedented scarcity of resources, including the already limited resource of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). With the large amount of critically ill patients and the highly contagious nature of the virus, significant consideration of ECMO candidacy is crucial for both appropriate allocation of resources as well as ensuring protection of health care personnel. As a leading pediatric ECMO program in the epicenter of the pandemic, we established new protocols and guidelines in order to continue caring for our pediatric patients while accepting adult patients to lessen the burden of our hospital system which was above capacity. This article describes our changes in consultation, cannulation, and daily care of COVID-19 positive patients requiring ECMO as well as discusses strategies for ensuring safety of our ECMO healthcare personnel and optimal allocation of resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Microcystic Adnexal Carcinoma: A Rare, Commonly Misdiagnosed Malignancy.

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC) is a rare, malignant cutaneous neoplasm that often presents as an inconspicuous, benign appearing lesion. Patients most commonly are asymptomatic and present for improved cosmesis, however perineural invasion may result in local numbness, paresthesia or pruritus. Although distant metastasis is rare, MAC has an increased propensity for local invasion, often resulting in significant morbidity as late presentation and misdiagnosis are common. A high index of suspicion is imperative, and deep tissue biopsy with defining histologic characteristics is required for diagnosis. Mohs micrographic surgery is currently the standard of care, providing the highest possibility for long-term cure. We present a case report of a 43-year-old male Air Force U-2 pilot with a benign presentation and initial clinical misdiagnoses of MAC, who underwent Mohs micrographic surgery followed by cervicofacial flap reconstruction of a 5.5 × 3.5 cm defect. We also identify increased radiation exposure of U-2 pilots as a potential risk factor for the early development of MAC, emphasizing the importance of exploring patient risk factors while having a high index of suspicion to aid in early diagnosis.