Bendamustine and rituximab is well-tolerated and efficient in the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma in elderly: A single center observational study.

Bendamustine and rituximab (BR) is a preferred first-line therapy for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, few reports on BR performance in elderly patients are available to date. We compared safety and efficacy of BR in patients ≥70 years (elderly) vs <70 years (younger) treated at our institution. Among 201 patients, 113 were elderly (median age: 77 years), including 38 patients ≥80 years, and 88 were younger (median age: 62 years). Elderly patients had more bone marrow involvement by lymphoma, anemia, ECOG status 3 and high-risk disease follicular lymphoma (P < .05 for all). Fifty-four percent of elderly received full dose of bendamustine vs 79.5% of younger patients. More elderly patients (54%) vs younger (43.2%) experienced treatment delay. Less elderly proceeded to rituximab maintenance. Overall, the number of adverse events per patient and transformed B-Cell lymphoma/secondary malignancies were similar between groups. Elderly patients had less febrile neutropenia, rituximab-associated infusion reactions, but more herpes zoster reactivation. There were more deaths in the elderly (37.2%) vs younger (10.2%) groups (P < .001), mainly due to non-lymphoma-related causes. With median follow-up of 42 months [4.0-97.0] disease-free survival for the elderly was similar to younger patients. There was no difference between patients <80 and ≥80 years (P = .274). In conclusion, the real-world elderly patients have more advanced disease and higher ECOG status. BR is well-tolerated; elderly patients had lower incidence of febrile neutropenia. Dose reduction and treatment delays are common, but BR efficacy was not affected even in very old patients (≥80 years).

Premedication with montelukast and rupatadine decreased rituximab infusion time, rate, severity of reactions and use of rescue medications.

Rituximab-associated infusion reactions (IRs) are significant burdens on oncology patients, caregivers and healthcare providers. We evaluated whether montelukast and rupatadine improve rituximab delivery, decrease frequency/severity of IRs and the number of medications used to control IRs. Using a nonrandomized clinical study design, we assessed adult rituximab naïve patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies from January 2017 to July 2019. Prior to the first rituximab infusion patients received one of the premedication regimens: (i) standard premedications, diphenhydramine hydrochloride and acetaminophen ("SP" group); (ii) SP + montelukast ("M" group); (iii) SP + rupatadine ("R" group); (iv) SP + rupatadine + montelukast Schedule 1 ("M + R Schedule 1" group); (v) SP + rupatadine + montelukast Schedule 2 ("M + R Schedule 2" group). A total of 223 patients with a median age of 69 years were assessed. Demographics and treatment groups were comparable among all five groups. Mean rituximab infusion time was 290 min in the SP group versus 273, 261, 243 and 236 min in the M, R, M + R Schedule 1 and M + R Schedule 2 groups, respectively. The incidence of rituximab IRs was 75% in the SP group versus 44, 41, 22 and 22% in the M, R, M + R Schedule 1 and M + R Schedule 2 groups, respectively. The median reaction grade was 2 in the SP group and 0 in all other groups. The median number of rescue medications was 3 in the SP group and 0 in all other groups. In conclusion, montelukast and rupatadine significantly improved rituximab delivery, decreased the rate and severity of IRs and reduced the need for rescue medications.

Application of a trigger tool in near real time to inform quality improvement activities: a prospective study in a general medicine ward.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective record review using trigger tools remains the most widely used method for measuring adverse events (AEs) to identify targets for improvement and measure temporal trends. However, medical records often contain limited information about factors contributing to AEs. We implemented an augmented trigger tool that supplemented record review with debriefing front-line staff to obtain details not included in the medical record. We hypothesised that this would foster the identification of factors contributing to AEs that could inform improvement initiatives. METHOD: A trained observer prospectively identified events in consecutive patients admitted to a general medical ward in a tertiary care academic medical centre (November 2010 to February 2011 inclusive), gathering information from record review and debriefing front-line staff in near real time. An interprofessional team reviewed events to identify preventable and potential AEs and characterised contributing factors using a previously published taxonomy. RESULTS: Among 141 patients, 14 (10%; 95% CI 5% to 15%) experienced at least one preventable AE; 32 patients (23%; 95% CI 16% to 30%) experienced at least one potential AE. The most common contributing factors included policy and procedural problems (eg, routine protocol violations, conflicting policies; 37%), communication and teamwork problems (34%), and medication process problems (23%). However, these broad categories each included distinct subcategories that seemed to require different interventions. For instance, the 32 identified communication and teamwork problems comprised 7 distinct subcategories (eg, ineffective intraprofessional handovers, poor interprofessional communication, lacking a shared patient care, paging problems). Thus, even the major categories of contributing factors consisted of subcategories that individually related to a much smaller subset of AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective application of an augmented trigger tool identified a wide range of factors contributing to AEs. However, the majority of contributing factors accounted for a small number of AEs, and more general categories were too heterogeneous to inform specific interventions. Successfully using trigger tools to stimulate quality improvement activities may require development of a framework that better classifies events that share contributing factors amenable to the same intervention.

Adult hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with severe pulmonary hypertension and a novel perforin gene mutation.

Adult hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare and deadly hyperinflammatory syndrome presenting both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. HLH may be primary, due to an underlying genetic abnormality, and/or secondary to infection, malignancy, or rheumatologic conditions. We describe a case of HLH-associated severe pulmonary hypertension paralleling Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation in a 52-year-old male in whom a novel perforin missense mutation was found (PRF1 1517C>T). Although intolerant of standard therapy (HLH-2004 protocol), a 6-week course of anti-CD52 (alemtuzumab) was associated with freedom-from-transfusion from weeks 4 to 13. However, 15 weeks after the onset of salvage therapy, he succumbed to polymicrobial sepsis despite treatment with prophylactic anti-infectives, with necropsy revealing disseminated blastomycosis and relapsed HLH. This case illustrates uncertainties in the relationships between pulmonary hypertension, a newly described PRF1 mutation, and possible pre-existing latent infectious risk factors (such as EBV or Blastomyces) in the pathogenesis and therapeutic perils of adult HLH.

High-dose methotrexate based chemotherapy with deferred radiation for treatment of newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma.

The addition of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) to whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has improved the survival of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). However, combined therapy is associated with increased neurotoxicity. In an effort to limit this toxicity, we treated a series of non-immunocompromised patients with HDMVP, a HD-MTX based regimen, with deferral of WBRT until progression. Twenty-three patients were treated with the HDMVP regimen consisting of MTX, vincristine, and procarbazine. The mean age at diagnosis was 60.9 years (range 45-79 years). The overall response rate was 65% (14 complete responses and one partial response). For patients achieving an initial response with HDMVP the median response duration was 40.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.5-61.3). The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI 0.0-20.4) and median overall survival was 41.4 months (95% CI 0.0-95.5). Fourteen patients received WBRT for relapsed or progressive disease. The conclusion of this trial is that HDVMP results in good initial response rates but only moderate disease control. Ultimately the majority of the patients in this series required WBRT for salvage treatment, potentially enabling a delay in treatment-associated neurotoxicity.