Distributed learning: a reliable privacy-preserving strategy to change multicenter collaborations using AI.

PURPOSE: The present scoping review aims to assess the non-inferiority of distributed learning over centrally and locally trained machine learning (ML) models in medical applications. METHODS: We performed a literature search using the term "distributed learning" OR "federated learning" in the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. No start date limit was used, and the search was extended until July 21, 2020. We excluded articles outside the field of interest; guidelines or expert opinion, review articles and meta-analyses, editorials, letters or commentaries, and conference abstracts; articles not in the English language; and studies not using medical data. Selected studies were classified and analysed according to their aim(s). RESULTS: We included 26 papers aimed at predicting one or more outcomes: namely risk, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment side effect/adverse drug reaction. Distributed learning was compared to centralized or localized training in 21/26 and 14/26 selected papers, respectively. Regardless of the aim, the type of input, the method, and the classifier, distributed learning performed close to centralized training, but two experiments focused on diagnosis. In all but 2 cases, distributed learning outperformed locally trained models. CONCLUSION: Distributed learning resulted in a reliable strategy for model development; indeed, it performed equally to models trained on centralized datasets. Sensitive data can get preserved since they are not shared for model development. Distributed learning constitutes a promising solution for ML-based research and practice since large, diverse datasets are crucial for success.

Image Embeddings Extracted from CNNs Outperform Other Transfer Learning Approaches in Classification of Chest Radiographs.

To identify the best transfer learning approach for the identification of the most frequent abnormalities on chest radiographs (CXRs), we used embeddings extracted from pretrained convolutional neural networks (CNNs). An explainable AI (XAI) model was applied to interpret black-box model predictions and assess its performance. Seven CNNs were trained on CheXpert. Three transfer learning approaches were thereafter applied to a local dataset. The classification results were ensembled using simple and entropy-weighted averaging. We applied Grad-CAM (an XAI model) to produce a saliency map. Grad-CAM maps were compared to manually extracted regions of interest, and the training time was recorded. The best transfer learning model was that which used image embeddings and random forest with simple averaging, with an average AUC of 0.856. Grad-CAM maps showed that the models focused on specific features of each CXR. CNNs pretrained on a large public dataset of medical images can be exploited as feature extractors for tasks of interest. The extracted image embeddings contain relevant information that can be used to train an additional classifier with satisfactory performance on an independent dataset, demonstrating it to be the optimal transfer learning strategy and overcoming the need for large private datasets, extensive computational resources, and long training times.