Giant left circumflex coronary artery aneurysm with fistula to the right atrium.

Coronary artery fistulae are rare cardiac anomalies with a prevalence of 0.2% of all the patients undergoing coronary angiography. The majority of them are congenital and generally origin from the right coronary artery. Occasionally acquired (mostly iatrogenic) fistulae can develop. Although frequently subclinical, symptoms of angina and congestive heart failure may occur. We present an unusual well-illustrated case of a strongly dilated circumflex coronary artery with formation of two giant aneurysms and fistulous communication towards the right atrium.

Impact of non-invasive anatomical testing on optimal medical prescription in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Compared to functional testing, coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) improves clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). This is thought to be the result of an increased prescription of preventive medical therapy (statins and aspirin) when relying on a CTA imaging strategy. We compared the rate of statins prescription in a patient cohort assessed either with coronary CTA or exercise testing, and evaluated the agreement on medication prescriptions. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent coronary CTA and exercise test for suspected CAD were included. Four clinical cardiologists independently analysed each case based on clinical information and the result of either coronary CTA or exercise test. For each case, treatment strategy and prescription were recorded while blinded to the results of the other cardiac test. Treatment strategy was reassessed using the alternative imaging modality three weeks after the first evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were included. Mean age was 56.7±11.5 years, 52% were males and diabetes were present in 6%. Coronary CTA showed an obstructive epicardial stenosis in 21.4% and any type of atherosclerotic plaque in 54.2%. Functional testing identified ischemia in 9.1%. The use of coronary CTA resulted in higher number of statin (64.9% vs. 44.5%, P<0.001) and aspirin (21.4% vs. 4.3%, P<0.001) prescriptions. There was a substantial agreement on the prescription of statins (mean Cohen's κ coefficient of 0.79±0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial atherosclerotic disease was found in half of patients with suspected CAD as assessed by coronary CTA. Compared to functional testing, coronary CTA evaluation by coronary was associated with an increase in the rate preventive therapy prescription.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices with a defibrillator component and all-cause mortality in left ventricular assist device carriers: results from the PCHF-VAD registry.

AIMS: To compare characteristics of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients receiving a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) with a defibrillator component (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillation, CIED-D) vs. those without one, and to assess whether carrying such a device contiguously with an LVAD is associated with outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 448 patients were analysed (mean age 52 ± 13 years, 82% male) in the multicentre European PCHF-VAD registry. To account for all active CIED-Ds during ongoing LVAD treatment, outcome analyses were performed by a time-varying analysis with active CIED-D status post-LVAD as the time-varying covariate. At the time of LVAD implantation, 235 patients (52%) had an active CIED-D. Median time on LVAD support was 1.1 years (interquartile range 0.5-2.0 years). A reduction of 36% in the risk of all-cause mortality was observed in patients with an active CIED-D [hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.91; P = 0.012), increasing to 41% after adjustment for baseline covariates (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.87; P = 0.008) and 39% after propensity score adjustment (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94; P = 0.027). Other than CIED-D, age, LVAD implant as redo surgery, number of ventricular arrhythmia episodes and use of vasopressors pre-LVAD were remaining significant risk factors of all-cause mortality. Incident ventricular arrhythmias post-LVAD portended a 2.4-fold and 2.6-fold increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, respectively; carrying an active CIED-D remained associated with a 47% and 43% reduction in these events, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis accounting for all active CIED-Ds, including those implanted during LVAD support, carrying such a device was associated with significantly better survival during LVAD support.