Abnormal approach-related motivation but spared reinforcement learning in MDD: Evidence from fronto-midline Theta oscillations and frontal Alpha asymmetry.

Major depression is characterized by abnormal reward processing and reinforcement learning (RL). This impairment might stem from deficient motivation processes, in addition to reduced reward sensitivity. In this study, we recorded 64-channel EEG in a large cohort of major depressive disorder (MDD) patients and matched healthy controls (HC) while they performed a standard RL task. Participants were asked to discover, by trial and error, several hidden stimulus-response associations having different reward probabilities, as enforced using evaluative feedback. We extracted induced fronto-midline Theta (FMT) power time-locked to the response and feedback as neurophysiological index of RL. Furthermore, we assessed approach-related motivation by measuring frontal alpha asymmetry concurrently. At the behavioral level, MDD patients and HCs showed comparable RL. At the EEG level, FMT power systematically varied as a function of reward probability, with opposing effects found at the response and feedback levels. Although this global pattern was spared in MDD, at the feedback level these patients showed however a steep FMT power decrease across trials when reward probability was low. Moreover, they showed impaired approach-related motivation during task execution, as reflected by frontal Alpha asymmetry. These results suggest a dissociation between (globally spared) RL and (impaired) approach motivation in MDD.

Integration of reward with cost anticipation during performance monitoring revealed by ERPs and EEG spectral perturbations.

Effort expenditure has an aversive connotation and it can lower hedonic feelings. In this study, we explored the electrophysiological correlates of the complex interplay of reward processing with cost anticipation. To this aim, healthy adult participants performed a gambling task where the outcome (monetary reward vs. no-reward) and its expectancy were manipulated on a trial by trial basis while 64-channel EEG was recorded. Crucially, on some trials, the no-reward outcome could be transformed to a rewarding one, pending effort expenditure by means of an orthogonal dot clicking task, enabling us to compare at the electrophysiological level reward processing when cost was anticipated or not. We extracted and compared different markers of reward processing at the feedback level using both classical ERPs and EEG spectral perturbations in specific bands (theta, delta and beta-gamma). At the behavioral level, participants reported enhanced pleasure and relief when the outcome was rewarding but effort expenditure could be avoided, relative to a control condition where the outcome was rewarding but no extra effort was anticipated. In this condition, EEG results showed a larger Reward Positivity ERP component and increased power in the Delta and Beta-gamma bands. By comparison, cost anticipation did not influence the processing of the no-reward outcome at the FRN and frontal midline theta levels. All together, these neurophysiological results suggest that effort avoidance is associated with increased reward processing.

TPJ-M1 interaction in the control of shared representations: New insights from tDCS and TMS combined.

There is extensive evidence that perceived and internally planned actions have a common representational basis: action observation can induce an automatic tendency to imitate others. If perceived and executed action, however, are based on shared representations, the question arises how we can distinguish self-related and other-related representations. It has been suggested that the control of shared representations involves a neural network centered on the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). However, the specific role of the TPJ in controlling shared representations is still not clear. In a conflict situation where participants have to execute action A while observing action B, the TPJ might either facilitate the relevant action A or inhibit the irrelevant action B (mirror response). In the present study, we used transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to condition neural activity in the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). We then analyzed the corticospinal output as indexed by motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by single-pulse TMS (spTMS) of the left primary motor cortex (M1) during action observation in the context of a conflict task. Results showed that tDCS-mediated increased control did not entail the attenuation of the task-irrelevant response activation: the effect of motor mirroring was not suppressed or reduced. Rather, facilitating TPJ activity via anodal tDCS selectively enhanced the instructed motor plan (self-related representation). This outcome supports the idea that TPJ plays a critical role in detecting the mismatch between self-related and other-related representations and is at work to enhance task-relevant representations.

Need for cognition moderates the relief of avoiding cognitive effort.

When making decisions, humans aim to maximize rewards while minimizing costs. The exertion of mental or physical effort has been proposed to be one those costs, translating into avoidance of behaviors carrying effort demands. This motivational framework also predicts that people should experience positive affect when anticipating demand that is subsequently avoided (i.e., a "relief effect"), but evidence for this prediction is scarce. Here, we follow up on a previous study [1] that provided some initial evidence that people more positively evaluated outcomes if it meant they could avoid performing an additional demanding task. However, the results from this study did not provide conclusive evidence that this effect was driven by effort avoidance. Here, we report two experiments that are able to do this. Participants performed a gambling task, and if they did not receive reward they would have to perform an orthogonal effort task. Prior to the gamble, a cue indicated whether this effort task would be easy or hard. We probed hedonic responses to the reward-related feedback, as well as after the subsequent effort task feedback. Participants reported lower hedonic responses for no-reward outcomes when high vs. low effort was anticipated (and later exerted). They also reported higher hedonic responses for reward outcomes when high vs. low effort was anticipated (and avoided). Importantly, this relief effect was smaller in participants with high need for cognition. These results suggest that avoidance of high effort tasks is rewarding, but that the size off this effect depends on the individual disposition to engage with and expend cognitive effort. They also raise the important question of whether this disposition alters the cost of effort per se, or rather offset this cost during cost-benefit analyses.

Dissociable effects of reward and expectancy during evaluative feedback processing revealed by topographic ERP mapping analysis.

Evaluative feedback provided during performance monitoring (PM) elicits either a positive or negative deflection ~250-300ms after its onset in the event-related potential (ERP) depending on whether the outcome is reward-related or not, as well as expected or not. However, it remains currently unclear whether these two deflections reflect a unitary process, or rather dissociable effects arising from non-overlapping brain networks. To address this question, we recorded 64-channel EEG in healthy adult participants performing a standard gambling task where valence and expectancy were manipulated in a factorial design. We analyzed the feedback-locked ERP data using a conventional ERP analysis, as well as an advanced topographic ERP mapping analysis supplemented with distributed source localization. Results reveal two main topographies showing opposing valence effects, and being differently modulated by expectancy. The first one was short-lived and sensitive to no-reward irrespective of expectancy. Source-estimation associated with this topographic map comprised mainly regions of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. The second one was primarily driven by reward, had a prolonged time-course and was monotonically influenced by expectancy. Moreover, this reward-related topographical map was best accounted for by intracranial generators estimated in the posterior cingulate cortex. These new findings suggest the existence of dissociable brain systems depending on feedback valence and expectancy. More generally, they inform about the added value of using topographic ERP mapping methods, besides conventional ERP measurements, to characterize qualitative changes occurring in the spatio-temporal dynamic of reward processing during PM.