Spine stereotactic radiosurgery for metastases from hepatobiliary malignancies: patient selection using PRISM scoring.

OBJECTIVE: Dose escalation via stereotactic radiation therapy techniques has been necessary for hepatobiliary malignancies in the primary and oligometastatic setting, but such dose escalation is challenging for spine metastases due to spinal cord proximity. Here, we investigate the role of spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) in the management of such metastases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with SSRS to spinal metastases from hepatobiliary malignancies between 2004 and 2017 at our Institution. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) and Cox regression analysis to identify factors associated with disease-related outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 28 patients treated to 43 spinal metastases with SSRS for either HCC or cholangiocarcinoma. The 1-year LC and OS were 85% and 23%, respectively. The median time to death was 6.2 months, while median time to local failure was not reached. Tumor volume > 60 cc (SHR 6.65, p = 0.03) and Bilsky ≥ 1c (SHR 4.73, p = 0.05) predicted for poorer LC, while BED10 > 81 Gy trended towards better local control (SHR 4.35, p = 0.08). Child-Pugh Class (HR 3.02, p = 0.003), higher PRISM Group (HR 3.49, p = 0.001), and systemic disease progression (HR 3.65, p = 0.001) were associated with worse mortality based on univariate modeling in patients treated with SSRS; on multivariate analysis, PRISM Group (HR 2.28, p = 0.03) and systemic disease progression (HR 2.67, p = 0.03) remained significant. Four patients (10%) developed compression deformity and one patient (2%) developed radiation neuritis. CONCLUSION: SSRS provides durable local control in patients with metastatic hepatobiliary malignancies, with higher BED necessary to ensure excellent LC. PRISM scoring is a promising prognostic tool to aid SSRS patient selection.

National Patterns of Care in the Management of World Health Organization Grade II and III Spinal Ependymomas.

BACKGROUND: Spinal ependymomas are rare, with an incidence of 1 per 100,000. Given the paucity of data for higher grade II and III disease, the management and patterns of care require further investigation. METHODS: Our study of 1345 patients with higher-grade spinal ependymoma used χ2 tests and simple and multivariable logistic regression models to assess demographic and clinical factors associated with therapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to assess overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Most grade II patients received surgery alone (81.1%) compared with 36.8% of grade III. Approximately 60% of patients with grade III ependymomas received radiotherapy (RT) versus 15.3% of grade II (P < 0.001). Patients living ≤32 km (20 miles) from a facility were more likely to receive RT (P < 0.001) than were those living further away. On multivariable logistic regression, grade (grade III, odds ratio, 8.6; P < 0.001) and facility distance were significantly associated with receipt of RT (P < 0.0001). The 5-year and 10-year OS was 94.7%/85.1% for patients with grade II disease and 58.2%/46.4% for grade III disease (P < 0.0001). OS was highest at facilities treating an average of 15 patients over 10 years, corresponding to the top 81st percentile in volume. The 10-year OS was 92.6% at facilities treating at least 15 patients and 88.0% at facilities treating 6-14 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of patients with grade III ependymomas do not receive immediate adjuvant therapy, which may be related to distance from a facility. Patients with this rare tumor may benefit from multidisciplinary care at facilities with a larger volume.